Jump to content

1881–1896 cholera pandemic: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Take 2
Line 34: Line 34:
In late June 1883, the first cases of cholera in Egypt, recently occupied by the [[History of Egypt under the British|British Empire]] in 1882, occurred in the port city of [[Damietta]] on the Mediterranean coast and rapidly spread in the [[Nile Delta]] and throughout the country in the summer and autumn,<ref name=rose>{{cite web |url=https://islamiclaw.blog/2020/05/25/christopher-s-rose/ |title=A Tale of Two Contagions: Science, Imperialism, and the 1883 Cholera in Egypt |last=Rose |first=Christopher |date=25 May 2020 |website=Islamic Law Blog |publisher=Harvard Law School |access-date=11 November 2023 |quote=}}</ref> "notwithstanding cordons maintained with a degree of severity and cruelty almost unexampled".<ref name=snowden83q>Snowden, ''Naples in the time of cholera, 1884-1911'', [https://archive.org/details/naplesintimeofch0000snow/page/83/mode/1up p. 83], quoting [https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/the-lancet/vol/122/issue/3126?page-size=100&page=1 The Progress of Cholera], ''The Lancet'' (1883, vol. 2), p. 159.</ref> In the course of a few months, 50,000<ref name=rose /> or 60,000<ref name=snowden59 /> people died. The sources of the contamination most likely were Muslim pilgrims returning from Mecca and Indian troops serving in the British army.<ref name=snowden59 /><ref name=kohn15 /> The approach of the British administration in Egypt was determined more by concerns that trade out of Indian ports towards Britain risked to be quarantined, as well as economic concerns about spending on public health.<ref name=rose />
In late June 1883, the first cases of cholera in Egypt, recently occupied by the [[History of Egypt under the British|British Empire]] in 1882, occurred in the port city of [[Damietta]] on the Mediterranean coast and rapidly spread in the [[Nile Delta]] and throughout the country in the summer and autumn,<ref name=rose>{{cite web |url=https://islamiclaw.blog/2020/05/25/christopher-s-rose/ |title=A Tale of Two Contagions: Science, Imperialism, and the 1883 Cholera in Egypt |last=Rose |first=Christopher |date=25 May 2020 |website=Islamic Law Blog |publisher=Harvard Law School |access-date=11 November 2023 |quote=}}</ref> "notwithstanding cordons maintained with a degree of severity and cruelty almost unexampled".<ref name=snowden83q>Snowden, ''Naples in the time of cholera, 1884-1911'', [https://archive.org/details/naplesintimeofch0000snow/page/83/mode/1up p. 83], quoting [https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/the-lancet/vol/122/issue/3126?page-size=100&page=1 The Progress of Cholera], ''The Lancet'' (1883, vol. 2), p. 159.</ref> In the course of a few months, 50,000<ref name=rose /> or 60,000<ref name=snowden59 /> people died. The sources of the contamination most likely were Muslim pilgrims returning from Mecca and Indian troops serving in the British army.<ref name=snowden59 /><ref name=kohn15 /> The approach of the British administration in Egypt was determined more by concerns that trade out of Indian ports towards Britain risked to be quarantined, as well as economic concerns about spending on public health.<ref name=rose />


The British administration adopted an [[Contingent contagionism|anti-contagionist stance]], favoring British shareholders in Egyptian and Indian companies and shipping lines.<ref name=rose /> The rapid spread of the disease and perceived population incompetence were used to justify British control over Egypt, despite Egypt's established national health system praised by European observers. The lack of effective measures to combat the 1883 epidemic was further complicated by European prejudices influenced by [[Orientalism]] that discredited the understanding by "Orientals" of health, science, and hygiene.<ref name=rose />
The rapid spread of the disease and the perceived incompetence of the population were used to justify British control of Egypt, despite that Egypt's established pre-colonial national health system had been talked about with appreciation by European observers.<ref name=rose /> However, the imposed [[Contingent contagionism|anti-contagionist stance]] by the British administration, favouring British shareholders in Egyptian and Indian companies and shipping lines, contributed to the lack of effective measures to combat the 1883 epidemic. Containing the epidemic further complicated by European prejudices influenced by [[Orientalism]] that discredited the understanding by "Orientals" of health, science, and hygiene.<ref name=rose />


=== Outbreak in Hamburg ===
=== Outbreak in Hamburg ===

Revision as of 08:50, 15 November 2023

Fifth cholera pandemic
German microbiologist Robert Koch (on the microscope) and Richard Friedrich Johannes Pfeiffer (standing) investigating cholera outbreak in Bombay, India.
DiseaseCholera
Bacteria strainVibrio cholerae
First outbreakGanges Delta in West Bengal
Dates1881–1896

