Jump to content

2009 Burlington mayoral election: Difference between revisions

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
No edit summary
Tag: Reverted
Revert known and proven falsehoods.
Tags: Manual revert references removed
Line 43: Line 43:
The '''2009 Burlington mayoral election''' was held in March 2009 for the city of [[Burlington, Vermont]]. A few years earlier, the city had switched to holding mayoral elections every three years (e.g. the [[1997 Burlington mayoral election|1997 election]], the [[2000 Burlington mayoral election|2000 election]], the [[2003 Burlington mayoral election|2003 election]], and the [[2006 Burlington mayoral election|2006 election]]), so this was the second mayoral election since the city's 2005 change to [[instant-runoff voting]] (IRV).<ref name="burlington_votes">[http://www.burlingtonvotes.org/faq 4. How did this change to IRV come about?] ''Over 64% of Burlington voters voted in favor of the IRV Charter amendment in March 2005, and it went into effect on May 12, 2005, when the governor signed the ratification bill, H.505, which had been passed by both the House and Senate.''</ref> In the 2009 election, incumbent [[List of mayors of Burlington, Vermont|Burlington mayor]] ([[Bob Kiss]]) won reelection as a member of the [[Vermont Progressive Party]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ci.burlington.vt.us/mayor/|title=Mayor Bob Kiss|website=City of Burlington|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071129081028/http://www.ci.burlington.vt.us/mayor/|archive-date=November 29, 2007|url-status=dead|access-date=November 16, 2007}}</ref>
The '''2009 Burlington mayoral election''' was held in March 2009 for the city of [[Burlington, Vermont]]. A few years earlier, the city had switched to holding mayoral elections every three years (e.g. the [[1997 Burlington mayoral election|1997 election]], the [[2000 Burlington mayoral election|2000 election]], the [[2003 Burlington mayoral election|2003 election]], and the [[2006 Burlington mayoral election|2006 election]]), so this was the second mayoral election since the city's 2005 change to [[instant-runoff voting]] (IRV).<ref name="burlington_votes">[http://www.burlingtonvotes.org/faq 4. How did this change to IRV come about?] ''Over 64% of Burlington voters voted in favor of the IRV Charter amendment in March 2005, and it went into effect on May 12, 2005, when the governor signed the ratification bill, H.505, which had been passed by both the House and Senate.''</ref> In the 2009 election, incumbent [[List of mayors of Burlington, Vermont|Burlington mayor]] ([[Bob Kiss]]) won reelection as a member of the [[Vermont Progressive Party]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ci.burlington.vt.us/mayor/|title=Mayor Bob Kiss|website=City of Burlington|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071129081028/http://www.ci.burlington.vt.us/mayor/|archive-date=November 29, 2007|url-status=dead|access-date=November 16, 2007}}</ref>


