Jump to content

Talk:Robert Del Naja: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Line 93: Line 93:


:I think that given the gravity of the allegation and the fact that the investigation was ended at the police interview, rather than a court acquittal like for example Michael Jackson, means that this is better off being left alone. The members of Joy Division have been open that they were interviewed about the Yorkshire Ripper case, and that can be included because we know the real culprit and they see the funny side years on. This case with Del Naja isn't like that. PS I moved the graffiti cautions because it's ridiculous to have that as the sole entry in a legal issues section [[User:Unknown Temptation|Unknown Temptation]] ([[User talk:Unknown Temptation|talk]]) 15:16, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
:I think that given the gravity of the allegation and the fact that the investigation was ended at the police interview, rather than a court acquittal like for example Michael Jackson, means that this is better off being left alone. The members of Joy Division have been open that they were interviewed about the Yorkshire Ripper case, and that can be included because we know the real culprit and they see the funny side years on. This case with Del Naja isn't like that. PS I moved the graffiti cautions because it's ridiculous to have that as the sole entry in a legal issues section [[User:Unknown Temptation|Unknown Temptation]] ([[User talk:Unknown Temptation|talk]]) 15:16, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
:Yeah leave this one alone. It was a mixup involving a stolen creditcard (or something to that effect) being used at a payment processor. The police had determined he had nothing to do with it. Poor guy doesn't need this hovering over his head. Believing women is important, but nobody has accused him of anything and it was just a cop mix-up that for a while was doing real damage to his career. [[User:Duckmonster|Duckmonster]] ([[User talk:Duckmonster|talk]]) 03:33, 19 November 2023 (UTC)


== Could Be Banksy? ==
== Could Be Banksy? ==

Revision as of 03:33, 19 November 2023

Instruments

How about adding instruments to the infobox. Like keyboards, vocals, guitar.

. It talked about 3D, Tricky and Roni Size being part of a "Bristol sound" movement. I took this out because (a) Bristol sound redirects to trip hop and both Massive Attack and Tricky (and, for that matter, Portishead and as far as I can make out EVERYONE to whom the term was ever applied) reject the existence of such a movement and (b) Roni Size plays drum and base and to my knowledge has never been describe as Trip hop or having the Bristol sound. A Geek Tragedy 21:41, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Robertdelnaja.jpg

Image:Robertdelnaja.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:47, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edit

Removed contradiction in the Political views section and corrected spelling errors. -20:35 EST

Date of birth

It's 1965 in the lead section and 1966 in the infobox. Sources vary, so maybe this uncertainty should be mentioned. Peter James (talk) 16:53, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It started out as 1966, but considering it has never been verified maybe it should be removed if there is a dispute. Sionk (talk) 17:50, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Website inactive

The website delnaja.com is currently not available. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.119.68.176 (talk) 13:04, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Robert Del Naja. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:36, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Robert Del Naja. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:14, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

polish-jewish mother, italian father

its interesting his italian-british father is mentioned but not his polish jewish mother — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.203.234.46 (talk) 15:26, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:21, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:06, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The following section was deleted without explanation in May 2020 by 67.167.223.47

In March 2003, Del Naja was arrested and interviewed under Operation Ore, an investigation into child abuse images. No further action was taken against him. The allegations disrupted Massive Attack's tour following the release of 100th Window, but the band eventually decided against suing the Sun newspaper or the police.[1]

This is the second time it was deleted. When it was previously removed by Penelopeinthewest, the change was reverted, but not on this occasion. The "Legal Issues" section now only contains reference to two police cautions as a young person.

I'm no expert on wikipedia's policy regarding criminal allegations/criminal history, so I'm not going to opine on whether this should be included, but there should be an explanation of why it should be deleted, considering the previous entry was adequately sourced.

If the allegations re: indecent images shouldn't be present, I would suggest removing the entire section. I'm not sure childhood grafitti by itself is worthy of an entire section.

MegaPowerTape (talk) 20:23, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think that given the gravity of the allegation and the fact that the investigation was ended at the police interview, rather than a court acquittal like for example Michael Jackson, means that this is better off being left alone. The members of Joy Division have been open that they were interviewed about the Yorkshire Ripper case, and that can be included because we know the real culprit and they see the funny side years on. This case with Del Naja isn't like that. PS I moved the graffiti cautions because it's ridiculous to have that as the sole entry in a legal issues section Unknown Temptation (talk) 15:16, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah leave this one alone. It was a mixup involving a stolen creditcard (or something to that effect) being used at a payment processor. The police had determined he had nothing to do with it. Poor guy doesn't need this hovering over his head. Believing women is important, but nobody has accused him of anything and it was just a cop mix-up that for a while was doing real damage to his career. Duckmonster (talk) 03:33, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Could Be Banksy?

Could It? Glitch TTG (talk) 18:46, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:CRYSTALBALL. Robvanvee 20:00, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I removed a claim that Robert Del Naja is Banksy, as this claim wasn't based on a source widely regarded as reliable. The statement about his identity has no place here until this assertion can be confirmed to reflect reality and thereby can be established as fact. --Jostiel (talk) 00:20, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have now removed what I think is the last remaining "Del Naja is Banksy" reference on the page, which was in the infobox. TimberToner (talk) 06:00, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  1. ^ Cite error: The named reference petridis was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:Robert_Del_Naja&oldid=1185807628"