User talk:Tayi Arajakate: Difference between revisions
→WikiCup 2023 September newsletter: new section Tag: |
Feedback Request Service notification on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment (1/1 this month). You can unsubscribe at WP:FRS. |
||
| Line 505: | Line 505: | ||
I will be standing down as a judge after the end of the contest. I think the Cup encourages productive editors to improve their contributions to Wikipedia and I hope that someone else will step up to take over the running of the Cup. [[User:Sturmvogel 66|Sturmvogel 66]] ([[User talk:Sturmvogel 66|talk]]), and [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) |
I will be standing down as a judge after the end of the contest. I think the Cup encourages productive editors to improve their contributions to Wikipedia and I hope that someone else will step up to take over the running of the Cup. [[User:Sturmvogel 66|Sturmvogel 66]] ([[User talk:Sturmvogel 66|talk]]), and [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) |
||
<!-- Message sent by User:Cwmhiraeth@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send&oldid=1172692052 --> |
<!-- Message sent by User:Cwmhiraeth@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send&oldid=1172692052 --> |
||
== Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment == |
|||
[[File:Internet-group-chat.svg|48px|left|alt=|link=]]Your feedback is requested  at [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#rfc_187BDE8|'''Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard'''  on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment]]. Thank you for helping out!<br/><small>You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of [[WP:FRS|Feedback Request Service]] subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by [[WP:FRS|removing your name]].</small> <!-- Template:FRS notification --><div class="paragraphbreak" style="margin-top:0.5em"></div> Message delivered to you with love by [[User:Yapperbot|Yapperbot]] :) | Is this wrong? Contact [[User talk:Naypta|my bot operator]]. | Sent at 17:31, 17 September 2023 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 17:31, 17 September 2023
Sanctions awareness
|
|---|
|
The editor is aware of the sanctions in the following topic(s) and should not be given alerts for those areas. |
Barnstars
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Did you know?
|
|---|
 On 23 July 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mumbai Mirror, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that 200,000 copies of the Mumbai Mirror were distributed on its inaugural print run in 2005, giving it the second-largest circulation in Mumbai? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mumbai Mirror. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Mumbai Mirror), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. On 27 January 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Radio Quarantine, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Radio Quarantine was founded in India by a group of professors, directors and PhD students in response to social isolation protocols following the outbreak of the coronavirus pandemic? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Radio Quarantine. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Radio Quarantine), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. On 20 January 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sangeeta Isvaran, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Bharatanatyam dancer Sangeeta Isvaran works with deprived communities and uses dance and theatre in an effort to bring about social reform? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sangeeta Isvaran. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Sangeeta Isvaran), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. On 17 January 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Thilagavathi, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the artist Thilagavathi teaches social interactions and facial expressions to children on the autism spectrum through Therukoothu folk-theatre performances? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Thilagavathi. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Thilagavathi), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. On 12 January 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Swati Thiyagarajan, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the environmental journalist Swati Thiyagarajan investigated claims of interspecies communication made by the conservationist Anna Breytenbach? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Swati Thiyagarajan. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Swati Thiyagarajan), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. On 8 December 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Salma (writer), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Salma wrote some of her works while sitting on the toilet, on pieces of paper ripped from calendars and notebooks? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Salma (writer). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Salma (writer)), and it may be added to the statistics page if it received over 400 views per hour. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Women in Red January 2023
 
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:04, 27 December 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Welcome to the 2023 WikiCup!
Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2023 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor you should be able to advance to at least the second round, improving your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page ready for you to take part. Any questions on the scoring, rules or anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:16, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:George Santos on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:30, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
February 2023 Labour Edit-a-thon
| 2023 WikiProject Organized Labour/Online Edit-A-Thon | |
|---|---|
 |
Hello, Tayi Arajakate! During the entire month of February there will be an ongoing edit-a-thon on all labour related projects across English Wikipedia and sister projects. Register to track your edits and sign up on the edit-a-thon's project page as a participant. To invite other participants paste {{subst:WPLABOR/2023}} on their talk page! This event is organized by WP:WikiProject Organized Labour |
~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 00:05, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red in February 2023
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:30, 30 January 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Like a Dragon: Ishin! on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 04:30, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Copyright contributor investigation and Good article reassessment
You are receiving this message because you were a Good article reviewer on at least one article that is part of Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/20210315 or you signed up for messages. An AN discussion closed with consensus to delist this group of Good articles for copyright and other problems, unless a reviewer opens an independent Good article reassessment and can vouch for/verify content of all sources. Please review Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/February 2023 for further information. A list of the GA reviewers can be found here. Questions or comments can be made at the project talk page. You can opt in or out of further messages at this page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:20, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Mahua Moitra
Please do not remove/undo adequately and real cited facts on a politician. Whatever I have cited are information that are in public domain. Since your bias is evident from your previous edits (or should I call it vandalism), I have tried to cite the best possible sources so that you don't flag my additions as poorly cited. But you went a step ahead and just removed the whole thing without giving any proper explanation. I believe, since politicians are public persons, it is important to cite facts. Your trying to remove my properly cited and factually true section shows your lack of knowledge on the topic and your evident bias. Kindly refrain from vandalising if you have no constructive things to add or suggest. We can engage upon this if you wish however I would appreciate that you let the real facts exist and keep the article unbiased. Encyclo Enthusiast (talk) 10:07, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
- The addition is a listing of unrelated arguments, incidents and other minor spats which was collated to create a novel premise that the person is "often been accused of using unparliamentary language". This is called synthesis and is prohibited. On top of that, the tone of the write-up, the weight given to individual incidents and the summarization of the sources are all inappropriate. To give an example, take the case of the "Susu Potty Republic" comment, the write-up is about 3 random twitter commentators not liking it (does not have weight) while the reason why she made the comment was omitted. (She appears to be accusing the government of damaging the rule of law because Twitter India offices were raided by the police after a party spokesperson's tweet was tagged as "manipulated media")
- Most of the sources can be flagged as poor as well (ranging from sensationalist tabloids to obscure and/or unreliable) but that's an afterthought at this point. The article is a BLP, and all additions need to strictly comply with policies, the tone should be dispassionate and minor and marginal issues or views should not be included or given undue prominence.
- I've removed the addition, the onus to gain consensus for inclusion is on you, the one who wants to include material, even if the material were to be "adequately and real cited facts". This is particularly relevant in a BLP article where such material should be immediately removed. Moreover when you make an addition and it is removed, you are expected to start a discussion and gain consensus for it before restoring it, per WP:BRD which you did not follow.
- If you have a problem with this and think that your addition is good, then I would highly recommend that you go to Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard and start a new section, where you can get input from other editors. Tayi Arajakate Talk 12:15, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red March 2023
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 12:55, 26 February 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
"Aruvithura" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Aruvithura has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 2 § Aruvithura until a consensus is reached. Jalen Folf (talk) 09:38, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
WikiCup 2023 March newsletter
So ends the first round of the 2023 WikiCup. Everyone with a positive score moved on to Round 2, with 54 contestants qualifying. The top scorers in Round 1 were:
Unlimitedlead with 1205 points, a WikiCup newcomer, led the field with two featured articles on historical figures and several featured article candidate reviews.
Epicgenius was in second place with 789 points; a seasoned WikiCup competitor he specialises in buildings and locations in New York.
FrB.TG was in third place with 625 points, garnered from a featured article on a filmmaker which qualified for an impressive number of bonus points.
TheJoebro64, another WikiCup newcomer, came next with 600 points gained from two featured articles on video games.
Iazyges was in fifth place with 532 points, from two featured articles on classical history.
The top sixteen contestants at the end of Round 1 had all scored over 300 points; these included 
LunaEatsTuna, 
Thebiguglyalien, 
Sammi Brie, 
Trainsandotherthings, 
Lee Vilenski, 
Juxlos, 
Unexpectedlydian, 
SounderBruce, 
Kosack, 
BennyOnTheLoose and 
PCN02WPS. It was a high-scoring start to the competition.
