Jump to content

Apatosaurinae: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
fix
Line 150: Line 150:


=== Tail ===
=== Tail ===
A 1997 article by [[Nathan Myhrvold]], a [[computer scientist]] from [[Microsoft]]. Myhrvold carried out a [[computer simulation]] of the tail, which in diplodocids like apatosaurines was a very long, tapering structure resembling a [[bullwhip]]. This computer modeling suggested that sauropods were capable of producing a whip-like cracking sound of over 200 [[Decibel|decibels]], comparable to the volume of a [[cannon]].<ref name="zimmer1997">{{cite magazine |last=Zimmer |first=C. |date=November 1997 |title=Dinosaurs in Motion |url=http://discovermagazine.com/1997/nov/dinosaursinmotio1261 |magazine=[[Discover (magazine)|Discover]] |access-date=July 27, 2008}}</ref> There is some circumstantial evidence supporting this as well: a number of diplodocids have been found with fused or damaged tail vertebrae, which may be a symptom of cracking their tails: these are particularly common between the 18th and the 25th caudal vertebra, a region the authors consider a transitional zone between the stiff muscular base and the flexible whiplike section.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Myhrvold |first1=Nathan P. |last2=Currie |first2=Philip J. |date=1997 |title=Supersonic sauropods? Tail dynamics in the diplodocids |url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/paleobiology/article/abs/supersonic-sauropods-tail-dynamics-in-the-diplodocids/2F49D4918CABD1009D5D4DA5B6F67287 |journal=Paleobiology |language=en |volume=23 |issue=4 |pages=393–409 |bibcode=1997Pbio...23..393M |doi=10.1017/S0094837300019801 |issn=0094-8373 |s2cid=83696153}}</ref> However, Rega (2012) notes that ''Camarasaurus'' while lacking a tailwhip, displays a similar level of caudal co-ossification and that ''[[Mamenchisaurus]]'' while having the same pattern of vertebral metrics, lacks a tailwhip and does not display fusion in any "transitional region". Also, the crush fractures which would be expected if the tail was used as a whip have never been found in diplodocids.<ref>{{Cite book |title=Rega, E. (2012). "Disease in Dinosaurs". In Brett-Surman, M.; Holtz, T.; Farlow, J. (eds.). The Complete Dinosaur. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.}}</ref> More recently, Baron (2020) has considered the use of the tail as a bullwhip unlikely because of the potentially catastrophic muscle and skeletal damage such speeds could cause on the large and heavy tail. Instead, he proposes that the tails might have been used as a tactile organ to keep in touch with the individuals behind and to the sides of the animal in a group, which could have augmented cohesion and allowed communication among individuals while limiting more energetically demanding activities like stopping to search for dispersed individuals, turning to visually check on others behind, or communicating vocally.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Baron |first=Matthew G. |date=October 3, 2021 |title=Tactile tails: a new hypothesis for the function of the elongate tails of diplodocid sauropods |url=https://doi.org/10.1080/08912963.2020.1769092 |journal=Historical Biology |volume=33 |issue=10 |pages=2057–2066 |doi=10.1080/08912963.2020.1769092 |issn=0891-2963 |s2cid=219762797}}</ref>
A 1997 study by [[Nathan Myhrvold]], a [[computer scientist]] from [[Microsoft]], carried out a [[computer simulation]] of the tail, which in diplodocids, including apatosaurines, was a very long, tapering structure resembling a [[bullwhip]]. This computer modeling suggested that sauropods were capable of producing a whip-like cracking sound of over 200 [[Decibel|decibels]], comparable to the volume of a [[cannon]].<ref name="zimmer1997">{{cite magazine |last=Zimmer |first=C. |date=November 1997 |title=Dinosaurs in Motion |url=http://discovermagazine.com/1997/nov/dinosaursinmotio1261 |magazine=[[Discover (magazine)|Discover]] |access-date=July 27, 2008}}</ref> There is some circumstantial evidence supporting this as well: a number of diplodocids have been found with fused or damaged tail vertebrae, which may be a symptom of cracking their tails: these are particularly common between the 18th and the 25th caudal vertebra, a region the authors consider a transitional zone between the stiff muscular base and the flexible whiplike section.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Myhrvold |first1=Nathan P. |last2=Currie |first2=Philip J. |date=1997 |title=Supersonic sauropods? Tail dynamics in the diplodocids |url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/paleobiology/article/abs/supersonic-sauropods-tail-dynamics-in-the-diplodocids/2F49D4918CABD1009D5D4DA5B6F67287 |journal=Paleobiology |language=en |volume=23 |issue=4 |pages=393–409 |bibcode=1997Pbio...23..393M |doi=10.1017/S0094837300019801 |issn=0094-8373 |s2cid=83696153}}</ref> However, Rega (2012) notes that ''Camarasaurus'' while lacking a tailwhip, displays a similar level of caudal co-ossification and that ''[[Mamenchisaurus]]'' while having the same pattern of vertebral metrics, lacks a tailwhip and does not display fusion in any "transitional region". Also, the crush fractures which would be expected if the tail was used as a whip have never been found in diplodocids.<ref>{{Cite book |title=Rega, E. (2012). "Disease in Dinosaurs". In Brett-Surman, M.; Holtz, T.; Farlow, J. (eds.). The Complete Dinosaur. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.}}</ref> More recently, Baron (2020) has considered the use of the tail as a bullwhip unlikely because of the potentially catastrophic muscle and skeletal damage such speeds could cause on the large and heavy tail. Instead, he proposes that the tails might have been used as a tactile organ to keep in touch with the individuals behind and to the sides of the animal in a group, which could have augmented cohesion and allowed communication among individuals while limiting more energetically demanding activities like stopping to search for dispersed individuals, turning to visually check on others behind, or communicating vocally.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Baron |first=Matthew G. |date=October 3, 2021 |title=Tactile tails: a new hypothesis for the function of the elongate tails of diplodocid sauropods |url=https://doi.org/10.1080/08912963.2020.1769092 |journal=Historical Biology |volume=33 |issue=10 |pages=2057–2066 |doi=10.1080/08912963.2020.1769092 |issn=0891-2963 |s2cid=219762797}}</ref>
[[File:Brontosaurus_excelsus_Cv8_Marsh_1881.jpg|alt=Cervical vertebra of Brontosaurus excelsus.|left|thumb|247x247px|A [[Cervical vertebrae|cervical vertebra]] of ''[[Brontosaurus|B. excelsus]]'', showing its robusticity.]]
[[File:Brontosaurus_excelsus_Cv8_Marsh_1881.jpg|alt=Cervical vertebra of Brontosaurus excelsus.|left|thumb|247x247px|A [[Cervical vertebrae|cervical vertebra]] of ''[[Brontosaurus|B. excelsus]]'', showing its robusticity.]]


Revision as of 14:54, 15 September 2023

Apatosaurines
Temporal range: Late Jurassic, 157–146.8 Ma
Skeleton
Skeleton of an apatosaurine (either Apatosaurus or Brontosaurus), American Museum of Natural History 460
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Clade: Dinosauria
Clade: Saurischia
Clade: †Sauropodomorpha
Clade: †Sauropoda
Superfamily: †Diplodocoidea
Family: †Diplodocidae
Subfamily: †Apatosaurinae
Janensch, 1927
Genera[1]

Apatosaurinae (the name deriving from the type genus Apatosaurus, meaning "deceptive lizard") is a subfamily of diplodocid sauropods, an extinct group of large, quadrupedal dinosaurs, the other subfamily in Diplodocidae being Diplodocinae. Apatosaurines are distinguished by their more robust, stocky builds and shorter necks proportionally to the rest of their bodies. Several fairly complete specimens are known, giving a comprehensive view of apatosaurine anatomy.

The subfamily includes only two genera for certain, Apatosaurus and Brontosaurus, according to a 2015 study, though Amphicoelias and a species of Atlantosaurus may also belong to this group. All members are known from the Late Jurassic-aged Morrison Formation of the American West, dating to between 157 and 146.8 million years ago. Fossils were first unearthed in 1877 by crews working for American paleontologist Othniel Charles Marsh in the midst of the Bone Wars, a fossil-hunting rivalry with naturalist Edward Drinker Cope. Marsh went on to name both genera of apatosaurine; Apatosaurus in 1877 and Brontosaurus in 1879. For many years, Brontosaurus was considered a taxonomic synonym of Apatosaurus after a 1903 study by paleontologist Elmer Riggs considered them synonyms. This was the prevalent notion until a 2015 paper led by Emmanuel Tschopp argued that the two were separate genera, however some authors still consider the two synonyms. According to Tschopp and colleagues, there are six valid species of apatosaurine; three in Brontosaurus and two in Apatosaurus.

Apatosaurines were nonselective low-browsers, utilizing their ped-like teeth to feed on plants like ferns, cycadoids, and horsetails. They also had rapid growth rates, with studies finding that apatosaurines reached adult sizes in just ten years, possibly peaking in 5,000 kg (11,000 lb) gained in a single year. As in their relatives the diplodocines, both Apatosaurus and Brontosaurus bore long, whip-like tails which potentially were used for defense or as a tactile organ, for touch. Of note is the robustly built and boxy cervical (neck) vertebrae of apatosaurines, with a study hypothesizing that their necks were used for intraspecific fighting between individuals. Being from the Morrison Formation, apatosaurines coexisted with a menagerie of other taxa such as the sauropods Diplodocus, Barosaurus, and Brachiosaurus; herbivorous ornithischians Stegosaurus, Dryosaurus, and Nanosaurus; as well as the carnivorous theropods Allosaurus, Marshosaurus and Ceratosaurus. This formation was a hotspot of sauropod biodiversity, with over 16 recognized genera, which resulted in niche partitioning between different sauropods.

