User talk:Isha.Narain: Difference between revisions
→Copyright and Wikipedia: new section |
Chronikhiles (talk | contribs) Notification: proposed deletion of Lakshmi Ganesha Saraswati Trinity. |
||
| Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
{{uw-copyright-new|Lakshmi Ganesha Saraswati Trinity}} [[User:Significa liberdade|Significa liberdade <small>(she/her)</small>]] ([[User talk:Significa liberdade|talk]]) 04:55, 18 November 2023 (UTC) |
{{uw-copyright-new|Lakshmi Ganesha Saraswati Trinity}} [[User:Significa liberdade|Significa liberdade <small>(she/her)</small>]] ([[User talk:Significa liberdade|talk]]) 04:55, 18 November 2023 (UTC) |
||
== [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[:Lakshmi Ganesha Saraswati Trinity]] == |
|||
[[File:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|link=|alt=Notice|48px|]] |
|||
The article [[:Lakshmi Ganesha Saraswati Trinity]] has been [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed for deletion]] because of the following concern: |
|||
<blockquote>'''As far as I know, there are no denominations that worship these three deities as a trinity, and this is merely a popular iconographical concept. The two goddess's association with Ganesha is already present and covered better in the [[Consorts of Ganesha]] article than here, where it does not use a single reliable source. I do not believe it has the scope or significance to justify a separate article.'''</blockquote> |
|||
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be [[WP:DEL#REASON|deleted for any of several reasons]]. |
|||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your [[Help:edit summary|edit summary]] or on [[Talk:Lakshmi Ganesha Saraswati Trinity|the article's talk page]]. |
|||
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> [[User:Chronikhiles|<b style="color:Teal">Chronikhiles</b>]] <sup>[[User talk:Chronikhiles|<b style="color:Black"><i>(talk)</i></b>]]</sup> 12:14, 18 November 2023 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 12:14, 18 November 2023
Welcome!
| Welcome, Isha.Narain! | |
|---|---|
|
Nomination of Ananya Rao for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ananya Rao until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
DareshMohan (talk) 06:34, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
The article VJ Archana has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Mr. Rasel Hasan (talk) 11:00, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
Copyright and Wikipedia
Hello Isha.Narain! Your additions to Lakshmi Ganesha Saraswati Trinity have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:
- Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
- Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
- Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
- Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
- Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § License requirements.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 04:55, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The article Lakshmi Ganesha Saraswati Trinity has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
As far as I know, there are no denominations that worship these three deities as a trinity, and this is merely a popular iconographical concept. The two goddess's association with Ganesha is already present and covered better in the Consorts of Ganesha article than here, where it does not use a single reliable source. I do not believe it has the scope or significance to justify a separate article.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chronikhiles (talk) 12:14, 18 November 2023 (UTC)