Talk:Nina Kulagina: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
→Edit by 5Q5: Response. |
|||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
This edit by 5Q5 was rather strange, the user added to the article Kulagina won the "paranormal side of the case" [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Nina_Kulagina&diff=prev&oldid=1182305055]. The source listed does not use wording like this. This is a bad case of [[WP:OR]]. [[User:Psychologist Guy|Psychologist Guy]] ([[User talk:Psychologist Guy|talk]]) 20:57, 26 November 2023 (UTC) |
This edit by 5Q5 was rather strange, the user added to the article Kulagina won the "paranormal side of the case" [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Nina_Kulagina&diff=prev&oldid=1182305055]. The source listed does not use wording like this. This is a bad case of [[WP:OR]]. [[User:Psychologist Guy|Psychologist Guy]] ([[User talk:Psychologist Guy|talk]]) 20:57, 26 November 2023 (UTC) |
||
:An unsurprising reversion, frankly, as it maintains the article on Nina Kulagina (a name she never used) as one of the longest-running, most biased, defamatory biographies of a deceased person on Wikipedia. Accusations of fraud in the article made against her using fourth- and fifth-party sources renders them unreliable [[Wikipedia:Hearsay]]. To wit: 1. Unnamed Russian scientist(s) who themselves may be passing along unsubstantiated rumor(s) or Soviet propaganda. > 2. Russian reporter > 3. Translation from Russian into English. 4. Martin Gardner (who never met Kulagina) > 5. Two book authors parroting Gardner. The cited Randi source actually says she won the defamation case, not a partial victory. I expect a future generation of editors will correct this unethical article. For now, there is no point in trying unless and until someone writes an unbiased mainstream biography that can be used as a source. <span style="background:#8FF;border:solid 1px;border-radius:8px;box-shadow:darkgray 4px 4px 4px;padding:1px 4px 0px 4px;">[[User:5Q5|<span style="font-family:arial;color:#DC143C;"><b>5Q5</b></span>]]|[[User talk:5Q5|<sup>✉</sup>]]</span> 14:30, 27 November 2023 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:30, 27 November 2023
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Nina Kulagina article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Correct link
p44.pdf (centerforinquiry.org) please correct it. 2A02:14F:179:8861:1CB3:BDE4:2338:CB9B (talk) 20:47, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Edit by 5Q5
This edit by 5Q5 was rather strange, the user added to the article Kulagina won the "paranormal side of the case" [1]. The source listed does not use wording like this. This is a bad case of WP:OR. Psychologist Guy (talk) 20:57, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
- An unsurprising reversion, frankly, as it maintains the article on Nina Kulagina (a name she never used) as one of the longest-running, most biased, defamatory biographies of a deceased person on Wikipedia. Accusations of fraud in the article made against her using fourth- and fifth-party sources renders them unreliable Wikipedia:Hearsay. To wit: 1. Unnamed Russian scientist(s) who themselves may be passing along unsubstantiated rumor(s) or Soviet propaganda. > 2. Russian reporter > 3. Translation from Russian into English. 4. Martin Gardner (who never met Kulagina) > 5. Two book authors parroting Gardner. The cited Randi source actually says she won the defamation case, not a partial victory. I expect a future generation of editors will correct this unethical article. For now, there is no point in trying unless and until someone writes an unbiased mainstream biography that can be used as a source. 5Q5|✉ 14:30, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
Categories:
- All unassessed articles
- C-Class paranormal articles
- Unknown-importance paranormal articles
- WikiProject Paranormal articles
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class biography (military) articles
- Military biography work group articles
- C-Class Russian, Soviet and CIS military history articles
- Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force articles
- C-Class World War II articles
- World War II task force articles
- C-Class Women's History articles
- Low-importance Women's History articles
- All WikiProject Women-related pages
- WikiProject Women's History articles
- C-Class biography articles
- Low-importance biography (military) articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- C-Class Soviet Union articles
- Low-importance Soviet Union articles
- WikiProject Soviet Union articles