User talk:Ippantekina/Archive 3: Difference between revisions
Ippantekina (talk | contribs) →TFA: archived using OneClickArchiver) |
Ippantekina (talk | contribs) →Promotion of Welcome to New York (song): archived using OneClickArchiver) |
||
Line 298: | Line 298: | ||
Thank you for the article, introduced: "'Baby just say yes.' Arguably one of the most enduring love songs of the 21st century, "Love Story" was Taylor Swift's first single to crack the Hot 100 top 5, and its resurgence on TikTok in 2021 attested to its timelessness." --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 18:43, 14 September 2023 (UTC) |
Thank you for the article, introduced: "'Baby just say yes.' Arguably one of the most enduring love songs of the 21st century, "Love Story" was Taylor Swift's first single to crack the Hot 100 top 5, and its resurgence on TikTok in 2021 attested to its timelessness." --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 18:43, 14 September 2023 (UTC) |
||
{{Clear}} |
|||
==Promotion of [[Welcome to New York (song)]]== |
|||
{{ivmbox |
|||
|image = Cscr-featured.svg |
|||
|imagesize=60px |
|||
|extracss=font-size:1.25em; font-family:Georgia; |
|||
|text = Congratulations, Ippantekina! The article you nominated, '''[[Welcome to New York (song)]]''', has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The '''[[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Welcome to New York (song)/archive1|nomination discussion]]''' has been archived.{{parabr}}This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may [[Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests|nominate it]] to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, {{user0|FrB.TG}} via [[User:FACBot|FACBot]] ([[User talk:FACBot|talk]]) 00:06, 7 November 2023 (UTC) |
|||
}}<!-- Template:FC pass talk message --> |
Revision as of 03:30, 21 December 2023
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Ippantekina. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
Your GA nomination of Betty (Taylor Swift song)
The article Betty (Taylor Swift song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Betty (Taylor Swift song) for comments about the article, and Talk:Betty (Taylor Swift song)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of BennyOnTheLoose -- BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 09:43, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of The Best Day (Taylor Swift song)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Best Day (Taylor Swift song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of BennyOnTheLoose -- BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 01:03, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of The Best Day (Taylor Swift song)
The article The Best Day (Taylor Swift song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:The Best Day (Taylor Swift song) and Talk:The Best Day (Taylor Swift song)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of BennyOnTheLoose -- BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 22:02, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of The Best Day (Taylor Swift song)
The article The Best Day (Taylor Swift song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Best Day (Taylor Swift song) for comments about the article, and Talk:The Best Day (Taylor Swift song)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of BennyOnTheLoose -- BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 09:02, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Midnight Rain
The article Midnight Rain you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Midnight Rain and Talk:Midnight Rain/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vaughan J. — VAUGHAN J. (TALK) 10:00, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Midnight Rain
The article Midnight Rain you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Midnight Rain for comments about the article, and Talk:Midnight Rain/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vaughan J. -- Vaughan J. (talk) 00:23, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
Unblock appeal
Ippantekina (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Caught by a colocation web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. My IP address is 183.81.8.163. I just moved apartment and somehow my IP was identified as a "web host provider". Well I'm not an IT guy of any sort and if I get blocked with the wifi I'm using, I wouldn't be able to contribute further as, well, this is my wifi for quite some time now. Best, Ippantekina (talk) 16:58, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
Accept reason:
I've granted you IP block exemption for a year. That should fix this. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 18:16, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
- Ippantekina, your talk page notes that you live in Oregon, and the IP you identified belongs to FPT Telecom in Vietnam. Are you sure you don't have a VPN enabled?-- Ponyobons mots 17:18, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
- Ponyo my userpage was updated a while ago (Oregon was nice). Now I’m in Ho Chi Minh for a job. Well this is getting personal as I don’t like exposing my IP and location like this… But in case you want to check my geolocation then yes I’m in an apartment in Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam. No VPN used. Ippantekina (talk) 17:22, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of You're on Your Own, Kid
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article You're on Your Own, Kid you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Unlimitedlead -- Unlimitedlead (talk) 21:43, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Labyrinth (Taylor Swift song)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Labyrinth (Taylor Swift song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of BennyOnTheLoose -- BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 00:04, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Labyrinth (Taylor Swift song)
The article Labyrinth (Taylor Swift song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Labyrinth (Taylor Swift song) and Talk:Labyrinth (Taylor Swift song)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of BennyOnTheLoose -- BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 14:44, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 18
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of UK Albums Chart number ones of the 2020s, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Drake.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of You're on Your Own, Kid
The article You're on Your Own, Kid you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:You're on Your Own, Kid for comments about the article, and Talk:You're on Your Own, Kid/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Unlimitedlead -- Unlimitedlead (talk) 14:44, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Labyrinth (Taylor Swift song)
The article Labyrinth (Taylor Swift song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Labyrinth (Taylor Swift song) for comments about the article, and Talk:Labyrinth (Taylor Swift song)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of BennyOnTheLoose -- BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 21:23, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
Please do not copy articles into your sandbox without attribution
Hello. I noticed you have these in your sandbox (User:Ippantekina/Evermore, User:Ippantekina/Midnights, User:Ippantekina/FearlessTV, User:Ippantekina/Stephen), all of which have been copied from previous versions of their Wikipedia articles. Please do not do that without leaving necessary attributions, whether on the sandbox talk page or on the edit summary when you create the sandboxes. See this section of Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia to learn how to provide attribution. Thank you. Elias 🌊 💬 "Will you call me?"
