Jump to content

Chewing gum sales ban in Singapore: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Duplicate word removed
Tag: Reverted
ce, ungarble, grammar, syntax, WP:ENGVAR
Tag: Reverted
Line 3: Line 3:
{{Use Singapore English|date=March 2021}}
{{Use Singapore English|date=March 2021}}


The sales of [[chewing gum]] has generally not been available in Singapore since 1992. Contrary to a common misconception, the consumption of chewing gum is not illegal in Singapore, but rather to import it and sell it, apart from the aforementioned exceptions.<ref>{{cite web |title=Why Chewing Gum Is Not Allowed in Singapore |website= Chewing Gum Facts |url= http://www.chewinggumfacts.com/chewing-gum-facts/chewing-gum-in-singapore |access-date=2 November 2018 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20180930225032/http://www.chewinggumfacts.com/chewing-gum-facts/chewing-gum-in-singapore/ |archive-date=30 September 2018 |url-status=live}}</ref> It is also permitted for a traveler, be it a returning local or a tourist, to bring in a small amount of chewing gum for their own personal consumption, although there is a fine for spitting the gum out in an inappropriate public place.<ref>{{Cite news |date=2015-03-28 |title=Why Singapore banned chewing gum |language=en-GB |work=BBC News |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-32090420 |access-date=2023-07-06}}</ref>
[[Chewing gum]] has generally not been available for sale in Singapore since 1992. Contrary to a common misconception, it is not the consumption of chewing gum that is illegal in Singapore, but rather its importation and sale.<ref>{{cite web |title=Why Chewing Gum Is Not Allowed in Singapore |website= Chewing Gum Facts |url= http://www.chewinggumfacts.com/chewing-gum-facts/chewing-gum-in-singapore |access-date=2 November 2018 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20180930225032/http://www.chewinggumfacts.com/chewing-gum-facts/chewing-gum-in-singapore/ |archive-date=30 September 2018 |url-status=live}}</ref> It is also permitted for a traveller, whether returning local or tourist, to bring in a small amount of chewing gum for their own personal consumption, although there is a fine for spitting the gum out in an inappropriate public place.<ref>{{Cite news |date=2015-03-28 |title=Why Singapore banned chewing gum |work=BBC News |url= https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-32090420 |access-date=2023-07-06}}</ref>


The ban was first enacted under the premiership of [[Goh Chok Tong]]. Some motivations for the ban included stopping the placement of used chewing gum in inappropriate and costly places, such as the sensors of [[Mass Rapid Transit (Singapore)|Mass Rapid Transit]] (MRT) train doors, inside lock cylinders, and on lift buttons. The ban was relaxed in 2004 when an exceptions was made for therapeutic, dental, and nicotine chewing gums<ref>{{cite web |publisher= Civil Aviation Authority Singapore |year=2010 |title= National Regulations and Requirements Gen 1.3: Entry, Transit and Departure of Passenger and Crew |url= http://www.caas.gov.sg/caasWeb2010/export/sites/caas/en/Regulations/Aeronautical_Information/AIP/general/gen1/GEN_1.3.pdf |url-status=live |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20150923195750/http://www.caas.gov.sg/caasWeb2010/export/sites/caas/en/Regulations/Aeronautical_Information/AIP/general/gen1/GEN_1.3.pdf |archive-date=23 September 2015 }}</ref> which can be bought from a doctor or registered pharmacist.
The ban was first enacted under the premiership of [[Goh Chok Tong]]. Reasons for the ban included stopping the placement of used chewing gum in inappropriate and costly places, such as the sensors of [[Mass Rapid Transit (Singapore)|Mass Rapid Transit]] (MRT) train doors, inside lock cylinders, and on lift buttons. The ban was relaxed in 2004 when an exception was made for therapeutic, dental, and nicotine chewing gums,<ref>{{cite web |publisher= Civil Aviation Authority Singapore |year=2010 |title= National Regulations and Requirements Gen 1.3: Entry, Transit and Departure of Passenger and Crew |url= http://www.caas.gov.sg/caasWeb2010/export/sites/caas/en/Regulations/Aeronautical_Information/AIP/general/gen1/GEN_1.3.pdf |url-status=live |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20150923195750/http://www.caas.gov.sg/caasWeb2010/export/sites/caas/en/Regulations/Aeronautical_Information/AIP/general/gen1/GEN_1.3.pdf |archive-date=23 September 2015 }}</ref> which can be bought from a doctor or registered pharmacist.
==Origins==
==Origins==
===Lee Kuan Yew===
===Lee Kuan Yew===
In his memoirs,<ref>Lee Kuan Yew (2000). ''From Third World to First: The Singapore Story''. {{ISBN|0-06-019776-5}}</ref> [[Lee Kuan Yew]] said that in 1983, when he was [[Prime Minister of Singapore]], a proposal for the ban was brought to him by [[Teh Cheang Wan]], then [[Minister for National Development (Singapore)|Minister for National Development]]. Chewing gum was causing maintenance problems in high-rise [[Housing and Development Board|public-housing]] apartments, with vandals disposing of spent gum in mailboxes, inside keyholes, and on lift buttons. Chewing gum left on the ground, stairways, and pavements in public areas increased the cost of cleaning and damaged cleaning equipment. Gum stuck on the seats of public buses was also considered a problem. However, Lee thought that a ban would be "too drastic".
In his memoirs,<ref>Lee Kuan Yew (2000). ''From Third World to First: The Singapore Story''. {{ISBN|0-06-019776-5}}</ref> [[Lee Kuan Yew]] said that in 1983, when he was [[Prime Minister of Singapore]], a proposal for the ban was brought to him by [[Teh Cheang Wan]], then [[Minister for National Development (Singapore)|Minister for National Development]]. Chewing gum was causing maintenance problems in high-rise [[Housing and Development Board|public-housing]] apartments, with vandals disposing of spent gum in mailboxes, inside keyholes, and on lift buttons. Chewing gum left on the ground, stairways, and pavements in public areas increased the cost of cleaning and damaged cleaning equipment. Gum stuck on the seats of public buses was also a problem. However, Lee thought that a ban would be "too drastic".


