Jump to content

Talk:Tom Cruise: Unauthorized: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Smee (talk | contribs)
28,728 edits
Raeft (talk | contribs)
120 edits
No edit summary
Line 10: Line 10:
::I do not understand? Was that last bit sarcasm? [[User:Smee|Smee]] 18:02, 26 March 2007 (UTC).
::I do not understand? Was that last bit sarcasm? [[User:Smee|Smee]] 18:02, 26 March 2007 (UTC).
:::''"Nice page here, and nice work. Now to expand it as things occur in relation."'' - But thank you very much for those kind words, that means a lot! [[User:Smee|Smee]] 18:17, 26 March 2007 (UTC).
:::''"Nice page here, and nice work. Now to expand it as things occur in relation."'' - But thank you very much for those kind words, that means a lot! [[User:Smee|Smee]] 18:17, 26 March 2007 (UTC).

:::Ha, no, not explicitly sarcasm. I meant moreso that I believe the forthcoming legal action, sure to occur, will be interesting and very public, thus making it easily documentable in a fine article. Further, I've noted one of our first issues: When searching Tom Cruise, this does not come up, not even on a disambiguation in a "To see other" link underneath his name on the Tom Cruise page. Just a thought...

Revision as of 20:58, 26 March 2007

WikiProject iconBooks Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

See also

The See also section here is relevant, it references topics that deal with Cruise, and will be expanded upon. Smee 04:38, 26 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Hmm, have to agree with you there. It's funny, my potential list of pages to watch is starting to look like I'm stalking certain people, you included Smee. I believe it may be a case of similar interests. Nice page here, and nice work. Now to expand it as things occur in relation. I'm waiting for a lawsuit. Raeft 17:43, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I do not understand? Was that last bit sarcasm? Smee 18:02, 26 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]
"Nice page here, and nice work. Now to expand it as things occur in relation." - But thank you very much for those kind words, that means a lot! Smee 18:17, 26 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]
Ha, no, not explicitly sarcasm. I meant moreso that I believe the forthcoming legal action, sure to occur, will be interesting and very public, thus making it easily documentable in a fine article. Further, I've noted one of our first issues: When searching Tom Cruise, this does not come up, not even on a disambiguation in a "To see other" link underneath his name on the Tom Cruise page. Just a thought...
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:Tom_Cruise:_Unauthorized&oldid=118093453"