Discovery and history

Arthur Lakes' painting of YPM crews excavating fossils of Apatosaurus ajax at Quarry 10 in Morrison.

Initial discoveries and naming

The first apatosaurine fossils were discovered by Arthur Lakes, a local miner, and his friend Henry C. Beckwith in the spring of 1877 in Morrison, a town in the eastern foothills of the Rocky Mountains in Jefferson County, Colorado. Arthur Lakes wrote to Othniel Charles Marsh, Professor of Paleontology at Yale University, and Edward Drinker Cope, a paleontologist based in Philadelphia, about the discovery until eventually collecting several fossils and sending them to both paleontologists. By this time, the Morrison Formation had become the center of the Bone Wars, a fossil-collecting rivalry between Marsh and Cope. Because of this, the publications and descriptions of taxa by the two were rushed at the time.[2] Marsh named Atlantosaurus montanus based on some of the fossils sent and hired Lakes to collect the rest of the material at Morrison and send it to Yale, while Cope attempted to hire Lakes as well but was rejected.[3] One of the best specimens collected by Lakes in 1877 was a well preserved partial postcranial skeleton, including many vertebrae, and a partial braincase (YPM VP 1860), which was sent to Marsh and named Apatosaurus ajax in November 1877.[1][3] The composite term Apatosaurus comes from the Greek words apatē (ἀπάτη)/apatēlos (ἀπατηλός) meaning "deception"/"deceptive", and sauros (σαῦρος) meaning "lizard"; thus, "deceptive lizard". Marsh gave it this name based on the chevron bones, which are dissimilar to those of other dinosaurs; instead, the chevron bones of Apatosaurus showed similarities with those of mosasaurs, most likely that of the representative species Mosasaurus. Marsh distinguished the new genus Apatosaurus from Atlantosaurus on the basis of the number of sacral vertebrae, with Apatosaurus possessing three and Atlantosaurus four. Recent research shows that traits usually used to distinguish taxa at this time were actually widespread across several taxa, causing many of the taxa named to be invalid, like Atlantosaurus.[1] Marsh believed that both genera were part of a clade he named Atlantosauridae in 1877.[4] By the end of excavations at Lakes' quarry in Morrison, several partial specimens of Apatosaurus had been collected, but only the type specimen of A. ajax can be confidently referred to the species.[5][1] Based on remains from the same quarry, Atlantosaurus immanis was described by Marsh in an 1878 article based on an incomplete postcranial skeleton which he noted to be of great size, but did not mention detailed differences between it and A. montanus.[6] During excavation and transportation, the bones of the A. ajax holotype skeleton were mixed with those of Atlantosaurus immanis; as a consequence, some elements cannot be ascribed to either specimen with confidence.[7] A 1906 paper described gastroliths from the A. immanis holotype,[8] but gastrolith use in sauropods has since been disproven.[9] Later studies of the A. immanis holotype have determined that they are from an apatosaurine, potentially Apatosaurus itself,[10] though Tschopp et al stated it was a dubious apatosaurine.[1]

A possible genus of apatosaurine, Amphicoelias, was discovered in 1877 in Morrison Formation outcrops near Cañon City, Colorado by Aaron Ripley who was working for Cope. Ripley sent the remains, consisting of dorsal vertebrae, a femur, and a pubis, to Cope's home Philadelphia on October 21, 1877.[11] In December 1877, Cope named Amphicoelias, the genus name from the Greek terms amphi meaning "both" and kolios "concave" in reference to the anatomy of the dorsal vertebrae.[12] Three species were referred: A. altus, A. fragillimus, and A. latus.[12] Of these, only A. altus is still considered part of the genus whereas A. fragillimus is now Maraapunisaurus[13] and A. latus is a synonym of Camarasaurus supremus or C. grandis.[14][15]

The discovery of another large and fairly complete sauropod skeleton was announced in 1879 by Marsh. The specimen was collected from Morrison Formation rocks at Como Bluff, Wyoming by William Harlow Reed. Marsh identified it as belonging to an entirely new genus and species, which he named Brontosaurus excelsus,[16] meaning "thunder lizard", from the Greek brontē/βροντη meaning "thunder" and sauros/σαυρος meaning "lizard",[17] and from the Latin excelsus, "noble" or "high".[18] Brontosaurus excelsus' type specimen (YPM 1980) was one of the most complete sauropod skeletons known at the time, preserving many of the characteristic but fragile cervical vertebrae.[4] A year later in 1880, another partial postcranial Brontosaurus skeleton was collected near Como Bluff by Reed,[19][20] including well-preserved limb elements.[1] Marsh named this second skeleton Brontosaurus amplus ("large thunder lizard") in 1881,[20] but it was considered a synonym of B. excelsus in 2015.[1]

Second Dinosaur Rush

After the end of the Bone Wars, many major institutions in the eastern United States were inspired by the depictions and finds by Marsh and Cope to assemble their own dinosaur fossil collections. The competition to mount the first sauropod skeleton specifically was the most intense, with the American Museum of Natural History, Carnegie Museum of Natural History, and Field Museum of Natural History all sending expeditions to the west to find the most complete sauropod specimen, bring it back to the home institution, and mount it in their fossil halls. The American Museum of Natural History was the first to launch an expedition, finding a well preserved skeleton (AMNH 460), which is occasionally assigned to Apatosaurus, is considered nearly complete; only the head, feet, and sections of the tail are missing, and it was the first sauropod skeleton mounted.[21][22] The specimen was found north of Medicine Bow, Wyoming, in 1898 by Walter Granger, and took the entire summer to extract.[23] To complete the mount, sauropod feet that were discovered at the same quarry and a tail fashioned to appear as Marsh believed it should – but which had too few vertebrae – were added. In addition, a sculpted model of what the museum thought the skull of this massive creature might look like was made. This was not a delicate skull like that of Diplodocus – which was later found to be more accurate – but was based on "the biggest, thickest, strongest skull bones, lower jaws and tooth crowns from three different quarries".[24][25][10] These skulls were likely those of Camarasaurus, the only other sauropod for which good skull material was known at the time. The mount construction was overseen by Adam Hermann, who failed to find apatosaurine skulls. Hermann was forced to sculpt a stand-in skull by hand. Osborn said in a publication that the skull was "largely conjectural and based on that of Morosaurus" (now Camarasaurus).[26]

Obsolete mount of an apatosaurine (possibly Apatosaurus or Brontosaurus) specimen AMNH 460 with sculpted skull, American Museum of Natural History

In 1903, Elmer Riggs published a study that described a well-preserved skeleton of a diplodocid from the Grand River Valley near Fruita, Colorado, Field Museum of Natural History specimen P25112. Riggs thought that the deposits were similar in age to those of the Como Bluff in Wyoming from which Marsh had described Brontosaurus. Most of the skeleton was found, and after comparison with both Brontosaurus and Apatosaurus ajax, Riggs realized that the holotype of A. ajax was immature, and thus the features distinguishing the genera were not valid. Since Apatosaurus was the earlier name, Brontosaurus should be considered a junior synonym of Apatosaurus. Because of this, Riggs recombined Brontosaurus excelsus as Apatosaurus excelsus. Based on comparisons with other species proposed to belong to Apatosaurus, Riggs also determined that the Field Columbian Museum specimen was likely most similar to A. excelsus.[24] Despite Riggs' publication, Henry Fairfield Osborn, who was a strong opponent of Marsh and his taxa, labeled the Apatosaurus mount of the American Museum of Natural History Brontosaurus.[27][26] Because of this decision the name Brontosaurus was commonly used outside of scientific literature for what Riggs considered Apatosaurus, and the museum's popularity meant that Brontosaurus became one of the best known dinosaurs, even though it was invalid throughout nearly all of the 20th and early 21st centuries.[28]

Skull issue

Apatosaurine mount (FMNH P25112) in the Field Museum of Natural History in the 1950s, with its original, inaccurately reconstructed skull

It was not until 1909 that an Apatosaurus skull was found during the first expedition, led by Earl Douglass, to what would become known as the Carnegie Quarry at Dinosaur National Monument. The skull was found a short distance from a skeleton (specimen CM 3018) identified as the new species Apatosaurus louisae, named after Louise Carnegie, wife of Andrew Carnegie, who funded field research to find complete dinosaur skeletons in the American West. The skull was designated CM 11162; it was very similar to the skull of Diplodocus.[27] Another smaller skeleton of A. louisae was found nearby CM 11162 and CM 3018.[29] The skull was accepted as belonging to the Apatosaurus specimen by Douglass and Carnegie Museum director William H. Holland, although other scientists – most notably Osborn – rejected this identification. Holland defended his view in 1914 in an address to the Paleontological Society of America, yet he left the Carnegie Museum mount headless. While some thought Holland was attempting to avoid conflict with Osborn, others suspected Holland was waiting until an articulated skull and neck were found to confirm the association of the skull and skeleton.[26] After Holland's death in 1934, museum staff placed a cast of a Camarasaurus skull on the mount.[27]

In August 1883, Marshall P. Felch collected a disarticulated partial skull (USNM V 5730) of a sauropod further south in the Felch Quarry at Garden Park, Colorado and sent the specimen to Yale.[30][31] Marsh referred the skull to B. excelsus,[30][32] later featuring it in a skeletal reconstruction of the B. excelsus type specimen in 1891[32] and the illustration was featured again in Marsh's landmark publication, The Dinosaurs of North America, in 1896.[4] At the Yale Peabody Museum, the skeleton of Brontosaurus excelsus was mounted in 1931 with a skull based on the Marsh reconstruction of the Felch Quarry skull.[26] While at the time most museums were using Camarasaurus casts for skulls, the Peabody Museum sculpted a completely different skull based on Marsh's recon.[30][26] Marsh's skull was inaccurate for several other reasons: it included forward-pointing nasals, something truly different to any other dinosaur, and fenestrae differing from the drawing and other skulls. The mandible was based on a Camarasaurus'.[26] In 1998, the Felch Quarry skull that Marsh included in his 1896 skeletal restoration was suggested to belong to Brachiosaurus instead[30] and this was supported in 2020 with a redescription of the brachiosaurid material found at the Felch Quarry.[31]

