Jump to content

Charles Ingram: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Disambiguating links to Al Jazeera (link changed to Al Jazeera English) using DisamAssist.
Moving up trial details so that events are in chronological order. Removing unnecessary and highly subjective phrasing, such as "He was taking brazen risks and playing the game in an unusual manner"
Tag: Reverted
Line 28: Line 28:
}}
}}


'''Charles William Ingram''' (born 6 August 1963) is an English fraudster, [[novelist]] and former [[British Army]] [[Major (United Kingdom)|major]] who gained notoriety for his appearance on the [[ITV (TV network)|ITV]] [[game show|television game show]] ''[[Who Wants to Be a Millionaire? (British game show)|Who Wants to Be a Millionaire?]]'' In episodes recorded in September 2001, Ingram correctly answered fifteen questions to win the show's maximum prize of [[Pound sterling|£]]1 million,<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/1436999/Millionaire-cheat-told-to-leave-Army.html|title=Millionaire cheat told to leave Army|date= 24 July 2003|work=[[The Daily Telegraph]]|access-date=16 April 2020}}</ref> becoming the third recorded contestant to ever do so. However, he was denied the winnings due to suspicion of cheating.
'''Charles William Ingram''' (born 6 August 1963) is an English [[novelist]] and former [[British Army]] [[Major (United Kingdom)|major]] who gained notoriety for his appearance on the [[ITV (TV network)|ITV]] [[game show|television game show]] ''[[Who Wants to Be a Millionaire? (British game show)|Who Wants to Be a Millionaire?]]'' In episodes recorded in September 2001, Ingram correctly answered fifteen questions to win the show's maximum prize of [[Pound sterling|£]]1 million,<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/1436999/Millionaire-cheat-told-to-leave-Army.html|title=Millionaire cheat told to leave Army|date= 24 July 2003|work=[[The Daily Telegraph]]|access-date=16 April 2020}}</ref> becoming the third UK contestant ever to do so. However, he was denied the winnings due to suspicion of cheating.


Following [[R v Ingram, C., Ingram, D. and Whittock, T.|a lengthy trial]] at [[Southwark Crown Court]], Ingram was convicted on a single count of [[Deception (criminal law)|procuring the execution of a valuable security by deception]]. He was subsequently convicted of an unrelated offence involving [[insurance fraud]] in 2003 and ordered to resign his commission as a major by the [[Army Board]].
Following [[R v Ingram, C., Ingram, D. and Whittock, T.|a lengthy trial]] at [[Southwark Crown Court]], Ingram was convicted on a single count of [[Deception (criminal law)|procuring the execution of a valuable security by deception]]. He was subsequently convicted of an unrelated offence involving [[insurance fraud]] in 2003 and ordered to resign his commission as a major by the [[Army Board]].
Line 55: Line 55:
On 9 September 2001, Ingram became a contestant on the [[ITV (TV network)|ITV]] game show ''[[Who Wants to Be a Millionaire? (UK game show)|Who Wants to Be a Millionaire?]]'', following his wife Diana and her brother Adrian Pollock, each of whom had won [[Pound sterling|£]]32,000 as contestants on the show.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/2823407.stm |title=Major Charles Ingram has been found guilty of cheating his way to the top prize on ''Who Wants to Be a Millionaire'' |access-date=13 May 2008 |date=7 April 2003 |work=BBC News}}</ref><ref>{{cite AV media |people=[[Martin Bashir]] |year=2003 |title=Who Wants to Be a Millionaire: Major Fraud |medium=Television |publisher=ITV |location=London, England}}</ref> To prepare, Ingram practised for about twenty minutes per day on a homemade "[[Fastest Finger First (Who Wants to Be a Millionaire?)|Fastest Finger First]]" machine.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1425308/Millionaire-quiz-major-had-ploy-to-foil-Tarrant.html|title=Millionaire quiz major had ploy to foil Tarrant|last=Woolcock|first=Nicola|date=22 March 2003|work=The Daily Telegraph|access-date=16 March 2019}}</ref> Ingram got into the "hot seat" but used two lifelines early, ending the day at £4,000 and with only the 50/50 lifeline remaining. The production team doubted he would proceed much further, but he ended up making it all the way to the £1 million jackpot on the second day of recording.<ref name=":0" />
On 9 September 2001, Ingram became a contestant on the [[ITV (TV network)|ITV]] game show ''[[Who Wants to Be a Millionaire? (UK game show)|Who Wants to Be a Millionaire?]]'', following his wife Diana and her brother Adrian Pollock, each of whom had won [[Pound sterling|£]]32,000 as contestants on the show.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/2823407.stm |title=Major Charles Ingram has been found guilty of cheating his way to the top prize on ''Who Wants to Be a Millionaire'' |access-date=13 May 2008 |date=7 April 2003 |work=BBC News}}</ref><ref>{{cite AV media |people=[[Martin Bashir]] |year=2003 |title=Who Wants to Be a Millionaire: Major Fraud |medium=Television |publisher=ITV |location=London, England}}</ref> To prepare, Ingram practised for about twenty minutes per day on a homemade "[[Fastest Finger First (Who Wants to Be a Millionaire?)|Fastest Finger First]]" machine.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1425308/Millionaire-quiz-major-had-ploy-to-foil-Tarrant.html|title=Millionaire quiz major had ploy to foil Tarrant|last=Woolcock|first=Nicola|date=22 March 2003|work=The Daily Telegraph|access-date=16 March 2019}}</ref> Ingram got into the "hot seat" but used two lifelines early, ending the day at £4,000 and with only the 50/50 lifeline remaining. The production team doubted he would proceed much further, but he ended up making it all the way to the £1 million jackpot on the second day of recording.<ref name=":0" />