Unlike in the city's first IRV mayoral election three years prior, however, Kiss was neither the [[Plurality voting system|plurality]] winner (since [[Republican Party (United States)|Republican]] candidate [[Kurt Wright]] won a plurality of first-place votes) nor the [[Condorcet method|Condorcet]] winner ([[Democratic Party (United States)|Democratic]] candidate Andy Montroll was the [[Condorcet winner criterion|pairwise winner]]).<ref name="VermontDaily">{{cite web|url=http://vermontdailybriefing.com/?p%3D1215|title=Point/Counterpoint: Terry Bouricius Attempts To Rip Professor Gierzynski A New One Over Instant Runoff Voting Controversy (Now With All New Gierzynski Update!) |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110726125759/http://vermontdailybriefing.com/?p=1215|archive-date=July 26, 2011|url-status=dead|access-date=December 30, 2010}}</ref><ref name=":9">{{cite web|url=http://rangevoting.org/Burlington.html|title=Burlington Vermont 2009 IRV mayoral election|website=RangeVoting.org|access-date=April 1, 2016}}</ref> This led to a controversy about the use of IRV in mayoral elections,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://vermontdailybriefing.com/?p=1213|title=Voting Paradoxes and Perverse Outcomes: Political Scientist Tony Gierzynski Lays Out A Case Against Instant Runoff Voting|last=Baruth|first=Philip|date=March 12, 2009|publisher=Vermont Daily Briefing|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110726125814/http://vermontdailybriefing.com/?p=1213|archive-date=July 26, 2011|url-status=dead}}</ref> culminating in a successful 2010 citizen's [[initiative]] repealing IRV's use by a vote of 52% to 48%.<ref name="repeal2">{{cite web|url=http://www.wcax.com/story/12074080/burlington-voters-repeal-irv|title=Burlington voters repeal IRV|date=March 2, 2010|publisher=[[WCAX-TV|Wcax.com]]|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160409132306/http://www.wcax.com/story/12074080/burlington-voters-repeal-irv|archive-date=April 9, 2016|access-date=March 28, 2016}}</ref><ref name="rutland_herald">{{cite web|url=http://www.rutlandherald.com/article/20100427/NEWS03/4270339/1004/NEWS03|title=Instant run-off voting experiment ends in Burlington : Rutland Herald Online|date=April 27, 2010|website=Rutlandherald.com|access-date=April 1, 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304055602/http://www.rutlandherald.com/article/20100427/NEWS03/4270339/1004/NEWS03#|archive-date=March 4, 2016|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref name="BVT20100302">{{cite web|url=https://www.burlingtonvt.gov/sites/default/files/CT/ElectionResults/20100302/election_summary_report_20100302.pdf|title=Official Results Of 2010 Annual City Election|date=March 2, 2010|work=City of Burlington}}</ref> Ranked-choice voting would thus remain unused in Burlington until 2021, when voters again adopted IRV ([[Instant-runoff voting]]) for all city council elections (but not mayoral ones) by a vote of 64% to 36%.<ref name="Ballotpedia">{{cite web|url=https://ballotpedia.org/Burlington,_Vermont,_Question_4,_Ranked-Choice_Voting_Amendment_(March_2021)|title=Burlington, Vermont, Question 4, Ranked-Choice Voting Amendment (March)|website=Ballotpedia.org|access-date=April 18, 2021}}</ref>
Unlike in the city's first IRV mayoral election three years prior, however, Kiss was neither the [[Plurality voting system|plurality]] winner (since [[Republican Party (United States)|Republican]] candidate [[Kurt Wright]] won a plurality of first-place votes) nor the [[Condorcet method|Condorcet]] winner ([[Democratic Party (United States)|Democratic]] candidate Andy Montroll was the [[Condorcet winner criterion|pairwise winner]]).<ref name="VermontDaily">{{cite web|url=http://vermontdailybriefing.com/?p%3D1215|title=Point/Counterpoint: Terry Bouricius Attempts To Rip Professor Gierzynski A New One Over Instant Runoff Voting Controversy (Now With All New Gierzynski Update!) |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110726125759/http://vermontdailybriefing.com/?p=1215|archive-date=July 26, 2011|url-status=dead|access-date=December 30, 2010}}</ref><ref name=":9">{{cite web|url=http://rangevoting.org/Burlington.html|title=Burlington Vermont 2009 IRV mayoral election|website=RangeVoting.org|access-date=April 1, 2016}}</ref> This led to a controversy about the use of IRV in mayoral elections,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://vermontdailybriefing.com/?p=1213|title=Voting Paradoxes and Perverse Outcomes: Political Scientist Tony Gierzynski Lays Out A Case Against Instant Runoff Voting|last=Baruth|first=Philip|date=March 12, 2009|publisher=Vermont Daily Briefing|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110726125814/http://vermontdailybriefing.com/?p=1213|archive-date=July 26, 2011|url-status=dead}}</ref> culminating in a successful 2010 citizen's [[initiative]] repealing IRV's use by a vote of 52% to 48%.<ref name="repeal2">{{cite web|url=http://www.wcax.com/story/12074080/burlington-voters-repeal-irv|title=Burlington voters repeal IRV|date=March 2, 2010|publisher=[[WCAX-TV|Wcax.com]]|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160409132306/http://www.wcax.com/story/12074080/burlington-voters-repeal-irv|archive-date=April 9, 2016|access-date=March 28, 2016}}</ref><ref name="rutland_herald">{{cite web|url=http://www.rutlandherald.com/article/20100427/NEWS03/4270339/1004/NEWS03|title=Instant run-off voting experiment ends in Burlington : Rutland Herald Online|date=April 27, 2010|website=Rutlandherald.com|access-date=April 1, 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304055602/http://www.rutlandherald.com/article/20100427/NEWS03/4270339/1004/NEWS03#|archive-date=March 4, 2016|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref name="BVT20100302">{{cite web|url=https://www.burlingtonvt.gov/sites/default/files/CT/ElectionResults/20100302/election_summary_report_20100302.pdf|title=Official Results Of 2010 Annual City Election|date=March 2, 2010|work=City of Burlington}}</ref> Ranked-choice voting would thus remain unused in Burlington until 2021, when voters again adopted IRV for all city council elections (but not mayoral ones) by a vote of 64% to 36%.<ref name="Ballotpedia">{{cite web|url=https://ballotpedia.org/Burlington,_Vermont,_Question_4,_Ranked-Choice_Voting_Amendment_(March_2021)|title=Burlington, Vermont, Question 4, Ranked-Choice Voting Amendment (March)|website=Ballotpedia.org|access-date=April 18, 2021}}</ref>


{{anchor|Instant-runoff voting in Burlington}}
{{anchor|Instant-runoff voting in Burlington}}
Line 202: Line 202:


