Reform: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 13:07, 4 October 2023

Reform refers to the improvement or amendment of what is wrong, corrupt, unsatisfactory, etc.^[1] The modern usage of the word emerged in the late 18th century and is believed to have originated from Christopher Wyvill's Association movement, which identified “Parliamentary Reform” as its primary aim.^[2] Reform is generally considered antithetical to revolution.

Developing countries may implement a range of reforms to improve living standards, often with support from international financial institutions and aid agencies. This can involve reforms to macroeconomic policy, the civil service, and public financial management.

In the United States, rotation in office or term limits would, in contrast, be more revolutionary,^{[citation needed]} by altering basic political connections between incumbents and constituents.^{[note 1]}

Re-form

When used to describe something which is physically formed again, such as re-casting (moulding) or a band that gets back together, the proper term is re-form (with a hyphen), not "reform".^{[citation needed]}

Notes

^ On term limits reform see, U.S. Term Limits. On more radical/revolutionary changes, including term limits, see, for example, Robert Struble Jr., Treatise on Twelve Lights: To Restore America the Beautiful under God and the Written Constitution, 2007-08 edition.

References

^ "Reform". Dictionary.com. Retrieved 2023-02-16.
^ Innes, Joanna (2003). Reform in English Public Life: the fortunes of a word.

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 {{Other uses}}
 '''Reform''' refers to the improvement or amendment of what is wrong, corrupt, unsatisfactory, etc.<ref name="dictionary">{{cite web |title=Reform |publisher=Dictionary.com |url=http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/reform?s=t |access-date=2023-02-16}}</ref> The modern usage of the word emerged in the late 18th century and is believed to have originated from [[Christopher Wyvill (reformer)|Christopher Wyvill]]'s [[Christopher Wyvill (reformer)#The Yorkshire Association|Association movement]], which identified “Parliamentary Reform” as its primary aim.<ref name="Innes">Innes, Joanna (2003). ''Reform in English Public Life: the fortunes of a word''.</ref> Reform is generally considered antithetical to [[revolution]].
-Reform is part of the need for change versus time versus expectations- if expectations are contradicting change, good or bad, we may look to compensate in ways to contradict what we don't see in our real life. For example, a slow moving industry culture may breed a fast freedom loving underworld, in order to compensate for what we don't get in our day to day life in terms of stimulation and primitive instincts. However, a fast crime riddled culture may ask for social reforms that create a stable and safe family life as those are against the need to raise a child safely, instinctually.
-If time and change are too fast or too slow, then other types of reactions are present- too slow a change, we need to incite a reaction to create a way to destabilize a system and have it reform itself in the aftermath, too fast we may find ways to stop responding or to protest new technology to keep the changes from destroying our stability and way of life in exchange for the needs of another group.
 [[Developing countries]] may implement a range of reforms to improve living standards, often with support from [[international financial institutions]] and [[foreign aid|aid agencies]]. This can involve reforms to [[macroeconomics|macroeconomic policy]], the [[civil service reform in developing countries|civil service]], and [[Public finance|public financial management]].

Reform: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 13:07, 4 October 2023

Re-form

See also

Notes

References

Further reading