User talk:Russell7890: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 11:51, 30 October 2023

June 2023

Hello, I'm Fakescientist8000. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Draft:Alexander King, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. IMDb is not a reliable source. See WP:IMDB. Cheers, atque supra! Fake scientist 8000 00:04, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alexander King (June 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alexander King and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 10:32, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Russell7890! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 10:32, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Horror-noir moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Horror-noir, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hitro talk 06:49, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The draft has undergone constructive revision. Consider transferring Draft:Horror-noir to the actual article after checking this link. Thanks! Russell7890 (talk) 17:49, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Horror-noir

Hello Russell7890,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Horror-noir for deletion in response to your request.

If you didn't intend to make such a request and don't want the article to be deleted, you can edit the page and remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:22, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The draft has underwent a constructive, well-improved revision. Please take a look and review it and consider it moving to article space officially. Russell7890 (talk) 00:14, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The reworked version links to here: Draft:Horror-noir Russell7890 (talk) 00:19, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I published the page today. I believe it is notable. The page can be improved. Some of the crime horror films listed, even with a source, are not, in my view, noir horror films, but if a source says so, who am I. to judge? As for Religious horror, below, however, I think adding a section to Supernatural horror film is, for the moment, better. But again, if you have sources, it's up to you. Best, -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 17:47, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much. I appreciate this a lot. Russell7890 (talk) 02:14, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I think the religious horror film draft is unnecessary considering that it’s also past of supernatural horror, but thanks for letting me know Russell7890 (talk) 02:17, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Religious horror film (June 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Medium and Research Gate are not reliable sources. Other sources are poor (see WP:SCHOLARSHIP and WP:RSSM). The other issue is sources are generally about religion and horror but does not support there is a recognized "Religious horror" genre.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Religious horror film and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 14:51, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Blade (2025 upcoming film) (October 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Popsugar is not a reliable source. --Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 13:22, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Blade (2025 upcoming film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 13:22, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Horrorscope (film) (October 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The title of this draft either has been disambiguated or will need to be disambiguated for acceptance.

If this draft is accepted, the disambiguation page will need to be edited. Either an entry will need to be added, or an entry will need to be revised.

The disambiguation page for the primary name is Horrorscope (disambiguation).

This draft or article is about an unreleased film. The film notability guideline identifies three stages in the production cycle for films:

1. Planned films that have not begun production (principal photography or animation). These planned films do not satisfy film notability.
2. Films that are confirmed by reliable sources to have begun production, but have not been released. These films are only notable if production itself satisfies general notability in terms of significant coverage. Mere mention of the start of production does not satisfy notability.
3. Films that have been released, whose notability is determined by reception and reviews, or a major notable award for excellence in some aspect of filmmaking.

This film page must be evaluated based on general notability of production.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Horrorscope (film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 04:45, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 92: / Line 92: @@
 -->&nbsp;The comment the reviewer left was:
-{{divbox|blue|3={{adddisamb|Horrorscope}}
+{{divbox|blue|3=<!-- Template:Adddisamb-->
+The title of this draft either has been disambiguated or will need to be disambiguated for acceptance.
+If this draft is accepted, the disambiguation page will need to be edited.  Either an entry will need to be added, or an entry will need to be revised.
-{{unrelfilm}}}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer.  You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit ''after they have been resolved''.
+The disambiguation page for the primary name is [[Horrorscope (disambiguation)]].
+This draft or article is about an unreleased film. [[WP:NFILM|The film notability guideline]] identifies three stages in the production cycle for films:
+*1. Planned films that have not begun production ([[principal photography]] or animation). These planned films do not satisfy [[WP:NFILM|film notability]].
+*2. Films that are confirmed by [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] to have begun production, but have not been released. These films are only [[WP:N|notable]] if production itself satisfies [[WP:GNG|general notability]] in terms of [[WP:SIGCOV|significant coverage]]. Mere mention of the start of production does not satisfy notability.
+*3. Films that have been released, whose notability is determined by reception and reviews, or a major notable award for excellence in some aspect of filmmaking.
+This film page must be evaluated based on [[WP:GNG|general notability]] of production.}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer.  You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit ''after they have been resolved''.
 {{clear}}
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to [[Draft:Horrorscope (film)]] and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.