User talk:CorbieVreccan

This editor is a Most Pluperfect Labutnum and is entitled to display this Book of Knowledge with Coffee Cup Stain, Cigarette Burn, Chewed Broken Pencil, Sticky Note, and Bookmark.

	The Drama Llama is Watching You
	The owner of this page reserves the right to delete trolling and drama at their discretion.

Women and Wikipedia: the world is watching.

Requests for adminship and bureaucratship update

No current discussions. Recent RfAs, recent RfBs: (successful, unsuccessful)

If you are new here, and feeling angry, please read Tips for the Angry New User before explaining to us how terribly wrong and messed up Wikipedia is. Would you believe, we probably already know? You can also familiarise yourself with Wikipedia culture via these ^^^ policy links and helpful essays.

If you've been an admin for a while, and are feeling burnt out, take a step back and take some deep breaths, and don't forget to WP:CHILL

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	Thank you for all the hard work you put in toward Indigenous content on Wikipedia. Yuchitown (talk) 00:52, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

empathy

Thank you for quality articles about Indigenous women such as Theresa Spence, for service over 15 years including admin service, for empathy in article changes and exquisite edit summaries, for "I'm putting the women first here. Just because." - You are recipient no. 2832 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:48, 12 March 2023 (UTC) you are an awesome Wikipedian!

January 2020 at Women in Red

January 2020, Volume 6, Issue 1, Numbers 146, 148, 149, 150, 151, 153 Happy Holidays from all of us at Women in Red, and thank you for your support in 2019. We look forward to working with you in 2020! Online events: New: Activists / Public domain / Geofocus: Central America / Year-long campaign: Sports! Continuing: 2019 deaths / #1day1woman Editor feedback: Help us plan our future events at the Ideas Cafe Join the conversations on our talkpage Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

September 2023 at Women In Red

Women in Red September 2023, Vol 9, Iss 9, Nos 251, 252, 281, 282, 283 Online events: New: Alphabet run E & F | Women writers & their works | Geofocus: Celtic nations Continuing: Peace and Diplomacy (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman Tip of the month: The books she wrote might be notable, too; learn 5 quick tips about about book articles. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Victuallers (talk) 16:49, 25 August 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

YGM

Hello, CorbieVreccan. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 15:33, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

Draft:Witch (archetype)

If you've got objections to this being moved into article space, could you please express them in the conversation about this draft. If you have no objections, I think it would make the AfC team more comfortable if you said so. Doesn't really matter either way to me, it's really User:Esowteric's work, I just made it look nice and added some connecting prose and the Further reading... Skyerise (talk) 19:45, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – September 2023

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2023).

Administrator changes

• Pppery
• Theleekycauldron

• Dwheeler
• G.A.S
• Royalbroil
• Ssd

CheckUser changes

Bradv

Oversighter changes

Bradv

Guideline and policy news

• Following an RfC, TFAs will be automatically semi-protected the day before it is on the main page and through the day after.
• A discussion at WP:VPP about revision deletion and oversight for dead names found that [s]ysops can choose to use revdel if, in their view, it's the right tool for this situation, and they need not default to oversight. But oversight could well be right where there's a particularly high risk to the person. Use your judgment.

Technical news

• Special:Contributions now shows the user's local edit count and the account's creation date. (T324166)

Arbitration

• The SmallCat dispute case has closed. As part of the final decision, editors participating in XfD have been reminded to be careful about forming local consensus which may or may not reflect the broader community consensus. Regular closers of XfD forums were also encouraged to note when broader community discussion, or changes to policies and guidelines, would be helpful.

Miscellaneous

• Tech tip: The "Browse history interactively" banner shown at the top of Special:Diff can be used to easily look through a history, assemble composite diffs, or find out what archive something wound up in.

---

• Discuss this newsletter
• Subscribe
• Archive

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:21, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

Feedback request: Biographies request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Dina Belenkaya on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 23:30, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

Likely IP sockpuppet

Hi, I'm unsure how to report this but this IP user is making the same edits to Powhatan as blocked accounts User:Powhatan Nation and User:The Powhatan Nation. Yuchitown (talk) 19:19, 10 September 2023 (UTC)Yuchitown

On it now. - CorbieVreccan ^☊ ☼ 19:46, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

WP:LOUTSOCK. Blocked. - CorbieVreccan ^☊ ☼ 19:57, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

Thanks so much! A surprisingly persistent individual. Yuchitown (talk) 04:23, 11 September 2023 (UTC)Yuchitown

Notice of noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Long-term meatpuppetry by two admins. Thank you. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 22:06, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#CorbieVreccan, Mark Ironie, and Tamzin and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. As threaded discussion is not permitted on most arbitration pages, please ensure that you make all comments in your own section only. Additionally, the guide to arbitration and the Arbitration Committee's procedures may be of use.

Thanks, -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 19:05, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

Sorry that this has arisen, Corbie. This is absurd, and I hope it is equitably and quickly resolved.I've been slammed IRL so I apologize for not being of any assistance. Yuchitown (talk) 15:27, 13 September 2023 (UTC)Yuchitown

Corbie, you know you have my support. You are so important to the IPNA project and Indigenous topics on WP. I'm so sorry things that shouldn't have come up have been brought back up and it has potentially placed you or your loved ones in danger. I know that feeling from my own experiences. It's terrifying and stressful. Please, please stay safe. Like Yuchitown has stated, I hope this gets resolved swiftly and equitably. I hate the arbcom process. --ARoseWolf 14:28, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

Really?

Well, now I understand why you've treated me so poorly. But is that really how you want to play it at ArbCom? That I waited 8 years before even touching any of that sock farm's articles (you did notice that before you posted, right?), and then when I did start editing them I removed all the poorly-sourced material that the sock farm had added, and somehow that makes me a banned user? And that I waited 17 years to do the same to Celtic reconstructionism, which I only became aware of during the move discussion (which I chose not to respond to), and which wasn't even on my radar for COI until it got brought up by other editors? Perhaps you should look closer at my edits to those articles. Sure, I was aware of the sock farm; it's part of my process to read the talk pages. But given that my behavior with respect to those articles is the opposite of said farm? That's gonna be a hard sell, I think. Skyerise (talk) 22:19, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

P.S. Before you ask, because I hate seeing good editors shoot themselves in the foot. Skyerise (talk) 22:25, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Vivek Ramaswamy on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:30, 13 September 2023 (UTC)

Word limit exceeded

Hello, CorbieVreccan. You are currently exceeding the prescribed word limit at WP:A/R/C. Please do not add or subtract any more words from your statement without formal permission from the Arbitration Committee or clerks ahead of time. You can request a word limit extension by emailing the clerk team.
For the Arbitration Committee, –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 01:45, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

Your request

Hello CorbieVreccan, I processed your request at WP:BN and added some of the other flags for you. If you need anything else please let me know. — xaosflux ^Talk 19:48, 14 September 2023 (UTC)