Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Sonski: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 18:53, 9 October 2023

Peter Sonski

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails to meet notability standards for biographies. SecretName101 (talk) 18:15, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Politicians, and United States of America. SecretName101 (talk) 18:15, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep There are enough RS and content here to keep the article. I suspect there will only be more as the campaign progresses as well, but I am satisifeid with what exists currently. --Slugger O'Toole (talk) 18:25, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Slugger O'Toole Routine campaign coverage that fails to establish individual notability does not suffice. SecretName101 (talk) 18:55, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep for two reasons. (1) While coverage on private websites doesn't establish notability, coverage in National Review certainly does. The National Review column (cited in footnote 11) lists Sonski alongside Ron DeSantis as candidates who have endorsed a Princeton professor's column. It's reasonable for readers of National Review to wonder who Sonski is, and some of them will turn to Wikipedia for an answer. (2) In the 2020 presidential election, the American Solidarity Party was on the ballot in eight states, and an authorized write-in in most of the others, and received notable coverage. That makes their 2024 nominee notable. — Lawrence King ^(talk) 21:04, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Passing mention in an article has NEVER been enough to satisfy notability. So that National Review article is certainly not enough SecretName101 (talk) 20:09, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep based on coverage here 1, 2, and 3.Upper Deck Guy (talk) 19:20, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The first two are the very definition of routine coverage, and the third one alone does not establish his notability. None of those sources illustrate notability. SecretName101 (talk) 03:05, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 :({{Find sources AFD|title=Peter Sonski}})
 Fails to meet notability standards for biographies. [[User:SecretName101|SecretName101]] ([[User talk:SecretName101|talk]]) 18:15, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
+*<small class="delsort-notice">Note:  This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting|deletion sorting]] lists for the following topics: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/People|People]], [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Politicians|Politicians]],  and [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/United States of America|United States of America]]. [[User:SecretName101|SecretName101]] ([[User talk:SecretName101|talk]]) 18:15, 4 October 2023 (UTC)</small>
 *'''Keep''' There are enough RS and content here to keep the article. I suspect there will only be more as the campaign progresses as well, but I am satisifeid with what exists currently. --[[User:Slugger O&#39;Toole|Slugger O&#39;Toole]] ([[User talk:Slugger O&#39;Toole|talk]]) 18:25, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
@@ Line 11: / Line 13: @@
 *'''Keep''' for two reasons.  '''(1)'''  While coverage on private websites doesn't establish notability, coverage in ''[[National Review]]'' certainly does.  The ''National Review'' column (cited in footnote 11) lists Sonski alongside Ron DeSantis as candidates who have endorsed a Princeton professor's column.  It's reasonable for readers of ''National Review'' to wonder who Sonski is, and some of them will turn to Wikipedia for an answer.  '''(2)'''  In the 2020 presidential election, the American Solidarity Party was on the ballot in eight states, and an authorized write-in in most of the others, and received notable coverage.  That makes their 2024 nominee notable. &mdash; <span style="font: small-caps 12px times;">[[User:Lawrence King|Lawrence King]]</span> <sup style="font: small-caps 10px arial; color: #129dbc;">([[User talk:Lawrence King|<span style="color: #129dbc;">talk</span>]])</sup> 21:04, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
-*<small class="delsort-notice">Note:  This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting|deletion sorting]] lists for the following topics: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/People|People]], [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Politicians|Politicians]],  and [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/United States of America|United States of America]]. [[User:SecretName101|SecretName101]] ([[User talk:SecretName101|talk]]) 18:15, 4 October 2023 (UTC)</small>
 *:Passing mention in an article has NEVER been enough to satisfy notability. So that National Review article is certainly not enough [[User:SecretName101|SecretName101]] ([[User talk:SecretName101|talk]]) 20:09, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
 *'''Keep''' based on coverage here [https://ballot-access.org/2023/06/03/peter-sonski-is-the-american-solidarity-party-2024-presidential-nominee/ 1], [https://independentpoliticalreport.com/2023/06/peter-sonski-chosen-as-american-solidarity-presidential-nominee-on-first-ballot/ 2], and [https://www.nationalreview.com/news/princeton-professors-initiative-to-rebrand-june-fidelity-month-gains-steam-on-religious-right/ 3].[[User:Upper Deck Guy|Upper Deck Guy]] ([[User talk:Upper Deck Guy|talk]]) 19:20, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
 *:The first two are the very definition of routine coverage, and the third one alone does not establish his notability. None of those sources illustrate notability. [[User:SecretName101|SecretName101]] ([[User talk:SecretName101|talk]]) 03:05, 9 October 2023 (UTC)