Quotient rule: Difference between revisions
Undid revision 1182216565 by 73.246.84.174 (talk) reverting vandalism |
Undid revision 1182235548 by 2003:C9:2713:EF00:FC53:3FD:1EB1:8ACC (talk) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{short description|Formula for the derivative of a ratio of functions}} |
{{short description|Formula for the derivative of a ratio of functions}} |
||
In [[calculus]], the '''quotient rule''' is a method of finding the [[derivative]] of a [[function (mathematics)|function]] that is the ratio of two differentiable functions.<ref>{{cite book | last=Stewart | first=James | author-link=James Stewart (mathematician) | title=Calculus: Early Transcendentals | publisher=[[Brooks/Cole]] | edition=6th | year=2008 | isbn=978-0-495-01166-8 | url-access=registration | url=https://archive.org/details/calculusearlytra00stew_1 }}</ref><ref>{{cite book | last1=Larson | first1=Ron | author-link=Ron Larson (mathematician)| last2=Edwards | first2=Bruce H. | title=Calculus | publisher=[[Brooks/Cole]] | edition=9th | year=2009 | isbn=978-0-547-16702-2}}</ref><ref>{{cite book | last1 = Thomas | first1 = George B. | last2=Weir | first2= Maurice D. | last3=Hass | first3=Joel | author3-link = Joel Hass | author-link=George B. Thomas | title=Thomas' Calculus: Early Transcendentals | publisher=[[Addison-Wesley]] | year=2010 | edition=12th | isbn=978-0-321-58876-0}}</ref> Let <math>h(x)=\frac{f(x)}{g(x)}</math>, where both {{mvar|f}} and {{mvar|g}} are differentiable and <math>g(x)\neq 0.</math> The quotient rule states that the derivative of {{math|''h''(''x'')}} is |
In [[calculus]], the '''quotient rule''' is a method of finding the [[derivative]] of a [[function (mathematics)|function]] that is the ratio of two differentiable functions.<ref>{{cite book | last=Stewart | first=James | author-link=James Stewart (mathematician) | title=Calculus: Early Transcendentals | publisher=[[Brooks/Cole]] | edition=6th | year=2008 | isbn=978-0-495-01166-8 | url-access=registration | url=https://archive.org/details/calculusearlytra00stew_1 }}</ref><ref>{{cite book | last1=Larson | first1=Ron | author-link=Ron Larson (mathematician)| last2=Edwards | first2=Bruce H. | title=Calculus | publisher=[[Brooks/Cole]] | edition=9th | year=2009 | isbn=978-0-547-16702-2}}</ref><ref>{{cite book | last1 = Thomas | first1 = George B. | last2=Weir | first2= Maurice D. | last3=Hass | first3=Joel | author3-link = Joel Hass | author-link=George B. Thomas | title=Thomas' Calculus: Early Transcendentals | publisher=[[Addison-Wesley]] | year=2010 | edition=12th | isbn=978-0-321-58876-0}}</ref> Let <math>h(x)=\frac{f(x)}{g(x)}</math>, where both {{mvar|f}} and {{mvar|g}} are differentiable and <math>g(x)\neq 0.</math> The quotient rule states that the derivative of {{math|''h''(''x'')}} is |
||
:<math>h'(x) = \frac{f'(x)g(x) |
:<math>h'(x) = \frac{f'(x)g(x) + f(x)g'(x)}{g(x)^2}.</math> |
||
It is provable in many ways by using other [[Differentiation rules|derivative rules]]. |
It is provable in many ways by using other [[Differentiation rules|derivative rules]]. |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
Given <math>h(x)=\frac{e^x}{x^2}</math>, let <math>f(x)=e^x, g(x)=x^2</math>, then using the quotient rule:<math display="block">\begin{align} |
Given <math>h(x)=\frac{e^x}{x^2}</math>, let <math>f(x)=e^x, g(x)=x^2</math>, then using the quotient rule:<math display="block">\begin{align} |
||
\frac{d}{dx} \left(\frac{e^x}{x^2}\right) &= \frac{\left(\frac{d}{dx}e^x\right)(x^2) - (e^x)\left(\frac{d}{dx} x^2\right)}{(x^2)^2} \\ |
\frac{d}{dx} \left(\frac{e^x}{x^2}\right) &= \frac{\left(\frac{d}{dx}e^x\right)(x^2) - (e^x)\left(\frac{d}{dx} x^2\right)}{(x^2)^2} \\ |
||
&= \frac{(e^x)(x^2) |
&= \frac{(e^x)(x^2) + (e^x)(2x)}{x^4} \\ |
||
&= \frac{x^2 e^x |
&= \frac{x^2 e^x + 2x e^x}{x^4} \\ |
||
&= \frac{x e^x |
&= \frac{x e^x + 2 e^x}{x^3} \\ |
||
&= \frac{e^x(x |
&= \frac{e^x(x + 2)}{x^3}. |
||
\end{align}</math> |
\end{align}</math> |
||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
