Jump to content

Wikipedia:Changing username/Usurpations: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Smbarnzy (talk | contribs)
Line 309: Line 309:
::{{clerknote}} This request was modified by the target username. See [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Changing_username&diff=prev&oldid=116985829]. There is therefore nothing in the history to confirm that the account making the request wishes this username. Will ask them to clarify the situation. <span style="font-family: Verdana">[[User:WJBscribe|'''WjB''']][[User talk:WJBscribe|''scribe'']]</span> 21:45, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
::{{clerknote}} This request was modified by the target username. See [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Changing_username&diff=prev&oldid=116985829]. There is therefore nothing in the history to confirm that the account making the request wishes this username. Will ask them to clarify the situation. <span style="font-family: Verdana">[[User:WJBscribe|'''WjB''']][[User talk:WJBscribe|''scribe'']]</span> 21:45, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
:::It seems to be an honest mistake on the part of the user in question - the subject is a fairly young user who created the account by mistake then decided they wanted to switch their identity to it - several admins in his main WikiProjects including myself were consulted and we sent him here. I will contact Smbarnzy to get him to confirm this directly. [[User talk:Orderinchaos78|Orderinchaos78]] 03:27, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
:::It seems to be an honest mistake on the part of the user in question - the subject is a fairly young user who created the account by mistake then decided they wanted to switch their identity to it - several admins in his main WikiProjects including myself were consulted and we sent him here. I will contact Smbarnzy to get him to confirm this directly. [[User talk:Orderinchaos78|Orderinchaos78]] 03:27, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
::::Yeah, sorry OIC is correct, i still want it - both accounts are "mine" and i want it to continue as is. [[User:Smbarnzy|Le]][[User talk:Smbarnzy|Barn]] 05:46, 24 March 2007 (UTC)


====Argyle &larr; Pepto_gecko====
====Argyle &larr; Pepto_gecko====

Revision as of 05:46, 24 March 2007

This page permits users to request, and bureaucrats to consider and carry out, the "usurpation" of usernames. This consists of renaming an existing dormant account in order to permit another user to adopt the name. If you are interested in usurping another username, please be advised that the account must have no edits or log entries (except in the username creation log) to qualify for usurpation.

Please do not request usurpation if your user account is less than several months old, or barely used. In order to ensure that usurped usernames be put to good use, we prefer only to grant requests from reasonably well-established users.

Process

Please follow these instructions carefully to ensure that the process runs efficiently. Malformed requests may be rejected.

  • Be sure the account you wish to usurp has no edits or log entries, as described above.
  • Leave a message on the talk page of the target account (preferably of the form {{subst:usurpation requested}} ~~~~) notifying the user of your request.
  • Please do not e-mail the target account yourself. If this becomes necessary, a bureaucrat or other designated user will do it.
  • Copy and paste the following text into the bottom of the section on this page for today's date.
{{subst:usurp|Name_To_Usurp|Current_Name}} ~~~~
Replace "Name_To_Usurp" with the username you wish to usurp, and "Current_Name" with your current username. You may include some reason for the change if you wish. Be sure you are logged in under your current username. Save the page.
  • If the owner of the target account does not object within seven days, a bureaucrat will fulfill your request. Mark the date, so you will not be surprised when you find yourself unable to log in to your old account.

A few users have agreed to provide assistance with the mechanics of this process. If you wish to assist as well, please read the linked page carefully.

Current requests

Please place your request in the section for the current day, at the bottom of the list.


March 9, 2007

Requests left here will be filled no earlier than March 17, 2007.

Ooskapenaar ← EKhayaICT

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.

However, I noticed your only contribs so far have been related to the usurpation process. Abeg92contribs 14:34, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note:: Currently, usurpation is reserved only to accounts with significant edit histories. As Abeg indicates above, your two edits have been related to this process. Titoxd(?!? - cool stuff) 04:45, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done per above =Nichalp «Talk»= 09:14, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

March 10, 2007

Requests left here will be filled no earlier than March 18, 2007.