No Apatosaurus skull was mentioned in literature until the 1970s when John Stanton McIntosh and David Berman redescribed the skulls of Diplodocus and Apatosaurus. They found that though he never published his opinion, Holland was almost certainly correct, that Apatosaurus had a Diplodocus-like skull. According to them, many skulls long thought to pertain to Diplodocus might instead be those of Apatosaurus. They reassigned multiple skulls to Apatosaurus based on associated and closely associated vertebrae. Even though they supported Holland, it was noted that Apatosaurus might have possessed a Camarasaurus-like skull, based on a disarticulated Camarasaurus-like tooth found at the precise site where an Apatosaurus specimen was found years before.[10] On October 20, 1979, after the publications by McIntosh and Berman, the first true skull of Apatosaurus was mounted on a skeleton in a museum, that of the Carnegie.[26] In 1998, it was suggested that the Felch Quarry skull that Marsh had included in his 1896 skeletal restoration instead belonged to Brachiosaurus.[33][34]

Recent finds and reassessment

Another specimen of an apatosaurine was discovered in 1993 by the Tate Geological Museum, also from the Morrison Formation of central Wyoming. The specimen consisted of a partial postcranial skeleton, including a complete manus and multiple vertebrae, and was described by James Filla and Pat Redman a year later. Filla and Redman named the specimen Apatosaurus yahnahpin ("yahnahpin-wearing deceptive lizard"),[35] but Robert T. Bakker gave it the genus name Eobrontosaurus in 1998. Bakker believed that Eobrontosaurus was the direct predecessor to Brontosaurus,[36] although Tschopp et al.'s phylogenetic analysis placed B. yahnahpin as the basalmost species of Brontosaurus.[1]

In 2011, the first specimen of Apatosaurus where a skull was found articulated with its cervical vertebrae was described. This specimen, CMC VP 7180, was found to differ in both skull and neck features from A. louisae, but shared many features of the cervical vertebrae with A. ajax.[37] Another well-preserved skull is Brigham Young University specimen 17096, a well-preserved skull and skeleton, with a preserved braincase. The specimen was found in Cactus Park Quarry in western Colorado.[38] In 2013, Matthew Mossbrucker and several other authors published an abstract that described a premaxilla and maxilla from Lakes' original quarry in Morrison and referred the material to Apatosaurus ajax.[39] Another skull from Como Bluff, this specimen associated with several cervical vertebrae, was described in 2022.[40]

Infographic explaining the history of Brontosaurus and Apatosaurus according to Tschopp et al. 2015
Apatosaurus ajax skull, specimen CMC VP 7180

Almost all 20th-century paleontologists agreed with Riggs that all Apatosaurus and Brontosaurus species should be classified in a single genus. According to the rules of the ICZN, which governs the scientific names of animals, the name Apatosaurus, having been published first, had priority; Brontosaurus was considered a junior synonym and was therefore discarded from formal use.[41][42][43][44] Despite this, at least one paleontologist—Robert T. Bakker—argued in the 1990s that A. ajax and A. excelsus are sufficiently distinct that the latter continues to merit a separate genus.[36] In 2015, an extensive study of diplodocid relationships by Emanuel Tschopp, Octavio Mateus, and Roger Benson concluded that Brontosaurus was indeed a valid genus of sauropod distinct from Apatosaurus. The scientists developed a statistical method to more objectively assess differences between fossil genera and species and concluded that Brontosaurus could be "resurrected" as a valid name. They assigned two former Apatosaurus species, A. parvus, and A. yahnahpin, to Brontosaurus, as well as the type species B. excelsus.[1] The publication was met with some criticism from other paleontologists, including Michael D'Emic,[45] Donald Prothero, who criticized the mass media reaction to this study as superficial and premature,[46] and many others. Some paleontologists like John and Rebecca Hunt-Foster continue to consider Brontosaurus as a synonym of Apatosaurus.[47][48]

Description

Apatosaurines are large, long-necked, quadrupedal animals with long, whip-like tails, and forelimbs that were slightly shorter than its hindlimbs. The size of apatosaurines varies, like A. louisae which measures 21–23 m (69–75 ft) in length and 16.4–22.4 t (16.1–22.0 long tons; 18.1–24.7 short tons) in mass and B. excelsus which is 21–22 m (69–72 ft) long and 15–17 t (17–19 short tons).[49] Some specimens of A. ajax (such as OMNH 1670) represent individuals 11–30% longer, suggesting masses twice that of CM 3018 or 32.7–72.6 t (32.2–71.5 long tons; 36.0–80.0 short tons), potentially rivaling the largest titanosaurs.[50] However, the upper size estimate of OMNH 1670 is likely an exaggeration, with the size estimates revised in 2020 at 30 m (98 ft) in length and 33 t (36 short tons) in body mass based on volumetric analysis.[51]

Comparison of three specimens and a human: Oklahoma specimen of Apatosaurus ajax (orange), A. louisae (red), and Brontosaurus parvus (green)

The skull is small in relation to the size of the animal. The jaws are lined with spatulate (chisel-like) teeth suited to an herbivorous diet. The snout of Apatosaurus and similar diplodocoids is squared, with only Nigersaurus having a squarer skull.[52] The braincase of Apatosaurus is well preserved in specimen BYU 17096, which also preserved much of the skeleton. A phylogenetic analysis found that the braincase had a morphology similar to those of other diplodocoids.[53] Some skulls of Apatosaurus have been found still in articulation with their teeth. Those teeth that have the enamel surface exposed do not show any scratches on the surface; instead, they display a sugary texture and little wear.[52]

Vertebrae

A cervical (top) and dorsal vertebra (bottom) of B. excelsus.

Like those of other diplodocids, the vertebrae of the neck were deeply bifurcated on the dorsal side; that is, they carried paired spines, resulting in a wide and deep neck.[54] Their spines and tails consists of 15 cervicals, ten dorsals, five sacrals, and about 82 caudals in Apatosaurus and likely Brontosaurus. However, the number of caudal vertebrae has been noted to vary, even within a species. Vertebrae in the neck, torso, and sacrum of sauropods bore large pneumatic [[Glossary of dinosaur anatomy|foramen]] on their lateral sides. These are used to lighten the bones which aided in keeping the animal lighter. Within the vertebrae as well, smooth bone walls in addition to diverticula would make pockets of air to keep the bones light.[55] Similar structures are observable in birds and large mammals.[56] The cervical vertebrae were stouter than those of other diplodocids, being wide and rectangular in anterior view. On the lateral sides of the cervicals, apatosaurines had well-developed and thick [[parapophyses|parapophyses]] (extensions on the lateral sides of the vertebrae that attached to cervical ribs) which would point ventrally under the centrum. These parapophyses in conjunction with dense diapophyses and cervical ribs were strong anchors for neck muscles, which could sustain extreme force.[57] The cervicals were also more boxy than in other sauropods due to their truncated zygapophyses and tall build.[58][1] These vertebrae are triangular in anterior view, whereas they most often are rounded or square in genera like Camarasaurus. Despite its pneumaticy, the necks of Brontosaurus and Apatosaurus are thought to have been double the mass of that of other diplodocids due to the former's sturdiness.[57] Brontosaurus differs from Apatosaurus in several regards, such as their posterior dorsal vertebrae's neural spines are longer than they are wide and Apatosaurus' posterior cervicals bear a detached horizontal lamina in the fossae of their diapophyseal laminae in the mid-posterior cervicals.[1]

Pectoral girdle of Brontosaurus excelsus
Pectoral girdle of Brontosaurus excelsus

Their dorsal vertebrae have short centra with large fossae (shallow excavations) on their lateral sides, though not as extensively as the cervicals'.[59] Neural canals, which contain the spinal chord of the vertebral column, are ovate and large in the dorsals. The diapophyses protrude outward and curve downward in a hook-shape. Neural spines are thick in anterior-posterior view with a bifurcate top.[1] The neural spines of the dorsals would increase in height further towards the tail, creating an arched back. Apatosaurine neural spines compose more than half the height of the vertebrae. The dorsal ribs are not fused or tightly attached to their vertebrae, instead being loosely articulated.[25] Ten dorsal ribs are on either side of the body of apatosaurines.[24] Expanded excavations within the sacrum are present making it into a hollow cylinder-shape. Sacral neural spines are fused together into a thin plate. The posteriormost caudal vertebra was lightly fused to the sacral vertebrae, becoming part of the plate. Internally, the neural canal was enlarged.[60][61][24] The shape of the tail was typical of diplodocids', being comparatively slender, due to the vertebral spines rapidly decreasing in height the farther they are from the hips. As in other diplodocids, the last portion of the tails possessed a whip-like structure.[25] The tail also bears an extensive air-sac system to lighten its weight, as observed in specimens of B. parvus.[62][63]