Throughout Ingram's run, the production team grew more and more suspicious of Charles. He was taking brazen risks and playing the game in an unusual manner. One of the questions Ingram got during the run was "Who had a hit UK album with ''[[Born to Do It]]'' released in 2000?" After using his 50/50 the two remaining answers were [[A1 (group)|A1]] (what he thought the answer was) and [[Craig David]], who he said he had never heard of. After nearly locking in A1 as his final answer, he backed off and later said "80% of the time I'm wrong when I guess, so you know what—I'll go Craig David." He then locked in Craig David as his final answer, which was correct. At the penultimate question worth £500,000, Ingram was given the question "[[Baron Haussmann]] is best known for his planning of which city?" Among the options were [[Berlin]] and [[Paris]], the former of which he immediately assumed as the right answer due to his belief that Baron Haussmann was a German name. However, after a while he said "there's a possibility that it's Paris" before eventually deciding to lock it in as his final answer. This got Ingram to the million pound question—"A number one followed by one hundred zeros is known by what name?"—to which he thought the answer was [[nanomole]] and initially said he did not know what a [[googol]] was. However, he eventually decided to lock in "googol" as his final answer which won him the million pound jackpot.<ref>{{cite AV media |people=[[Martin Bashir]] |year=2003 |title=Who Wants to Be a Millionaire: Major Fraud |medium=Television |publisher=ITV |location=London, England}}</ref>
Ingram's £32,000 question was "Who had a hit UK album with ''[[Born to Do It]]'' released in 2000?" Ingram was unsure, but indicated he thought it was [[A1 (group)|A1]]. He then used his 50/50 lifeline to eliminate two wrong answers; A1 and [[Craig David]] remained. Ingram said he had never heard of Craig David, and nearly locked in A1. Then he said "Eighty percent of the time I'm wrong when I guess ... I'll go Craig David." This was correct, and guaranteed Ingram £32,000 even if he later gave an incorrect answer. Ingram got the next three questions right, and then faced the £500,000 question "[[Baron Haussmann]] is best known for his planning of which city?" Ingram said he thought it was [[Berlin]] due to the name sounding German. However, he eventually decided on [[Paris]] as his final answer. This got him to the million pound question: "A number one followed by one hundred zeros is known by what name?" Ingram initially said he thought it was [[Nanomole]], but "by process of elimination" eventually decided on [[Googol]], which he said he had never heard of. Host [[Chris Tarrant]] reminded him that he could simply take the £500,000 and not risk losing £468,000 if his answer was wrong. Ingram chose to play, and thus won the million pound jackpot.<ref>{{cite AV media |people=[[Martin Bashir]] |year=2003 |title=Who Wants to Be a Millionaire: Major Fraud |medium=Television |publisher=ITV |location=London, England}}</ref>


By the time Ingram had finished his run, producers were suspicious enough that a search was performed on him. Ingram’s hair, clothing and shoes were searched; however, the method of cheating used meant nothing incriminating was found on his person. After he left the set, the show's production company, [[Celador]], were tipped off by the show's producers of the assumed irregularities occurring within the quiz and suspended the jackpot payout to investigate the matter. At the same time, the show's presenter, [[Chris Tarrant]], overheard that the Ingrams had been arguing, despite Ingram's success, moments before Tarrant joined them in their dressing room for champagne; another member of the production team also noted a similar thought about the couple's behaviour.<ref name="Millionaire winner 'unhappy'">{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/2836937.stm|title=Millionaire winner 'unhappy'|date=10 March 2003|access-date=13 May 2008|work=BBC News}}</ref> While reviewing the recording, the production team made a connection between Ingram's answers and coughs coming from one of the waiting contestants, lecturer Tecwen Whittock; in another instance, the coughing came from Ingram's wife while she was in the audience.<ref name=":0">{{Cite news|url=https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/vdqdw9/15-years-of-the-coughing-major-who-wants-to-be-a-millionare|title=That Time a Guy Won 'Who Wants to Be a Millionaire?' by Cheating Terribly |author=Harrison, Angus |date=9 September 2016 |work=[[Vice (magazine)|VICE]]|access-date=5 July 2018|language=en-us}}</ref> Based on this evidence, all three were accused of cheating, and the matter handed over to police to investigate further. Whittock and the Ingrams were eventually charged with "[[Deception (criminal law)|procuring the execution of a valuable security by deception]]".
Producers were highly suspicious that Ingram had somehow been given answers. After his win, Ingram’s hair, clothing, and shoes were searched, but nothing incriminating was found. The show's production company, [[Celador]], suspended the jackpot payout to investigate the matter. At the same time, Tarrant overheard that the Ingrams had been arguing, despite Ingram's success, moments before Tarrant joined them in their dressing room for champagne; another member of the production team also noted a similar thought about the couple's behaviour.<ref name="Millionaire winner 'unhappy'">{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/2836937.stm|title=Millionaire winner 'unhappy'|date=10 March 2003|access-date=13 May 2008|work=BBC News}}</ref> While reviewing the recording, the production team made a connection between Ingram's answers and coughs coming from one of the waiting contestants, lecturer Tecwen Whittock; in another instance, the coughing came from Ingram's wife while she was in the audience.<ref name=":0">{{Cite news|url=https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/vdqdw9/15-years-of-the-coughing-major-who-wants-to-be-a-millionare|title=That Time a Guy Won 'Who Wants to Be a Millionaire?' by Cheating Terribly |author=Harrison, Angus |date=9 September 2016 |work=[[Vice (magazine)|VICE]]|access-date=5 July 2018|language=en-us}}</ref> Based on this evidence, all three were accused of cheating, and the matter handed over to police to investigate further. Whittock and the Ingrams were eventually charged with "[[Deception (criminal law)|procuring the execution of a valuable security by deception]]".


=== Trial ===
=== Trial ===
Following [[R v Ingram, C., Ingram, D. and Whittock, T.|a trial]] at [[Southwark Crown Court]] lasting four weeks (including jury deliberation for three and a half days), Ingram, his wife and Whittock were convicted by a majority verdict of their offences on 7 April 2003. Both of the Ingrams and Whittock were given prison sentences, [[suspended sentence|suspended]] for two years&mdash;the Ingrams were sentenced to eighteen months; Whittock was sentenced to twelve months&mdash;and each [[fine (penalty)|fined]] £15,000 and ordered to pay £10,000 towards prosecution costs. Within two months of the verdict and sentence, the trial's judge ordered the Ingrams to pay additional [[defense (law)|defence]] costs, which left them repaying a total of £115,000.<ref>{{cite news |title=Charles Ingram transcript |url=https://www.standard.co.uk/news/charles-ingram-transcript-6967487.html |access-date=13 January 2019 |work=Evening Standard |date=21 January 2004}}</ref>
Following [[R v Ingram, C., Ingram, D. and Whittock, T.|a trial]] at [[Southwark Crown Court]] lasting four weeks (including jury deliberation for three and a half days), the Ingrams and Whittock were convicted by a 10-1 verdict on 7 April 2003. The three were given prison sentences, [[suspended sentence|suspended]] for two years&mdash;the Ingrams were sentenced to eighteen months; Whittock was sentenced to twelve months&mdash;and each [[fine (penalty)|fined]] £15,000 and ordered to pay £10,000 towards prosecution costs. Within two months of the verdict and sentence, the trial's judge ordered the Ingrams to pay additional [[defense (law)|defence]] costs, which left them owing a total of £115,000.<ref>{{cite news |title=Charles Ingram transcript |url=https://www.standard.co.uk/news/charles-ingram-transcript-6967487.html |access-date=13 January 2019 |work=Evening Standard |date=21 January 2004}}</ref>