Saibot ← Saibot2

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
Luna Santin (talk) 09:52, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note that usernames with "bot" in them are discouraged per our username policy. --Conti| 15:18, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
OK, thanks for this information. I couldn't think of a better name, though... at least I'll place a note on my user page. Hopefully this won't cause confusion. - Saibot2 22:29, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done Since the name implies that it could be a bot. =Nichalp «Talk»= 06:56, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

March 12, 2007

Requests left here will be filled no earlier than March 20, 2007.

Piggy ← Schweinehund

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.

 Not doneDan | talk 00:18, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

March 15, 2007

Requests left here will be filled no earlier than March 23, 2007.

SHL ← Haakan

  • Current username: Haakan (talk · contribs)
  • Target username: SHL (talk · contribs · logs)
  • Datestamp: 14:30, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
  • For bureaucrat use: Email user; 1; 2
    Haakan 14:30, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oh, Now I for the first time see that user SHL actually HAS made edits. Have tried in all ways to find the edits, both obviously missed that. Truly sorry for that. Hope there is some way to contact SHL though? It would be really nice if I could take over that username (That is if it's OK with the current SHL of course), since it seems he/she isn't really actively using it, and since I'm having username SHL att Swedish wikipedia, meta.wikimedia.org, www.mediawiki.org et.c. // Sincerely, Haakan 14:40, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
WjBscribe 15:33, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Not doneDan | talk 02:14, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pratik mullick → Prtk2109luv

  • You should note that changing your username in this fashion will still allow everyone to see your real name, since the change will be publicly logged. If you just don't want to your name to be immediately visible, this sort of change is fine, but if you have an important reason to be anonymous, such as being at risk of off-wiki harassment for editing in controversial areas, then going this route is probably a bad idea. Just start a second account instead, and don't do anything to link the two. (I hope that my leaving this comment here is appropriate - something like this should probably be noted whenever someone gives this as a reason, and it might be a good idea to feature this issue more prominently in the instructions). --Philosophus T 08:54, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: If, in spite of Philosophus' advice above, you still want to make this request, this is the wrong board to have posted it on. This board is for requesting account names that already exist. Please request a namechange at WP:CHU. WjBscribe 05:10, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Not doneDan | talk 02:14, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Annabel ← Annabelleke

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
Annabel has now been notified. Annabelleke 16:25, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: I have updated the the above to reflect this, thanks. WjBscribe 17:18, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 DoneDan | talk 02:14, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew ← Andrew4793

--Andrew4793 t c 19:06, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
WjBscribe 19:13, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: The user page has some incoming links- those not connected to this process are from XfD debates where various IP editors and spas have signed as User:Andrew to attempt to influence those discussions. WjBscribe 19:18, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 DoneDan | talk 02:14, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Malcolm ← Llama man

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
--Conti| 00:25, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: Llama man (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) is an admin. It would be helpful if someone could update Wikipedia:List of administrators and User:NoSeptember/admin username changes when the usurpation is complete. WjBscribe 00:30, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 DoneDan | talk 02:14, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: I have updated Wikipedia:List of administrators and User:NoSeptember/admin username changes. WjBscribe 02:22, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

March 16, 2007

Requests left here will be filled no earlier than March 24, 2007.

Vaya ← Vayaka

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
--Conti| 15:30, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: The target account was only created on 14 February 2007. Might usurpation be a little premature in this instance? WjBscribe 16:50, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done - it seems only fair to leave an account this new alone. If it's still unused in six months or so, a usurpation request might be in order. — Dan | talk 21:30, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pigman ← Paul_Pigman

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.

 DoneDan | talk 02:16, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Shem ← Shem Daimwood

I requested a username change twice, prior to implementation of usurpation. Now that this option is in place, I'm hoping it'll finally be done. Shem(talk) 22:33, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
Yeah, an editor there incorrectly referred to me as "User:Shem" (wikilinked) due to my signature. Shem(talk) 22:41, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 DoneDan | talk 05:07, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

March 17, 2007

Requests left here will be filled no earlier than March 25, 2007.