Limbs

Several scapulae are known from apatosaurines, all of which are long and thin with relatively elongated shafts.[60] One of traits that distinguishes Brontosaurus and Apatosaurus is the presence of a depression on the posterior face of the scapula, which the latter lacks. The scapula of Brontosaurus also has a rounded extension off of its edge, a characteristic unique to Brontosaurus among Apatosaurinae. The coracoids of apatosaurines have a quadratic outline in dorsal view. Sterna have been preserved in some specimens of Apatosaurus and Brontosaurus, which display an oval outline.[1] The hip bones include robust ilia and the fused pubes and ischia. The limb bones are also very robust,[64] with the humerus resembling that of Camarasaurus. The humerus had a thin bone shaft and larger transverse ends. Its anterior end bears a large deltopectoral crest, which was on the extremities of the bone.[65] Charles Gilmore in 1936 noted that previous reconstructions erroneously proposed that the radius and ulna could cross, when in life they would have remained parallel.[25] Apatosaurines have a single large claw on each forelimb which faces towards the body, whereas the rest of the phalanges lacked unguals.[66] Even by 1936, it was recognized that no sauropod had more than one hand claw preserved, and this one claw is now accepted as the maximum number throughout the entire group.[25][67] The metacarpals are elongated and thinner than the phalanges, bearing boxy articular ends on its proximal and distal faces.[4] The single front claw bone is slightly curved and squarely shortened on the front end. The phalangeal formula is 2-1-1-1-1, meaning the innermost finger (phalanx) on the forelimb has two bones and the next has one. The single manual claw bone (ungual) is slightly curved and squarely truncated on the anterior end. Proportions of the manus bones vary within Apatosaurinae as well, with B. yahnahpin's ratio of longest metacarpal to radius length around 0.40 or greater compared to a lower value in Apatosaurus louisae.[1] The femora of apatosaurines are very stout and represent some of the most robust femora of any member of Sauropoda. The tibia and fibula bones are different from the slender bones of Diplodocus but are nearly indistinguishable from those of Camarasaurus. The fibula is longer and slenderer than the tibia. Apatosaurine feet have three claws on the innermost digits; the digit formula is 3-4-5-3-2. The first metatarsal is the stoutest, a feature shared among all diplodocids.[25]

Classification

Portrait of Othniel Charles Marsh, describer of Apatosaurus and Brontosaurus
Portrait of Othniel Charles Marsh, describer of Apatosaurus and Brontosaurus

Apatosaurinae is definitively represented by only two genera; Apatosaurus and Brontosaurus, according to a comprehensive 2015 study by researcher Emmanuel Tschopp and colleagues which found the two to be separate genera.[1] It is stem-based, being defined as all taxa more closely related to Apatosaurus than Diplodocus by paleontologists Mike Taylor and Darren Naish in 2005.[68] Two other sauropods, Amphicoelias and a species of the dubious genus Atlantosaurus, A. immanis, have been suggested to be part of the group as well. However, some studies have placed Amphicoelias as a basal member of Diplodocidae or Diplodocoidea,[1] though a 2021 study found it to be an apatosaurine in one phylogenetic analysis.[69] Several indeterminate apatosaurine skeletons have also been found and likely belong to either Apatosaurus or Brontosaurus, such as the specimens AMNH 460 and FMNH P25112, though their statuses are inconclusive. Dozens of isolated or fragmentary specimens have also been assigned to the genera, but were not reviewed by Tschopp and colleague's study.[1][47]

The cladogram below is the result of an analysis by Tschopp, Mateus, and Benson (2015). The authors analyzed most diplodocid type specimens separately to deduce which specimen belonged to which species and genus.[1]

 Apatosaurinae 

YPM 1840 ("Atlantosaurus" immanis type)

NSMT-PV 20375

AMNH 460

 Apatosaurus 
 Apatosaurus ajax 

YPM 1860 (Apatosaurus ajax type)

 Apatosaurus louisae 

CM 3018 (Apatosaurus louisae type)

YPM 1861 (Apatosaurus laticollis type)

 Brontosaurus 
 Brontosaurus excelsus 

YPM 1980 (Brontosaurus excelsus type)

YPM 1981 (Brontosaurus amplus type)

AMNH 5764 (Amphicoelias altus type)

FMNH P25112

 Brontosaurus yahnahpin 

Tate-001 (Eobrontosaurus yahnahpin type)

 Brontosaurus parvus 

CM 566 (Elosaurus parvus type)

UM 15556

BYU 1252-18531

Though Marsh was the first to recognize the differences between Apatosaurus and Brontosaurus versus other sauropods and researcher Otto Jaekel erected Brontosauridae in 1911,[70] Apatosauridae was named in 1927 by paleontologist Friedrich von Huene, who included only Apatosaurus and the invalid Uintasaurus in the subfamily. He considered Apatosauridae, Diplodocidae, Dicraeosauridae, Morosauridae, Cardiodontidae, and Brachiosauridae to be part of Sauropoda.[71] However, its first explicit use was in a 1929 paper by Werner Janensch, who classified it, including only Apatosaurus, within the invalid grouping Homalosauropodidae.[72] Later sauropod specialists considered Apatosaurinae and Diplodocinae to be together in Diplodocidae, which excluded Titanosauria and Dicraeosauridae.[41][1]

Below is a cladogram of apatosaurinae interrelationships based on Tschopp et al., 2015.[1]

 Diplodocidae 

Paleobiology

When Brontosaurus and Apatosaurus were described in the late 1870s, the widespread notion in the scientific community was that sauropods were semi-aquatic, lathargic reptiles that were inactive.[41][4][16] In Othniel Marsh's publication The Dinosaurs of North America, he described B. excelsus as "more or less amphibious, and its food was probably aquatic plants or other succulent vegetation".[4] This is unsupported by fossil evidence. Instead, sauropods were active and had adaptations for dwelling on land.[41] Marsh also noted the animal's supposed lack of intellect based on the small braincase of the Felch Quarry skull and slender neural cord. Recent research has found signs of intelligence in dinosaurs, akin to modern birds, though sauropods had relatively small brains.[73]

Various uses for the single claw on the forelimb of sauropods have been proposed. One suggestion is that they were used for defense, but their shape and size make this unlikely. It was also possible they were for foraging, but the most probable use for the claw was grasping objects such as tree trunks when rearing.[67]

Trackways of sauropods show that the average range for them was around 20–40 km (10–25 mi) per day, and they could potentially reach a top speed of 20–30 km/h (12–19 mph).[74] The slow locomotion of sauropods may be due to the minimal muscling or recoil after strides.[75] A possible bipedal trackway of a juvenile Apatosaurus is known, but it is disputed if it was possible for the sauropod.[76]

Infant Apatosaurus footprints
Infant Apatosaurus footprints

Diet and energy requirements

Being diplodocids, apatosaurines were herbivorous and fed on ferns, cycadeoids, seed ferns, and horsetails, eating at ground height as a nonselective browser.[52] The replacement method and physiology of Apatosaurus' teeth is unique, with the entire tooth row unit being replaced at once but less often than Diplodocus. The teeth of Apatosaurus are thick, lack denticles, and are strongly cylindrical in cross-section whereas they are long, slender, and elliptical in cross-section in Diplodocus. These characteristics imply that Apatosaurus consumed tougher vegetation than Diplodocus.[40] Diplodocids in general also have shorter necks than the long-necked, vertically inclined macronarians. This would result in niche partitioning, the various taxa thus avoiding direct competition with each other due to feeding on different plants and at different heights.[69] Hypotheses of the food requirements of Brontosaurus have been made, though predicting this is difficult due to the lack of modern analogues.[77] Endotherms (mammals) and ectotherms (reptiles) require a specific amount of nutrition to survive which correlates with their metabolism as well as body size. Estimations of the dietary necessities of Brontosaurus were made in 2010, with a guess of 2•10^4 to 50•10^4 kilojoules needed daily. This led to hypotheses on the distributions of Brontosaurus to meet this requirement, though they varied on whether it was an ectotherm or endotherm. If Brontosaurus was an endotherm, fewer adult individuals could be sustained than if it were an ectotherm, which could have tens of animals per square kilometer.[78][79] Due to this, it has been theorized that sauropods living within the arid environment of the Morrison Formation participated in migrations between feeding sites.[77] James Farlow (1987) calculates that a Brontosaurus-sized dinosaur about 35 t (34 long tons; 39 short tons) would have possessed 5.7 t (5.6 long tons; 6.3 short tons) of fermentation contents.[80] Assuming Apatosaurus had an avian respiratory system and a reptilian resting-metabolism, Frank Paladino et al. (1997) estimate the animal would have needed to consume only about 262 liters (58 imp gal; 69 U.S. gal) of water per day.[81]

Posture

Further information: Sauropod neck posture

Historically, apatosaurines and other sauropods were believed to have been too massive to support their weight on dry land, so theoretically, they must have lived partly submerged in water, perhaps in swamps. Recent findings do not support this, and sauropods are thought to have been fully terrestrial animals.[82] Diplodocids are often portrayed with their necks held high up in the air, allowing them to browse on tall trees. Though some studies have suggested that diplodocid necks were less flexible than previously believed,[83] other studies have found that all tetrapods appear to hold their necks at the maximum possible vertical extension when in a normal, alert posture, and argue that the same would hold true for sauropods barring any unknown, unique characteristics that set the soft tissue anatomy of their necks apart from that of other animals.[84]

Physiology

Further information: Physiology of dinosaurs

James Spotila et al. (1991) suggest that the large body size of sauropods would have made them unable to maintain high metabolic rates, as they would not be able to release enough heat. However, temperatures in the Jurassic were 3 degrees Celsius higher than present.[85] Furthermore, they assumed that the animals had a reptilian respiratory system. Matt Wedel found that an avian system would have allowed them to dump more heat.[86] Some scientists have also argued that the heart would have had trouble sustaining sufficient blood pressure to oxygenate the brain.[82]

