Jump to content

Talk:Native American mascot controversy: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 6 discussion(s) to Talk:Native American mascot controversy/Archive 4) (bot
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Native American mascot controversy/Archive 4) (bot
Line 40: Line 40:


This isn't "Financial impact of change", and should be moved to another section, esp. since it's not really discussing the financial aspect (remove the words "despite the cost of a change in team mascots," and see). I think a counterpoint should be included, but this isn't it. I don't know where to move these lines though, but they shouldn't be here.
This isn't "Financial impact of change", and should be moved to another section, esp. since it's not really discussing the financial aspect (remove the words "despite the cost of a change in team mascots," and see). I think a counterpoint should be included, but this isn't it. I don't know where to move these lines though, but they shouldn't be here.

== New York tells schools to drop Native American mascots ==

School districts across the state of New York are prohibited from using any Native American mascots, team names or logos. And the state's education department is now urging its school comply by the end of the school year — or risk losing state aid. [https://www.npr.org/2022/11/19/1137904447/native-american-mascots-new-york-schools Source.]

I'm not sure where to put this in the article; thought I'd start here. [[User:Kire1975|Kire1975]] ([[User talk:Kire1975|talk]]) 08:34, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

:I have already begun updating the linked article [[Native American mascot laws and regulations#New York]]. Some of the first news reports on the current situation have been incorrect or oversimplified, so I am referencing only the official state documents. The section in this article on ''Legal and administrative action'' needs to be updated also, and I plan to do so.--[[User:WriterArtistDC|WriterArtistDC]] ([[User talk:WriterArtistDC|talk]]) 13:44, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
::Revision completed--[[User:WriterArtistDC|WriterArtistDC]] ([[User talk:WriterArtistDC|talk]]) 16:23, 20 November 2022 (UTC)


== NPOV ==
== NPOV ==

Revision as of 04:41, 21 November 2023

Irrelevant half of paragraph

Under "Financial impact of change":

Opponents feel that despite the cost of a change in team mascots, it should be done to prevent what they believe is racial stereotyping. Clyde Bellecourt, when director of the American Indian Movement stated: "It's the behavior that accompanies all of this that's offensive. The rubber tomahawks, the chicken feather headdresses, people wearing war paint and making these ridiculous war whoops with a tomahawk in one hand and a beer in the other; all of these have significant meaning for us. And the psychological impact it has, especially on our youth, is devastating."

This isn't "Financial impact of change", and should be moved to another section, esp. since it's not really discussing the financial aspect (remove the words "despite the cost of a change in team mascots," and see). I think a counterpoint should be included, but this isn't it. I don't know where to move these lines though, but they shouldn't be here.

NPOV

@David Gerard:: I disagree with your reversion of my recent edit, which clearly identifies the author and publisher of an alternative view of the topic. Given that this article presents the masses of opinion on the majority and academically supported side, is there any reason the right wing nuts should not be given a few sentences? WriterArtistDC (talk) 17:52, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Because if their opinions are significant, they'll be in RSes. And look, there's National Review! We don't put in non-RSes for this purpose. We note viewpoints insofar as they're covered in RSes, documented to those RSes. See WP:FALSEBALANCE - David Gerard (talk) 16:24, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Article size, summary style

The article has been steadily creeping up in size. A remedy is likely applying summary style more aggressively; moving content to the many linked articles and keeping a minimum here. WriterArtistDC (talk) 20:09, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]