User talk:Drjsilverstein

Your submission at Articles for creation: Panevolutionary Theory (December 31)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Fermiboson was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Panevolutionary Theory poses a dramatic paradigm shift in the understanding of evolution by proposing a Grand Unifying Theory that unites all aspects of how matter and energy are organized in all contexts. obvious pseudoscience. Also COI.

Fermiboson (talk) 15:41, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

Dear Fermiboson, it is not pseudoscience and it has been peer-reviewed and published. That it contradicts or modifies the perspective on the dominant paradigm is the reason that it should be made available on a popular venue. If you can explain to me how the current theory of evolution explains abiogenesis or AI, or the signifcant changes in the complexity of the organization of matter in the universe, I welcome being enlightened. If I failed to explain how evolutionary processes are better defined as the transference of information used to rearrange matter rather than just genetic inheritance, that is on me, or perhaps it represents a failure on your part to actually understand the topic. You can reject by saying that I have a COI in the topic and therefore lack independence that is fine if it cannot be addressed with a disclosure, but using a defamatory characterization that is unfounded and inflamatory.

Happy New Year,

Dr. Jay Silverstein Drjsilverstein (talk) 16:07, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Drjsilverstein! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Fermiboson (talk) 15:41, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Drjsilverstein. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template), including links or details of reliable sources that support your suggestions;
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Fermiboson (talk) 15:42, 31 December 2023 (UTC)