Given the large body mass and long neck of sauropods, physiologists have encountered problems determining how these animals breathed. Beginning with the assumption that, like crocodilians, Brontosaurus and Apatosaurus did not have a diaphragm, the dead-space volume (the amount of unused air remaining in the mouth, trachea, and air tubes after each breath) has been estimated at 0.184 m3 (184 L) for a 30 t (30 long tons; 33 short tons) specimen. Paladino calculates its tidal volume (the amount of air moved in or out during a single breath) at 0.904 m3 (904 L) with an avian respiratory system, 0.225 m3 (225 L) if mammalian, and 0.019 m3 (19 L) if reptilian.[81]

a herd of Brontosaurus
Life restoration of a herd of B. excelsus

Based on this, its respiratory system would likely have consisted of parabronchi, with multiple pulmonary air sacs as in avian lungs, and a flow-through lung. An avian respiratory system would need a lung volume of about 0.60 m3 (600 L) compared with a mammalian requirement of 2.95 m3 (2,950 L), which would exceed the space available. The overall thoracic volume of the same-sized Apatosaurus has been estimated at 1.7 m3 (1,700 L), allowing for a 0.50 m3 (500 L), a four-chambered heart and a 0.90 m3 (900 L) lung capacity. That would allow about 0.30 m3 (300 L) for the necessary tissue.[81] Evidence for the avian system in apatosaurines and other sauropods is also present in the pneumaticity of the vertebrae. Though this plays a role in reducing the weight of the animal, Wedel (2003) states they are also likely connected to air sacs, as in birds.[86]

Juveniles

A 1999 microscopic study of Apatosaurus and Brontosaurus bones concluded the animals grew rapidly when young and reached near-adult sizes in about 10 years.[87] In 2008, a study on the growth rates of sauropods was published by biologists Thomas Lehman and Holly Woodward. They said that by using growth lines and length-to-mass ratios, Apatosaurus would have grown to 25 t (25 long tons; 28 short tons) in 15 years, with growth peaking at 5,000 kg (11,000 lb) in a single year. An alternative method, using limb length and body mass, found Brontosaurus and Apatosaurus grew 520 kg (1,150 lb) per year, and reached their full mass before it was about 70 years old.[88] These estimates have been called unreliable because the calculation methods are not sound; old growth lines would have been obliterated by bone remodeling.[89] One of the first identified growth factors of Apatosaurus was the number of sacral vertebrae, which increased to five by the time of the creature's maturity. This was first noted in 1903 and again in 1936.[25][24]

Juvenile Brontosaurus material is known based on the type specimen of B. parvus. The material of this specimen, CM 566, includes vertebrae from various regions, one pelvic bone, and some bones of the hindlimb.[90] When describing B. parvus, Peterson and Gilmore noted that the neural spines were sutured, the sacral vertebrae were unfused, and the coracoid was missing. All of these features are signs of immaturity in other archosaurs, showing that sauropods had these traits too.[91] Peterson and Gilmore also theorized that sauropods never stopped growing, which supposedly helped in attaining their massive size, a concept unsupported by fossils.[92]

Caudal vertebrae of an indeterminate apatosaurine
Caudal vertebrae of an indeterminate apatosaurine (FMNH P25112)

Tail

A 1997 study by Nathan Myhrvold, a computer scientist from Microsoft, carried out a computer simulation of the tail, which in diplodocids, including apatosaurines, was a very long, tapering structure resembling a bullwhip. This computer modeling suggested that sauropods were capable of producing a whip-like cracking sound of over 200 decibels, comparable to the volume of a cannon.[93] There is some circumstantial evidence supporting this as well: a number of diplodocids have been found with fused or damaged tail vertebrae, which may be a symptom of cracking their tails: these are particularly common between the 18th and the 25th caudal vertebra, a region the authors consider a transitional zone between the stiff muscular base and the flexible whiplike section.[94] However, Rega (2012) notes that Camarasaurus while lacking a tailwhip, displays a similar level of caudal co-ossification and that Mamenchisaurus while having the same pattern of vertebral metrics, lacks a tailwhip and does not display fusion in any "transitional region". Also, the crush fractures which would be expected if the tail was used as a whip have never been found in diplodocids.[95] More recently, Baron (2020) has considered the use of the tail as a bullwhip unlikely because of the potentially catastrophic muscle and skeletal damage such speeds could cause on the large and heavy tail. Instead, he proposes that the tails might have been used as a tactile organ to keep in touch with the individuals behind and to the sides of the animal in a group, which could have augmented cohesion and allowed communication among individuals while limiting more energetically demanding activities like stopping to search for dispersed individuals, turning to visually check on others behind, or communicating vocally.[96]

Cervical vertebra of Brontosaurus excelsus.
A cervical vertebra of B. excelsus, showing its robusticity.

Neck combat

The cervical vertebrae of Brontosaurus and Apatosaurus are robust, which has led to speculation on the use of these structures. These structures had expensive energy requirements, so the reason for their evolution must have been important to the animal. notable features include dense cervical ribs and diapophyses, ribs that are angled ventrally, and an overall subtriangular cross-section. These traits are in contrast to the more fragile cervicals of diplodocines.[97] Cervical ribs acted as anchors for the longus colli ventralis and flexer colli lateralis muscles, which are used in the downward motion of the neck. Stronger muscles for ventral motions allowed more force to be exerted downward. The cervical ribs formed a "V"-shape, which could be used to shelter the softer underlying tissues of the neck from damage. Ventral sides of the cervical ribs were capped by round, protruding processes. These have been suggested to have been attachment points for bosses or keratinous spikes. A 2015 preprint by Taylor and colleagues thought that due to the combination of these traits, apatosaurines would use their necks for combat between individuals through the use of striking necks.[57][98] Behavior like this has been observed in other animals like giraffes and large tortoises.[99][100]

Paleoecology

Strata of the Brushy Basin Member of the Morrison Formation
Strata of the Morrison Formation, where all apatosaurines have been found.

The Morrison Formation is a sequence of shallow marine and alluvial sediments which, according to radiometric dating, ranges between 156.3 million years old (Mya) at its base,[101] and 146.8 Mya at the top,[102] which places it in the late Oxfordian, Kimmeridgian, and early Tithonian stages of the Late Jurassic period. This formation is interpreted as a semiarid environment with distinct wet and dry seasons. The Morrison Basin, where dinosaurs lived, stretched from New Mexico to Alberta and Saskatchewan and was formed when the precursors to the Front Range of the Rocky Mountains started pushing up to the west. The deposits from their east-facing drainage basins were carried by streams and rivers and deposited in swampy lowlands, lakes, river channels, and floodplains.[103] This formation is similar in age to the Lourinhã Formation in Portugal and the Tendaguru Formation in Tanzania.[104]

Fossils of Brontosaurus are relatively uncommon whereas Apatosaurus is the second most common sauropod in the formation, after Camarasaurus. Apatosaurus and Brontosaurus may have been a more solitary animal than other Morrison Formation dinosaurs.[105] Both genera existed for a long interval, and was found in most levels of the Morrison. B. excelsus, A. ajax, and A. louisae fossils have been reported from only the Brushy Basin Member, dating to the late Kimmeridgian age, about 151 Mya.[106] Older Brontosaurus remains have also been identified from the middle Kimmeridgian, and are assigned to B. parvus.[90] Fossils of these animals have been found in Nine Mile Quarry and Bone Cabin Quarry in Wyoming and at sites in Colorado, Oklahoma, and Utah, present in stratigraphic zones 2–6 according to John Foster's model.[107]

The Morrison Formation records an environment and time dominated by gigantic sauropod dinosaurs.[107] Dinosaurs known from the Morrison include the theropods Ceratosaurus, Ornitholestes, and Allosaurus, the sauropods Apatosaurus, Brachiosaurus, Camarasaurus, and Diplodocus, and the ornithischians Camptosaurus, Dryosaurus, and Stegosaurus.[108] Other vertebrates that shared this paleoenvironment included ray-finned fishes, frogs, salamanders, turtles, sphenodonts, lizards, terrestrial and aquatic crocodylomorphs, and several species of pterosaurs. Shells of bivalves and aquatic snails, are also common. The flora of the period has been revealed by fossils of green algae, mosses, horsetails, cycads, ginkgoes, and several families of conifers. Vegetation varied from river-lining forests of tree ferns and ferns (gallery forests), to fern savannas with occasional trees such as the Araucaria-like conifer Brachyphyllum.[109]