<math display="block">\begin{align} |
<math display="block">\begin{align} |
||
\frac{d}{dx} \tan x &= \frac{d}{dx} \left(\frac{\sin x}{\cos x}\right) \\ |
\frac{d}{dx} \tan x &= \frac{d}{dx} \left(\frac{\sin x}{\cos x}\right) \\ |
||
&= \frac{\left(\frac{d}{dx}\sin x\right)(\cos x) |
&= \frac{\left(\frac{d}{dx}\sin x\right)(\cos x) + (\sin x)\left(\frac{d}{dx}\cos x\right)}{\cos^2 x} \\ |
||
&= \frac{(\cos x)(\cos x) |
&= \frac{(\cos x)(\cos x) + (\sin x)(-\sin x)}{\cos^2 x} \\ |
||
&= \frac{\cos^2 x + \sin^2 x}{\cos^2 x} \\ |
&= \frac{\cos^2 x + \sin^2 x}{\cos^2 x} \\ |
||
&= \frac{1}{\cos^2 x} = \ |
&= \frac{1}{\cos^2 x} = \csc^2 x. |
||
\end{align}</math> |
\end{align}</math> |
||
== Reciprocal rule == |
== Reciprocal rule == |
||
{{Main|Reciprocal rule}} |
{{Main|Reciprocal rule}} |
||
The reciprocal rule is a special case of the quotient rule in which the numerator <math>f(x)=1</math>. Applying the quotient rule gives<math display="block">h'(x)=\frac{d}{dx}\left[\frac{1}{g(x)}\right]=\frac{0 \cdot g(x) |
The reciprocal rule is a special case of the quotient rule in which the numerator <math>f(x)=1</math>. Applying the quotient rule gives<math display="block">h'(x)=\frac{d}{dx}\left[\frac{1}{g(x)}\right]=\frac{0 \cdot g(x) + 1 \cdot g'(x)}{g(x)^2}=\frac{g'(x)}{g(x)^2}.</math> |
||
Note that utilizing the [[chain rule]] yields the same result. |
Note that utilizing the [[chain rule]] yields the same result. |
||
Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
&= \left[\lim_{k\to 0} \frac{f(x+k)g(x) - f(x)g(x)}{k} - \lim_{k\to 0}\frac{f(x)g(x+k) - f(x)g(x)}{k} \right] \cdot \frac{1}{g(x)^2} \\ |
&= \left[\lim_{k\to 0} \frac{f(x+k)g(x) - f(x)g(x)}{k} - \lim_{k\to 0}\frac{f(x)g(x+k) - f(x)g(x)}{k} \right] \cdot \frac{1}{g(x)^2} \\ |
||
&= \left[\lim_{k\to 0} \frac{f(x+k) - f(x)}{k} \cdot g(x) - f(x) \cdot \lim_{k\to 0}\frac{g(x+k) - g(x)}{k} \right] \cdot \frac{1}{g(x)^2} \\ |
&= \left[\lim_{k\to 0} \frac{f(x+k) - f(x)}{k} \cdot g(x) - f(x) \cdot \lim_{k\to 0}\frac{g(x+k) - g(x)}{k} \right] \cdot \frac{1}{g(x)^2} \\ |
||
&= \frac{f'(x)g(x) |
&= \frac{f'(x)g(x) + f(x)g'(x)}{g(x)^2}. |
||
\end{align}</math>The limit evaluation <math>\lim_{k \to 0}\frac{1}{g(x+k)g(x)}=\frac{1}{g(x)^2}</math> is justified by the differentiability of <math>g(x)</math>, implying continuity, which can be expressed as <math>\lim_{k \to 0}g(x+k) = g(x)</math>. |
\end{align}</math>The limit evaluation <math>\lim_{k \to 0}\frac{1}{g(x+k)g(x)}=\frac{1}{g(x)^2}</math> is justified by the differentiability of <math>g(x)</math>, implying continuity, which can be expressed as <math>\lim_{k \to 0}g(x+k) = g(x)</math>. |
||
Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
<math display="block">\begin{align} |
<math display="block">\begin{align} |
||
h'(x) &= \frac{f'(x) -g'(x)h(x)}{g(x)} \\ |
h'(x) &= \frac{f'(x) -g'(x)h(x)}{g(x)} \\ |
||
&= \frac{f'(x) |
&= \frac{f'(x) + g'(x)\cdot\frac{f(x)}{g(x)}}{g(x)} \\ |
||
&= \frac{f'(x)g(x) |
&= \frac{f'(x)g(x) + f(x)g'(x)}{g(x)^2}. |
||
\end{align}</math> |
\end{align}</math> |
||
Line 75: | Line 75: | ||
&= {\frac{g(x)}{g(x)}}\cdot{\frac{f'(x)}{g(x)}} - \frac{f(x)g'(x)}{g(x)^2} \\ |
&= {\frac{g(x)}{g(x)}}\cdot{\frac{f'(x)}{g(x)}} - \frac{f(x)g'(x)}{g(x)^2} \\ |
||
&= \frac{f'(x)g(x) |
&= \frac{f'(x)g(x) + f(x)g'(x)}{g(x)^2}. |
||
\end{align}</math> |
\end{align}</math> |
||
Line 92: | Line 92: | ||
h'(x)&=h(x)\left[\frac{f'(x)}{f(x)}-\frac{g'(x)}{g(x)}\right]\\ |
h'(x)&=h(x)\left[\frac{f'(x)}{f(x)}-\frac{g'(x)}{g(x)}\right]\\ |
||
&=\frac{f(x)}{g(x)}\left[\frac{f'(x)}{f(x)}-\frac{g'(x)}{g(x)}\right]\\ |
&=\frac{f(x)}{g(x)}\left[\frac{f'(x)}{f(x)}-\frac{g'(x)}{g(x)}\right]\\ |
||
&=\frac{f'(x)}{g(x)} |
&=\frac{f'(x)}{g(x)}+\frac{f(x)g'(x)}{g(x)^2}\\ |
||
&=\frac{f'(x)g(x) |
&=\frac{f'(x)g(x)+f(x)g'(x)}{g(x)^2}. |
||
\end{align}</math> |
\end{align}</math> |
||
Line 99: | Line 99: | ||
==Higher order derivatives== |
==Higher order derivatives== |
||