===Mass Rapid Transit (MRT) and implementation===
===Mass Rapid Transit (MRT) and implementation===
In 1987, the $5 billion local railway system, the [[Mass Rapid Transit (Singapore)|Mass Rapid Transit]] (MRT), started running. It was then the largest public project ever implemented in Singapore.
In 1987, the $5 billion local railway system, the [[Mass Rapid Transit (Singapore)|Mass Rapid Transit]] (MRT), started operating. It was then the largest public project ever implemented in Singapore.


It was reported that vandals had begun sticking chewing gum on the door sensors of MRT trains, preventing doors from functioning properly and causing disruption to train services. Such incidents were rare but costly, and the culprits were difficult to apprehend. In January 1992, [[Goh Chok Tong]], who had just taken over as Prime Minister, decided on a ban. The restriction on the distribution of chewing gum was enacted in Singapore Statute Chapter 57, the ''Control of Manufacture Act'', which also governs the restriction of certain [[alcohol (drug)|alcohol]] and [[tobacco]] products.<ref>{{Cite web |url= https://sso.agc.gov.sg/Act/CMA1959 |title=Control of Manufacture Act |website= Singapore Statutes Online |access-date=5 April 2018 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20180405153243/https://sso.agc.gov.sg/Act/CMA1959 |archive-date=5 April 2018 |url-status=live }}</ref>
It was reported that vandals had been sticking chewing gum on the door sensors of MRT trains, preventing the doors from functioning properly and causing disruption to train services. Such incidents were rare but costly, and the culprits were difficult to apprehend. In January 1992, [[Goh Chok Tong]], who had just taken over as Prime Minister, decided on a ban. The restriction on the distribution of chewing gum was enacted in Singapore Statute Chapter 57, the ''Control of Manufacture Act'', which also governs the restriction of certain [[alcohol (drug)|alcohol]] and [[tobacco]] products.<ref>{{Cite web |url= https://sso.agc.gov.sg/Act/CMA1959 |title=Control of Manufacture Act |website= Singapore Statutes Online |access-date=5 April 2018 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20180405153243/https://sso.agc.gov.sg/Act/CMA1959 |archive-date=5 April 2018 |url-status=live }}</ref>