Tooby ← Tooby2

Tooby is my username everywhere else in Wikimedia projects. Maybe someone registered this username here before I could do. I linked my user page to my main user page on it.WN. Tooby2 09:34, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
WjBscribe 17:19, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: Tooby2's only edits are in relation to this process. However, this user is a very active contributor, administrator and bureaucrat on Italian Wikinews. He uses the name Tooby on commons, meta and a number of other Italian Wikimedia projects. WjBscribe 17:44, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed: [1] Titoxd(?!? - cool stuff) 07:28, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Greg ← Gregbirdsall

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
WjBscribe 20:06, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I do not edit indiscriminately, I correct mistakes and omissions as I see them. Hopefully they will set a rule of the number of edits to be considered "reasonably well-established" instead of it seeming a completely discriminatory decision. Greg Birdsall 12:44, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

March 18, 2007

Requests left here will be filled no earlier than March 26, 2007.

Jonny ← J2thawiki

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.

Kyoko ← Tachikoma

(copied from CUU talk page) Hello, some months back, another user (User:Randfan) set up the account User:Kyoko as a means to guard against impersonation of me, without asking me first. I've been giving it some thought, and I think I'd like to move my account to there, because I'm getting tired of being called "Tachikoma". I think Randfan created the Kyoko account as a new page, the same way a new article is created, i.e. without making a password first.

I currently have a number of subpages that I would also like transferred to the Kyoko account. I plan on changing the subpages (anti-vandalism scripts, etc.) once they are there. I also plan on recreating the Tachikoma account for redirection towards the Kyoko account. That way, my old talk page messages will point to the new account. Thank you. --Kyoko 16:51, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
WjBscribe 17:40, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: Incoming links to the target username all come from people refering to Tachikoma, who has signed as "Kyoko" for some time and used User:Kyoko as a redirect. WjBscribe 17:45, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Question: Is the Kyoko account really usurpsed? I don't see a "new user" thing in the logs. But I don't have one, either, so the "New user account" must have been added somewhere between Jan. 2005 and now. Hbdragon88 00:04, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The new user log is fairly recent; however, the authoritative listing is Special:Listusers, at least for now. Titoxd(?!? - cool stuff) 00:15, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
And by the way, the subpages are automatically renamed when your account is renamed, as well. Titoxd(?!? - cool stuff) 06:10, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
A few things: I think Randfan created the User:Kyoko account in November or so, by typing in "User:Kyoko" in the search box, and then creating it as if it were an article. He then made the user and talk pages into redirects to my Tachikoma account. As for the subpages, I use a modified version of Lupin's vandal-whacking script, which calls to customized vandalism warnings within my userspace. I expect that I will have to change the code of this script and various other pages in my userspace. It's no big deal, just a little tedious to do. --Kyoko 12:50, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Well, the redirects would be left behind, so they wouldn't die off and become an issue. However, if you update the code, then it should be even less of a problem. Titoxd(?!? - cool stuff) 07:22, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

March 19, 2007

Requests left here will be filled no earlier than March 27, 2007.

Chaos ← Chaoss

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
WjBscribe 13:16, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

March 20, 2007

Requests left here will be filled no earlier than March 28, 2007.

Katt ← Pdxkatt

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
I must confess that I do not have a "large amount" of edits, but I am working to change that! The joys of being an undergrad/graduate student... The top of the page mentioned "reasonably well-established users" which I believe that I qualify under: I've been a registered user since December 2005, and I think that my contributions show a reasonable intent to continue improving and contributing to Wikipedia. I just thought I would throw it out there for you to help in making the decision --Katt 06:54, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
As of this timestamp, you have 62 edits, per Flcelloguy's Tool. However, there is no set barrier for usurpations; whether 60 edits is enough or not is up to the bureaucrat's discretion. If you contribute more during this period, then that may factor in their decision as well. Titoxd(?!? - cool stuff) 07:26, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Masti ← Mst06

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
WjBscribe 00:35, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

March 21, 2007

Requests left here will be filled no earlier than March 29, 2007.

GDK ← Gunter.krebs

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.

March 22, 2007

Requests left here will be filled no earlier than March 30, 2007.