== Analysis of the 2009 election ==
== Analysis of the 2009 election ==
The IRV election is considered a success by IRV advocates such as [[FairVote]], asserting it prevented the election of the first round plurality leader, Wright. It avoided the effect of [[Vote splitting|vote-splitting]] between the candidates Kiss and Montroll that might have prevented the election of one or other of them, instead of Wright, the initial front runner.<ref name=":0">{{Cite web|url=http://www.fairvote.org/response-to-faulty-analysis-of-burlington-irv-election|title=Response to Faulty Analysis of Burlington IRV Election|last=Bouricius|first=Terry|date=March 17, 2009|website=FairVote.org|access-date=October 1, 2017|quote=successfully prevented the election of the candidate who would likely have won under plurality rules, but would have lost to either of the other top finishers in a runoff}}</ref> was easy for voters to understand,<ref name=":4">{{Cite news|url=https://www.rutlandherald.com/articles/instant-runoff-was-success/|title=Instant runoff was success|last=Etnier|first=Carl|date=March 6, 2009|work=Rutland Herald|access-date=March 17, 2018}}</ref> avoided the need for traditional runoffs,<ref name=":4" /><ref name=":5">{{Cite news|url=https://www.sevendaysvt.com/vermont/burlington-residents-seek-repeal-of-instant-runoff-voting/Content?oid=2177125|title=Burlington Residents Seek Repeal of Instant Runoff Voting|last=Totten|first=Shay|work=Seven Days|access-date=March 17, 2018|language=en|quote=We waited to bring in the signatures because we didn't want this to be about Kurt Wright losing after being ahead, or Andy Montroll who had more first and second place votes and didn't win. We wanted this to be about IRV.}}</ref> and "contributed to producing a campaign among four serious candidates that was widely praised for its substantive nature".<ref name=":0" />
The IRV election is considered a success by IRV advocates such as [[FairVote]], asserting it prevented the election of the first round plurality leader by avoiding the effect of [[Vote splitting|vote-splitting]] between the other candidates,<ref name=":0">{{Cite web|url=http://www.fairvote.org/response-to-faulty-analysis-of-burlington-irv-election|title=Response to Faulty Analysis of Burlington IRV Election|last=Bouricius|first=Terry|date=March 17, 2009|website=FairVote.org|access-date=October 1, 2017|quote=successfully prevented the election of the candidate who would likely have won under plurality rules, but would have lost to either of the other top finishers in a runoff}}</ref> was easy for voters to understand,<ref name=":4">{{Cite news|url=https://www.rutlandherald.com/articles/instant-runoff-was-success/|title=Instant runoff was success|last=Etnier|first=Carl|date=March 6, 2009|work=Rutland Herald|access-date=March 17, 2018}}</ref> avoided the need for traditional runoffs,<ref name=":4" /><ref name=":5">{{Cite news|url=https://www.sevendaysvt.com/vermont/burlington-residents-seek-repeal-of-instant-runoff-voting/Content?oid=2177125|title=Burlington Residents Seek Repeal of Instant Runoff Voting|last=Totten|first=Shay|work=Seven Days|access-date=March 17, 2018|language=en|quote=We waited to bring in the signatures because we didn't want this to be about Kurt Wright losing after being ahead, or Andy Montroll who had more first and second place votes and didn't win. We wanted this to be about IRV.}}</ref> and "contributed to producing a campaign among four serious candidates that was widely praised for its substantive nature".<ref name=":0" />

Montroll, according to some analysis, is said to have been the rightful winner but at no time did he have more votes as cast than the other two main contenders.<ref>https://web.archive.org/web/20110725111908/http://www.burlingtonvotes.org/20090303/2009%20Burlington%20Mayor%20Round3.htm</ref>