References

  1. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t Tschopp, E.; Mateus, O. V.; Benson, R. B. J. (2015). "A specimen-level phylogenetic analysis and taxonomic revision of Diplodocidae (Dinosauria, Sauropoda)". PeerJ. 3: e857. doi:10.7717/peerj.857. PMC 4393826. PMID 25870766.
  2. ^ Moon, B. (2010). "The Sauropod Dinosaurs of the Morrison Formation (Upper Jurassic, USA): A Review". Dinosauria: 1–9. Archived from the original on January 28, 2015.
  3. ^ a b Kohl, M. F., & McIntosh, J. S. 1997, Discovering Dinosaurs in the Old West: The field journals of Arthur Lakes.
  4. ^ a b c d e f Marsh, Othniel Charles (1896). The Dinosaurs of North America (1st ed.). U.S. Government Printing Office.
  5. ^ Marsh, O.T. "Apatosaurus ajax?; YPM VP 004833; North America; USA; Colorado; Jefferson County; Arthur Lakes". collections.peabody.yale.edu. Retrieved March 11, 2022.
  6. ^ Marsh, Othniel Charles (1878-11-01). "Principal characters of American Jurassic dinosaurs". American Journal of Science. s3-16 (95): 411–416. Bibcode:1878AmJS...16..411M. doi:10.2475/ajs.s3-16.95.411. hdl:2027/hvd.32044107172876. ISSN 0002-9599. S2CID 219245525.
  7. ^ Cannon, Geo. L. (1906-07-27). "Sauropodan Gastroliths". Science. 24 (604): 116. doi:10.1126/science.24.604.116.a. ISSN 0036-8075. S2CID 239859293.
  8. ^ Cannon, Geo. L. (1906-07-27). "Sauropodan Gastroliths". Science. 24 (604): 116. doi:10.1126/science.24.604.116.a. ISSN 0036-8075. S2CID 239859293.
  9. ^ Wings, Oliver; Sander, P. Martin (2007-03-07). "No gastric mill in sauropod dinosaurs: new evidence from analysis of gastrolith mass and function in ostriches". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 274 (1610): 635–640. doi:10.1098/rspb.2006.3763. ISSN 0962-8452. PMC 2197205. PMID 17254987.
  10. ^ a b c McIntosh, John S.; Berman, David S. (1975). "Description of the Palate and Lower Jaw of the Sauropod Dinosaur Diplodocus (Reptilia: Saurischia) with Remarks on the Nature of the Skull of Apatosaurus". Journal of Paleontology. 49 (1): 187–199. ISSN 0022-3360. JSTOR 1303324.
  11. ^ McIntosh, John (1998). "New information about the Cope collection of sauropods from the Garden Park, Colorado" (PDF). The Morrison Formation: An Interdisciplinary Study. Part 2. Modern Geology. 23.
  12. ^ a b Cope, E. D. (1877). "On the Vertebrata of the Dakota Epoch of Colorado". Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society. 17 (100): 233–247. ISSN 0003-049X. JSTOR 982303.
  13. ^ Carpenter, Kenneth (2018-10-19). "Maraapunisaurus fragillimus, N.G. (formerly Amphicoelias fragillimus), a basal Rebbachisaurid from the Morrison Formation (Upper Jurassic) of Colorado". Geology of the Intermountain West. 5: 227–244. doi:10.31711/giw.v5.pp227-244. ISSN 2380-7601. S2CID 210973474.
  14. ^ Carpenter, K. (1998). Vertebrate biostratigraphy of the Morrison Formation near Cañon City, Colorado. Modern Geology, 23, 407.
  15. ^ Osborn, H.F.; Mook, C. C. (1921). "Camarasaurus, Amphicoelias and other sauropods of Cope". Memoirs of the American Museum of Natural History. New Series. 3 (3): 249–387. hdl:2027/mdp.39015042532476.
  16. ^ a b Marsh, O. C. (1879). "Notice of new Jurassic reptiles" (PDF). American Journal of Science. 18 (108): 501–505. Bibcode:1879AmJS...18..501M. doi:10.2475/ajs.s3-18.108.501. S2CID 131001110.
  17. ^ Liddell, G. H.; Scott, R. (1882). A Greek-English Lexicon. Harper & Brothers. pp. 1–1774.
  18. ^ Mahoney, K. D. (2015). "Latin Definitions for: excelsus (Latin search)". LatDict Latin Dictionary and Grammar Resources.
  19. ^ Marsh, Othniel Charles. "Apatosaurus excelsus; YPM VP 001981; North America; USA; Wyoming; Albany County; William H. Reed, Reed-Como party, 1880; 1880". collections.peabody.yale.edu. Retrieved March 10, 2022.
  20. ^ a b Marsh, Othniel Charles (May 1, 1881). "Principal characters of American Jurassic dinosaurs, Part V". American Journal of Science. s3-21 (125): 417–423. Bibcode:1881AmJS...21..417M. doi:10.2475/ajs.s3-21.125.417. ISSN 0002-9599. S2CID 219234316.
  21. ^ Brinkman, Paul (2010). The Second Jurassic Dinosaur Rush (1st ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. pp. 1–10. ISBN 978-0-226-07472-6.
  22. ^ "Apatosaurus: Hall of Saurischian Dinosaurs". American Museum of Natural History. Retrieved 4 September 2023.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  23. ^ Matthew, W.D. (1905). "The mounted skeleton of Brontosaurus". The American Museum Journal. 5 (2): 63–70.
  24. ^ a b c d e Riggs, E.S. (1903). "Structure and Relationships of Opisthocoelian Dinosaurs. Part I, Apatosaurus Marsh" (PDF). Publications of the Field Columbian Museum Geographical Series. 2 (4): 165–196. OCLC 494478078. Archived (PDF) from the original on October 9, 2022.
  25. ^ a b c d e f g Gilmore, C. W. (February 1936). "Osteology of Apatosaurus, with special references to specimens in the Carnegie Museum". Memoirs of the Carnegie Museum. 11 (4): 175–300. doi:10.5962/p.234849. OCLC 16777126. S2CID 89649268.
  26. ^ a b c d e f g Miller, B (2014-10-30). "Bully for Camarasaurus". EXTINCT MONSTERS. Retrieved 2023-09-04.
  27. ^ a b c Parsons, K.M. (1997). "The Wrongheaded Dinosaur". Carnegie Magazine. Archived from the original on April 14, 2010.
  28. ^ Crafton, D.C. (1982). Before Mickey: The Animated Film 1898–1928 (PDF). MIT Press. pp. 1–57. ISBN 978-0-262-03083-0. Archived (PDF) from the original on October 9, 2022.
  29. ^ Glut, Donald F. (2013). Dinosaurs, the encyclopedia. Jefferson (N.C.): McFarland and Co. ISBN 978-0-7864-7222-2.
  30. ^ a b c d Carpenter, Kenneth; Tidwell, Virginia (1998). "Preliminary Description of a Brachiosaurus Skull from Felch Quarry 1, Garden Park, Colorado". In Carpenter, Kenneth; Chure, Dan; Kirkland, James Ian (eds.). The Upper Jurassic Morrison Formation: an interdisciplinary study. Taylor & Francis. ISBN 978-90-5699-183-8.
  31. ^ a b D'Emic, Michael D.; Carrano, Matthew T. (June 28, 2019). "Redescription of Brachiosaurid Sauropod Dinosaur Material From the Upper Jurassic Morrison Formation, Colorado, USA". The Anatomical Record. 303 (4): 732–758. doi:10.1002/ar.24198. ISSN 1932-8486. PMID 31254331. S2CID 195765189.
  32. ^ a b Marsh, O. C. (1891). "Restoration of Brontosaurus". American Journal of Science. s3-41: 341–342.
  33. ^ D'Emic, Michael D.; Carrano, Matthew T. (2020). "Redescription of Brachiosaurid Sauropod Dinosaur Material From the Upper Jurassic Morrison Formation, Colorado, USA". The Anatomical Record. 303 (4): 732–758. doi:10.1002/ar.24198. ISSN 1932-8486. PMID 31254331. S2CID 195765189.
  34. ^ Carpenter, Kenneth; Tidwell, Virginia (1998). "Preliminary Description of a Brachiosaurus Skull from Felch Quarry 1, Garden Park, Colorado". In Carpenter, Kenneth; Chure, Dan; Kirkland, James Ian (eds.). The Upper Jurassic Morrison Formation: an interdisciplinary study. Taylor & Francis. ISBN 978-90-5699-183-8.
  35. ^ Filla, B. J., & Redman, P. D. (1994). Apatosaurus yahnahpin: a preliminary description of a new species of diplodocid dinosaur from the Late Jurassic Morrison Formation of Southern Wyoming, the first sauropod dinosaur found with a complete set of “belly ribs”. In The dinosaurs of Wyoming. Wyoming Geological Association 44th annual field conference guidebook. Casper: Wyoming Geological Association (pp. 159-178).
  36. ^ a b Bakker, R. T. (1998). "Dinosaur mid-life crisis: the Jurassic-Cretaceous transition in Wyoming and Colorado". In Lucas, Spencer G.; Kirkland, James I.; Estep, J. W. (eds.). Lower and Middle Cretaceous Terrestrial Ecosystems. Vol. 14. New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science Bulletin. pp. 67–77.
  37. ^ Barrett, P.M.; Storrs, G.W.; Young, M.T.; Witmer, L.M. (2011). "A new skull of Apatosaurus and its taxonomic and palaeobiological implications" (PDF). Symposium of Vertebrate Palaeontology & Comparative Anatomy Abstracts of Presentations: 5. Archived (PDF) from the original on October 9, 2022.
  38. ^ Balanoff, Amy M.; Bever, Gabe S.; Ikejiri, Takehito (2010-03-04). "The Braincase of Apatosaurus (Dinosauria: Sauropoda) Based on Computed Tomography of a New Specimen with Comments on Variation and Evolution in Sauropod Neuroanatomy". American Museum Novitates (3677): 1–32. doi:10.1206/591.1. ISSN 0003-0082. S2CID 83813837.
  39. ^ Mossbrucker, M. T., & Bakker, R. T. (October 2013). Missing muzzle found: new skull material referrable to Apatosaurus ajax (Marsh 1877) from the Morrison Formation of Morrison, Colorado. In Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs (Vol. 45, p. 111).