Wassermann ← WassermannNYC

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
WjBscribe 04:57, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orderinchaos ← Orderinchaos78

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
Left notice, updated above note. – Luna Santin (talk) 17:58, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Every Me Every You ← Smbarnzy

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
 Clerk note: This request was modified by the target username. See [2]. There is therefore nothing in the history to confirm that the account making the request wishes this username. Will ask them to clarify the situation. WjBscribe 21:45, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It seems to be an honest mistake on the part of the user in question - the subject is a fairly young user who created the account by mistake then decided they wanted to switch their identity to it - several admins in his main WikiProjects including myself were consulted and we sent him here. I will contact Smbarnzy to get him to confirm this directly. Orderinchaos78 03:27, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, sorry OIC is correct, i still want it - both accounts are "mine" and i want it to continue as is. LeBarn 05:46, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Argyle ← Pepto_gecko

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
WjBscribe 18:51, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

March 23, 2007

Requests left here will be filled no earlier than March 31, 2007.

Haus ← Haus42

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
WjBscribe 00:21, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Aldor ← Cyvros

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
WjBscribe 15:52, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Basil ← Pepto gecko

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
Dan has confirmed that usurpation is appropriate in this case (one edit only in Jan 2002 to a talkpage) [3]. WjBscribe 21:38, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]


March 24, 2007

Requests left here will be filled no earlier than April 1, 2007.

MEDIAGUY ← ERICLATINKID1025

 Clerk note: The username MEDIAGUY is not taken, however Mediaguy is and has made edits. A request at WP:CHU is possible but a rename probably will not be performed given the similarity. Perhaps an alternative name? Also, user has only made 4 edits other than those to this page. WjBscribe 01:47, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Instructions to bureaucrats

  • Accounts should be renamed to "Username (usurped)" -- this is intuitive and is unlikely ever to be a desired account name. The links labeled '1' and '2' will automatically fill out the user renaming interface with the proper information.
  • If a user consents to have his account usurped, the request may be fulfilled immediately, rather than after the full waiting period.
  • Mark completed requests with {{done}} and rejected requests with {{not done}}. A bot will archive them.

Changing username:

  • Completed rename requests:
1|2|3|4|5|6|7|8|9|10|11|12|13
14|15|16|17|18|19|20|21|22|23|24|25|26
27|28|29|30|31|32|33|34|35|36|37|38|39
40|41|42|43|44|45|46|47|48|49|50|51|52
53|54|55|56|57|58|59|60|61|62|63|64|65
66|67|68|69|70|71|72|73|74|75|76|77|78
79|80|81|82|83|84|85|86|87|88|89|90|91
92|93|94|95|96|97|98|99|100|101|102|103|104
105|106|107|108|109|110|111|112|113|114|115|116|117
118|119|120|121|122|123|124|125|126|127|128|129|130
131|132|133|134|135|136|137|138|139|140|141|142|143
144|145|146|147|148|149|150|151|152|153|154|155|156
157|158|159|160|161|162|163|164|165|166|167|168|169
170|171|172|173|174|175|176|177|178|179|180|181|182
183|184|185|186|187|188|189|190|191|192|193|194|195
196|197|198|199|200|201|202|203|204|205|206|207|208
209|210|211|212|213|214|215|216|217|218|219|220|221
222|223|224|225|226|227|228|229|230|231|232|233|234
235|236|237|238|239|240|241|242|243|244|245|246|247
248|249|250|251|252|253|254|255|256|257|258|259|260
261|262|263|264|265|266|267|268|269|270|271|272|273
274|275|276|277|278|279|280|281|282|283|284|285|286
287|288|289|290|291
  • Rejected rename requests:
2005: Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec
2006: Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec
2007: Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec
2008: Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec
2009: Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec
2010: Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec
2011: Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec
2012: Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec
2013: Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec
2014: Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec
2015: Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec
2016: Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec
2017: Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec
2018: Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec
2019: Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec
2020: Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec
2021: Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec
2022: Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec
2023: Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec
2024: Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec

Usurpations:

  • Completed:
1|2|3|4|5|6|7|8|9|10|11|12|13|14|15|16
17|18|19|20|21|22|23|24|25|26|27|28|29|30|31|32
33|34|35|36|37|38|39|40|41|42|43|44|45|46|47|48
49|50|51|52|53|54|55|56|57
  • Rejected/Not Completed:
1|2|3|4|5|6|7|8|9|10|11|12|13|14|15|16
17|18|19|20|21|22|23|24|25|26|27|28|29|30|31|32

SUL requests:

  • Completed:
1|2|3|4|5|6|7|8|9|10|11
  • Rejected/Not Completed:
1|2|3



See also