Advocates of other voting reforms considered the election a failure of IRV because a 54% majority of voters preferred another specific candidate, Montroll, over the IRV winner, Kiss:<ref name=":1">{{Cite web|url=http://scorevoting.net/Burlington.html|title=Burlington Vermont 2009 IRV mayoral election|last1=Gierzynski|first1=Anthony|last2=Hamilton|first2=Wes|date=March 2009|website=RangeVoting.org|access-date=October 1, 2017|quote=Montroll was favored over Republican Kurt Wright 56% to 44% ... and over Progressive Bob Kiss 54% to 46% ... In other words, in voting terminology, Montroll was a 'beats-all winner,' also called a 'Condorcet winner' ... However, in the IRV election, Montroll came in third! ... voters preferred Montroll over every other candidate ... Montroll is the most-approved|last3=Smith|first3=Warren D.}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Bristow-Johnson|first1=Robert|date=2023|title=The failure of Instant Runoff to accomplish the purpose for which it was adopted: a case study from Burlington Vermont|journal=Constitutional Political Economy|doi=10.1007/s10602-023-09393-1}}</ref> The [[Condorcet winner|Condorcet "beats-all" winner]]<ref name=":8">{{Cite journal|last1=Ornstein|first1=Joseph T.|last2=Norman|first2=Robert Z.|date=October 1, 2014|title=Frequency of monotonicity failure under Instant Runoff Voting: estimates based on a spatial model of elections|journal=Public Choice|language=en|volume=161|issue=1–2|pages=1–9|doi=10.1007/s11127-013-0118-2|s2cid=30833409|issn=0048-5829|quote=Although the Democrat was the Condorcet winner (a majority of voters preferred him in all two way contests), he received the fewest first-place votes and so was eliminated ... 2009 mayoral election in Burlington, VT, which illustrates the key features of an upward monotonicity failure}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=0aRaDgAAQBAJ&pg=PA111|title=Changing How America Votes|last=Donovan|first=Todd|date=April 1, 2017|publisher=Rowman & Littlefield|isbn=9781442276086|language=en|quote=it is possible that a candidate who would beat each of the other candidates in a head-to-head contest still loses an election with RCV rules ... this particular unusual result seems to have occurred in a 2009 mayoral election in Burlington, Vermont}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|url=https://archive.org/details/hownottobewrongp0000elle|url-access=registration|page=[https://archive.org/details/hownottobewrongp0000elle/page/385 385]|title=How Not to Be Wrong: The Power of Mathematical Thinking|last=Ellenberg|first=Jordan|date=May 29, 2014|publisher=Penguin|isbn=9780698163843|language=en|quote=a majority of voters liked the centrist candidate Montroll better than Kiss, and a majority of voters liked Montroll better than Wright ... yet Montroll was tossed in the first round.}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Stensholt|first=Eivind|date=October 7, 2015|title=What Happened in Burlington?|journal=NHH Dept. Of Business and Management Science|language=en|volume=Discussion Paper No. 2015/26|doi=10.2139/ssrn.2670462|ssrn=2670462|quote=K was elected even though M was a clear Condorcet winner and W was a clear Plurality winner.|hdl=11250/2356264|hdl-access=free}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Lewyn|first=Michael|date=2012|title=Two Cheers for Instant Runoff Voting|journal=Phoenix L. Rev.|language=en|volume=6 |page=117|ssrn=2276015|quote=election where Democratic candidate for mayor was Condorcet winner but finished third behind Republican and 'Progressive{{'-}}}}</ref> (and likely most-approved/[[Cardinal voting|highest-rated]] candidate) did not win.<ref name=":1" /> Critics claimed the system is convoluted,<ref name=":5" /> did nothing to increase voter turnout,<ref name=":5" /> turned voting into a "gambling game" due to [[Monotonicity criterion|non-monotonicity]],<ref name=":8" /><ref name=":6">{{Cite news|url=https://www.aspentimes.com/news/irv-much-worse-than-old-runoffs/|title=IRV much worse than old runoffs|last=Dopp|first=Kathy|date=June 10, 2009|work=The Aspen Times|access-date=March 17, 2018|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Felsenthal|first1=Dan S.|last2=Tideman|first2=Nicolaus|date=2014|title=Interacting double monotonicity failure with direction of impact under five voting methods|journal=Mathematical Social Sciences|volume=67|pages=57–66|doi=10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2013.08.001|issn=0165-4896|quote=A display of non-monotonicity under the Alternative Vote method was reported recently, for the March 2009 mayoral election in Burlington, Vermont.}}</ref> and "eliminated the most popular moderate candidate and elected an extremist".<ref name=":6" />
Advocates of other voting reforms considered the election a failure of IRV because a 54% majority of voters preferred another specific candidate, Montroll, over the IRV winner, Kiss:<ref name=":1">{{Cite web|url=http://scorevoting.net/Burlington.html|title=Burlington Vermont 2009 IRV mayoral election|last1=Gierzynski|first1=Anthony|last2=Hamilton|first2=Wes|date=March 2009|website=RangeVoting.org|access-date=October 1, 2017|quote=Montroll was favored over Republican Kurt Wright 56% to 44% ... and over Progressive Bob Kiss 54% to 46% ... In other words, in voting terminology, Montroll was a 'beats-all winner,' also called a 'Condorcet winner' ... However, in the IRV election, Montroll came in third! ... voters preferred Montroll over every other candidate ... Montroll is the most-approved|last3=Smith|first3=Warren D.}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Bristow-Johnson|first1=Robert|date=2023|title=The failure of Instant Runoff to accomplish the purpose for which it was adopted: a case study from Burlington Vermont|journal=Constitutional Political Economy|doi=10.1007/s10602-023-09393-1}}</ref> The [[Condorcet winner|Condorcet "beats-all" winner]]<ref name=":8">{{Cite journal|last1=Ornstein|first1=Joseph T.|last2=Norman|first2=Robert Z.|date=October 1, 2014|title=Frequency of monotonicity failure under Instant Runoff Voting: estimates based on a spatial model of elections|journal=Public Choice|language=en|volume=161|issue=1–2|pages=1–9|doi=10.1007/s11127-013-0118-2|s2cid=30833409|issn=0048-5829|quote=Although the Democrat was the Condorcet winner (a majority of voters preferred him in all two way contests), he received the fewest first-place votes and so was eliminated ... 2009 mayoral election in Burlington, VT, which illustrates the key features of an upward monotonicity failure}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=0aRaDgAAQBAJ&pg=PA111|title=Changing How America Votes|last=Donovan|first=Todd|date=April 1, 2017|publisher=Rowman & Littlefield|isbn=9781442276086|language=en|quote=it is possible that a candidate who would beat each of the other candidates in a head-to-head contest still loses an election with RCV rules ... this particular unusual result seems to have occurred in a 2009 mayoral election in Burlington, Vermont}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|url=https://archive.org/details/hownottobewrongp0000elle|url-access=registration|page=[https://archive.org/details/hownottobewrongp0000elle/page/385 385]|title=How Not to Be Wrong: The Power of Mathematical Thinking|last=Ellenberg|first=Jordan|date=May 29, 2014|publisher=Penguin|isbn=9780698163843|language=en|quote=a majority of voters liked the centrist candidate Montroll better than Kiss, and a majority of voters liked Montroll better than Wright ... yet Montroll was tossed in the first round.}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Stensholt|first=Eivind|date=October 7, 2015|title=What Happened in Burlington?|journal=NHH Dept. Of Business and Management Science|language=en|volume=Discussion Paper No. 2015/26|doi=10.2139/ssrn.2670462|ssrn=2670462|quote=K was elected even though M was a clear Condorcet winner and W was a clear Plurality winner.|hdl=11250/2356264|hdl-access=free}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Lewyn|first=Michael|date=2012|title=Two Cheers for Instant Runoff Voting|journal=Phoenix L. Rev.|language=en|volume=6 |page=117|ssrn=2276015|quote=election where Democratic candidate for mayor was Condorcet winner but finished third behind Republican and 'Progressive{{'-}}}}</ref> (and likely most-approved/[[Cardinal voting|highest-rated]] candidate) did not win.<ref name=":1" /> Critics claimed the system is convoluted,<ref name=":5" /> did nothing to increase voter turnout,<ref name=":5" /> turned voting into a "gambling game" due to [[Monotonicity criterion|non-monotonicity]],<ref name=":8" /><ref name=":6">{{Cite news|url=https://www.aspentimes.com/news/irv-much-worse-than-old-runoffs/|title=IRV much worse than old runoffs|last=Dopp|first=Kathy|date=June 10, 2009|work=The Aspen Times|access-date=March 17, 2018|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Felsenthal|first1=Dan S.|last2=Tideman|first2=Nicolaus|date=2014|title=Interacting double monotonicity failure with direction of impact under five voting methods|journal=Mathematical Social Sciences|volume=67|pages=57–66|doi=10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2013.08.001|issn=0165-4896|quote=A display of non-monotonicity under the Alternative Vote method was reported recently, for the March 2009 mayoral election in Burlington, Vermont.}}</ref> and "eliminated the most popular moderate candidate and elected an extremist".<ref name=":6" />