The fifth cholera pandemic (1881–1896) was the fifth major international outbreak of cholera in the 19th century. The endemic origin of the pandemic, as had its predecessors, was in the Ganges Delta in West Bengal.[1][2] While the Vibrio cholerae bacteria had not been able to spread to western Europe until the 19th century, faster and improved modes of modern transportation, such as steamships and railways, reduced the duration of the journey considerably and facilitated the transmission of cholera and other infectious diseases.[1][3]

In addition, the growing colonial rule of the British in India, and France's colonial war in Indo-China,[4] with its increased military presence and economic exchanges multiplied the connections both inside Asia and between Asia and Europe. Therefore, cholera for the first time could spread significantly outside its original source habitat on the Indian subcontinent, where it had been home for centuries.[1][3] The fifth cholera pandemic would be known in Europe as the 'eastern plague'.[4] A better insight in the disease and improved sanitation limited mortality largely in Europe and North America, although some substantial outbreaks in Europe did happen.[5]

During this pandemic, there were significant scientific advances that improved the control of the disease. German microbiologist Robert Koch isolated Vibrio cholerae and proposed postulates to explain how bacteria caused disease. His work helped to establish the germ theory of disease.[6] In 1892, the Russian-French bacteriologist Waldemar Haffkine, developed a cholera vaccine.[7]

The spread of the pandemic

The spread of cholera in Europe in 1884
1892 Cholera outbreak in Baku. The sick bay where patients with cholera were treated.

In 1881, the cholera bacterium spread both East and West, and eventually reached Europe and Latin America.[2][8] From its endemic origin in the Ganges Delta in West Bengal, there was a virulent outbreak in the Punjab and Lahore in northwest India in the years 1881-82, with a very serious death rate. Other early outbreaks occurred in Korea in 1881, and in Thailand in 1882. Mecca (Arabia), with its yearly influx of Muslim pilgrims, was hit during both these years. Further eastward outbreaks occurred in China (also in 1883), and in Japan, followed by the Philippines in 1882-83.[2] In the following years cholera in Asia hit China in 1888, 1890, and 1895; Japan in 1885, 1886, 1890, 1891, and 1895; Korea in 1888, 1890, 1891, and 1895; and the Philippines in 1888-89.[2]

In 1883 it reached Egypt and in the course of a few months, tens of thousands of victims died.[1] Further westward cholera outbreaks occurred in April 1884 in the naval base Toulon,[4] France, with smaller outbreaks in Marseilles, Paris, and other cities, affecting 10,000 people all over France.[2] In 1885, some of the same areas were again infected. Italian migrant workers brought cholera from France to Italy, with a serious outbreak in the city of Naples in August-September 1884.[9] There were minor outbreaks in Italy in 1886-87 without causing epidemics.[2] The outbreak provoked a poisoning "phobia" directed primarily against Gypsies.[10]

The pandemic also spread to Spain, with a minor outbreak starting in Alicante on the Mediterranean coast.[11] But with a more virulent one at the end of 1885, with 160,000 cases and about 60,000 deaths.[2] In 1890 there was another smaller outbreak. According to The New York Times in 1890, cholera had swept away about 120,000 of the inhabitants in the country.[12] Quarantine measures for ships and immigrants based on the findings of the British physician, John Snow, prevented cholera outbreaks in Great Britain and the United States.[2][8][13] However, the disease reached Latin America with serious outbreaks in 1886 (Argentina), 1887 (Chile), and 1888 (Argentina and Chile).[2]

The pandemic reappeared in 1891 and originated in Bengal when 60,000 Hindu pilgrims arrived at a small village to celebrate a bathing festival unknown to the authorities. The pilgrims caused new immense cholera outbreaks in northern India during 1891, with more than 580,000 cholera deaths in Assam, Bengal, and Uttar Pradesh.[14] The disease continued westward in 1892, across the Punjab (with 75,000 cholera deaths), and raged on through Afghanistan and claimed 60,000 lives in Persia,[14][15] and then reached Russia which suffered a staggering morbidity rate, exacerbated by the Russian famine of 1891–1892.[16] Cholera's penetration in Russia began at Baku, a port on the Caspian Sea. The disease spread upstream along the Volga to reach Moscow and St. Petersburg, where morbidity was relatively minor. The official death toll for 1892 was 300,321. The epidemic faded during the winter and 42,250 cholera deaths were recorded in 1893.[16]