==Results==
==Results==
After the ban was announced, the importation of chewing gum was immediately halted. After a transition period allowing shops to clear existing stock, the sale of chewing gum was completely banned, the penalties being fines of up to S$2,000 for those convicted of selling chewing gum as well as fines and/or jail terms for importers. Extant stocks of gum were confiscated.<ref>{{cite web |url= https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/infopedia/articles/SIP_2014-04-07_091840.html |title= Chewing gum ban |first=Sharon |last=Teng |date=7 April 2014 |work=Singapore Infopedia |publisher= National Library Board}}</ref>
After the ban was announced, the importation of chewing gum was immediately halted. After a transition period allowing shops to clear existing stock, the sale of chewing gum was completely banned, the penalties being fines of up to S$2,000 for those convicted of selling chewing gum as well as fines and/or jail terms for importers. Extant stocks of gum were confiscated.<ref>{{cite web |url= https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/infopedia/articles/SIP_2014-04-07_091840.html |title= Chewing gum ban |first=Sharon |last=Teng |date=7 April 2014 |work=Singapore Infopedia |publisher= National Library Board}}</ref>


When first introduced, the ban caused much controversy and some open defiance. Some people decided on traveling to neighbouring countries to purchase chewing gum. No [[black market]] for chewing gum in Singapore ever emerged however, though some Singaporeans occasionally still manage to bring in some chewing gum from neighbouring countries for their own consumption. Subsequent to the ban, town councils reported a substantial decrease in chewing-gum litter in public spaces, and chewing gum no longer jammed lift doors or disrupted MRT systems.<ref>{{Cite news |url= http://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/Digitised/Article/straitstimes19911231-1.2.2 |title=Chewing gum to be banned |work=The Straits Times |location= Singapore |first=Dominic |last=Nathan |page=1 |date=31 December 1991}}</ref>
When first introduced, the ban caused much controversy and some open defiance. Some people decided to travel to neighbouring countries to buy chewing gum. But no [[black market]] for chewing gum in Singapore ever emerged, though some Singaporeans occasionally still manage to bring in some chewing gum from neighbouring countries for their own consumption. After the ban, town councils reported a substantial decrease in chewing-gum litter in public spaces, and chewing gum no longer jammed lift doors or disrupted MRT systems.<ref>{{Cite news |url= http://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/Digitised/Article/straitstimes19911231-1.2.2 |title=Chewing gum to be banned |work=The Straits Times |location= Singapore |first=Dominic |last=Nathan |page=1 |date=31 December 1991}}</ref>


The ban has since been partially lifted, as some types of gum are allowable, such as gum chewed for dental health. However, the government refuses to completely lift the ban due to the risk of gum littering again.
The ban has since been partially lifted, as some types of gum are allowable, such as gum chewed for dental health. However, the government refuses to completely lift the ban due to the risk of gum littering again.