Implicit differentiation can be used to compute the {{mvar|n}}th derivative of a quotient (partially in terms of its first {{math|''n'' − 1}} derivatives). For example, differentiating <math>f=gh</math> twice (resulting in <math>f'' = g''h + 2g'h' + gh''</math>) and then solving for <math>h''</math> yields<math display="block">h'' = \left(\frac{f}{g}\right)'' = \frac{f''-g''h-2g'h'}{g}.</math> |
Implicit differentiation can be used to compute the {{mvar|n}}th derivative of a quotient (partially in terms of its first {{math|''n'' − 1}} derivatives). For example, differentiating <math>f=gh</math> twice (resulting in <math>f'' = g''h + 2g'h' + gh''</math>) and then solving for <math>h''</math> yields<math display="block">h'' = \left(\frac{f}{g}\right)'' = \frac{f''-g''h-2g'h'}{g'}.</math> |
||
==See also== |
==See also== |
||
Revision as of 13:46, 28 October 2023
Part of a series of articles about |
Calculus |
---|
In calculus, the quotient rule is a method of finding the derivative of a function that is the ratio of two differentiable functions.[1][2][3] Let , where both f and g are differentiable and The quotient rule states that the derivative of h(x) is
It is provable in many ways by using other derivative rules.
Examples
Example 1: Basic example
Given , let , then using the quotient rule:
Example 2: Derivative of tangent function
The quotient rule can be used to find the derivative of as follows:
Reciprocal rule
The reciprocal rule is a special case of the quotient rule in which the numerator . Applying the quotient rule gives
Note that utilizing the chain rule yields the same result.
Proofs
Proof from derivative definition and limit properties
Let Applying the definition of the derivative and properties of limits gives the following proof, with the term added and subtracted to allow splitting and factoring in subsequent steps without affecting the value:The limit evaluation is justified by the differentiability of , implying continuity, which can be expressed as .
Proof using implicit differentiation
Let so that
The product rule then gives
Solving for and substituting back for gives:
Proof using the reciprocal rule or chain rule
Let
Then the product rule gives
To evaluate the derivative in the second term, apply the reciprocal rule, or the power rule along with the chain rule:
Substituting the result into the expression gives
Proof by logarithmic differentiation
Let Taking the absolute value and natural logarithm of both sides of the equation gives
Applying properties of the absolute value and logarithms,
Taking the logarithmic derivative of both sides,
Solving for and substituting back for gives:
Note: Taking the absolute value of the functions is necessary for the logarithmic differentiation of functions that may have negative values, as logarithms are only real-valued for positive arguments. This works because , which justifies taking the absolute value of the functions for logarithmic differentiation.
Higher order derivatives
Implicit differentiation can be used to compute the nth derivative of a quotient (partially in terms of its first n − 1 derivatives). For example, differentiating twice (resulting in ) and then solving for yields
See also
- Chain rule – For derivatives of composed functions
- Differentiation of integrals – Problem in mathematics
- Differentiation rules – Rules for computing derivatives of functions
- General Leibniz rule – Generalization of the product rule in calculus
- Inverse functions and differentiation – Calculus identity
- Linearity of differentiation – Calculus property
- Product rule – Formula for the derivative of a product
- Reciprocal rule – differentiation rule
- Table of derivatives – Rules for computing derivatives of functions
- Vector calculus identities – Mathematical identities
References
- ^ Stewart, James (2008). Calculus: Early Transcendentals (6th ed.). Brooks/Cole. ISBN 978-0-495-01166-8.
- ^ Larson, Ron; Edwards, Bruce H. (2009). Calculus (9th ed.). Brooks/Cole. ISBN 978-0-547-16702-2.
- ^ Thomas, George B.; Weir, Maurice D.; Hass, Joel (2010). Thomas' Calculus: Early Transcendentals (12th ed.). Addison-Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-58876-0.