The busy ports of Hamburg in Germany, and New York City, the main exit and entry points for cross Atlantic emigration from Europe to the United States, were hit by serious cholera outbreaks in 1892. New York, the busiest port of the U.S. was hit by a combination of typhus fever and cholera in 1892 through Hamburg.[17] The main source of those epidemics were East European Jews, mainly from Russia, that tried to escape the appalling conditions, the 1891–1892 famine, and antisemitic restrictions (such as the expulsion of Jews from Moscow early in 1892) in their home country.[18][19] In Europe in 1892, the disease was alo prevalent in France. Germany and France were reinfected in 1893-94 but outbreaks did not reach epidemic levels.[2] Latin America again suffered attacks several times in the 1890s. Brazil was hit with cholera in 1893-95, Argentina in 1894-95, and Uruguay in 1895.[2] The pandemic also reached the African continent, with outbreaks in 1893 (Tripolitania, Tunisia, Algeria, Morocco, and French West Africa), 1894 (Sudan, Tripolitania, and French West Africa), 1895 (Morocco and Egypt), and 1896 (Egypt).[2]

Outbreak in Egypt

Egyptː 1883 Cholera epidemic in Cairo

In late June 1883, the first cases of cholera in Egypt, recently occupied by the British Empire in 1882, occurred in the port city of Damietta on the Mediterranean coast and rapidly spread in the Nile Delta and throughout the country in the summer and autumn,[20] "notwithstanding cordons maintained with a degree of severity and cruelty almost unexampled".[21] In the course of a few months, 50,000[20] or 60,000[1] people died. The sources of the contamination most likely were Muslim pilgrims returning from Mecca and Indian troops serving in the British army.[1][2] The approach of the British administration in Egypt was determined more by concerns that trade out of Indian ports towards Britain risked to be quarantined, as well as economic concerns about spending on public health.[20]

The rapid spread of the disease and the perceived incompetence of the population were used to justify British control of Egypt, despite that Egypt's established pre-colonial national health system had been talked about with appreciation by European observers.[20] However, the imposed anti-contagionist stance by the British administration, favouring British shareholders in Egyptian and Indian companies and shipping lines, contributed to the lack of effective measures to combat the 1883 epidemic. Containing the epidemic further complicated by European prejudices influenced by Orientalism that discredited the understanding by "Orientals" of health, science, and hygiene.[20]

Outbreak in Hamburg

1892 Cholera outbreak in Hamburg, Germany, hospital ward
1892 Cholera outbreak in Hamburg, Germany, disinfection team

In the autumn of 1892 the city of Hamburg, Germany, was hit by a cholera epidemic lasting just over six weeks. Nearly 10,000 people died and many more suffered the appalling symptoms of the disease. No other city in western Europe was as seriously affected in this wave of the pandemic.[22] Although at the time it was fiercely contested, the infection of the city's water-supply was the main reason for the rapid spread of the cholera. The death rate of the population was 13.4 per cent according to the official statistics, but it may have even been higher.[23]

In 1893 violent riots broke out, because the public objected to sanitary officers trying to enforce regulations for the prevention of spread of the disease. The crowd beat to death a sanitary officer and one of the policemen sent to protect them. Troops were called out and dispersed the crowd with fixed bayonets.[24]

American author Mark Twain visited Hamburg during the outbreak. In a piece dated 1891-1892, he points out the insufficient information in local newspapers about the outbreak, particularly regarding death figures. Twain criticizes how impoverished individuals were forcefully moved to pest houses where many perished unrecognized and unceremoniously buried. He expresses disappointment at the global, and specifically American, lack of awareness concerning cholera.[25]

Scientific advances

Photograph of Koch (third from the right) and other members of the German Cholera Commission in Egypt, 1884
Haffkine during anti-cholera vaccination in Calcutta, March 1894

In August 1883, the German government sent a medical team led by Robert Koch to Alexandria, Egypt, to investigate a cholera epidemic there.[6] As the outbreak in Egypt declined, he was transferred to Calcutta (now Kolkata) India, where there was a more severe outbreak. He soon found that the river Ganges was the source of cholera. He performed autopsies of almost 100 bodies, and found in each bacterial infection. He identified the same bacteria from water tanks, linking the source of the infection. Koch isolated Vibrio cholerae and proposed postulates to explain how bacteria caused disease. His work helped to establish the germ theory of disease.[6]