Revision as of 02:17, 18 December 2023

2009 Burlington mayoral election
← 2006 March 3, 2009 2012 →
 
Nominee Bob Kiss Kurt Wright
Party Progressive Republican
First round count 2,585 (28.8%) 2,951 (32.88%)
Final round count 4,313 (51.51%) 4,061 (48.50%)
 
Nominee Andy Montroll Dan Smith
Party Democratic Independent
First round count 2,063 (22.98%) 1,306 (14.55%)
Final round count eliminated eliminated
Mayor before election

Bob Kiss
Progressive

Elected mayor

Bob Kiss
Progressive

Elections in Vermont
Federal government
Presidential elections
Presidential primaries
Democratic
2000
2004
2008
2012
2016
2020
2024
Republican
2008
2012
2016
2020
2024
U.S. Senate elections
U.S. House elections
State government
General elections
Gubernatorial elections
Lieutenant gubernatorial elections
Attorney General elections
Senate elections
House of Representatives elections
Ballot measures
2022
Proposal 2
Proposal 5
Burlington
Mayoral elections

The 2009 Burlington mayoral election was held in March 2009 for the city of Burlington, Vermont. A few years earlier, the city had switched to holding mayoral elections every three years (e.g. the 1997 election, the 2000 election, the 2003 election, and the 2006 election), so this was the second mayoral election since the city's 2005 change to instant-runoff voting (IRV).[1] In the 2009 election, incumbent Burlington mayor (Bob Kiss) won reelection as a member of the Vermont Progressive Party.[2]

Unlike in the city's first IRV mayoral election three years prior, however, Kiss was neither the plurality winner (since Republican candidate Kurt Wright won a plurality of first-place votes) nor the Condorcet winner (Democratic candidate Andy Montroll was the pairwise winner).[3][4] This led to a controversy about the use of IRV in mayoral elections,[5] culminating in a successful 2010 citizen's initiative repealing IRV's use by a vote of 52% to 48%.[6][7][8] Ranked-choice voting would thus remain unused in Burlington until 2021, when voters again adopted IRV for all city council elections (but not mayoral ones) by a vote of 64% to 36%.[9]

Background

See also: Instant-runoff voting, Instant-runoff voting in the United States § Vermont, and 2006 Burlington mayoral election

The city of Burlington, Vermont approved IRV for use in mayoral elections with a 64% vote in 2005,[1] at a time when IRV was only used in a few local elections in the United States.[10] The 2006 Burlington mayoral election was decided after two rounds of IRV tallying, selecting candidate Bob Kiss of the Vermont Progressive Party (VPP). In the election, Kiss prevailed over opponents Hinda Miller, Democrat, and Kevin Curley, Republican. With his election Kiss became the second member of the VPP to be elected to the office (Peter Clavelle was the first).

Candidates

  • Bob Kiss (P), incumbent mayor (elected in 2006) seeking second term
  • Andy Montroll (D), then current member of the Burlington City Council
  • Dan Smith (I), lawyer
  • James Simpson (G), owner of human-powered transportation services company in Burlington
  • Kurt Wright (R), then current City Councilor and State Representative

Results

Unlike Burlington's first IRV mayoral election in 2006, the mayoral race in 2009 was decided in three rounds. Bob Kiss won the election, receiving 28.8% of the vote in the first round, and receiving 48.0% in the final round (which made up 51.5% of the ballots which had not been exhausted), defeating final challenger Kurt Wright (who received more votes than Kiss in the earlier rounds, but only received 45.2% in the final round).