On 19 August 2003, the Army Board ordered Ingram to resign his commission as a major after sixteen years of service, but stated that this would not affect his [[pension]] entitlements.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/3092357.stm|title=BBC NEWS - UK - Millionaire cheat sacked by Army|website=news.bbc.co.uk|date=24 July 2003}}</ref>

On 19 May 2004, the [[Court of Appeal]] denied Ingram leave to appeal against his conviction and upheld his sentence but agreed to quash his wife's fine and prosecution costs.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/wiltshire/3728929.stm |title=TV quiz cheat loses his appeal |access-date=13 May 2008 |date=19 May 2004 |work=BBC News}}</ref> On 5 October, the [[House of Lords]] denied Ingram leave to appeal against his fine and prosecution costs, and he appealed to the [[European Court of Human Rights]]. On 20 October, the original trial judge reduced Ingram's defence costs order to £25,000 and Diana's defence costs order to £5,000.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/wiltshire/3762688.stm |title=Quiz cheat has defence costs cut |access-date=13 May 2008 |date=21 October 2004 |work=BBC News}}</ref> Ingram's defence costs were later further reduced to £5,000 on appeal.

In 2006, journalist [[Jon Ronson]], who covered the case at the time for ''[[The Guardian (newspaper)|The Guardian]]'', wrote that he believed the Ingrams might be innocent. Ronson, who attended every day of the trial, had observed that when the word "cough" was mentioned, pensioners in the public gallery had coughed. Chess [[Grandmaster (chess)|grandmaster]] [[James Plaskett]], who had appeared in the Fastest Finger First round several times before winning £250,000 in January 2006, argued this was an example of coughs caused by unconscious triggers; Whittock or others had simply coughed involuntarily upon hearing the correct answer. Whittock was also accused of having coughed after Ingram mentioned an incorrect option to his penultimate question and swiftly following that up with a smothered "no". However, Plaskett, who had sat in that very same seat, argued that someone might have audibly said it in response to an incorrect option in the same way that other waiting contestants have been known to whisper "no".<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2006/jul/17/couldthewhowantstobeami|title=Are the Millionaire three innocent?|last=Ronson|first=Jon|date=17 July 2006|work=The Guardian|access-date=17 August 2014|location=London}}</ref>


====Recorded evidence====
====Recorded evidence====
Line 72: Line 66:


====Testimony of Larry Whitehurst====
====Testimony of Larry Whitehurst====
Larry Whitehurst, another contestant who had appeared on the show as a Fastest Finger First contestant on four occasions, was adamant that he had known the answers to Ingram's questions. He told the court that he had been able to detect a pattern of coughing, and that he was entirely convinced that coughing had helped Ingram.<ref name="BBC News–Coughs">{{cite news|title=Contestant 'spotted Millionaire coughs'|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/2839587.stm|work=BBC News|access-date=8 July 2011|date=11 March 2003}}</ref>
Graham "Larry" Whitehurst, another contestant who had appeared on the show as a Fastest Finger First contestant on four occasions, told the court that he had observed a pattern of coughs from Whittock which he was convinced had helped Ingram. Whitehurst said he knew the answer to the million pound question, and observed Whittock cough as soon as Ingram mentioned "Googol".<ref name="BBC News–Coughs">{{cite news|title=Contestant 'spotted Millionaire coughs'|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/2839587.stm|work=BBC News|access-date=8 July 2011|date=11 March 2003}}</ref>


====Testimony of Tecwen Whittock====
====Testimony of Tecwen Whittock====
Whittock claims to have suffered a persistent cough for his entire life,<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.theguardian.com/weekend/story/0,3605,938649,00.html |title=So I phoned a friend – part two |access-date=13 May 2008 |date=19 April 2003 |location=London |work=The Guardian}}</ref> insisted that he had a genuine cough caused by a combination of [[hay fever]] and a dust [[allergy]], and that it was only coincidence that his throat problem coincided with the right answers.<ref name="scotsman_pager" /> During the trial, however, the jury heard evidence that once Whittock himself earned the right to sit in the hot seat, his throat problems disappeared.<ref name="scotsman_pager" /> Whittock later testified that he drank several glasses of water before he went in front of the cameras.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/2888791.stm |title=Cheating 'silly' says Millionaire accused |access-date=13 May 2008 |date=26 March 2003 |work=BBC News}}</ref> Whittock also insisted that he had not known the answers to three of the questions he allegedly helped with. However, the police found the answer to the twelfth question, regarding the artist who painted ''[[The Ambassadors (Holbein)|The Ambassadors]]'', in a hand-written general knowledge book at Whittock's home.<ref name="scotsman_pager">{{cite news |url=http://news.scotsman.com/uk/Pager-plot-too-risky-for.2408136.jp |title=Pager plot too risky for TV quiz |access-date=13 May 2008 |date=7 March 2003 |location=Edinburgh |work=The Scotsman |first=John |last=Innes|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121022105328/http://www.scotsman.com/news/uk/pager-plot-too-risky-for-tv-quiz-1-548871|archive-date=22 October 2012}}</ref>
Whittock insisted that he had a genuine cough caused by a combination of [[hay fever]] and a dust [[allergy]], and that any coughs after correct answers were only a coincidence.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.theguardian.com/weekend/story/0,3605,938649,00.html |title=So I phoned a friend – part two |access-date=13 May 2008 |date=19 April 2003 |location=London |work=The Guardian}}</ref><ref name="scotsman_pager" /> During the trial, however, the jury heard evidence that once Whittock himself earned the right to sit in the hot seat, his throat problems disappeared.<ref name="scotsman_pager" /> Whittock later testified that he drank several glasses of water before he went in front of the cameras.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/2888791.stm |title=Cheating 'silly' says Millionaire accused |access-date=13 May 2008 |date=26 March 2003 |work=BBC News}}</ref> Whittock also insisted that he had not known the answers to three of the questions he allegedly helped with. However, the police found the answer to the twelfth question, regarding the artist who painted ''[[The Ambassadors (Holbein)|The Ambassadors]]'', in a hand-written general knowledge book at Whittock's home.<ref name="scotsman_pager">{{cite news |url=http://news.scotsman.com/uk/Pager-plot-too-risky-for.2408136.jp |title=Pager plot too risky for TV quiz |access-date=13 May 2008 |date=7 March 2003 |location=Edinburgh |work=The Scotsman |first=John |last=Innes|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121022105328/http://www.scotsman.com/news/uk/pager-plot-too-risky-for-tv-quiz-1-548871|archive-date=22 October 2012}}</ref>