Prior to this time, many physicians believed the disease was caused by direct exposure to the products of filth and decay. Koch helped establish that the disease was more specifically contagious and was transmitted by exposure to the feces of an infected person, including through contaminated water supply.[26]

Waldemar Haffkine, a Russian-French bacteriologist, focused his research on developing a cholera vaccine, and produced an attenuated form of the bacterium. Risking his own life, on 18 July 1892, Haffkine performed the first human test on himself. To definitively test the vaccine, he needed an area where cholera was common to conduct large trials on humans and moved to India in 1894. After Haffkine's experiments in Calcutta showed promising results, he was asked by the owners of tea plantations in Assam to vaccinate their workers.[7]

Society and culture

The pandemic had a significant impact on the cultural history of the affected regions. For example, the pandemic inspired the creation of the "cholera waltz"[27] which was a satirical dance that mocked the government's response to the outbreak.[28]

The pandemic led to the introduction of new laws and regulations aimed at controlling the spread of the disease. For example, many countries introduced quarantine measures for ships arriving from affected regions.[28]

The pandemic was perceived as a threat to the social order and was often associated with the lower classes. The disease was also linked to poverty, filth, and immorality.[28]

The stigma associated with cholera led to the isolation and quarantine of infected individuals and their families. This often resulted in social ostracism and economic hardship.[28]

See also

References

  1. ^ a b c d e f Snowden, Naples in the time of cholera, 1884-1911, p. 59
  2. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m Kohn, Encyclopedia of Plague and Pestilence, p. 15
  3. ^ a b Hayes, The Burdens of Disease, p. 136; pp. 180-86
  4. ^ a b c Snowden, Naples in the time of cholera, 1884-1911, p. 62
  5. ^ Aberth, Plagues in World History, p. 102
  6. ^ a b c Howard-Jones, N. (1984). "Robert Koch and the cholera vibrio: a centenary". British Medical Journal. 288 (6414): 379–381. doi:10.1136/bmj.288.6414.379. PMC 1444283. PMID 6419937.
  7. ^ a b Gunter, Joel; Pandey, Vikas (11 December 2020). "Waldemar Haffkine: The vaccine pioneer the world forgot". BBC News. Retrieved 14 December 2020.
  8. ^ a b "Cholera's seven pandemics". Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. May 9, 2008. Retrieved 14 May 2020.
  9. ^ Snowden, Naples in the time of cholera, 1884-1911, p. 104
  10. ^ Aberth, Plagues in World History, p. 105
  11. ^ Cholera Invades Spain. Great Alarm at Madrid And In The Provinces. The Dread Disease Appears in Alicante, The New York Times, September 3, 1884
  12. ^ The Cholera In Spain, The New York Times, June 20, 1890
  13. ^ Hayes, The Burdens of Disease, p. 147
  14. ^ a b Kohn, Encyclopedia of Plague and Pestilence, p. 151
  15. ^ Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Cholera" . Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 6 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 262–267, see page 265, para 3. 1892–1895.—
  16. ^ a b Kohn, Encyclopedia of Plague and Pestilence, p. 283-84
  17. ^ Markel, Quarantine!, pp. 88-90
  18. ^ Evans, Death in Hamburg, pp. 279-82
  19. ^ Markel, Quarantine!, p. 11; p. 18
  20. ^ a b c d e Rose, Christopher (25 May 2020). "A Tale of Two Contagions: Science, Imperialism, and the 1883 Cholera in Egypt". Islamic Law Blog. Harvard Law School. Retrieved 11 November 2023.
  21. ^ Snowden, Naples in the time of cholera, 1884-1911, p. 83, quoting The Progress of Cholera, The Lancet (1883, vol. 2), p. 159.
  22. ^ Evans, Death in Hamburg, p. vii
  23. ^ Evans, Death in Hamburg, pp. 292-93
  24. ^ Cholera Riot In Hamburg; Sanitary Officers Again Attacked By A Mob, The New York Times, October 11, 1893
  25. ^ Blount, Roy K. (2010). A tramp abroad. Following the equator: other travels. New York: Library of America. p. 1145.
  26. ^ Evans, Death in Hamburg, p. 267
  27. ^ Holsapple, Cortell King (1938). ""The Masque of the Red Death" and "I Promessi Sposi"". Studies in English (18). Holsapple, Cortell King: 137–39. JSTOR 20779501.
  28. ^ a b c d Briggs, Asa (1961). "Cholera and Society in the Nineteenth Century". Past & Present. 19 (19): 76–96. doi:10.1093/past/19.1.76. JSTOR 649981.

Sources