Burlington mayoral election, 2009 (Summary analysis)
Party Candidate Maximum
round 		Maximum
votes 		Share in
maximum
round 		Maximum votes
First round votesTransfer votes


Progressive Bob Kiss 3 4,313 48.0%
​​
Republican Kurt Wright 3 4,061 45.2%
​​
Democratic Andy Montroll 2 2,554 28.4%
​​
Independent Dan Smith 1 1,306 14.5%
​​
Green James Simpson 1 35 0.4%
​​
Write-in 1 36 0.4%
​​
Exhausted votes 606 6.7%
​​

The elimination rounds were as follows:[11][12]

Candidates 1st round 2nd round 3rd round
Candidate Party Votes % % Active ± Votes % % Active ± Votes % % Active
Bob Kiss Progressive 2,585 28.8% 28.8% +396 2,981 33.2% 33.8% +1332 4,313 48.0% 51.5%
Kurt Wright Republican 2,951 32.9% 32.9% +343 3,294 36.7% 37.3% +767 4,061 45.2% 48.5%
Andy Montroll Democrat 2,063 23.0% 23.0% +491 2,554 28.4% 28.9% -2,554 0 0.0%  
Dan Smith Independent 1,306 14.5% 14.5% -1,306 0 0.0%     0 0.0%  
James Simpson Green 35 0.4% 0.4% -35 0 0.0%     0 0.0%  
Write-in   36 0.4% 0.4% -36 0 0.0%     0 0.0%  
EXHAUSTED PILE   4 0.0% 0.0% +147 151 1.7%   +455 606 6.7%  
TOTALS   8980 100.0%   8980 100.0%   8980 100.0%  

Analysis of the 2009 election

The IRV election is considered a success by IRV advocates such as FairVote, asserting it prevented the election of the first round plurality leader by avoiding the effect of vote-splitting between the other candidates,[13] was easy for voters to understand,[14] avoided the need for traditional runoffs,[14][15] and "contributed to producing a campaign among four serious candidates that was widely praised for its substantive nature".[13]

Advocates of other voting reforms considered the election a failure of IRV because a 54% majority of voters preferred another specific candidate, Montroll, over the IRV winner, Kiss:[16][17] The Condorcet "beats-all" winner[18][19][20][21][22] (and likely most-approved/highest-rated candidate) did not win.[16] Critics claimed the system is convoluted,[15] did nothing to increase voter turnout,[15] turned voting into a "gambling game" due to non-monotonicity,[18][23][24] and "eliminated the most popular moderate candidate and elected an extremist".[23]

The IRV outcome was a result of vote-splitting: Andy Montroll defeated both Bob Kiss and Kurt Wright in separate pairwise contests, and was eliminated in the semifinal round of IRV due to vote-splitting with both candidates. Kurt Wright became the spoiler candidate (a loser whose presence in the race changed who the winner is), splitting the vote against Bob Kiss; Wright received more first-choice votes (including promoted votes to first-choice) than Montroll due to Kiss splitting the vote against Wright.[25]

The election did demonstrate that voters are capable of using ranked-choice ballots, with 99.9% of the ballots filled out correctly,[13] though this includes 16% of voters who bullet-voted for only one candidate.[26]

Pairwise preference combinations:

Andy Montroll

(Democratic Party)

4 wins and no losses (4–0) 4 Wins ↓
Bob Kiss

(Vermont Progressive Party)

3 wins, 1 loss (3–1) 1 Loss →

↓ 3 Wins

4064 (Montroll) –

3476 (Kiss)

Kurt Wright

(Republican Party)

2 wins, 2 losses (2–2) 2 Losses →

2 Wins ↓

4313 (Kiss) –

4061 (Wright)

4597 (Montroll) –

3664 (Wright)

Dan Smith (Independent) 1 win, 3 losses (1–3) 3 Losses →

1 Win ↓

3971 (Wright) –

3793 (Smith)

3944 (Kiss) –

3576 (Smith)

4570 (Montroll) –

2997 (Smith)

James Simpson

(Green Party)

0 wins, 4 losses (0–4) 4 Losses → 5570 (Smith) –

721 (Simpson)

5270 (Wright) –

1310 (Simpson)

5514 (Kiss) –

844 (Simpson)

6262 (Montroll) –

591 (Simpson)

This leads to an overall preference ranking of:

  1. Montroll – defeats all candidates below, including Kiss (4,064 to 3,476)
  2. Kiss – defeats all candidates below, including Wright (4,313 to 4,061)
  3. Wright – defeats all candidates below, including Smith (3,971 to 3,793)
  4. Smith – defeats Simpson (5,570 to 721) and the write-in candidates

Montroll was therefore preferred over Kiss by 54% of voters, preferred over Wright by 56% of voters, over Smith by 60%, and over Simpson by 91% of voters.[27][4]

Hypothetical results under various voting systems

The winner under other voting methods can be deduced, assuming voters would not employ tactical voting.[16] In IRV, a voter never helps their preferred candidate win by withholding or falsifying their second choice. For each voting method below that elects Montroll, Kiss supporters can withhold or falsify their second choice to defeat Montroll.

