Talk:Asao B. Inoue: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 14:25, 10 October 2023

Writing Unassessed

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Writing, a WikiProject interested in improving Wikipedia's coverage of content related to the fields of rhetoric, composition, technical communication, literacy, and language studies.WritingWikipedia:WikiProject WritingTemplate:WikiProject WritingWriting
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Notability and primary sources issues

Hi @Rosguill, Thanks for your assessment. I have worked to remove and replace primary sources in order to solve the over-reliance on these (which were a leftover from an early draft). Could you take a look and see if we can remove that tag at your earliest convenience?

Also, as an academic biography, I think we can make the case that the subject meets notability requirements via criteria #2 - "The person has received a highly prestigious academic award or honor at a national or international level." Note that the requirements for academics notability only specify that one of the criteria be met(and verifiable) per WP:NACADEMIC. See the lead for descriptions of academic awards. I would like to request that tag be removed as well, or further rationale for its remaining be provided. Thanks! Matthewvetter (talk) 14:15, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your edits, I think the issues have been addressed. FWIW, I would say I agreed from the beginning with your NACADEMIC assessment, but articles that only meet a subject-specific notability guideline can still be challenged on GNG grounds (which have now been addressed). _signed,Rosguill ^talk 14:25, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 Also, as an academic biography, I think we can make the case that the subject meets notability requirements via criteria #2 - "The person has received a highly prestigious academic award or honor at a national or international level." Note that the requirements for academics notability only specify that one of the criteria be met(and verifiable) per [[Wikipedia:Notability (academics)| WP:NACADEMIC]]. See the lead for descriptions of academic awards. I would like to request that tag be removed as well, or further rationale for its remaining be provided. Thanks!
 [[User:Matthewvetter|Matthewvetter]] ([[User talk:Matthewvetter|talk]]) 14:15, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
+:Thank you for your edits, I think the issues have been addressed. FWIW, I would say I agreed from the beginning with your NACADEMIC assessment, but articles that only meet a subject-specific notability guideline can still be challenged on GNG grounds (which have now been addressed). <sub>signed, </sub>[[User:Rosguill|'''''Rosguill''''']] <sup>[[User talk:Rosguill|''talk'']]</sup> 14:25, 10 October 2023 (UTC)