  40. ^ a b Peterson, Joseph E.; Lovelace, David; Connely, Melissa; McHugh, Julia B. (2022). "A novel feeding mechanism of diplodocid sauropods revealed in an Apatosaurine skull from the Upper Jurassic Nail Quarry (Morrison Formation) at Como Bluff, Wyoming, USA". Palaeontologia Electronica. 25 (2): 1–23. doi:10.26879/1216. ISSN 1094-8074. S2CID 251174364.
  41. ^ a b c d Taylor, M. P. (2010). "Sauropod dinosaur research: a historical review" (PDF). Geological Society, London, Special Publications. 343 (1): 361–386. Bibcode:2010GSLSP.343..361T. doi:10.1144/SP343.22. S2CID 910635.
  42. ^ Brinkman, P. (2006). "Bully for Apatosaurus". Endeavour. 30 (4): 126–130. doi:10.1016/j.endeavour.2006.10.004. PMID 17097734.
  43. ^ Upchurch, P.; Barrett, P. M.; Dodson, P. (2004). "Sauropoda". In Weishampel, D. B.; Osmólska, H.; Dodson, P. (eds.). The Dinosauria (2 ed.). University of California Press. pp. 259–322.
  44. ^ McIntosh, J. S. (1995). A. Sun; Y. Wang (eds.). "Remarks on the North American sauropod Apatosaurus Marsh". Sixth Symposium on Mesozoic Terrestrial Ecosystems and Biota Short Papers: 119–123.
  45. ^ D'Emic, Michael (April 9, 2015). "Not So Fast, Brontosaurus". Time. Retrieved July 9, 2023.
  46. ^ Prothero, D. 2015. "Is "Brontosaurus" Back? Not So Fast!". Skeptic.com
  47. ^ a b Foster, John R.; Peterson, Joseph E. (September 1, 2016). "First report of Apatosaurus (Diplodocidae: Apatosaurinae) from the Cleveland-Lloyd Quarry in the Upper Jurassic Morrison Formation of Utah: Abundance, distribution, paleoecology, and taphonomy of an endemic North American sauropod clade". Palaeoworld. 25 (3): 431–443. doi:10.1016/j.palwor.2015.11.006. ISSN 1871-174X.
  48. ^ Foster, John; Hunt-Foster, ReBecca; Gorman, Mark; Trujillo, Kelli; Suarez, Celina; McHugh, Julia; Peterson, Joseph; Warnock, Jonathan; Schoenstein, Heidi (April 19, 2018). "Paleontology, taphonomy, and sedimentology of the Mygatt-Moore Quarry, a large dinosaur bonebed in the Morrison Formation, western Colorado—Implications for Upper Jurassic dinosaur preservation modes". Geology of the Intermountain West. 5: 23–93. doi:10.31711/giw.v5.pp23-93. ISSN 2380-7601.
  49. ^ Paul, Gregory S. (2016). The Princeton Field Guide to Dinosaurs. Princeton University Press. p. 217. ISBN 978-1-78684-190-2. OCLC 985402380.
  50. ^ Wedel, M. (2013). "A giant, skeletally immature individual of Apatosaurus from the Morrison Formation of Oklahoma" (PDF). 61st Symposium on Vertebrate Palaeontology and Comparative Anatomy – Programme and Abstracts: 40–45. Archived (PDF) from the original on October 9, 2022.
  51. ^ Molina-Pérez, R.; Larramendi, A. (2020). Dinosaur Facts and Figures: The Sauropods and Other Sauropodomorphs. Princeton University Press. p. 256. ISBN 978-0691190693.
  52. ^ a b c Whitlock, John A. (2011-04-06). "Inferences of Diplodocoid (Sauropoda: Dinosauria) Feeding Behavior from Snout Shape and Microwear Analyses". PLOS ONE. 6 (4): e18304. Bibcode:2011PLoSO...618304W. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0018304. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC 3071828. PMID 21494685.
  53. ^ Balanoff, Amy M.; Bever, Gabe S.; Ikejiri, Takehito (2010-03-04). "The Braincase of Apatosaurus (Dinosauria: Sauropoda) Based on Computed Tomography of a New Specimen with Comments on Variation and Evolution in Sauropod Neuroanatomy". American Museum Novitates (3677): 1–32. doi:10.1206/591.1. ISSN 0003-0082. S2CID 83813837.
  54. ^ Fastovsky, D. E.; Weishampel, D. B. (2009). Dinosaurs: A Concise Natural History (PDF). Cambridge University Press. pp. 165–200. ISBN 978-0-521-88996-4.
  55. ^ Wedel, M. J. (2005). Postcranial skeletal pneumaticity in sauropods and its implications for mass estimates. The sauropods: evolution and paleobiology. University of California Press, Berkeley, 201-228.
  56. ^ O'Connor, Patrick M. (2006). "Postcranial pneumaticity: An evaluation of soft-tissue influences on the postcranial skeleton and the reconstruction of pulmonary anatomy in archosaurs". Journal of Morphology. 267 (10): 1199–1226. doi:10.1002/jmor.10470. PMID 16850471. S2CID 15284762.
  57. ^ a b c Taylor, M.P.; Wedel, M.J.; Naish, Darren; Engh, B. (2015). "Were the necks of Apatosaurus and Brontosaurus adapted for combat?". PeerJ PrePrints. 3: e1663. doi:10.7287/peerj.preprints.1347v1.
  58. ^ Wedel, M. J., Sanders, R. K., & Cuozzo, F. P. (2002). Osteological correlates of cervical musculature in Aves and Sauropoda (Dinosauria: Saurischia), with comments on the cervical ribs of Apatosaurus. Museum of Paleontology, University of California, Berkeley.
  59. ^ Wedel, Mathew J.; Taylor, Michael P. (October 30, 2013). "Caudal Pneumaticity and Pneumatic Hiatuses in the Sauropod Dinosaurs Giraffatitan and Apatosaurus". PLOS ONE. 8 (10): e78213. Bibcode:2013PLoSO...878213W. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0078213. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC 3812994. PMID 24205162.
  60. ^ a b Osborn, H. F. (1904). Manus, sacrum, and caudals of Sauropoda (Vol. 3).
  61. ^ Moro, Débora; Kerber, Leonardo; Müller, Rodrigo T.; Pretto, Flávio A. (2021). "Sacral co‐ossification in dinosaurs: The oldest record of fused sacral vertebrae in Dinosauria and the diversity of sacral co‐ossification patterns in the group". Journal of Anatomy. 238 (4): 828–844. doi:10.1111/joa.13356. ISSN 0021-8782. PMC 7930772. PMID 33164207.
  62. ^ Taylor, Mike; Wedel, Mathew (January 20, 2021). "Why is vertebral pneumaticity in sauropod dinosaurs so variable?". Qeios. doi:10.32388/1G6J3Q. ISSN 2632-3834.
  63. ^ "Happy Valentine's Day from Apatosaurinae". Sauropod Vertebra Picture of the Week. February 15, 2021. Retrieved June 10, 2023.
  64. ^ Lovelace, D. M.; Hartman, S. A.; Wahl, W. R. (2007). "Morphology of a specimen of Supersaurus (Dinosauria, Sauropoda) from the Morrison Formation of Wyoming, and a re-evaluation of diplodocid phylogeny". Arquivos do Museu Nacional. 65 (4): 527–544. ISSN 0365-4508.
  65. ^ Hatcher, J. B. (1902). "Structure of the fore limb and manus of Brontosaurus". Annals of the Carnegie Museum. 1 (3): 356–376. doi:10.5962/p.247231. S2CID 92181040.
  66. ^ Martin, A. J. (2006). Introduction to the Study of Dinosaurs (Second ed.). Blackwell Publishing. p. 560. ISBN 978-1-4051-3413-2. ASIN 1405134135.
  67. ^ a b Upchurch, P. (1994). "Manus claw function in sauropod dinosaurs" (PDF). Gaia. 10: 161–171. ISSN 0871-5424.
  68. ^ Taylor, Michael; Naish, Darren (2005). "The phylogenetic taxonomy of Diplodocoidea (Dinosauria: Sauropoda)" (PDF). PaleoBios. 25 (2). University of California Museum of Paleontology: 1–7.
  69. ^ a b Mannion, Philip D.; Tschopp, Emanuel; Whitlock, John A. (2021). "Anatomy and systematics of the diplodocoid Amphicoelias altus supports high sauropod dinosaur diversity in the Upper Jurassic Morrison Formation of the USA". Royal Society Open Science. 8 (6): 210377. Bibcode:2021RSOS....810377M. doi:10.1098/rsos.210377. ISSN 2054-5703. PMC 8206699. PMID 34150318.
  70. ^ Jaekel, Otto; Jaekel, Otto (1911). Die Wirbeltiere : eine Übersicht über die fossilen und lebenden Formen. Berlin: Verlag Gebrüder Borntraeger. doi:10.5962/bhl.title.119340.
  71. ^ Huene, Friedrich von (1927). "Short review of the present knowledge of the Sauropoda" (PDF). Memoirs of the Queensland Museum. 9 (1): 121–126.
  72. ^ Janensch, W. (1929-01-01). "Material und Formengehalt der Sauropoden in der Ausbeute der Tendaguru-Expedition". Palaeontographica - Supplementbände (in German): 1–34.
  73. ^ Russell, Dale A. (1997). "Intelligence". In Kevin Padian; Philip J. Currie (eds.). Encyclopedia of dinosaurs. San Diego: Academic Press. pp. 370–372. ISBN 978-0-12-226810-6.
  74. ^ Fastovsky, D.E.; Weishampel, D.B. (2009). Dinosaurs: A Concise Natural History (PDF). Cambridge University Press. pp. 165–200. ISBN 978-0-521-88996-4. Archived from the original (PDF) on September 24, 2015.
  75. ^ Sellers, W. I.; Margetts, L.; Coria, R. A.; Manning, P. L. (2012). "March of the Titans: The Locomotor Capabilities of Sauropod Dinosaurs". PLOS ONE. 8 (10): e78733. Bibcode:2013PLoSO...878733S. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0078733. PMC 3864407. PMID 24348896.
  76. ^ Magazine, Smithsonian; Black, Riley. "Did Wee Little Sauropods Stand Up to Run?". Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved June 10, 2023.