📝 "Will you hang me out to dry?" 09:02, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
- Duly noted. Thanks for letting me know! Ippantekina (talk) 09:12, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
The Eras Tour
Taylor Swift said she'd announce international dates as part of The Eras Tour, so it'd be wise to find relevant sources until she reveals which overseas countries will be included. Besides, she never limits her tours to the United States. 96.227.141.216 (talk) 02:00, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
The Eras Tour
Just because the U.S. leg of The Eras Tour ends in August doesn't mean it's the final tour date altogether. 96.227.141.216 (talk) 00:43, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
Request for peer review help
Hello again! I hope you are doing well, and congratulations on your recent FAs. I was wondering if you could possibly help with my current peer review? I completely understand if you do not have the time or interest. I just wanted to reach out to you since you are experienced with music articles, and my peer review is on an R&B ballad so your perspective would be beneficial if possible. Have a great rest of your weekend! Aoba47 (talk) 01:25, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
- Hi Aoba47, appreciate you reaching out :) I was about to chime in the PR but from what I see the article is already in great shape and the comments at the PR are sufficient imo. Therefore I'd be happy to jump in the FAC in the future as I believe my input at the PR might be insubstantial. Cheers, Ippantekina (talk) 04:17, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for the kind words! That makes sense to me. I will open a FAC later in the week, but I thought I should leave it open until the end of the month. I am very grateful for the comments I have received as they have helped to improve the article immensely. Hope you are doing well! Aoba47 (talk) 15:51, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Sweet Nothing (Taylor Swift song)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sweet Nothing (Taylor Swift song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Heartfox -- Heartfox (talk) 08:02, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Promotion of State of Grace (song)
Promotion of Hey Stephen
Promotion of White Horse (Taylor Swift song)
Your GA nomination of Sweet Nothing (Taylor Swift song)
The article Sweet Nothing (Taylor Swift song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Sweet Nothing (Taylor Swift song) for comments about the article, and Talk:Sweet Nothing (Taylor Swift song)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Heartfox -- Heartfox (talk) 04:01, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Reputation (album)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Reputation (album) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Cherrell410 -- Cherrell410 (talk) 17:22, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Reputation (album)
The article Reputation (album) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Reputation (album) and Talk:Reputation (album)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Cherrell410 -- Cherrell410 (talk) 17:02, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Reputation (album)
The article Reputation (album) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Reputation (album) for comments about the article, and Talk:Reputation (album)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Cherrell410 -- Cherrell410 (talk) 04:23, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of All of the Girls You Loved Before
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article All of the Girls You Loved Before you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pamzeis -- Pamzeis (talk) 05:23, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of All of the Girls You Loved Before
The article All of the Girls You Loved Before you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:All of the Girls You Loved Before and Talk:All of the Girls You Loved Before/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pamzeis -- Pamzeis (talk) 06:40, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of All of the Girls You Loved Before
The article All of the Girls You Loved Before you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:All of the Girls You Loved Before for comments about the article, and Talk:All of the Girls You Loved Before/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pamzeis -- Pamzeis (talk) 14:23, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
@Ippantekina: Share your thoughts regarding the album if you wish to. 2001:D08:2931:AE67:1771:70C0:BAF5:973E (talk) 15:53, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Fearless (Taylor's Version)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Fearless (Taylor's Version) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vaughan J. -- Vaughan J. (talk) 10:23, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Fearless (Taylor's Version)
