User talk:KylieTastic

It is approximately 7:31 AM where this user lives (Cambridge, UK).

If you have a general question it may be quicker to ask at the Wikipedia:Teahouse or Click this to start a New Question here

AfC Drafts NOTE: To be fair to all submitters I do not review/re-review on request, I just pick new and old submissions at random... Current Backlog: 1,855 pending submissions

 

NFL players at WP:AFC

I noticed that you tend to decline a lot of submissions at WP:AFC on NFL players. However, most of them are notable. A simple Newspapers.com search will get many of these drafts published. I often don't have time to keep up with your speed! I hope I don't trouble you too much by asking you to leave the reviews up to me. Scorpions1325 (talk) 02:52, 29 October 2023 (UTC)

• Hi Scorpions1325, that is the basic premiss of the Draft+AfC process: pick a notable topic, find the sources, write the bare minimum to show nobility and submit. However we have one or more submitters that just create very minimal articles without showing nobility. Although many NFL players are notable many are not which is why the old WP:GRIDIRON nobility was dropped. Even when that was the only requirement many minimal submissions had factual errors as they appear to be just quick copy-hack-submit-repeat. So all the details needed to be checked and still many didn't even show enough to pass the very low bar WP:GRIDIRON was (i.e. has played in 1 NFL game). For instance a recent decline was Draft:Jim Hendley but the nfl.com career page shows no NFL games and the pro-football-reference.com/ has no games logged. Anyone can take a list of probably notable subjects and spam out articles. But no, if editors submit with zero effort they will be declined so we can find and accept the work of submitters putting effort in and need their work accepted asap. However, for your purpose if your interested in NFL bios just use this search for current NFL submissions, or this search for declined ones or just use this search to find all drafts using "Infobox NFL biography". However, if you want to review AfC drafts you should request access to the tool at WP:AFC/P. That tool helps remove the AfC template like you left here, also it will assist with project tagging, cats, informing submitters etc. and other changes that help others/wiki-projects find newly accepted acticles. Regards KylieTastic (talk) 10:13, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
  • Came across this discussion after it was mentioned at WP:ANI#IP constantly resubmitting AfC submissions – FWIW, in my view the reason NGRIDIRON was dropped wasn't specifically because of its merits but as part of the crossfire from attacks on ridiculously lenient criteria such as NFOOTBALL – the criterion IMO actually worked pretty well as the vast majority of NFL players are notable – each of submissions do show evidence for the players playing in the NFL – note that NFL.com seems to be incomplete when it comes to those types of players, but you can always find those games listed on the players' pro-football-reference pages – the IP kind of has to rely on others to demonstrate the notability as the coverage is almost always exclusively available in the paywalled Newspapers.com – Per messages on my talk page, the IP seems to create them with the intention that I (or Scorpions) will eventually clean it up, as I have access to the sources but not the time to create the articles whereas the IP has the time to create them but doesn't have access to the sources. It would probably work if their submissions were placed in some sort of category "Reserved AFC submissions for Scorpions1325 and BeanieFan11" – do you know whether that'd be possible? BeanieFan11 (talk) 21:50, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

    @BeanieFan11, if they had created an account they would have had Wikipedia Library access years ago, also for some I'm sure some sources exist on google. They still could at any point. If you can get them to talk to you great. If they agree to just add a category rather than submit to AfC then I'm sure we can get them unblocked. So that it does not break WP:DRAFTNOCAT it would have to be something like Category:Drafts about American Football or Category:Drafts about American Football Players. I do the same you do for these just for for other subjects, I have multiple searches to find submissions or drafts in progress I work on getting accepted. Note that Dogloverr16 has these mostly American Football submissions waiting which need less work just checking that would probably be easier for you and Scorpions1325 if your interested. Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 13:02, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

for posting new artical

Hello sir, this is my own artical and this is my own website(submited url in artical). There are no copywright issue my side and my website this is a public content write my website artical is write orignal not copyed and submit two destination my website and wiki. please sir remove my error and publis my artical Thank you sir Narendra Choudhary Narendra13078 (talk) 13:06, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

• Narendra13078, firstly Draft:Winter Fashion is not an encyclopedic article so is not suitable at all. It is a blog post and opinion piece. Secondly see your own website terms "You must not: ... Republish material from Fashion XYZ...Reproduce, duplicate or copy material from Fashion XYZ..." KylieTastic (talk) 13:10, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

Draft:Yusif Meizongo Jnr changes made

Hello thank you for reviewing my article. I have made the corrections as you earlier indicated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Heatrave (talk • contribs) 18:15, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

Hi Heatrave, if you have finished updating please re-submit. Your in luck as there is a backlog clearing drive on at the moment so a quick review is more likely. Regards KylieTastic (talk) 18:31, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

Can you explain your edit note?

