Talk:Nuclear weapon: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 17:11, 13 September 2023

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Nuclear weapon article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5: 3 months

Template:Vital article

Nuclear weapon is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.

This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on March 13, 2004.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 19, 2004	Refreshing brilliant prose	Kept
May 26, 2005	Featured article review	Kept
April 29, 2006	Featured topic candidate	Not promoted
May 2, 2007	Featured article review	Demoted
July 15, 2007	Good article nominee	Not listed
June 13, 2017	Peer review	Reviewed
Current status: Former featured article

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: Technology / Weaponry C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Physics C‑class High‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Engineering C‑class High‑importance

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Environment C‑class High‑importance

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Science Policy C‑class High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Policy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science policy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science PolicyWikipedia:WikiProject Science PolicyTemplate:WikiProject Science PolicyScience Policy
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Template:WP1.0

Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Policy Analysis

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 28 March 2022 and 30 May 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Lesotelo1218 (article contribs).

Wiki Education assignment: War and the Environment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 4 May 2022 and 6 August 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): JKendraB (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Jmack2214.

— Assignment last updated by Karanaconda (talk) 18:37, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

German

Put IT in German 195.8.226.76 (talk) 18:14, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please see de:Kernwaffe. VQuakr (talk) 18:16, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed change for clarity

Currently, the text includes,

most of these are for non-strategic (decisively war-winning) purposes

As there is ambiguity whether the parenthetical definition applies to "strategic" or "non-strategic", I would change this to state,

most of these are not for strategic (decisively war-winning) purposes

If I have misunderstood the difference between strategic and tactical, then swap out those terms. In any case, the revised sentence seems less ambiguous than the original. 194.25.174.98 (talk) 07:23, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extinction

The new section on effects of nuclear war gives far too much weight to the unlikely prospect of human extinction. Nuclear war could have a range of effects, from highly localized to widespread catastrophe. Focusing on the most implausible extreme is both biased and undermines the credibility of the section. NPguy (talk) 19:00, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's two sentences, which appear to be backed up with sources. Do you have sources for the implausibility of human extinction? John (talk) 19:07, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This was the first thing that came up: Nuclear war is unlikely to cause human extinction. NPguy (talk) 20:05, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sylwester Kaliski

Poland (from the 1980s to 1993) - there were three Soviet bases (facility 3001 - Podborsko, facility 3002 - Brzeźnica-Kolonia, facility 3003 - Templewo), where about 180 warheads were stored[34]. Some of them (for R-17 missiles in four tactical-operational missile brigades) and air bombs for modified Su-7s were planned to be handed over to the Polish Army shortly before the launch. There was a rumor that the Russians were offering Jaruzelski nuclear weapons to directly equip the Polish Army, but there is no contemporary evidence of such information. It is possible that this was an attempt to mask the fact that in the 1960s the command of the Polish Army and the leadership of the state did not oppose the deployment of Soviet nuclear weapons on the territory of the People's Republic of Poland. It is also known that in the 1970s Edward Gierek patronized the work of the rector of the Military University of Technology, General Sylwester Kaliski, on inducing a chain reaction with a laser. Gierek thought about possible nuclear tests in the tunnels in the Bieszczady Mountains. Ultimately, only experimental reactors were built in Poland at the institute in Świerk. Kaliski himself died in unclear circumstances. 5.173.140.182 (talk) 16:10, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 5 December 2022

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

209.174.65.194 (talk) 13:55, 5 December 2022 (UTC)i belive i should be able to edit be i am a history teacher who has studied bombs.[reply]

Not done The usage of this template is to request changes to the article. The easiest way to get access to semi-protected articles like this one is to create an account. VQuakr (talk) 16:44, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 13 September 2023

It is requested that an edit be made to the semi-protected article at Nuclear weapon. (edit · history · last · links · protection log)

This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. "Please change X" is not acceptable and will be rejected; the request must be of the form "please change X to Y".

The edit may be made by any autoconfirmed user. Remember to change the |answered=no parameter to "yes" when the request has been accepted, rejected or on hold awaiting user input. This is so that inactive or completed requests don't needlessly fill up the edit requests category. You may also wish to use the {{ESp}} template in the response. To request that a page be protected or unprotected, make a protection request.

no where in this article does it say that nuclear weapons were developed and invented in Los alamos national laboratory by J. Robert Oppenheimer and tested 210 miles south of Los Alamos, New Mexico, on the plains of the Alamogordo Bombing Range, known as the Jornada del Muertos also known as the trinity site Memerman42069 (talk) 17:11, 13 September 2023 (UTC) New Mexico history textbook and New Mexico history class at Rio rancho high school[reply]

@@ Line 101: / Line 101: @@
 [[Special:Contributions/209.174.65.194|209.174.65.194]] ([[User talk:209.174.65.194|talk]]) 13:55, 5 December 2022 (UTC)i belive i should be able to edit be i am a history teacher who has studied bombs.
 :{{nd}} The usage of this template is to request changes to the article. The easiest way to get access to semi-protected articles like this one is to create an account. [[User:VQuakr|VQuakr]] ([[User talk:VQuakr|talk]]) 16:44, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
+== Semi-protected edit request on 13 September 2023 ==
+{{edit semi-protected|Nuclear weapon|answered=no}}
+no where in this article does it say that nuclear weapons were developed and invented in Los alamos national laboratory by J. Robert Oppenheimer and tested 210 miles south of Los Alamos, New Mexico, on the plains of the Alamogordo Bombing Range, known as the Jornada del Muertos also known as the trinity site [[User:Memerman42069|Memerman42069]] ([[User talk:Memerman42069|talk]]) 17:11, 13 September 2023 (UTC) New Mexico history textbook and New Mexico history class at Rio rancho high school