Talk:Google Scholar

Not as good as described in this article

It seems that google scholar is not as good as described in this article. A perfect paper on the subject matter is written here You can check it out for yourself, what is written is really true. Would it thus be possible to include a milder version of my critic on this wikipedia page, like it exists in the German version of this article, without having it deleted? I thank you in advance. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 194.39.218.10 (talk • contribs) .

The German article referred to is aat http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Scholar

would 194.39.218.10 please give some contact information? ---

I found that your article was somewhat informative. However, it seemed to be highly biased against Google Scholar by blasting it at every opportunity. An example: "The "Googlemania" fueled by the enormous media publicity and laymen's ecstasy rubs off on Google Scholar and makes otherwise learned people disregard reality." —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 131.202.42.70 (talk • contribs) .

"Google Scholar and academic libraries" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Google Scholar and academic libraries and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 15#Google Scholar and academic libraries until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 02:26, 15 August 2022 (UTC)