The article Fearless (Taylor's Version) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Fearless (Taylor's Version) and Talk:Fearless (Taylor's Version)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vaughan J. -- Vaughan J. (talk) 08:20, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Fearless (Taylor's Version)
The article Fearless (Taylor's Version) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Fearless (Taylor's Version) for comments about the article, and Talk:Fearless (Taylor's Version)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vaughan J. -- Vaughan J. (talk) 08:02, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
Writing in All Caps
I undid your revision at Anti because of what it says at MOS:ALLCAPS, and I quote: "Avoid writing with all caps (all capital letters), including small caps (all caps at a reduced size), when they have only a stylistic function. Reduce them to title case, sentence case, or normal case, as appropriate
. The title of the album appearing in all capitals followed by a note saying '(stylized in all caps)' is the literal definition of this. Stylisation is not an important note at all. It's superfluous and usually never know if its the word being deliberately written in capitals or if its the font style as some are rendered in capitals therefore we have no idea if its a stylisation or just the type face of the font (two different things). E.g. Arial font is not capitalised by default, but if I choose, I could type a word in Arial in capitals. That's two different things. Plus its logic and natural conclusion that if we're not physically going to write the title in all caps, there's absolutely no need to write a note that its stylised in capitals. >> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 17:41, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Lil-unique1: sorry but I had to undo your edit... "Avoid writing with all caps" means we do not write it as ANTI and has nothing to do with the note about its stylization. The note remains because the album's title is all cap on streaming platforms/physical pressings. Ippantekina (talk) 01:00, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- That has no relevance. The whole point of the guidance is that "stylisation" is not important - its not relevant. It's superfluous. All that's happened is it Anti was written in sentence case, and maybe someone else or maybe yourself added the note to get around the MOS. The manual of style isn't optional. You and I both know that the note about stylisation is a weasel to get around the MOS rules on stylisation and capitals. >> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 19:40, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Lil-unique1: You better improve your reading comprehension. I'm done talking. Ippantekina (talk) 03:23, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
- That has no relevance. The whole point of the guidance is that "stylisation" is not important - its not relevant. It's superfluous. All that's happened is it Anti was written in sentence case, and maybe someone else or maybe yourself added the note to get around the MOS. The manual of style isn't optional. You and I both know that the note about stylisation is a weasel to get around the MOS rules on stylisation and capitals. >> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 19:40, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Mirrorball (Taylor Swift song)
Hello, Ippantekina. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mirrorball (Taylor Swift song), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
August 2023
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to NewJeans, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 06:31, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
Just a quick note about civility
Just because you have changed your username from HD doesn't mean you get a free pass to behave like an inexperienced editor. Slamdunking a rude and uncivil comment like this and then archive the conversation is petty. Of course I'd see the notification and be curious as to what I was pinged. I've never had any run-ins with you previously (to the best of my knowledge) so I'm caught of guard by your curtness. You should absolutely know better to criticise the edits not the editor. If you want to be petty, I have a honours degree from a well-recognised UK university, there's no issue with my comprehension. I'm clear what is of encyclopaedic value and importance that's all. If you disagree that's fine we can discuss it and ask others for an opinion but there's no need for the childish and uncivil comment like the one you made.
