Jump to content

Talk:Asthma: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
PrimeBOT (talk | contribs)
m top: Task 24: banner removal following a TFD
m Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Talk:Asthma/Archive 3) (bot
Line 80: Line 80:


"The current consensus is that there is no known cure for asthma, and many efficacious treatments are available that have variable effectiveness."
"The current consensus is that there is no known cure for asthma, and many efficacious treatments are available that have variable effectiveness."

== References ==
Why are all the references in the notes section and not the references section? <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/90.242.28.15|90.242.28.15]] ([[User talk:90.242.28.15#top|talk]]) 20:14, 22 April 2023 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Semi-protected edit request on 5 June 2023 ==

{{edit semi-protected|Asthma|answered=yes}}
Under "Associated Conditions" subheading, remove line that says "It is not known whether asthma causes psychological problems or psychological problems lead to asthma.". This line borders on implying causation from a correlation that was found, while not adding anything to the subheading. The correlation is worth stating, but it is just a correlation. I just feel it isn't necessary to even writing the words "asthma causes psychological problems" and "psychology problems lead to asthma" without any sort of proposed causal mechanism with any traction. [[User:Thestonkinator|Thestonkinator]] ([[User talk:Thestonkinator|talk]]) 05:22, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
:[[File:Red information icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:''' please provide [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable sources]] that support the change you want to be made.<!-- Template:ESp --> [[user:Lemonaka‎|<span style="color:blue; text-shadow:jet 0 0.2em 0.2em; font-family:Segoe Print; font-size: 13px">-Lemonaka‎</span>]] 23:44, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:54, 3 December 2023

Template:Vital article

Former featured articleAsthma is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Good articleAsthma has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on October 5, 2005.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 11, 2005Peer reviewReviewed
September 2, 2005Featured article candidatePromoted
July 9, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
December 14, 2008Featured article reviewDemoted
November 9, 2010Peer reviewReviewed
January 27, 2013Good article nomineeListed
Current status: Former featured article, current good article

Editing Request

The National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP) of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) recommends that asthma treatment incorporates various methods, such as asthma monitoring, patient and family education, the removal of environmental triggers, and/or the use of long-term and quick-relief medication.

[1]

References

  1. ^ Anise, Ayodola; Hasnain-Wynia, Romana (December 2016). "Patient-centered outcomes research to improve asthma outcomes". Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 138 (6): 1503–1510. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2016.10.003. {{cite journal}}: Check |doi= value (help); External link in |doi= (help)

Help me edit the introductory section to Asthma

This statement appears in the top section of the Asthma page:

"There is no known cure for asthma, but it is easily treatable.[3]"

I could not find a way to edit it myself, hence I am requesting you to consider an edit I cannot make. The phrase - "easily treatable" - is technically correct but misleading. It is true that asthma is treatable, and most of the treatments are "easy" unless one acknowledges that many people have trouble with inhaler technique. However, the statement implies that asthma treatment is also universally effective and this is far from the case. Later in the page I added information to illustrate this.

It turns out there is evidence for a known cure for some forms of asthma, which I will address on the 'Chlamydia pneumoniae' page. However, this topic is still very controversial so I am not dealing with it directly on the asthma page, except to explain why I suggest altering the statement to read:

"The current consensus is that there is no known cure for asthma, and many efficacious treatments are available that have variable effectiveness."