Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1-san (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 18:50, 24 March 2007

1-san

A character created on a message board which doesn't seem to be verifiable or having. There was a VFD 2 years ago here. Seems like if some sort of reliable source was available on the subject, it would've been noted already. There's already a mention of it in the 2ch article and I don't think this passes WP:ATT on its own so delete. Wickethewok 21:52, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. ⇒ SWATJester ^{On Belay!} 23:51, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. There are two books on 2ch AA characters commercially available that I know of (both in Japanese). Shift_JIS art lists both in its further reading section. Those should be considered reliable sources. Also, this nomination does not say what has changed (presumably for the worse) since the previous nomination, which resulted in a keep. — Gwalla | Talk 03:33, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Consesus can change and the article was still entirely unsourced and unnecessary. Wickethewok 04:00, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions. -- Neier 12:06, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Richard Cavell 03:58, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I've read over both the article and the previous deletion discussion, and I understand the arguments that led to the "keep" result. It might be notable, its totally out of my field of interest or expertise so I don't know, but the problem is it has no sources at all and therefore is deletable as original research. Correct me if I'm wrong. --Tractor kings fan 20:20, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If this is notable, someone with knowledge of the subject should be able to come up with references to prove it. Delete if that hasn't happened by the time this AfD expires. --Selket ^Talk 01:26, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- References are the aforementioned books, and the corresponding article on Japanese Wikipedia: ja:1さん. — Gwalla | Talk 05:09, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. SakotGrimshine 18:50, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 *If this is notable, someone with knowledge of the subject should be able to come up with references to prove it.  '''Delete''' if that hasn't happened by the time this AfD expires.  --'''[[User:Selket|Selket]]''' <sup>[[User_talk:Selket|Talk]]</sup> 01:26, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
 ** References are the aforementioned books, and the corresponding article on Japanese Wikipedia: [[:ja:1さん]]. &mdash; [[User:Gwalla|Gwalla]] | [[User talk:Gwalla|Talk]] 05:09, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
+*'''Delete''' per nom. [[User:SakotGrimshine|SakotGrimshine]] 18:50, 24 March 2007 (UTC)