Davies, the floor manager on ''Millionaire'', said that as soon as the coughing came to his notice during the recording he decided to find out who was responsible. "The loudest coughing was coming from Tecwen in seat number three", he said. "He was talking to the person to his left when I was observing him, and then he turned towards the set and the hot seat to {{nowrap|cough"{{mdash}}{{tsp}}}}and while Davies described this as "bizarre", Whittock remarked during the trial, "You do not cough into someone's face".<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.portia.org/chapter14/major.html |title=Playing the game |access-date=26 September 2004 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20041020172443/http://www.portia.org/chapter14/major.html |archive-date=20 October 2004 }}</ref>
Davies, the floor manager on ''Millionaire'', said that as soon as the coughing came to his notice during the recording he decided to find out who was responsible. "The loudest coughing was coming from Tecwen in seat number three", he said. "He was talking to the person to his left when I was observing him, and then he turned towards the set and the hot seat to {{nowrap|cough"{{mdash}}{{tsp}}}}and while Davies described this as "bizarre", Whittock remarked during the trial, "You do not cough into someone's face".<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.portia.org/chapter14/major.html |title=Playing the game |access-date=26 September 2004 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20041020172443/http://www.portia.org/chapter14/major.html |archive-date=20 October 2004 }}</ref>


During the trial, Whittock portrayed himself as a "serial quiz show loser" because he had been eliminated in round one of [[Channel 4]]'s ''[[Fifteen to One]]'', had also failed on ITV's ''[[The People Versus]]'' and had been able to win only an atlas on his appearance on ITV's ''[[Sale of the Century (UK game show)|Sale of the Century]]''. He had also done poorly on ''Beat the Bong'', although he did reach the semi-final stage of the [[BBC]] radio quiz show ''[[Brain of Britain]]''.<ref name="scotsman_whittock">{{cite news |url=http://news.scotsman.com/topics.cfm?tid=788&id=360802003 |title=Lecturer a serial quiz show failure, court is told |access-date=13 May 2008 |date=26 March 2003 |location=Edinburgh |work=The Scotsman|last=Innes|first=John|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20030418205015/http://www.news.scotsman.com/topics.cfm?id=360802003&tid=788|archive-date=18 April 2003}}</ref>
During the trial, Whittock portrayed himself as a "serial quiz show loser" because he had been eliminated in round one of [[Channel 4]]'s ''[[Fifteen to One]]'', had also failed on ITV's ''[[The People Versus]]'' and had been able to win only an atlas on his appearance on ITV's ''[[Sale of the Century (UK game show)|Sale of the Century]]''. He had also done poorly on ''Beat the Bong'', although he did reach the semi-final stage of the [[BBC]] radio quiz show ''[[Brain of Britain]]''.<ref name="scotsman_whittock">{{cite news |url=http://news.scotsman.com/topics.cfm?tid=788&id=360802003 |title=Lecturer a serial quiz show failure, court is told |access-date=13 May 2008 |date=26 March 2003 |location=Edinburgh |work=The Scotsman|last=Innes|first=John|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20030418205015/http://www.news.scotsman.com/topics.cfm?id=360802003&tid=788|archive-date=18 April 2003}}</ref>

=== Aftermath ===
On 19 August 2003, the Army Board ordered Ingram to resign his commission as a major after sixteen years of service, but stated that this would not affect his [[pension]] entitlements.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/3092357.stm|title=BBC NEWS - UK - Millionaire cheat sacked by Army|website=news.bbc.co.uk|date=24 July 2003}}</ref>

On 19 May 2004, the [[Court of Appeal]] denied Ingram leave to appeal against his conviction and upheld his sentence but agreed to quash his wife's fine and prosecution costs.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/wiltshire/3728929.stm |title=TV quiz cheat loses his appeal |access-date=13 May 2008 |date=19 May 2004 |work=BBC News}}</ref> On 5 October, the [[House of Lords]] denied Ingram leave to appeal against his fine and prosecution costs, and he appealed to the [[European Court of Human Rights]]. On 20 October, the original trial judge reduced Ingram's defence costs order to £25,000 and Diana's defence costs order to £5,000.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/wiltshire/3762688.stm |title=Quiz cheat has defence costs cut |access-date=13 May 2008 |date=21 October 2004 |work=BBC News}}</ref> Ingram's defence costs were later further reduced to £5,000 on appeal.

[[Grandmaster (chess)|Chess grandmaster]] [[James Plaskett]] wrote an essay arguing that no cheating had occurred. In 2006, journalist [[Jon Ronson]], who covered the case at the time for ''[[The Guardian (newspaper)|The Guardian]]'', read the essay and began to doubt the defendants' guilt. Ronson, who attended every day of the trial, had observed that the mention of the word "cough" seemed to cause people to cough. Plaskett, who had appeared in the Fastest Finger First round several times before winning £250,000 in January 2006, argued that a correct answer being mentioned might also have been an unconscious trigger for coughs. On the second-to-last question, Whittock was also accused of having coughed at the wrong time and swiftly following that up with a smothered "no". However, Plaskett, who had sat in that very same seat, said that it was common for waiting contestants to whisper "no" when the contestant favored an incorrect answer.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2006/jul/17/couldthewhowantstobeami|title=Are the Millionaire three innocent?|last=Ronson|first=Jon|date=17 July 2006|work=The Guardian|access-date=17 August 2014|location=London}}</ref>


==After ''Millionaire''==
==After ''Millionaire''==
Line 95: Line 96:
In late 2003, Ingram and his wife were charged with further [[fraud]] offences. On 28 October, Ingram was found guilty at [[Bournemouth Crown Court]] of obtaining a pecuniary advantage by deception, and of a second charge of deception, having attempted to claim on an insurance policy after an alleged [[burglary]] at his home. Ingram had failed to tell [[Direct Line]] Insurance about claims he had made in the three years before he took out the policy in July 2001. However a spokesman for Wiltshire Constabulary, David Taylor, said those offences were "not fraud". The court was told that Ingram had been a "habitual claimant" with [[Norwich Union]] after suffering "unfortunate" losses of private possessions.<ref name=woolcock>{{cite news |last1=Woolcock |first1=Nicola |title='Millionaire' quiz cheat guilty of insurance fraud |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1445354/Millionaire-quiz-cheat-guilty-of-insurance-fraud.html |access-date=12 September 2018 |work=Daily Telegraph (UK) |date=29 October 2003}}</ref>
In late 2003, Ingram and his wife were charged with further [[fraud]] offences. On 28 October, Ingram was found guilty at [[Bournemouth Crown Court]] of obtaining a pecuniary advantage by deception, and of a second charge of deception, having attempted to claim on an insurance policy after an alleged [[burglary]] at his home. Ingram had failed to tell [[Direct Line]] Insurance about claims he had made in the three years before he took out the policy in July 2001. However a spokesman for Wiltshire Constabulary, David Taylor, said those offences were "not fraud". The court was told that Ingram had been a "habitual claimant" with [[Norwich Union]] after suffering "unfortunate" losses of private possessions.<ref name=woolcock>{{cite news |last1=Woolcock |first1=Nicola |title='Millionaire' quiz cheat guilty of insurance fraud |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1445354/Millionaire-quiz-cheat-guilty-of-insurance-fraud.html |access-date=12 September 2018 |work=Daily Telegraph (UK) |date=29 October 2003}}</ref>


