User talk:Director: Difference between revisions
Tag: Reverted |
Tag: Reverted |
||
Line 83: | Line 83: | ||
:::Here's the thing: they wore both. At least the Skanderbegs and similar "international" SS units did. On the collar or right sleeve you had the divisional patch (with very few exceptions white symbol on black) - and on the left some sort of national arms. This was the case with the Bosniak Handschar and Kama divisions (who carried the Croatian checkerboard), and the Skanderbegs with their Albanian black-on-red double-headed eagle. Sometimes they had both, sometimes they didn't, but either way those are two different patches both of which would ideally be worn [https:/upwiki/wikipedia/commons/1/13/Celler_Garnison_Museum_Celle_Niedersachsen_29_Germany_German_WW2_uniforms_Africa_Middle_East%2C_13th_SS_Handschar_Division%2C_fez%2C_Wehrmacht_Afrikkorps_etc._Photo_www.euro-t-guide.com_2009_Free_use_No_known_copyright_restrictions.jpg][https://i.pinimg.com/564x/93/36/10/933610e7bfc177a14ec7d85eb0470f2a.jpg]. From the actual preserved militaria of the division, it's patch/symbol is obvious. Also have a look at the cover of a published book specifically dedicated to the history of the 21st [https://i.pinimg.com/564x/93/36/10/933610e7bfc177a14ec7d85eb0470f2a.jpg]. I'll grant you it's not Keegan, but neither does it contradict him because, from what I can gather - he only describes their ''vehicle symbol.'' Whereas, yes, the SS Divisions actually ''did,'' as a rule, have "logos". Their divisional insignia. Far from OR, I'd say this WP:BLUE. You can literally just look it up with a quick search. I figured this actual pennant of the Skanderbeg division would resolve the issue [http://www.spandaumilitariashop.com/ss-skanderbeg-pennant/]. <font face="Eras Bold ITC">-- [[User:Director|<span style="color:#353535">Director</span>]] <span style="color:#464646">([[User talk:Director|<span style="color:#464646">talk</span>]])</span></font> 10:23, 17 September 2023 (UTC) |
:::Here's the thing: they wore both. At least the Skanderbegs and similar "international" SS units did. On the collar or right sleeve you had the divisional patch (with very few exceptions white symbol on black) - and on the left some sort of national arms. This was the case with the Bosniak Handschar and Kama divisions (who carried the Croatian checkerboard), and the Skanderbegs with their Albanian black-on-red double-headed eagle. Sometimes they had both, sometimes they didn't, but either way those are two different patches both of which would ideally be worn [https:/upwiki/wikipedia/commons/1/13/Celler_Garnison_Museum_Celle_Niedersachsen_29_Germany_German_WW2_uniforms_Africa_Middle_East%2C_13th_SS_Handschar_Division%2C_fez%2C_Wehrmacht_Afrikkorps_etc._Photo_www.euro-t-guide.com_2009_Free_use_No_known_copyright_restrictions.jpg][https://i.pinimg.com/564x/93/36/10/933610e7bfc177a14ec7d85eb0470f2a.jpg]. From the actual preserved militaria of the division, it's patch/symbol is obvious. Also have a look at the cover of a published book specifically dedicated to the history of the 21st [https://i.pinimg.com/564x/93/36/10/933610e7bfc177a14ec7d85eb0470f2a.jpg]. I'll grant you it's not Keegan, but neither does it contradict him because, from what I can gather - he only describes their ''vehicle symbol.'' Whereas, yes, the SS Divisions actually ''did,'' as a rule, have "logos". Their divisional insignia. Far from OR, I'd say this WP:BLUE. You can literally just look it up with a quick search. I figured this actual pennant of the Skanderbeg division would resolve the issue [http://www.spandaumilitariashop.com/ss-skanderbeg-pennant/]. <font face="Eras Bold ITC">-- [[User:Director|<span style="color:#353535">Director</span>]] <span style="color:#464646">([[User talk:Director|<span style="color:#464646">talk</span>]])</span></font> 10:23, 17 September 2023 (UTC) |
||
::::It's not BLUE, and Spandau Militaria isn't a reliable source. [[User:Peacemaker67|Peacemaker67]] ([[User_talk:Peacemaker67|click to talk to me]]) 10:39, 17 September 2023 (UTC) |
::::It's not BLUE, and Spandau Militaria isn't a reliable source. [[User:Peacemaker67|Peacemaker67]] ([[User_talk:Peacemaker67|click to talk to me]]) 10:39, 17 September 2023 (UTC) |
||
:::::Now you're just wikilawyering. There is such a thing as common sense: the SS divisions had actual specific insignia as seperate from their vehicle symbols - and they're not a mystery. Looking at the matter more carefully I find these collar tabs (depicting Skanderbeg's fabulous helmet plumage) also appear [https://www.germanmilitaria.com/WaffenSS/photos/S008084A.jpg]. One way or another I don't see why we should use the vehicle symbol. The divisional insignia was certainly either a white eagle on black or the Skanderbeg's helmet - white-on-black. Just like virtually all SS Divisions. <font face="Eras Bold ITC">-- [[User:Director|<span style="color:#353535">Director</span>]] <span style="color:#464646">([[User talk:Director|<span style="color:#464646">talk</span>]])</span></font> 10:45, 17 September 2023 (UTC) |
:::::Now you're just wikilawyering. There is such a thing as common sense: the SS divisions had actual specific insignia as seperate from their vehicle symbols - and they're not a mystery. Looking at the matter more carefully I find these collar tabs (depicting Skanderbeg's fabulous helmet plumage) also appear [https://www.germanmilitaria.com/WaffenSS/photos/S008084A.jpg]. One way or another I don't see why we should use the vehicle symbol. The divisional insignia was certainly either a white eagle on black or the Skanderbeg's helmet - white-on-black. Just like virtually all SS Divisions. |
||
:::::If you want to be technical, Keegan isn't a "source" for this at all: he describes symbols they painted on vehicles, not the divisional emblem proper. <font face="Eras Bold ITC">-- [[User:Director|<span style="color:#353535">Director</span>]] <span style="color:#464646">([[User talk:Director|<span style="color:#464646">talk</span>]])</span></font> 10:45, 17 September 2023 (UTC) |
Revision as of 10:49, 17 September 2023
Sign (~~~~) before you save.
Home Talk Contributions Archives Make yourself at home.... | |||||
New Page Patrol survey
RfC started on WikiProject YugoslaviaSince you have taken part in substantial discussion on this matter, I am informing you that an RfC has been opened on WP Yugoslavia [1] RE:RenamingHello, Director. You have new messages at Talk:Draža Mihailović.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Merry Christmas
Spread the Christmas cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Re:Hello, Director. You have new messages at IvanOS's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! DecisiveVandalism on multiple articles now by Keith-264. Most prominent example: Second Battle of El Alamein The Bugle: Issue 209, September 2023
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Patches vs vehicle signsG'day Direktor. Please just work through the 21st one with me rather than going around reverting my work, which is based on reliable sources. I would appreciate it if you would revert the other one. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:35, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
|