User talk:OligoclonalBand: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 07:53, 27 December 2023

This is OligoclonalBand's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Betty Q. Banker has been accepted

Betty Q. Banker, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Liance (talk) 19:29, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mary Anne Guggenheim has been accepted

Mary Anne Guggenheim, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 08:23, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Diana M. Cejas (December 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

interviews do not contribute to any notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Diana M. Cejas and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 16:22, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, OligoclonalBand! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 16:22, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Diana M. Cejas (December 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ToadetteEdit was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Diana M. Cejas and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Toadette ^{(Merry Christmas, and a happy new year)} 21:04, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Dr. Cejas's story was covered in CBS News, Teen Vogue and Huffpost, all cited here. In June I created a page for Z Paige L'Erario, a transgender neurologist and writer, with significantly less external coverage by secondary sources and less formal leadership in international societies. I am perplexed as to why the one qualifies and not the other. OligoclonalBand (talk) 23:50, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Yasmin Khakoo has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Yasmin Khakoo. Thanks! CNMall41 (talk) 02:27, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Are there new standards? I'm looking at the Wikipedia pages of other neurologists and I don't see additional external verification - often there is little beyond their institutional page.

Khakoo has additional info at a national society, is mentioned in a published textbook on the history of child neurology, and is editor in chief of a major journal (which is verifiable on the journal's masthead).

If there are new standards, I apologize. 174.174.54.144 (talk) 07:53, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 70: / Line 70: @@
 <div style="border:solid 1px #9accf6;background:#f1f9ff; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> [[File:AFC-Logo.svg|50px|left]]
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at [[Draft:Yasmin Khakoo]]. Thanks! [[User:CNMall41|CNMall41]] ([[User talk:CNMall41|talk]]) 02:27, 27 December 2023 (UTC) </div>
+:Are there new standards? I'm looking at the Wikipedia pages of other neurologists and I don't see additional external verification - often there is little beyond their institutional page.
+:Khakoo has additional info at a national society, is mentioned in a published textbook on the history of child neurology, and is editor in chief of a major journal (which is verifiable on the journal's masthead).
+:If there are new standards, I apologize. [[Special:Contributions/174.174.54.144|174.174.54.144]] ([[User talk:174.174.54.144|talk]]) 07:53, 27 December 2023 (UTC)