==International attention==
==International attention==
In the mid 1990s, Singapore's laws began to receive international press coverage. US media paid great attention to the case of [[Michael P. Fay]], an American teenager sentenced in 1994 to [[Caning_in_Singapore|caning]] in Singapore for [[vandalism]] (using spray paint, not chewing gum). They also drew attention to some of Singapore's other laws, including the "mandatory flushing of public toilets" rule.<ref>{{Cite news |url= https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-32090420 |title=Why Singapore banned chewing gum |last=Metz |first=Elle |date=28 March 2015 |website=BBC News |access-date=31 July 2016 |url-status=live |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20160701044729/http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-32090420 |archive-date=1 July 2016}}</ref> Confused reporting about these issues led to the myth that the use or importation of chewing gum is itself punishable with caning. In fact, the only penalties provided under Chapter 57 are fines and imprisonment, in addition to being hardly enforced.<ref>{{cite web |title=Regulation of Imports and Exports (Chewing Gum) Regulations |website= Singapore Statutes Online |url= http://statutes.agc.gov.sg/aol/search/display/view.w3p;ident=cbefa04c-7341-4a57-9762-15d39db691e6;page=0;query=DocId%3A%22125e649f-9e18-4cd1-9950-619cd8e2e0a1%22%20Status%3Ainforce%20Depth%3A0;rec=0 |url-status=live |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20151011165648/http://statutes.agc.gov.sg/aol/search/display/view.w3p;ident=cbefa04c-7341-4a57-9762-15d39db691e6;page=0;query=DocId%3A%22125e649f-9e18-4cd1-9950-619cd8e2e0a1%22%20Status%3Ainforce%20Depth%3A0;rec=0-|archive-date=11 October 2015}}</ref>
In the mid 1990s, Singapore's laws began to receive international press coverage. US media paid great attention to the case of [[Michael P. Fay]], an American teenager sentenced in 1994 to [[Caning_in_Singapore|caning]] in Singapore for [[vandalism]] (using spray paint, not chewing gum). They also drew attention to some of Singapore's other laws, including the "mandatory flushing of public toilets" rule.<ref>{{Cite news |url= https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-32090420 |title=Why Singapore banned chewing gum |last=Metz |first=Elle |date=28 March 2015 |website=BBC News |access-date=31 July 2016 |url-status=live |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20160701044729/http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-32090420 |archive-date=1 July 2016}}</ref> Confused reporting about these issues led to the myth that the use or importation of chewing gum was itself punishable with caning. In fact, the only penalties provided under Chapter 57 are fines and imprisonment, rarely enforced in practice.<ref>{{cite web |title=Regulation of Imports and Exports (Chewing Gum) Regulations |website= Singapore Statutes Online |url= http://statutes.agc.gov.sg/aol/search/display/view.w3p;ident=cbefa04c-7341-4a57-9762-15d39db691e6;page=0;query=DocId%3A%22125e649f-9e18-4cd1-9950-619cd8e2e0a1%22%20Status%3Ainforce%20Depth%3A0;rec=0 |url-status=live |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20151011165648/http://statutes.agc.gov.sg/aol/search/display/view.w3p;ident=cbefa04c-7341-4a57-9762-15d39db691e6;page=0;query=DocId%3A%22125e649f-9e18-4cd1-9950-619cd8e2e0a1%22%20Status%3Ainforce%20Depth%3A0;rec=0-|archive-date=11 October 2015}}</ref>


When a BBC reporter suggested that such laws would stifle the people's creativity, Lee Kuan Yew said: "If you can't think because you can't chew, try a banana."<ref>{{cite news |url= http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/from_our_own_correspondent/820234.stm |work=BBC News |title=Singapore's elder statesman |date=5 July 2000 |access-date=28 April 2010 |url-status=live |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20100906071321/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/from_our_own_correspondent/820234.stm |archive-date=6 September 2010 }}</ref>
When a BBC reporter suggested that such laws would stifle the people's creativity, Lee Kuan Yew said: "If you can't think because you can't chew, try a banana."<ref>{{cite news |url= http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/from_our_own_correspondent/820234.stm |work=BBC News |title=Singapore's elder statesman |date=5 July 2000 |access-date=28 April 2010 |url-status=live |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20100906071321/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/from_our_own_correspondent/820234.stm |archive-date=6 September 2010 }}</ref>
Line 29: Line 29:
==Revision==
==Revision==
[[File:SingaporeUS FreeTrade.jpg|thumb|U.S. President [[George W. Bush]] and Singapore Prime Minister [[Goh Chok Tong]] sign a free trade agreement in the White House, 6 May 2003. White House photo by Tina Hager.]]
[[File:SingaporeUS FreeTrade.jpg|thumb|U.S. President [[George W. Bush]] and Singapore Prime Minister [[Goh Chok Tong]] sign a free trade agreement in the White House, 6 May 2003. White House photo by Tina Hager.]]
In 1999, United States President [[Bill Clinton]] and Singapore Prime Minister [[Goh Chok Tong]] agreed to initiate talks between the two countries for a bilateral free trade agreement (USS-FTA).<ref>Bill Clinton (2004). ''My Life''. Knopf. {{ISBN|0-375-41457-6}}.</ref> The talks later continued under the new administration of President [[George W. Bush]].
In 1999, United States President [[Bill Clinton]] and Singapore Prime Minister [[Goh Chok Tong]] agreed to initiate talks between the two countries for a bilateral free-trade agreement (USS-FTA).<ref>Bill Clinton (2004). ''My Life''. Knopf. {{ISBN|0-375-41457-6}}.</ref> The talks later continued under the administration of President [[George W. Bush]].