Effect on IRV in Burlington

There was post-election controversy regarding the IRV method, and in 2010 a citizen's initiative resulted in the repeal of IRV in Burlington.[28] The initially "stagnant" repeal campaign drew renewed interest as Kiss became embroiled in a series of controversies.[29] In December 2009, a group called "One Person, One Vote", made up of Republicans and Democrats unhappy with the election outcome,[15] held a press conference to announce that they had collected enough signatures for an initiative to repeal IRV.[30] According to a local columnist, the vote was a referendum on Kiss's mayoralty; Kiss had allegedly become a "lame duck" because of a scandal relating to Burlington Telecom and other local issues.[15] However, in an interview with Vermont Public Radio, Kiss disputed that claim,[31] and those gathering signatures for the repeal stated that it was specifically a rejection of IRV itself.[15]

The IRV repeal initiative in March 2010 won 52% to 48%. It earned a majority of the vote in only two of the city's seven wards, but the vote in those 2009 strongholds for Kurt Wright was lopsided against IRV.[6][7][8] Republican Governor Jim Douglas signed the repeal into law in April 2010, saying "Voting ought to be transparent and easy to understand, and affects the will of the voters in a direct way. I'm glad the city has agreed to a more traditional process."[29]

The repeal reverted the system back to a 40% rule that requires a top-two runoff if no candidate exceeds 40% of the vote. Had the 2009 election occurred under these rules, Kiss and Wright would have advanced to the runoff. If the same voters had participated in the runoff as in the first election and not changed their preferences, Kiss would have won the runoff.[32]

The following decade saw continuing controversy about voting methods in Burlington. In 2011, for example, an initiative effort to increase the winning threshold from the 40% plurality to a 50% majority failed by 58.5% to 41.5%,[33] while in 2019, instant-runoff voting was once again proposed for Burlington by Councilor Jack Hanson but went unapproved by the Charter Change Committee for the March 2020 ballot.[34] One year later, in July 2020, the city council voted 6–5 in support of a measure to reinstate IRV, but that was vetoed by Mayor Miro Weinberger the following month.[35] In a city election, Burlington voters voted in favor by IRV by 64% to 36% (8914 to 4918) on March 2, 2021.[36][37][38] The charter change requires approval and enactment by the Vermont legislature, which did not act on it 2021.