Christopher Parker, prosecuting, said Ingram switched insurers to [[Zurich Insurance Group]] in 1997, after Norwich Union reduced a burglary claim from £19,000 to £9,000, and in 2000 switched again to Direct Line. "He has been [https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/ineluctable#Adjective ineluctably] dishonest," Parker said. "He went to Direct Line and didn't make a disclosure about his claims history, because he knew he wouldn't have been insured. It might not have started off as the most monstrous piece of villainy but these things tend to snowball and it all came to a sticky end when he claimed for £30,000." Staff at Direct Line were already "suspicious" about Ingram's £30,000 burglary claim but decided to investigate only after reading newspaper coverage about his questionable win on ''Millionaire''.<ref name=woolcock/>
Christopher Parker, prosecuting, said Ingram switched insurers to [[Zurich Insurance Group]] in 1997, after Norwich Union reduced a burglary claim from £19,000 to £9,000, and in 2000 switched again to Direct Line. "He has been [[wiktionary:ineluctable#Adjective|ineluctably]] dishonest," Parker said. "He went to Direct Line and didn't make a disclosure about his claims history, because he knew he wouldn't have been insured. It might not have started off as the most monstrous piece of villainy but these things tend to snowball and it all came to a sticky end when he claimed for £30,000." Staff at Direct Line were already "suspicious" about Ingram's £30,000 burglary claim but decided to investigate only after reading newspaper coverage about his questionable win on ''Millionaire''.<ref name=woolcock/>


Ingram was given a [[conditional discharge]] on the charge of fraudulently claiming £30,000 on insurance. The judge told Ingram he took into account "the punishment [Ingram had] brought upon [himself] and [his] dire financial state" and rejected an alternative option of [[community service]] after Ingram told a [[probation officer]] he feared other criminals would bully him.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Savill |first1=Richard |title=Cheating major walks free over insurance fraud |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1447382/Cheating-major-walks-free-over-insurance-fraud.html |access-date=12 September 2018 |work=Daily Telegraph (UK) |date=22 November 2003}}</ref>
Ingram was given a [[conditional discharge]] on the charge of fraudulently claiming £30,000 on insurance. The judge told Ingram he took into account "the punishment [Ingram had] brought upon [himself] and [his] dire financial state" and rejected an alternative option of [[community service]] after Ingram told a [[probation officer]] he feared other criminals would bully him.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Savill |first1=Richard |title=Cheating major walks free over insurance fraud |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1447382/Cheating-major-walks-free-over-insurance-fraud.html |access-date=12 September 2018 |work=Daily Telegraph (UK) |date=22 November 2003}}</ref>
Line 102: Line 103:
A book covering the case, ''Bad Show: The Quiz, The Cough, The Millionaire Major'', by [[Bob Woffinden]] and [[James Plaskett]], was published in January 2015.
A book covering the case, ''Bad Show: The Quiz, The Cough, The Millionaire Major'', by [[Bob Woffinden]] and [[James Plaskett]], was published in January 2015.


''[[Quiz (play)|Quiz]]'', a play written by [[James Graham (playwright)|James Graham]] that re-examines the events and subsequent conviction of the Ingrams and Whittock, opened at the [[Minerva Theatre, Chichester|Minerva Theatre]], [[Chichester]], on 3 November 2017, running until 9 December 2017.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.cft.org.uk/whats-on/event/quiz |title=Quiz |access-date=18 November 2017 |publisher=[[Chichester Festival Theatre]] |archive-date=21 August 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170821084444/https://www.cft.org.uk/whats-on/event/quiz |url-status=dead }}</ref> The play transferred to the [[West End theatre|West End]], playing at the [[Noël Coward Theatre]] from 31 March 2018 to 16 June 2018.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://quiztheplay.com/|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180412123518/http://quiztheplay.com/|url-status=dead|archive-date=12 April 2018|title=Quiz the Play by James Graham {{!}} Official West End Website|date=12 April 2018|access-date=12 April 2018}}</ref> In 2019, Graham adapted his play into a [[Quiz (TV series)|serial drama]] for [[ITV (TV channel)|ITV]] that was broadcast in April 2020 in three parts.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.itvmedia.co.uk/making-an-impact/itv-has-commissioned-quiz-a-three-part-drama-directed-by-stephen-frears-starring-hollywood-star-michael-sheen|title=ITV has commissioned 'Quiz' a three-part drama directed by Stephen Frears starring Hollywood star, Michael Sheen|website=ITV Media|language=en|access-date=15 November 2019|archive-date=15 November 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191115112808/https://www.itvmedia.co.uk/making-an-impact/itv-has-commissioned-quiz-a-three-part-drama-directed-by-stephen-frears-starring-hollywood-star-michael-sheen|url-status=dead}}</ref> Ingram was portrayed in the series by [[Matthew Macfadyen]]. The series also aired on [[AMC (TV channel)|AMC]] and [[BBC America]] in the United States in June 2020 and on [[RTÉ One]] in Ireland in February 2021.
''[[Quiz (play)|Quiz]]'', a play written by [[James Graham (playwright)|James Graham]] that re-examines the events and subsequent conviction of the Ingrams and Whittock, opened at the [[Minerva Theatre, Chichester|Minerva Theatre]], [[Chichester]], on 3 November 2017, running until 9 December 2017.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.cft.org.uk/whats-on/event/quiz |title=Quiz |access-date=18 November 2017 |publisher=[[Chichester Festival Theatre]] |archive-date=21 August 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170821084444/https://www.cft.org.uk/whats-on/event/quiz |url-status=dead}}</ref> The play transferred to the [[West End theatre|West End]], playing at the [[Noël Coward Theatre]] from 31 March 2018 to 16 June 2018.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://quiztheplay.com/|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180412123518/http://quiztheplay.com/|url-status=dead|archive-date=12 April 2018|title=Quiz the Play by James Graham {{!}} Official West End Website|date=12 April 2018|access-date=12 April 2018}}</ref> In 2019, Graham adapted his play into a [[Quiz (TV series)|serial drama]] for [[ITV (TV channel)|ITV]] that was broadcast in April 2020 in three parts.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.itvmedia.co.uk/making-an-impact/itv-has-commissioned-quiz-a-three-part-drama-directed-by-stephen-frears-starring-hollywood-star-michael-sheen|title=ITV has commissioned 'Quiz' a three-part drama directed by Stephen Frears starring Hollywood star, Michael Sheen|website=ITV Media|language=en|access-date=15 November 2019 |archive-date=15 November 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191115112808/https://www.itvmedia.co.uk/making-an-impact/itv-has-commissioned-quiz-a-three-part-drama-directed-by-stephen-frears-starring-hollywood-star-michael-sheen|url-status=dead}}</ref> Ingram was portrayed in the series by [[Matthew Macfadyen]]. The series also aired on [[AMC (TV channel)|AMC]] and [[BBC America]] in the United States in June 2020 and on [[RTÉ One]] in Ireland in February 2021.


