Talk:Black Dresses: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
NazaSuzuki (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Goodboy5553 (talk | contribs) →Rookie stray: new section |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
the article refers to black dresses in the past tense, despite the fact that they are still listed as active on the sidebar and they have also released two albums since their "breakup". is it safe to assume that we can refer to them in the present tense now? -- <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 20px lightskyblue, -4px -4px 20px lightskyblue;font-weight:bold;">[[User:NazaSuzuki|NazaSuzuki]] ● [[User_talk:NazaSuzuki|talk]] ● [[Special:Contributions/NazaSuzuki|contribs]]</span> 14:04, 3 March 2022 (UTC) |
the article refers to black dresses in the past tense, despite the fact that they are still listed as active on the sidebar and they have also released two albums since their "breakup". is it safe to assume that we can refer to them in the present tense now? -- <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 20px lightskyblue, -4px -4px 20px lightskyblue;font-weight:bold;">[[User:NazaSuzuki|NazaSuzuki]] ● [[User_talk:NazaSuzuki|talk]] ● [[Special:Contributions/NazaSuzuki|contribs]]</span> 14:04, 3 March 2022 (UTC) |
||
: I agree that they are not broken up. However the band released a twitter statement that they remain broken up despite their output, and I haven't seen any sources that contradict that. After two albums it seems we should be able to find a source that says they're back together. But as long as our sources maintain this weird charade I think it's better that we don't contradict them. [[User:AquitaneHungerForce|AquitaneHungerForce]] ([[User talk:AquitaneHungerForce|talk]]) 08:57, 15 February 2022 (UTC) |
: I agree that they are not broken up. However the band released a twitter statement that they remain broken up despite their output, and I haven't seen any sources that contradict that. After two albums it seems we should be able to find a source that says they're back together. But as long as our sources maintain this weird charade I think it's better that we don't contradict them. [[User:AquitaneHungerForce|AquitaneHungerForce]] ([[User talk:AquitaneHungerForce|talk]]) 08:57, 15 February 2022 (UTC) |
||
== Rookie stray == |
|||
Why is ada rook a pornstar. And was it ok to place that info? If no, I will remove it. [[User:Goodboy5553|Goodboy5553]] ([[User talk:Goodboy5553|talk]]) 01:21, 8 September 2023 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:21, 8 September 2023
Canada: Ontario / Music Start‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||||||||
|
Rock music Unassessed | ||||||||||
|
Breakup status
the article refers to black dresses in the past tense, despite the fact that they are still listed as active on the sidebar and they have also released two albums since their "breakup". is it safe to assume that we can refer to them in the present tense now? -- NazaSuzuki ● talk ● contribs 14:04, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
- I agree that they are not broken up. However the band released a twitter statement that they remain broken up despite their output, and I haven't seen any sources that contradict that. After two albums it seems we should be able to find a source that says they're back together. But as long as our sources maintain this weird charade I think it's better that we don't contradict them. AquitaneHungerForce (talk) 08:57, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
Rookie stray
Why is ada rook a pornstar. And was it ok to place that info? If no, I will remove it. Goodboy5553 (talk) 01:21, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class Canada-related articles
- Low-importance Canada-related articles
- Start-Class Ontario articles
- Low-importance Ontario articles
- Start-Class Canadian music articles
- Low-importance Canadian music articles
- WikiProject Canadian music articles
- All WikiProject Canada pages
- Unassessed Rock music articles
- Unknown-importance Rock music articles
- WikiProject Rock music articles