References

  1. ^ a b 4. How did this change to IRV come about? Over 64% of Burlington voters voted in favor of the IRV Charter amendment in March 2005, and it went into effect on May 12, 2005, when the governor signed the ratification bill, H.505, which had been passed by both the House and Senate.
  2. ^ "Mayor Bob Kiss". City of Burlington. Archived from the original on November 29, 2007. Retrieved November 16, 2007.
  3. ^ "Point/Counterpoint: Terry Bouricius Attempts To Rip Professor Gierzynski A New One Over Instant Runoff Voting Controversy (Now With All New Gierzynski Update!)". Archived from the original on July 26, 2011. Retrieved December 30, 2010.
  4. ^ a b "Burlington Vermont 2009 IRV mayoral election". RangeVoting.org. Retrieved April 1, 2016.
  5. ^ Baruth, Philip (March 12, 2009). "Voting Paradoxes and Perverse Outcomes: Political Scientist Tony Gierzynski Lays Out A Case Against Instant Runoff Voting". Vermont Daily Briefing. Archived from the original on July 26, 2011.
  6. ^ a b "Burlington voters repeal IRV". Wcax.com. March 2, 2010. Archived from the original on April 9, 2016. Retrieved March 28, 2016.
  7. ^ a b "Instant run-off voting experiment ends in Burlington : Rutland Herald Online". Rutlandherald.com. April 27, 2010. Archived from the original on March 4, 2016. Retrieved April 1, 2016.
  8. ^ a b "Official Results Of 2010 Annual City Election" (PDF). City of Burlington. March 2, 2010.
  9. ^ "Burlington, Vermont, Question 4, Ranked-Choice Voting Amendment (March)". Ballotpedia.org. Retrieved April 18, 2021.
  10. ^ Sneyd, Ross (March 16, 2006). "Vt. City Offers Instant Runoff in Race". The Guardian. Archived from the original on March 16, 2006. Retrieved June 3, 2018.
  11. ^ "ChoicePlus Pro 2009 Burlington Mayor Round Detail Report". July 25, 2011. Archived from the original on July 25, 2011. Retrieved January 3, 2018.
  12. ^ "ChoicePlus Pro 2009 Burlington Mayor Round 4 Report". March 3, 2009. Archived from the original on July 25, 2011. Retrieved February 28, 2011.
  13. ^ a b c Bouricius, Terry (March 17, 2009). "Response to Faulty Analysis of Burlington IRV Election". FairVote.org. Retrieved October 1, 2017. successfully prevented the election of the candidate who would likely have won under plurality rules, but would have lost to either of the other top finishers in a runoff
  14. ^ a b Etnier, Carl (March 6, 2009). "Instant runoff was success". Rutland Herald. Retrieved March 17, 2018.
  15. ^ a b c d e f Totten, Shay. "Burlington Residents Seek Repeal of Instant Runoff Voting". Seven Days. Retrieved March 17, 2018. We waited to bring in the signatures because we didn't want this to be about Kurt Wright losing after being ahead, or Andy Montroll who had more first and second place votes and didn't win. We wanted this to be about IRV.
  16. ^ a b c d Gierzynski, Anthony; Hamilton, Wes; Smith, Warren D. (March 2009). "Burlington Vermont 2009 IRV mayoral election". RangeVoting.org. Retrieved October 1, 2017. Montroll was favored over Republican Kurt Wright 56% to 44% ... and over Progressive Bob Kiss 54% to 46% ... In other words, in voting terminology, Montroll was a 'beats-all winner,' also called a 'Condorcet winner' ... However, in the IRV election, Montroll came in third! ... voters preferred Montroll over every other candidate ... Montroll is the most-approved
  17. ^ Bristow-Johnson, Robert (2023). "The failure of Instant Runoff to accomplish the purpose for which it was adopted: a case study from Burlington Vermont". Constitutional Political Economy. doi:10.1007/s10602-023-09393-1.
  18. ^ a b Ornstein, Joseph T.; Norman, Robert Z. (October 1, 2014). "Frequency of monotonicity failure under Instant Runoff Voting: estimates based on a spatial model of elections". Public Choice. 161 (1–2): 1–9. doi:10.1007/s11127-013-0118-2. ISSN 0048-5829. S2CID 30833409. Although the Democrat was the Condorcet winner (a majority of voters preferred him in all two way contests), he received the fewest first-place votes and so was eliminated ... 2009 mayoral election in Burlington, VT, which illustrates the key features of an upward monotonicity failure
  19. ^ Donovan, Todd (April 1, 2017). Changing How America Votes. Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 9781442276086. it is possible that a candidate who would beat each of the other candidates in a head-to-head contest still loses an election with RCV rules ... this particular unusual result seems to have occurred in a 2009 mayoral election in Burlington, Vermont
  20. ^ Ellenberg, Jordan (May 29, 2014). How Not to Be Wrong: The Power of Mathematical Thinking. Penguin. p. 385. ISBN 9780698163843. a majority of voters liked the centrist candidate Montroll better than Kiss, and a majority of voters liked Montroll better than Wright ... yet Montroll was tossed in the first round.
  21. ^ Stensholt, Eivind (October 7, 2015). "What Happened in Burlington?". NHH Dept. Of Business and Management Science. Discussion Paper No. 2015/26. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2670462. hdl:11250/2356264. SSRN 2670462. K was elected even though M was a clear Condorcet winner and W was a clear Plurality winner.
  22. ^ Lewyn, Michael (2012). "Two Cheers for Instant Runoff Voting". Phoenix L. Rev. 6: 117. SSRN 2276015. election where Democratic candidate for mayor was Condorcet winner but finished third behind Republican and 'Progressive'
  23. ^ a b Dopp, Kathy (June 10, 2009). "IRV much worse than old runoffs". The Aspen Times. Retrieved March 17, 2018.
  24. ^ Felsenthal, Dan S.; Tideman, Nicolaus (2014). "Interacting double monotonicity failure with direction of impact under five voting methods". Mathematical Social Sciences. 67: 57–66. doi:10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2013.08.001. ISSN 0165-4896. A display of non-monotonicity under the Alternative Vote method was reported recently, for the March 2009 mayoral election in Burlington, Vermont.
  25. ^ Laatu, Juho; Smith, Warren D. (March 2009). "THE RANK-ORDER VOTES IN THE 2009 BURLINGTON MAYORAL ELECTION".
  26. ^ "Voter Paradox in the 2009 Burlington IRV Mayoral Race" (PDF). Figure: Percent of voters who made a 1st choice, 2nd choice, etc., 2006 and 2009 Burlington mayoral election. 2 choices = 83.5%
  27. ^ "IRV and Core Support". The Center for Election Science. Retrieved December 4, 2019.
  28. ^ Gierzynski, Tony (March 12, 2009). "Voting Paradoxes and Perverse Outcomes: Political Scientist Tony Gierzynski Lays Out A Case Against Instant Runoff Voting". Vermont Daily Briefing. Archived from the original on October 19, 2015. Retrieved September 27, 2017.
  29. ^ a b "IRV Repeal Signed into Law". Seven Days. April 26, 2010.
  30. ^ "One Person, One Vote Press Conference". CCTV Center for Media and Democracy. December 29, 2009. Retrieved April 10, 2018.
  31. ^ "Bob Kiss on IRV, Burlington Telecom and the Moran Plant – VPR Archive". vprarchive.vpr.net. Retrieved April 10, 2018.
  32. ^ "City of Burlington, Vermont | Instant Runoff Voting". September 28, 2011. Archived from the original on September 28, 2011. Retrieved April 8, 2018. – FAQ 5. for IRV: Under the old [pre-IRV] system a candidate could be elected with just over 40% of the vote, meaning a candidate could win even though seen as the last choice of nearly 60% of the voters.
  33. ^ "Annual City Election results" (PDF). City of Burlington. March 1, 2011.
  34. ^ "Ranked-Choice Voting Proposal Advances in Burlington". Seven Days. Retrieved December 4, 2019.
  35. ^ "Push for ranked-choice voting dies in Vermont's biggest city". The Fulcrum. August 10, 2020. Retrieved September 22, 2020.
  36. ^ Swann, Sara. "Ranked-choice voting poised to return to Vermont's largest city". The Fulcrum. Retrieved May 2, 2021.
  37. ^ Huntley, Katharine. "Voters approve all Burlington ballot issues". WCAX3. Retrieved May 2, 2021.
  38. ^ "Burlington, Vermont, Question 4, Ranked-Choice Voting Amendment (March 2021)". Ballotpedia. Retrieved July 24, 2021.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=2009_Burlington_mayoral_election&oldid=1190469716"