These contestants, like all the others, now have to start again from scratch. The first round finished on February 26. Remember that any content promoted after that date but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Some contestants made claims before the new submissions pages were set up, and they will need to resubmit them. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.
If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:37, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
I have added sources
Thank you for reviewing my article on Maulana Saad. I have added sources and citations to my writing. The previous one did not. Due2myweakness (talk) 00:03, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
If you have questions please ask
you've made a number of mistaken assumptions and I am rather curious why you are so emotional about all those things you think I am. I would encourage you to take a deeper look next time you judge someone. If you are in journalism you should care about speaking the truth hmm? Have a good day Elinruby (talk) 13:16, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
Elinruby (talk) Elinruby (talk) 13:16, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
Radio Quarantine
I was looking at this page for a possible future GA review and got the distinct impression that the two Radio Quarantines are unrelated except for name and purpose. Would they be better off as separate articles? I see a scope issue relevant for GA. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 01:42, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
- Hi Sammi Brie, sorry for the late response. I'm not sure what to make of it. I could make the article be about the Kolkata based radio and move the Bangalore based one to the article on Yashas Shetty since I don't think the latter would be independently notable.
- When I first made the article, I had seen The Economist article and Scroll.in article, and gotten the impression that they are two stations of the same organisation, since only these two sources had covered the Bangalore based one, had done so alongside the Kolkata based one and placed them in the same context, without clarity that they may be separate and just namesakes. I later realised after a second look at the Scroll.in article that neither of the sources had mentioned a direct organisational link and that there's also a New Indian Express article which solely covers Shetty and his radio, so I restructured the article in that order.
- So what do you think? Tayi Arajakate Talk 09:41, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
- I think it's time to split: Radio Quarantine Kolkata and The Radio Quarantine (split the latter out, then move Radio Quarantine to the former and put a dabpage after repointing links). Judging by the content, the latter article will be shorter than the former, and the Kolkata one would probably be the one to continue at GA. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 17:35, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
- Sammi Brie, I've split the page now. Tayi Arajakate Talk 17:50, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
- I think it's time to split: Radio Quarantine Kolkata and The Radio Quarantine (split the latter out, then move Radio Quarantine to the former and put a dabpage after repointing links). Judging by the content, the latter article will be shorter than the former, and the Kolkata one would probably be the one to continue at GA. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 17:35, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red April 2023
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:53, 27 March 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Your GA nomination of Radio Quarantine Kolkata
The article Radio Quarantine Kolkata you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Radio Quarantine Kolkata and Talk:Radio Quarantine Kolkata/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 05:01, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Radio Quarantine Kolkata
The article Radio Quarantine Kolkata you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Radio Quarantine Kolkata for comments about the article, and Talk:Radio Quarantine Kolkata/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 17:03, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:The Grayzone on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:40, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
Love jihad
This edit should be incorporated into the Wikipedia Love jihad article which is extended confirmed protected. Please do so!-2406:7400:98:395:2407:4AEA:6F30:4872 (talk) 09:27, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red May 2023
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:30, 27 April 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
WikiCup 2023 May newsletter
The second round of the 2023 WikiCup has now finished. Contestants needed to have scored 60 points to advance into round 3. Our top five scorers in round 2 all included a featured article among their submissions and each scored over 500 points. They were:
- Iazyges (1040) with three FAs on Byzantine emperors, and lots of bonus points.
- Unlimitedlead (847), with three FAs on ancient history, one GA and nine reviews.
- Epicgenius (636), a WikiCup veteran, with one FA on the New Amsterdam Theatre, four GAs and eleven DYKs
- BennyOnTheLoose (553), a seasoned competitor, with one FA on snooker, six GAs and seven reviews.
- FrB.TG (525), with one FA, a Lady Gaga song and a mass of bonus points.