The [[Chicago, Illinois|Chicago]]-based [[Wm. Wrigley Jr. Company]] enlisted the help of a Washington, D.C. [[lobbyist]] and of Illinois Congressman [[Phil Crane]], then-[[chairman]] of the [[United States House Ways and Means Subcommittee on Trade]], to get chewing gum on the agenda of the [[United States-Singapore Free Trade Agreement]].<ref name=":0">{{Cite news |last=Prystay |first=Cris |title=At Long Last, Gum Is Legal in Singapore, But There Are Strings |url= https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB108629672446328324 |url-access= subscription |access-date=31 January 2023 |work=The Wall Street Journal |location=New York |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20160818072901/http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB108629672446328324 |archive-date=18 August 2016 |url-status=live }}</ref> This caused a dilemma for the Singapore Government. It recognised the health benefits of certain gums, such as a brand of sugar-free gum that contains [[calcium lactate]] to strengthen [[tooth enamel]]. Sale of this newly categorised medicinal gum was allowed, provided it was sold by a dentist or pharmacist, who must keep a record of the names of buyers.<ref name=":0"/>
The [[Chicago, Illinois|Chicago]]-based [[Wm. Wrigley Jr. Company]] enlisted the help of a Washington, D.C. [[lobbyist]] and of Illinois Congressman [[Phil Crane]], then-[[chairman]] of the [[United States House Ways and Means Subcommittee on Trade]], to get chewing gum on the agenda of the [[United States-Singapore Free Trade Agreement]].<ref name=":0">{{Cite news |last=Prystay |first=Cris |title=At Long Last, Gum Is Legal in Singapore, But There Are Strings |url= https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB108629672446328324 |url-access= subscription |access-date=31 January 2023 |work=The Wall Street Journal |location=New York |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20160818072901/http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB108629672446328324 |archive-date=18 August 2016 |url-status=live }}</ref> This caused a dilemma for the Singapore Government. It recognised the health benefits of certain gums, such as a brand of sugar-free gum that contains [[calcium lactate]] to strengthen [[tooth enamel]]. Sale of this newly categorised medicinal gum was allowed, provided it was sold by a dentist or pharmacist, who must keep a record of the names of buyers.<ref name=":0"/>

Revision as of 12:58, 18 September 2023

Chewing gum has generally not been available for sale in Singapore since 1992. Contrary to a common misconception, it is not the consumption of chewing gum that is illegal in Singapore, but rather its importation and sale.[1] It is also permitted for a traveller, whether returning local or tourist, to bring in a small amount of chewing gum for their own personal consumption, although there is a fine for spitting the gum out in an inappropriate public place.[2]

The ban was first enacted under the premiership of Goh Chok Tong. Reasons for the ban included stopping the placement of used chewing gum in inappropriate and costly places, such as the sensors of Mass Rapid Transit (MRT) train doors, inside lock cylinders, and on lift buttons. The ban was relaxed in 2004 when an exception was made for therapeutic, dental, and nicotine chewing gums,[3] which can be bought from a doctor or registered pharmacist.

Origins

Lee Kuan Yew

In his memoirs,[4] Lee Kuan Yew said that in 1983, when he was Prime Minister of Singapore, a proposal for the ban was brought to him by Teh Cheang Wan, then Minister for National Development. Chewing gum was causing maintenance problems in high-rise public-housing apartments, with vandals disposing of spent gum in mailboxes, inside keyholes, and on lift buttons. Chewing gum left on the ground, stairways, and pavements in public areas increased the cost of cleaning and damaged cleaning equipment. Gum stuck on the seats of public buses was also a problem. However, Lee thought that a ban would be "too drastic".

Mass Rapid Transit (MRT) and implementation

In 1987, the $5 billion local railway system, the Mass Rapid Transit (MRT), started operating. It was then the largest public project ever implemented in Singapore.

It was reported that vandals had been sticking chewing gum on the door sensors of MRT trains, preventing the doors from functioning properly and causing disruption to train services. Such incidents were rare but costly, and the culprits were difficult to apprehend. In January 1992, Goh Chok Tong, who had just taken over as Prime Minister, decided on a ban. The restriction on the distribution of chewing gum was enacted in Singapore Statute Chapter 57, the Control of Manufacture Act, which also governs the restriction of certain alcohol and tobacco products.[5]

Results

After the ban was announced, the importation of chewing gum was immediately halted. After a transition period allowing shops to clear existing stock, the sale of chewing gum was completely banned, the penalties being fines of up to S$2,000 for those convicted of selling chewing gum as well as fines and/or jail terms for importers. Extant stocks of gum were confiscated.[6]

When first introduced, the ban caused much controversy and some open defiance. Some people decided to travel to neighbouring countries to buy chewing gum. But no black market for chewing gum in Singapore ever emerged, though some Singaporeans occasionally still manage to bring in some chewing gum from neighbouring countries for their own consumption. After the ban, town councils reported a substantial decrease in chewing-gum litter in public spaces, and chewing gum no longer jammed lift doors or disrupted MRT systems.[7]

The ban has since been partially lifted, as some types of gum are allowable, such as gum chewed for dental health. However, the government refuses to completely lift the ban due to the risk of gum littering again.

