Jump to content

User talk:Pioussouls: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 83: Line 83:
::Despite three declines the language has not improved, which leads me to suspect your only want to promote this person - use Wikipedia to [[WP:SPAM]]. This is not permitted.
::Despite three declines the language has not improved, which leads me to suspect your only want to promote this person - use Wikipedia to [[WP:SPAM]]. This is not permitted.
::As such, your article is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia and will not be considered further. <span style="background-color: RoyalBlue; border-radius: 1em; padding: 3px 3px 3px 3px;">'''[[User:Qcne|<span style="color: GhostWhite">Qcne</span>]]''' <small>[[User talk:Qcne|<span style="color: GhostWhite">(talk)</span>]]</small></span> 19:09, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
::As such, your article is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia and will not be considered further. <span style="background-color: RoyalBlue; border-radius: 1em; padding: 3px 3px 3px 3px;">'''[[User:Qcne|<span style="color: GhostWhite">Qcne</span>]]''' <small>[[User talk:Qcne|<span style="color: GhostWhite">(talk)</span>]]</small></span> 19:09, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
:::@[[User:Qcne|Qcne]] kindly can you please check and advise me i have completed all the parameters. But still no progress. [[User:Pioussouls|Pioussouls]] ([[User talk:Pioussouls#top|talk]]) 06:40, 23 September 2023 (UTC)


== Paid editing ==
== Paid editing ==

Revision as of 06:40, 23 September 2023

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox/Oleg Parashchak (September 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:58, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Pioussouls! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:58, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox/Oleg Parashchak (September 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rich Smith was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
- RichT|C|E-Mail 16:00, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

Information icon Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Oleg Parashchak, from its old location at User:Pioussouls/sandbox/Oleg Parashchak. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. - RichT|C|E-Mail 16:00, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon

Hello Pioussouls. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Pioussouls. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Pioussouls|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 331dot (talk) 17:01, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!
Thanks for your kind response.
Yes i want to use a paid template. As this person is notable and has various achievements.Kindly guide me further.
Thanks Pioussouls (talk) 17:06, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I will share the details of my client who hired me. It is a paid ones. Pioussouls (talk) 17:36, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The instructions in my above message explain how you can disclose.
Be advised that your draft has been rejected, which typically means it will not be considered further. No amount of editing can confer notability on a topic. If your payment depended on you succeeding in creating an article, I suggest that you return their money. 331dot (talk) 17:47, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Oleg Parashchak (September 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Theroadislong were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 13:40, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Oleg Parashchak (September 10)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Qcne was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: This is simply a promotional piece, with entirely inappropriate language for Wikipedia. Despite repeated attempts you have not seemed to understood WP:NPOV.
Qcne (talk) 17:46, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It is not promotional but a person who is notable and the contribution to the society is appreciable.I am making this page for the admiration no promotional intend.If so kindly mention the specific part. Pioussouls (talk) 17:51, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Pioussouls Your article is promotional in nature- it is full of WP:PEACOCK language and is not written from a WP:NEUTRAL point of view.
Despite three declines the language has not improved, which leads me to suspect your only want to promote this person - use Wikipedia to WP:SPAM. This is not permitted.
As such, your article is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia and will not be considered further. Qcne (talk) 19:09, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Qcne kindly can you please check and advise me i have completed all the parameters. But still no progress. Pioussouls (talk) 06:40, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Information icon

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Pioussouls, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Pioussouls|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Theroadislong (talk) 17:55, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!
I am trying to add the paid template but each time it shows error.Kindly see here: https://imageupload.io/uacKaGYgkllRopP
Guide me how to resolve this issue.
Will be grateful.
Thanks Pioussouls (talk) 06:39, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]