==Personal life==
==Personal life==
Ingram met his wife, Diana, while she was training to be a teacher at [[Barry College]] in Wales. The two became engaged during his first posting with the Royal Engineers in Germany. They were married in November 1989 and have three children.<ref name="thetimesapr03" />
Ingram met Diana Pollock while she was training to be a teacher at [[Barry College]] in Wales. The two became engaged during his first posting with the Royal Engineers in Germany. They were married in November 1989 and have three children.<ref name="thetimesapr03" />


In 2010, Ingram lost three toes on his left foot in an accident involving a [[lawnmower]].<ref>[https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/millionaire-cheat-loses-toes-in-accident-2081292.html Millionaire cheat loses toes in accident]. ''The Independent''.</ref>
In 2010, Ingram lost three toes on his left foot in an accident involving a [[lawnmower]].<ref>[https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/millionaire-cheat-loses-toes-in-accident-2081292.html Millionaire cheat loses toes in accident]. ''The Independent''.</ref>
Line 124: Line 125:
[[Category:1963 births]]
[[Category:1963 births]]
[[Category:Living people]]
[[Category:Living people]]
[[Category:People educated at Oswestry School]]
[[Category:Alumni of Kingston University]]
[[Category:21st-century English criminals]]
[[Category:21st-century English criminals]]
[[Category:Royal Engineers officers]]
[[Category:Royal Engineers officers]]
Line 135: Line 134:
[[Category:English fraudsters]]
[[Category:English fraudsters]]
[[Category:People from Shardlow]]
[[Category:People from Shardlow]]
[[Category:People educated at Oswestry School]]
[[Category:Alumni of Kingston University]]
[[Category:British people convicted of fraud]]
[[Category:British people convicted of fraud]]
[[Category:Mensans]]
[[Category:Mensans]]

Revision as of 22:30, 16 November 2023

Charles Ingram
Ingram with his wife Diana in 2006
Born
Charles William Ingram

(1963-08-06) 6 August 1963 (age 61)
EducationOswestry School
Alma materKingston University
Occupation(s)Novelist, army major
Known forAppearance on Who Wants to Be a Millionaire? and subsequent scandal
Spouse
Diana Ingram
(m. 1989)
Children3
Military career
Allegiance United Kingdom
Service / branch British Army
Years of service1987–2003
RankMajor
Service number525791

Charles William Ingram (born 6 August 1963) is an English novelist and former British Army major who gained notoriety for his appearance on the ITV television game show Who Wants to Be a Millionaire? In episodes recorded in September 2001, Ingram correctly answered fifteen questions to win the show's maximum prize of £1 million,[1] becoming the third UK contestant ever to do so. However, he was denied the winnings due to suspicion of cheating.

Following a lengthy trial at Southwark Crown Court, Ingram was convicted on a single count of procuring the execution of a valuable security by deception. He was subsequently convicted of an unrelated offence involving insurance fraud in 2003 and ordered to resign his commission as a major by the Army Board.

Early life

Charles Ingram was born on 6 August 1963 in Shardlow, Derbyshire, the son of retired RAF wing commander John Ingram[2] and his wife, theatre set designer Susan Ingram. His father's Wellington bomber, operating with 103 Squadron from RAF Elsham Wolds, had been shot down in late September 1941; he was taken as a prisoner of war while two of his crew were killed.[3]

Ingram's parents divorced when he was young and he spent most of his education years boarding privately at Oswestry School in Oswestry, Shropshire.[4] There he was a member of the Combined Cadet Force and completed the Duke of Edinburgh Silver Award.[3] He went on to obtain a BSc in civil engineering from Kingston University.[4]

Military career

In 1987, Ingram trained for the British Army at Sandhurst and was commissioned as an officer in the Royal Engineers.[5] He was promoted to the rank of captain in 1990[5] and major in 1995.[6] In 1999, Ingram was sent to Banja Luka in Bosnia[7] for six months on United Nations peacekeeping duties.[8] He graduated from Cranfield University with a master's degree in corporate management in August 2000.[3] He was ordered by the Army Board via letter to resign his commission on 20 August 2003 and to give up his rank of major. It is widely disputed whether or not he was dishonourably discharged.[9]

Who Wants to Be a Millionaire? scandal

£1 million (15 of 15) – No time limit
A number one followed by one hundred zeros is known by what name?
⬥ A: Googol ⬥ B: Megatron
⬥ C: Gigabit ⬥ D: Nanomole
Ingram's £1 million question

On 9 September 2001, Ingram became a contestant on the ITV game show Who Wants to Be a Millionaire?, following his wife Diana and her brother Adrian Pollock, each of whom had won £32,000 as contestants on the show.[10][11] To prepare, Ingram practised for about twenty minutes per day on a homemade "Fastest Finger First" machine.[12] Ingram got into the "hot seat" but used two lifelines early, ending the day at £4,000 and with only the 50/50 lifeline remaining. The production team doubted he would proceed much further, but he ended up making it all the way to the £1 million jackpot on the second day of recording.[13]

Ingram's £32,000 question was "Who had a hit UK album with Born to Do It released in 2000?" Ingram was unsure, but indicated he thought it was A1. He then used his 50/50 lifeline to eliminate two wrong answers; A1 and Craig David remained. Ingram said he had never heard of Craig David, and nearly locked in A1. Then he said "Eighty percent of the time I'm wrong when I guess ... I'll go Craig David." This was correct, and guaranteed Ingram £32,000 even if he later gave an incorrect answer. Ingram got the next three questions right, and then faced the £500,000 question "Baron Haussmann is best known for his planning of which city?" Ingram said he thought it was Berlin due to the name sounding German. However, he eventually decided on Paris as his final answer. This got him to the million pound question: "A number one followed by one hundred zeros is known by what name?" Ingram initially said he thought it was Nanomole, but "by process of elimination" eventually decided on Googol, which he said he had never heard of. Host Chris Tarrant reminded him that he could simply take the £500,000 and not risk losing £468,000 if his answer was wrong. Ingram chose to play, and thus won the million pound jackpot.[14]

Producers were highly suspicious that Ingram had somehow been given answers. After his win, Ingram’s hair, clothing, and shoes were searched, but nothing incriminating was found. The show's production company, Celador, suspended the jackpot payout to investigate the matter. At the same time, Tarrant overheard that the Ingrams had been arguing, despite Ingram's success, moments before Tarrant joined them in their dressing room for champagne; another member of the production team also noted a similar thought about the couple's behaviour.[15] While reviewing the recording, the production team made a connection between Ingram's answers and coughs coming from one of the waiting contestants, lecturer Tecwen Whittock; in another instance, the coughing came from Ingram's wife while she was in the audience.[13] Based on this evidence, all three were accused of cheating, and the matter handed over to police to investigate further. Whittock and the Ingrams were eventually charged with "procuring the execution of a valuable security by deception".