International attention

In the mid 1990s, Singapore's laws began to receive international press coverage. US media paid great attention to the case of Michael P. Fay, an American teenager sentenced in 1994 to caning in Singapore for vandalism (using spray paint, not chewing gum). They also drew attention to some of Singapore's other laws, including the "mandatory flushing of public toilets" rule.[8] Confused reporting about these issues led to the myth that the use or importation of chewing gum was itself punishable with caning. In fact, the only penalties provided under Chapter 57 are fines and imprisonment, rarely enforced in practice.[9]

When a BBC reporter suggested that such laws would stifle the people's creativity, Lee Kuan Yew said: "If you can't think because you can't chew, try a banana."[10]

Revision

U.S. President George W. Bush and Singapore Prime Minister Goh Chok Tong sign a free trade agreement in the White House, 6 May 2003. White House photo by Tina Hager.

In 1999, United States President Bill Clinton and Singapore Prime Minister Goh Chok Tong agreed to initiate talks between the two countries for a bilateral free-trade agreement (USS-FTA).[11] The talks later continued under the administration of President George W. Bush.

The Chicago-based Wm. Wrigley Jr. Company enlisted the help of a Washington, D.C. lobbyist and of Illinois Congressman Phil Crane, then-chairman of the United States House Ways and Means Subcommittee on Trade, to get chewing gum on the agenda of the United States-Singapore Free Trade Agreement.[12] This caused a dilemma for the Singapore Government. It recognised the health benefits of certain gums, such as a brand of sugar-free gum that contains calcium lactate to strengthen tooth enamel. Sale of this newly categorised medicinal gum was allowed, provided it was sold by a dentist or pharmacist, who must keep a record of the names of buyers.[12]

References

  1. ^ "Why Chewing Gum Is Not Allowed in Singapore". Chewing Gum Facts. Archived from the original on 30 September 2018. Retrieved 2 November 2018.
  2. ^ "Why Singapore banned chewing gum". BBC News. 28 March 2015. Retrieved 6 July 2023.
  3. ^ "National Regulations and Requirements Gen 1.3: Entry, Transit and Departure of Passenger and Crew" (PDF). Civil Aviation Authority Singapore. 2010. Archived (PDF) from the original on 23 September 2015.
  4. ^ Lee Kuan Yew (2000). From Third World to First: The Singapore Story. ISBN 0-06-019776-5
  5. ^ "Control of Manufacture Act". Singapore Statutes Online. Archived from the original on 5 April 2018. Retrieved 5 April 2018.
  6. ^ Teng, Sharon (7 April 2014). "Chewing gum ban". Singapore Infopedia. National Library Board.
  7. ^ Nathan, Dominic (31 December 1991). "Chewing gum to be banned". The Straits Times. Singapore. p. 1.
  8. ^ Metz, Elle (28 March 2015). "Why Singapore banned chewing gum". BBC News. Archived from the original on 1 July 2016. Retrieved 31 July 2016.
  9. ^ "Regulation of Imports and Exports (Chewing Gum) Regulations". Singapore Statutes Online. Archived from the original on 11 October 2015.
  10. ^ "Singapore's elder statesman". BBC News. 5 July 2000. Archived from the original on 6 September 2010. Retrieved 28 April 2010.
  11. ^ Bill Clinton (2004). My Life. Knopf. ISBN 0-375-41457-6.
  12. ^ a b Prystay, Cris. "At Long Last, Gum Is Legal in Singapore, But There Are Strings". The Wall Street Journal. New York. Archived from the original on 18 August 2016. Retrieved 31 January 2023.

Further reading

  1. Ho Khai Leong (2003) Shared Responsibilities, Unshared Power: The Politics of Policy-Making in Singapore, ISBN 981-210-218-3.