Jump to content

Talk:Emeliana Aiza: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 33: Line 33:
:Your comment is incomprehensible. —[[User talk:Alalch E.|Alalch E.]] 07:15, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
:Your comment is incomprehensible. —[[User talk:Alalch E.|Alalch E.]] 07:15, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
:If my understanding is correct, you're saying some supplemental information in the article doesn't necessarily inform about the subject themselves? I suppose I can see that, especially in my mention of candidate selection mechanisms in Potosí or the aside on tensions over the ''gasolinazo''. It's just my style to add additional context where I can, as I believe interesting asides enhance the article and give readers a broader perspective. [[User:Krisgabwoosh|Krisgabwoosh]] ([[User talk:Krisgabwoosh|talk]]) 07:22, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
:If my understanding is correct, you're saying some supplemental information in the article doesn't necessarily inform about the subject themselves? I suppose I can see that, especially in my mention of candidate selection mechanisms in Potosí or the aside on tensions over the ''gasolinazo''. It's just my style to add additional context where I can, as I believe interesting asides enhance the article and give readers a broader perspective. [[User:Krisgabwoosh|Krisgabwoosh]] ([[User talk:Krisgabwoosh|talk]]) 07:22, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
::Although, I'm not sure what this has to do with article neutrality. [[User:Krisgabwoosh|Krisgabwoosh]] ([[User talk:Krisgabwoosh|talk]]) 07:24, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:24, 4 October 2023

    Good articleEmeliana Aiza has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
    Article milestones
    DateProcessResult
    August 21, 2023Good article nomineeListed
    Did You Know
    A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on October 4, 2023.
    The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that while serving in the Bolivian parliament, legislator Emeliana Aiza took night courses to receive her high school baccalaureate?


    Article neutrality

    The articles seems to impart real information in a way that doesn’t add context to the subject of the article. 2605:8D80:408:269B:B010:48E8:E01D:A5D6 (talk) 05:38, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

    Your comment is incomprehensible. —Alalch E. 07:15, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    If my understanding is correct, you're saying some supplemental information in the article doesn't necessarily inform about the subject themselves? I suppose I can see that, especially in my mention of candidate selection mechanisms in Potosí or the aside on tensions over the gasolinazo. It's just my style to add additional context where I can, as I believe interesting asides enhance the article and give readers a broader perspective. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 07:22, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Although, I'm not sure what this has to do with article neutrality. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 07:24, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]