Trial

Following a trial at Southwark Crown Court lasting four weeks (including jury deliberation for three and a half days), the Ingrams and Whittock were convicted by a 10-1 verdict on 7 April 2003. The three were given prison sentences, suspended for two years—the Ingrams were sentenced to eighteen months; Whittock was sentenced to twelve months—and each fined £15,000 and ordered to pay £10,000 towards prosecution costs. Within two months of the verdict and sentence, the trial's judge ordered the Ingrams to pay additional defence costs, which left them owing a total of £115,000.[16]

Recorded evidence

In court, Ingram claimed the videotape of his appearance on Millionaire was "unrepresentative of what I heard", and he continues to assert that it was "unfairly manipulated". A video recording, with coughing amplified relative to other sounds, including Ingram's and Tarrant's voices, was prepared by Celador's editors (Editworks) for the prosecution and "for the benefit of the jury" during the trial (and later for viewers in television broadcasts). Ingram claims that he neither "listened for, encouraged, nor noticed any coughing". The prosecution alleged that, of the 192 coughs recorded during his second-night performance, 32 were recorded from the ten Fastest Finger First contestants, and that 19 of the 32 coughs heard on the video tape were "significant". The prosecution asserted that these "significant" coughs were by Whittock when the correct answer had been spoken. During the trial, Tarrant also denied hearing any coughing throughout the episode, claiming he was too busy to notice.[17]

Testimony of Larry Whitehurst

Graham "Larry" Whitehurst, another contestant who had appeared on the show as a Fastest Finger First contestant on four occasions, told the court that he had observed a pattern of coughs from Whittock which he was convinced had helped Ingram. Whitehurst said he knew the answer to the million pound question, and observed Whittock cough as soon as Ingram mentioned "Googol".[18]

Testimony of Tecwen Whittock

Whittock insisted that he had a genuine cough caused by a combination of hay fever and a dust allergy, and that any coughs after correct answers were only a coincidence.[19][20] During the trial, however, the jury heard evidence that once Whittock himself earned the right to sit in the hot seat, his throat problems disappeared.[20] Whittock later testified that he drank several glasses of water before he went in front of the cameras.[21] Whittock also insisted that he had not known the answers to three of the questions he allegedly helped with. However, the police found the answer to the twelfth question, regarding the artist who painted The Ambassadors, in a hand-written general knowledge book at Whittock's home.[20]

Davies, the floor manager on Millionaire, said that as soon as the coughing came to his notice during the recording he decided to find out who was responsible. "The loudest coughing was coming from Tecwen in seat number three", he said. "He was talking to the person to his left when I was observing him, and then he turned towards the set and the hot seat to cough"—and while Davies described this as "bizarre", Whittock remarked during the trial, "You do not cough into someone's face".[22]

During the trial, Whittock portrayed himself as a "serial quiz show loser" because he had been eliminated in round one of Channel 4's Fifteen to One, had also failed on ITV's The People Versus and had been able to win only an atlas on his appearance on ITV's Sale of the Century. He had also done poorly on Beat the Bong, although he did reach the semi-final stage of the BBC radio quiz show Brain of Britain.[23]

Aftermath

On 19 August 2003, the Army Board ordered Ingram to resign his commission as a major after sixteen years of service, but stated that this would not affect his pension entitlements.[24]

On 19 May 2004, the Court of Appeal denied Ingram leave to appeal against his conviction and upheld his sentence but agreed to quash his wife's fine and prosecution costs.[25] On 5 October, the House of Lords denied Ingram leave to appeal against his fine and prosecution costs, and he appealed to the European Court of Human Rights. On 20 October, the original trial judge reduced Ingram's defence costs order to £25,000 and Diana's defence costs order to £5,000.[26] Ingram's defence costs were later further reduced to £5,000 on appeal.

Chess grandmaster James Plaskett wrote an essay arguing that no cheating had occurred. In 2006, journalist Jon Ronson, who covered the case at the time for The Guardian, read the essay and began to doubt the defendants' guilt. Ronson, who attended every day of the trial, had observed that the mention of the word "cough" seemed to cause people to cough. Plaskett, who had appeared in the Fastest Finger First round several times before winning £250,000 in January 2006, argued that a correct answer being mentioned might also have been an unconscious trigger for coughs. On the second-to-last question, Whittock was also accused of having coughed at the wrong time and swiftly following that up with a smothered "no". However, Plaskett, who had sat in that very same seat, said that it was common for waiting contestants to whisper "no" when the contestant favored an incorrect answer.[27]

After Millionaire

Books

Since leaving the Army, Ingram has written two novels: The Network (2006) and Deep Siege (2007).[28][29]

TV appearances

Following his appearance on Millionaire, Ingram has appeared on various other television shows, including Channel 4's The Games,[30] the BBC's The Weakest Link, and Channel 4's Wife Swap, featuring alongside his wife in the latter two.[31]

On The Weakest Link, Anne Robinson jokingly referred to the "dashing young major with a throat infection", regarding his Millionaire appearance. A question was also posed concerning, "In classical music what 'C' is the act of throat clearing which members of the audience are asked to try to avoid?", the answer being "coughing".

Ingram also narrowly lost to Paul Daniels on the short-lived Channel 5 game show 19 Keys in November 2003.

Insurance fraud case

In late 2003, Ingram and his wife were charged with further fraud offences. On 28 October, Ingram was found guilty at Bournemouth Crown Court of obtaining a pecuniary advantage by deception, and of a second charge of deception, having attempted to claim on an insurance policy after an alleged burglary at his home. Ingram had failed to tell Direct Line Insurance about claims he had made in the three years before he took out the policy in July 2001. However a spokesman for Wiltshire Constabulary, David Taylor, said those offences were "not fraud". The court was told that Ingram had been a "habitual claimant" with Norwich Union after suffering "unfortunate" losses of private possessions.[32]

Christopher Parker, prosecuting, said Ingram switched insurers to Zurich Insurance Group in 1997, after Norwich Union reduced a burglary claim from £19,000 to £9,000, and in 2000 switched again to Direct Line. "He has been ineluctably dishonest," Parker said. "He went to Direct Line and didn't make a disclosure about his claims history, because he knew he wouldn't have been insured. It might not have started off as the most monstrous piece of villainy but these things tend to snowball and it all came to a sticky end when he claimed for £30,000." Staff at Direct Line were already "suspicious" about Ingram's £30,000 burglary claim but decided to investigate only after reading newspaper coverage about his questionable win on Millionaire.[32]

Ingram was given a conditional discharge on the charge of fraudulently claiming £30,000 on insurance. The judge told Ingram he took into account "the punishment [Ingram had] brought upon [himself] and [his] dire financial state" and rejected an alternative option of community service after Ingram told a probation officer he feared other criminals would bully him.[33]

A book covering the case, Bad Show: The Quiz, The Cough, The Millionaire Major, by Bob Woffinden and James Plaskett, was published in January 2015.