  77. ^ a b Gordon, Iain J.; Prins, Herbert H. T.; Mallon, Jordan; Puk, Laura D.; Miranda, Everton B. P.; Starling-Manne, Carolina; van der Wal, René; Moore, Ben; Foley, William (2019), Gordon, Iain J.; Prins, Herbert H. T. (eds.), "The Ecology of Browsing and Grazing in Other Vertebrate Taxa", The Ecology of Browsing and Grazing II, Ecological Studies, vol. 239, Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 339–404, doi:10.1007/978-3-030-25865-8_15, ISBN 978-3-030-25865-8, S2CID 210259098, retrieved June 10, 2023
  78. ^ Farlow JO, Coroian ID, Foster JR (2010) Giants on the landscape: modelling the abundance of megaherbivorous dinosaurs of the Morrison formation (late Jurassic, western USA). Hist Biol 22:403–429
  79. ^ Farlow JO (1976) A consideration of the trophic dynamics of a Late Cretaceous large-dinosaur community (Oldman formation). Ecology 57:841–857
  80. ^ Farlow, J.A. (1987). "Speculations About the Diet and Physiology of Herbivorous Dinosaurs". Paleobiology. 13 (1): 60–72. doi:10.1017/S0094837300008587. JSTOR 2400838. S2CID 88396062.
  81. ^ a b c Paladino, F.V.; Spotila, J.R.; Dodson, P. (1997). "A Blueprint for Giants: Modeling the Physiology of Large Dinosaurs". In Farlow, J.O.; Brett-Surman, M.K. (eds.). The Complete Dinosaur. Indiana University Press. pp. 491–504. ISBN 978-0-253-33349-0.
  82. ^ a b Pierson, D. J. (2009). "The Physiology of Dinosaurs: Circulatory and Respiratory Function in the Largest Animals Ever to Walk the Earth". Respiratory Care. 54 (7): 887–911. doi:10.4187/002013209793800286. PMID 19558740.
  83. ^ Stevens, Kent A.; Parrish, J. M. (1999). "Neck Posture and Feeding Habits of Two Jurassic Sauropod Dinosaurs". Science. 284 (5415): 798–800. Bibcode:1999Sci...284..798S. doi:10.1126/science.284.5415.798. PMID 10221910. Retrieved August 3, 2008.
  84. ^ Taylor, M. P. (2014). "Quantifying the effect of intervertebral cartilage on neutral posture in the necks of sauropod dinosaurs". PeerJ. 2: e712. doi:10.7717/peerj.712. PMC 4277489. PMID 25551027.
  85. ^ Spotila, J. R.; O'Connor, M. P.; Dodson, P. R.; Paladino, F. V. (1991). "Hot and cold running dinosaurs. Metabolism, body temperature, and migration". Modern Geology. 16: 203–227.
  86. ^ a b Wedel, M. J. (2003). "Vertebral Pneumaticity, Air Sacs, and the Physiology of Sauropod Dinosaurs" (PDF). Paleobiology. 29 (2): 243–255. doi:10.1666/0094-8373(2003)029<0243:vpasat>2.0.co;2. JSTOR 4096832. S2CID 46619244.
  87. ^ Curry, Kristina A. (1999). "Ontogenetic histology of Apatosaurus (Dinosauria: Sauropoda): new insights on growth rates and longevity". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 19 (4): 654–665. Bibcode:1999JVPal..19..654C. doi:10.1080/02724634.1999.10011179. JSTOR 4524036.
  88. ^ Lehman, T.M.; Woodward, H.N. (2008). "Modelling growth rates for sauropod dinosaurs" (PDF). Paleobiology. 34 (2): 264–281. doi:10.1666/0094-8373(2008)034[0264:MGRFSD]2.0.CO;2. S2CID 84163725.
  89. ^ Griebeler, EM; Klein, N; Sander, PM (2013). "Aging, Maturation and Growth of Sauropodomorph Dinosaurs as Deduced from Growth Curves Using Long Bone Histological Data: An Assessment of Methodological Constraints and Solutions". PLOS ONE. 8 (6): e67012. Bibcode:2013PLoSO...867012G. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0067012. PMC 3686781. PMID 23840575.
  90. ^ a b Upchurch, P.; Tomida, Y.; Barrett, P. M. (2005). "A new specimen of Apatosaurus ajax (Sauropoda: Diplodocidae) from the Morrison Formation (Upper Jurassic) of Wyoming, USA". National Science Museum Monographs. 26 (118): 1–156. ISSN 1342-9574.
  91. ^ Peterson, Olof August; Gilmore, Charles W. (1902). "Elosaurus parvus: a new genus and species of the Sauropoda". Annals of the Carnegie Museum. 1 (3): 490––499. doi:10.5962/p.78087. S2CID 145874092.
  92. ^ Griebeler, Eva Maria; Klein, Nicole; Sander, P. Martin (June 19, 2013). "Aging, Maturation and Growth of Sauropodomorph Dinosaurs as Deduced from Growth Curves Using Long Bone Histological Data: An Assessment of Methodological Constraints and Solutions". PLOS ONE. 8 (6): e67012. Bibcode:2013PLoSO...867012G. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0067012. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC 3686781. PMID 23840575.
  93. ^ Zimmer, C. (November 1997). "Dinosaurs in Motion". Discover. Retrieved July 27, 2008.
  94. ^ Myhrvold, Nathan P.; Currie, Philip J. (1997). "Supersonic sauropods? Tail dynamics in the diplodocids". Paleobiology. 23 (4): 393–409. Bibcode:1997Pbio...23..393M. doi:10.1017/S0094837300019801. ISSN 0094-8373. S2CID 83696153.
  95. ^ Rega, E. (2012). "Disease in Dinosaurs". In Brett-Surman, M.; Holtz, T.; Farlow, J. (eds.). The Complete Dinosaur. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  96. ^ Baron, Matthew G. (October 3, 2021). "Tactile tails: a new hypothesis for the function of the elongate tails of diplodocid sauropods". Historical Biology. 33 (10): 2057–2066. doi:10.1080/08912963.2020.1769092. ISSN 0891-2963. S2CID 219762797.
  97. ^ Klein, Nicole; Christian, Andreas; Sander, P. Martin (December 23, 2012). "Histology shows that elongated neck ribs in sauropod dinosaurs are ossified tendons". Biology Letters. 8 (6): 1032–1035. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2012.0778. ISSN 1744-9561. PMC 3497149. PMID 23034173.
  98. ^ "So what were apatosaurs doing with their crazy necks?". Sauropod Vertebra Picture of the Week. September 14, 2015. Retrieved June 17, 2023.
  99. ^ Hone, D. W. E., & Naish, D. (2013). The ‘species recognition hypothesis’ does not explain the presence and evolution of exaggerated structures in non‐avialan dinosaurs. Journal of Zoology 290(3):172-180.
  100. ^ Simmons, Robert E.; Scheepers, Lue (1996). "Winning by a Neck: Sexual Selection in the Evolution of Giraffe". The American Naturalist. 148 (5): 771–786. doi:10.1086/285955. ISSN 0003-0147. JSTOR 2463405. S2CID 84406669.
  101. ^ Trujillo, K. C.; Chamberlain, K. R.; Strickland, A. (2006). "Oxfordian U/Pb ages from SHRIMP analysis for the Upper Jurassic Morrison Formation of southeastern Wyoming with implications for biostratigraphic correlations". Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. 38 (6): 7.
  102. ^ Bilbey, S. A. (1998). "Cleveland-Lloyd Dinosaur Quarry – age, stratigraphy and depositional environments". In Carpenter, K.; Chure, D.; Kirkland, J. I. (eds.). The Morrison Formation: An Interdisciplinary Study. Modern Geology 22. Taylor and Francis Group. pp. 87–120. ISSN 0026-7775.
  103. ^ Russell, Dale A. (1989). An Odyssey in Time: Dinosaurs of North America. Minocqua, Wisconsin: NorthWord Press. pp. 64–70. ISBN 978-1-55971-038-1.
  104. ^ Mateus, Octávio (2006). "Jurassic dinosaurs from the Morrison Formation (USA), the Lourinhã and Alcobaça Formations (Portugal), and the Tendaguru Beds (Tanzania): A comparison". In Foster, John R.; Lucas, Spencer G. (eds.). Paleontology and Geology of the Upper Jurassic Morrison Formation. New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science Bulletin, 36. Albuquerque, New Mexico: New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science. pp. 223–231.
  105. ^ Dodson, Peter; Behrensmeyer, A.K.; Bakker, Robert T.; McIntosh, John S. (1980). "Taphonomy and paleoecology of the dinosaur beds of the Jurassic Morrison Formation". Paleobiology. 6 (2): 208–232. Bibcode:1980Pbio....6..208D. doi:10.1017/S009483730000676X. S2CID 130686856.
  106. ^ Turner, C.E. and Peterson, F., (1999). "Biostratigraphy of dinosaurs in the Upper Jurassic Morrison Formation of the Western Interior, U.S.A." Pp. 77–114 in Gillette, D. D. (ed.), Vertebrate Paleontology in Utah. Utah Geological Survey Miscellaneous Publication 99-1.
  107. ^ a b Foster, John (2007). Jurassic West: The Dinosaurs of the Morrison Formation and Their World. Indiana University Press. pp. 273–329. ISBN 978-0-253-34870-8.
  108. ^ Chure, Daniel J.; Litwin, Ron; Hasiotis, Stephen T.; Evanoff, Emmett; Carpenter, Kenneth (2006). "The fauna and flora of the Morrison Formation: 2006". In Foster, John R.; Lucas, Spencer G. (eds.). Paleontology and Geology of the Upper Jurassic Morrison Formation. New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science Bulletin, 36. Albuquerque, New Mexico: New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science. pp. 233–248.
  109. ^ Carpenter, Kenneth (2006). "Biggest of the big: a critical re-evaluation of the mega-sauropod Amphicoelias fragillimus". In Foster, John R.; Lucas, Spencer G. (eds.). Paleontology and Geology of the Upper Jurassic Morrison Formation. New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science Bulletin, 36. Albuquerque, New Mexico: New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science. pp. 131–138.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Apatosaurinae&oldid=1175510196"