On this - I am reading it as shorthand for "revert more" - but that doesn't compute to me, so I must be wrong. Just want to understand the note/reason for the rv. Thanks Picard's Facepalm (talk) 19:52, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

• Hey Picard's Facepalm, yes it was "revert more" - you have reverted one part of 2001:8f8:1361:1b9:a820:d5d:a378:5d7ds edit but the other part was an invalid image, so the article needed to be reverted back one more version. Plus I reverted the other edit from probably the same editor as an unsourced addition. Nice name btw - made me smile :) Regards KylieTastic (talk) 19:55, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

  Okaaaaay..... so the interim solution is to revert a revert which restores the problem I reverted - instead of going back one more version or otherwise you editing further? Sorry that I did not see the other edit in question - I was simply going off of Special:RecentChanges, and it is not an article I regularly patrol or monitor. I would think that WP:SOFIXIT would be more constructive vs. reverting to a problematic edit? Nonetheless - I will take a deeper look and try to encompass both of those changes, and perhaps others - though that will take me 2/3rds of the way to a 3RR. Thanks for the explanation. Picard's Facepalm (talk) 20:02, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

  Picard's Facepalm sorry I just saw what happened rather than what I thought I had done! It's been a long week and I'm a little slow :/ I thought I had reverted the other edit the anon made but see I mucked up and just reverted your reversion - hence your obvious (now) confusion. Sorry about that. Make that a KylieTastic Facepalm. Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 20:17, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

  No worries - is all good. Thanks again for the explain. :) Picard's Facepalm (talk) 14:29, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Article Declined

Why are you declined articles.It was simple and Reference was Available and I'm was improving it.Please accept it Nnn edits (talk) 20:50, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

• Looking at your user page I have not declined your article. KylieTastic (talk) 20:51, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

  What is about the user page. Nnn edits (talk) 20:52, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

  If I had declined one of your articles the notice would be on User talk:Nnn edits. If you are saying you are the IP re-submitting articles with just one source then stop. Read the multiple notices and understand that all new articles on Wikipedia have to show the subject is notable (See WP:N) which in most cases requires significant coverage (WP:SIGCOV) in multiple independent (WP:INDY) reliable sources (WP:RS) KylieTastic (talk) 20:56, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

Hi there.

I want to know why the ADTEC shah alam article is denied?

it is quite similar to https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Institut_Latihan_Perindustrian_Kuala_Lumpur

Thank you Editing and contributing (talk) 09:49, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

• Hi Editing and contributing, unfortunately there are a lot of existing articles that are not good and need to be improved or deleted. With 6.7 million articles, cleaning up old ones takes a lot of volunteer time. I have tagged that article for attention. As for Draft:Advanced Technology Centre Shah Alam all new articles on Wikipedia have to show the subject is notable (See WP:N) which in most cases requires significant coverage (WP:SIGCOV) in multiple independent (WP:INDY) reliable sources (WP:RS). Most of the content in unsourced and it has no independent sources to show notability. Regards KylieTastic (talk) 09:57, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

  Alright. Thank you for the information and advice. Does Wikipedia accept sources in other languages? ILPKL and ADTEC Shah Alam are like the oxford and cambridge of advanced training centres in Malaysia, and they do have coverage from national television, local news and websites. Many people here are skill based which is why they go to training centres.

  If it is acceptable, I'll try to reference them properly. If not, what can be done?

  Thanks. Editing and contributing (talk) 10:02, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

  @Editing and contributing, yes sources can be in any language. KylieTastic (talk) 10:05, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Draft:FeminISISt

Why are you keep rejecting the truth? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ddllggpro (talk • contribs) 21:11, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

• Ddllggpro it's not "the truth" - it's just a social media post. This is an Encyclopedia. KylieTastic (talk) 21:14, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Request on 18:57:36, 9 November 2023 for assistance on AfC submission by MRaichura

• MRaichura (talk · contribs)
  • User:MRaichura/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi there,

Thanks for taking time to review the submission. It was quite fast, I must say. As for rejection, this is my first submission and was expecting that to happen.

However, this is a local not-for-profit astronomy club that I thought would benefit from exposure via Wikipedia and to some extant the people of Rajkot may benefit from the information as well.

However, while the club has organised hundreds of events, very few newspaper cover it because the club does not believe in creating hypes and click-bait topics etc which is not newspaper wants and as such it does not have lots of references as such.

The club does have presenece on social media but I did not add links to it assuming that it would look like a marketing page and not like an information page about local astronomy club that locals may be interested in.

Your inputs are very much welcome if you could point me in the right direction.

Thanks.

MRaichura (talk) 18:57, 9 November 2023 (UTC)