Quiz, a play written by James Graham that re-examines the events and subsequent conviction of the Ingrams and Whittock, opened at the Minerva Theatre, Chichester, on 3 November 2017, running until 9 December 2017.[34] The play transferred to the West End, playing at the Noël Coward Theatre from 31 March 2018 to 16 June 2018.[35] In 2019, Graham adapted his play into a serial drama for ITV that was broadcast in April 2020 in three parts.[36] Ingram was portrayed in the series by Matthew Macfadyen. The series also aired on AMC and BBC America in the United States in June 2020 and on RTÉ One in Ireland in February 2021.

Personal life

Ingram met Diana Pollock while she was training to be a teacher at Barry College in Wales. The two became engaged during his first posting with the Royal Engineers in Germany. They were married in November 1989 and have three children.[3]

In 2010, Ingram lost three toes on his left foot in an accident involving a lawnmower.[37]

See also

References

  1. ^ "Millionaire cheat told to leave Army". The Daily Telegraph. 24 July 2003. Retrieved 16 April 2020.
  2. ^ (RAF/39187)
  3. ^ a b c d "The major: strategist who flunked simple questions; Profile". The Times. 8 April 2003. p. 11. Retrieved 2 October 2017.
  4. ^ a b Walne, Toby (16 September 2006). "Fame and fortune". The Guardian. Retrieved 2 October 2017.
  5. ^ a b "No. 52131". The London Gazette (Supplement). 8 May 1990. p. 8819.
  6. ^ "The major behind the sting". news.bbc.co.uk. Retrieved 25 February 2023.
  7. ^ Vasagar, Jeevan (20 March 2003). "Pager claims are rot, major tells court". The Guardian. Retrieved 2 October 2017.
  8. ^ "The man behind the scams". BBC News. 28 October 2003. Retrieved 2 October 2017.
  9. ^ "Marching orders for Army gameshow cheat". Al Jazeera. 24 July 2003. Retrieved 2 October 2017.
  10. ^ "Major Charles Ingram has been found guilty of cheating his way to the top prize on Who Wants to Be a Millionaire". BBC News. 7 April 2003. Retrieved 13 May 2008.
  11. ^ Martin Bashir (2003). Who Wants to Be a Millionaire: Major Fraud (Television). London, England: ITV.
  12. ^ Woolcock, Nicola (22 March 2003). "Millionaire quiz major had ploy to foil Tarrant". The Daily Telegraph. Retrieved 16 March 2019.
  13. ^ a b Harrison, Angus (9 September 2016). "That Time a Guy Won 'Who Wants to Be a Millionaire?' by Cheating Terribly". VICE. Retrieved 5 July 2018.
  14. ^ Martin Bashir (2003). Who Wants to Be a Millionaire: Major Fraud (Television). London, England: ITV.
  15. ^ "Millionaire winner 'unhappy'". BBC News. 10 March 2003. Retrieved 13 May 2008.
  16. ^ "Charles Ingram transcript". Evening Standard. 21 January 2004. Retrieved 13 January 2019.
  17. ^ Mcveigh, Karen (13 March 2003). "Quizmaster 'amazed' to hear £1m winner could have cheated". The Scotsman. Edinburgh. Retrieved 13 May 2008.
  18. ^ "Contestant 'spotted Millionaire coughs'". BBC News. 11 March 2003. Retrieved 8 July 2011.
  19. ^ "So I phoned a friend – part two". The Guardian. London. 19 April 2003. Retrieved 13 May 2008.
  20. ^ a b c Innes, John (7 March 2003). "Pager plot too risky for TV quiz". The Scotsman. Edinburgh. Archived from the original on 22 October 2012. Retrieved 13 May 2008.
  21. ^ "Cheating 'silly' says Millionaire accused". BBC News. 26 March 2003. Retrieved 13 May 2008.
  22. ^ "Playing the game". Archived from the original on 20 October 2004. Retrieved 26 September 2004.
  23. ^ Innes, John (26 March 2003). "Lecturer a serial quiz show failure, court is told". The Scotsman. Edinburgh. Archived from the original on 18 April 2003. Retrieved 13 May 2008.
  24. ^ "BBC NEWS - UK - Millionaire cheat sacked by Army". news.bbc.co.uk. 24 July 2003.
  25. ^ "TV quiz cheat loses his appeal". BBC News. 19 May 2004. Retrieved 13 May 2008.
  26. ^ "Quiz cheat has defence costs cut". BBC News. 21 October 2004. Retrieved 13 May 2008.
  27. ^ Ronson, Jon (17 July 2006). "Are the Millionaire three innocent?". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 17 August 2014.
  28. ^ Ingram, Charles (2007). Deep Siege. Pegasus Elliot Mackenzie Pu. ISBN 978-1-84386-380-9.
  29. ^ The Network Hardcover – 18 April 2006. ASIN 1846240026.
  30. ^ "The Games". UK Game Shows. Retrieved 25 April 2019.
  31. ^ "Goody and Ingram's celebrity swap". The BBC. 3 November 2003. Retrieved 13 April 2020.
  32. ^ a b Woolcock, Nicola (29 October 2003). "'Millionaire' quiz cheat guilty of insurance fraud". Daily Telegraph (UK). Retrieved 12 September 2018.
  33. ^ Savill, Richard (22 November 2003). "Cheating major walks free over insurance fraud". Daily Telegraph (UK). Retrieved 12 September 2018.
  34. ^ "Quiz". Chichester Festival Theatre. Archived from the original on 21 August 2017. Retrieved 18 November 2017.
  35. ^ "Quiz the Play by James Graham | Official West End Website". 12 April 2018. Archived from the original on 12 April 2018. Retrieved 12 April 2018.
  36. ^ "ITV has commissioned 'Quiz' a three-part drama directed by Stephen Frears starring Hollywood star, Michael Sheen". ITV Media. Archived from the original on 15 November 2019. Retrieved 15 November 2019.
  37. ^ Millionaire cheat loses toes in accident. The Independent.