Happy to draw a line under that now we've both said our bit - there's an on-going discussion on the talkpage and evidently if you want to contribute you are more than welcome to. I hope our interactions are more civil and productive going forward. >> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 18:57, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Lil-unique1: Hi, yes I own it that I was an asshole and I have no excuses for that behaviour. I apologise had it hurt you in any way. I will take a look at the RfC shortly. Ippantekina (talk) 10:28, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
august 2023
Hi, I wonder why you deleted my updates in the Taylor Swift discography pages, since I only uploaded Italian charts' data Seemone01 (talk) 14:36, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Seemone01: Hello, the existing charts for Taylor Swift discographies already amount 10, which is the recommended number of charts for discography lists. You can read more at WP:DISCOGSTYLE, which says: "In the case of multiple charts, "comprehensive" does not necessarily mean an exhaustive list of countries and charts the artist has charted on. A limit of approximately 10 separate charts is suggested, using any combination of country, component, or competing charts." Ippantekina (talk) 15:06, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Clean (song)
The article Clean (song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Clean (song) and Talk:Clean (song)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pamzeis -- Pamzeis (talk) 13:02, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
AfC notification: Draft:Now That We Don't Talk has a new comment
Your submission at Articles for creation: Now That We Don't Talk has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
CNMall41 (talk) 08:24, 5 November 2023 (UTC)Your GA nomination of Clean (song)
The article Clean (song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Clean (song) for comments about the article, and Talk:Clean (song)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pamzeis -- Pamzeis (talk) 15:03, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive
Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive | |
August 2023 Backlog Drive:
| |
Other ways to participate: | |
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. |
Hi @Ippantekina: There's another one mentioned Kelly Clarkson's song Catch My Breath. 2402:1980:82E7:2B93:0:0:0:1 (talk) 04:35, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
FYI. An article, Clean (song), was created on 10 August 2023. As that's not at least a GA, therefore the topic is in danger of being demoted after a 3 month grace period (currently set to expiry on 10 November 2023). Regards, Armbrust The Homunculus 18:58, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 1989 (Taylor's Version)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1989 (Taylor's Version) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of MaranoFan -- MaranoFan (talk) 15:22, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Now That We Don't Talk
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Now That We Don't Talk you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Heartfox -- Heartfox (talk) 04:00, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Now That We Don't Talk
The article Now That We Don't Talk you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Now That We Don't Talk for comments about the article, and Talk:Now That We Don't Talk/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Heartfox -- Heartfox (talk) 20:43, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Album subtitle is unnecessary
There’s no reason to include the edition of the album on songs, especially if the song appears on different versions. Why is having it the notes not enough? Does it have to be mentioned multiple times in the infobox that the song is on a certain edition. For example, both Bigger Than the Whole Sky and Would’ve, Could’ve, Should’ve both in the note state the song is included on the 3am edition and other editions of the same album. I don’t get why people think it needs to be included twice. 147.147.63.15 (talk) 16:26, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
- How is it unnecessary? And why a note is better? Ippantekina (talk) 18:38, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
- Have you ever heard of redundant? Apparently not. Why does the same information be in the infobox twice? You’re not making any legitimate argument to include the subtitle of an album in the infobox. You’re claim about Ours (song) was wrong because it doesn’t matter if it was released as a single from the Speak Now album or not, it appears only on the Target exclusive and wide retail deluxe edition of the album and yet the infobox does not included the name (Target Exclusive) in it. Also it’s inconsistent. I’m not gonna point out any other pages that do the same thing because you’ll just go vandalize them and put the subtitles in instead of having consistency. 92.1.70.84 (talk) 20:53, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Please stop your vandalism
I have made an admin aware of your vandalism on two GA pages where you keep changing and adding unnecessary information and removing what made the article a GA based solely on your opinion. Please stop your vandalism. Thank you. 174.198.0.195 (talk) 13:45, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
Okay, so I finally remembered how to promote GAs. Congratulations on the promotion of the aforementioned article; I have seen a notice that said something about bots possibly being malfunctional today, so this may delay the GA process. Nonetheless, thank you kindly for your patience and hard work on this article. Hail Taylor. Unlimitedlead (talk) 12:55, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
TFA nom for Love Story (Taylor Swift song)
I have nominated Love Story (Taylor Swift song) to be today's featured article on Sep 15. As the article's FAC nominator, you are invited to click here and give your comments on the nomination and prepared blurb. Thanks and happy editing. Z1720 (talk) 17:39, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
- Due to a discussion at WP:ERRORS regarding another article, I've had to bring on your article 11 hours early. It will run the full day on the 15th. Wehwalt (talk) 13:34, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
TFA
Just to let you know that Wehwalt had to bump up the TFA appearance of Love Story (Taylor Swift song) per an issue with the previous TFA; see WP:ERRORS. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 13:24, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
Thank you for the article, introduced: "'Baby just say yes.' Arguably one of the most enduring love songs of the 21st century, "Love Story" was Taylor Swift's first single to crack the Hot 100 top 5, and its resurgence on TikTok in 2021 attested to its timelessness." --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:43, 14 September 2023 (UTC)