Other notable performances were put in by Sammi Brie, Thebiguglyalien, 
MyCatIsAChonk, PCN02WPS, and 
AirshipJungleman29.
So far contestants have achieved thirteen featured articles between them, one being a joint effort, and forty-nine good articles. The judges are pleased with the thorough reviews that are being performed, and have hardly had to reject any. As we enter the third round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed in round 3. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them.
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:15, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Removal of [failed verification] tags
You removed two tags from this page here, without providing any proof of sourcing, with the edit summary "rv disruptive cite tagging". Firstly, do not make frivolous allegations of disruptive editing when it is obvious no such editing has occurred. However, removing legitimate tags by claiming them to be disruptive does fall under WP:DE, and you should be careful of your own conduct.
Before removing those tags again, kindly elucidate on the talk page of that article as to which section of the paper the statements are cited to. As of now it seems to only be possible through WP:SYNTH, as none of what is stated is directly supported by the source. Captain Jack Sparrow (talk) 06:39, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- There is a source cited with all the details present in it and the stated lines are an accurate summary of the cited chapter. If you have any problems or believe there are inaccuracies in how the source is summarised, you are free to bring them on the talk page but stamping multiple "failed verification" tags on such a sentence is very clear disruptive cite tagging 101. Tayi Arajakate Talk 07:19, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- For the policy you cited, theres a difference in Failed verification and Citation needed - "Citation needed" when citation exists is clear disruption; "Failed verification" when citation exists is a way to allow possibly wrongly sourced material to be justified/modified without engaging in deletion of material. I have replied to your content based concerns on the Talk page of the article. Captain Jack Sparrow (talk) 08:10, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- Using a "failed verification" tag instead of "citation needed" to do the exact same thing does not make it not disruptive. Tayi Arajakate Talk 08:47, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- For the policy you cited, theres a difference in Failed verification and Citation needed - "Citation needed" when citation exists is clear disruption; "Failed verification" when citation exists is a way to allow possibly wrongly sourced material to be justified/modified without engaging in deletion of material. I have replied to your content based concerns on the Talk page of the article. Captain Jack Sparrow (talk) 08:10, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Tks
heyy, Tayi...
We need to add many things to the article, many things happend between these days.
- Pm modi supported this film in his political rally.[1]
- Film got tax free in Madhya Pradesh.[2]
- Film got banned in west bengal.[3]
- Threatre owners said they will not screen this film in Tamil Nadu.[4]
- Reference about that fictional storyline in disclaimer of film has been reported by The Hindu.[5]
- In this report of The Wire [6] they said
"The figure of 32,000 recruits from India, and the assertion that a large number of them were women, is therefore absurd – all the more so because estimates by the European Union and the Central Intelligence Agency in the US have put the maximum strength of the IS at its height at around 30,000"
citing this report [7].
Tousif ❯❯❯ Talk 13:47, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- Okay I'll look into it tomorrow. Tayi Arajakate Talk 18:15, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
References
- ^ "PM Modi cites The Kerala Story, says Congress standing with terrorists". India Today. Retrieved 2023-05-08.
- ^ "The Kerala Story declared tax-free in Madhya Pradesh, announces CM Shivraj Singh Chouhan". India Today. Retrieved 2023-05-08.
- ^ "Mamata Banerjee announces ban on The Kerala Story in West Bengal, film producer reacts". Hindustan Times. 2023-05-08. Retrieved 2023-05-08.
- ^ "Theatre Owners To Stop Screening Of "The Kerala Story" In Tamil Nadu". NDTV.com. Retrieved 2023-05-08.
- ^ "More than a story: on the film, The Kerala Story, and the demand that it be banned". The Hindu. 2023-05-07. ISSN 0971-751X. Retrieved 2023-05-08.
- ^ "Modi's Backing of Inflammatory, Fictional 'Kerala Story' Highlights Pressing Need for Opposition Unity". The Wire. Retrieved 2023-05-10.
- ^ "- INSIDE THE MIND OF ISIS: UNDERSTANDING ITS GOALS AND IDEOLOGY TO BETTER PROTECT THE HOMELAND". www.govinfo.gov. Retrieved 2023-05-10.
The Kashmir Files
I was just about to revert it, but it seems you have faster fingers than mine 😅 — DaxServer (t · m · c) 07:12, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
- Better luck next time. :p Tayi Arajakate Talk 04:21, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
WikiProject Women in Green June 2023 Good Article Editathon notification
Hello Tayi Arajakate:
WikiProject Women in Green is holding a month-long Good Article Editathon event in June 2023!
Running from June 1 to 30, 2023, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) editathon event – another Wildcard Edition! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to any and all women and women's works during the event period. Want to improve an article about a Bollywood actress? Go for it. A pioneering female climate scientist? Absolutely. An award-winning book or film by a woman? Yes! GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to receive a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.
We hope to see you there!
You are receiving this message as a member of the WikiProject Women in Green. You can remove yourself from receiving notifications here.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red - June 2023
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 09:17, 28 May 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:October Surprise conspiracy theory on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:31, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red July 2023
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:44, 27 June 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:PragerU on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 08:30, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
WikiCup 2023 July newsletter
The third round of the 2023 WikiCup has come to an end. The 16 users who made it to the fourth round had at least 175 points. Our top scorers in round 3 were:
- Thebiguglyalien, with 919 points from a featured article on Frances Cleveland as well as five good articles and many reviews,
- Unlimitedlead, with 862 points from a high-scoring featured articles on Henry II of England and numerous reviews,
- Iazyges, with 560 points from a high-scoring featured article on Tiberius III.
Contestants achieved 11 featured articles, 2 featured lists, 47 good articles, 72 featured or good article reviews, over 100 DYKs and 40 ITN appearances. As always, any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met. Please also remember that all submissions must meet core Wikipedia policies, regardless of the review process.
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:18, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red 8th Anniversary
|
|
Women in Red 8th Anniversary |
| In July 2015 around 15.5% of the English Wikipedia's biographies were about women. As of July 2023, 19.61% of the English Wikipedia's biographies are about women. That's a lot of biographies created in the effort to close the gender gap. Happy 8th Anniversary! Join us for some virtual cake and add comments or memories and please keep on editing to close the gap! |
--Lajmmoore (talk) 11:02, 18 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red August 2023
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 19:26, 28 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive
| Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive |  |
August 2023 Backlog Drive:
| |
| Other ways to participate: | |
| You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. | |
Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:30, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
September 2023 at Women in Red
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Victuallers (talk) 16:59, 25 August 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
WikiCup 2023 September newsletter
The fourth round of the competition has finished, with anyone scoring less than 673 points being eliminated. It was a high scoring round with all but one of the contestants who progressed to the final having achieved an FA during the round. The highest scorers were
- Epicgenius, with 2173 points topping the scores, gained mainly from a featured article, 38 good articles and 9 DYKs. He was followed by
- Sammi Brie, with 1575 points, gained mainly from a featured article, 28 good articles and 50 good article reviews. Close behind was
- Thebiguglyalien, with 1535 points mainly gained from a featured article, 15 good articles, 26 good article reviews and lots of bonus points.
Between them during round 4, contestants achieved 12 featured articles, 3 featured lists, 3 featured pictures, 126 good articles, 46 DYK entries, 14 ITN entries, 67 featured article candidate reviews and 147 good article reviews. Congratulations to our eight finalists and all who participated! It was a generally high-scoring and productive round and I think we can expect a highly competitive finish to the competition.
Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them and within 24 hours of the end of the final. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.
I will be standing down as a judge after the end of the contest. I think the Cup encourages productive editors to improve their contributions to Wikipedia and I hope that someone else will step up to take over the running of the Cup. Sturmvogel 66 (talk), and Cwmhiraeth (talk)
Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:31, 17 September 2023 (UTC)