Jump to content

Talk:Stephen Hawking: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
Line 150: Line 150:
::::So from what I have read it says that Epstein emailed Maxwell telling her to deny that Stephen Hawking participated in an “underage orgy”. Now obviously we must wait a couple more days for more information to come out but as you can see my main root point here is that Stephen Hawking is being named as complicit since you know Epstein is emailing his accomplice to deny that hawking was a participant basically telling her to lie. Again it’s too early but more confirmation and information will come out soon [[Special:Contributions/99.232.236.142|99.232.236.142]] ([[User talk:99.232.236.142|talk]]) 08:27, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
::::So from what I have read it says that Epstein emailed Maxwell telling her to deny that Stephen Hawking participated in an “underage orgy”. Now obviously we must wait a couple more days for more information to come out but as you can see my main root point here is that Stephen Hawking is being named as complicit since you know Epstein is emailing his accomplice to deny that hawking was a participant basically telling her to lie. Again it’s too early but more confirmation and information will come out soon [[Special:Contributions/99.232.236.142|99.232.236.142]] ([[User talk:99.232.236.142|talk]]) 08:27, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
:::::Sorry didn’t read it right I might have misunderstood. So yes Epstein did email about it being a “false allegation”. Again however another source that telegraph article didn’t say that. Again it’s just been a day since the news broke out so we must wait longer do determine if the allegations are true or not. [[Special:Contributions/99.232.236.142|99.232.236.142]] ([[User talk:99.232.236.142|talk]]) 08:29, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
:::::Sorry didn’t read it right I might have misunderstood. So yes Epstein did email about it being a “false allegation”. Again however another source that telegraph article didn’t say that. Again it’s just been a day since the news broke out so we must wait longer do determine if the allegations are true or not. [[Special:Contributions/99.232.236.142|99.232.236.142]] ([[User talk:99.232.236.142|talk]]) 08:29, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
::::I think a really good idea would be to wait for the website hosting the Epstein client list to come back online and then directly access it. This will take longer than the actual news coming out but would be direct evidence and would help clear up a lot of misunderstanding and all [[Special:Contributions/99.232.236.142|99.232.236.142]] ([[User talk:99.232.236.142|talk]]) 08:32, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 08:32, 4 January 2024

Template:Vital article

Former featured articleStephen Hawking is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
In the news Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 12, 2006Good article nomineeListed
September 20, 2006Good article reassessmentDelisted
February 6, 2010Good article nomineeNot listed
February 16, 2012Good article nomineeListed
February 29, 2012Peer reviewReviewed
March 28, 2012Featured article candidateNot promoted
June 17, 2012Peer reviewReviewed
August 10, 2012Featured article candidateNot promoted
September 3, 2012Featured article candidatePromoted
February 23, 2014Featured article reviewDemoted
In the news A news item involving this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "In the news" column on March 14, 2018.
Current status: Former featured article

NHS / Socialised Healthcare

I find it surprising that the section on his views includes no mention of his forthright defence of the UK NHS and socialised medicine. https://www.hawking.org.uk/in-words/speeches/speech-1

The redirect Stephen Hawking CH CBE FRS FRSA has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 3 § Stephen Hawking CH CBE FRS FRSA until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 06:02, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Personal information

parent name and wife name 36.252.69.73 (talk) 11:37, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 26 November 2023

Change: Hawking claimed to be an atheist.

To: Hawking was an atheist. 81.78.67.89 (talk) 12:15, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Tollens (talk) 13:22, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Recent allegations of sexual misconduct regarding Hawking’s name being mentioned in the Epstein client clist

Does anybody know how to factor this in? I know we must wait for more information but at the very least we can add a stub saying there have been “allegations” and then see if the allegations are further proven then we edit accordingly 99.232.236.142 (talk) 03:23, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Allegations of what? HiLo48 (talk) 05:03, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I would suggest putting a subsection about the Epstein court case under the Personal life section, similar to the Sexual harassment lawsuits section on the Danny Elfman article. We will also need to take care to cite from reliable sources, as there are so many news outlets reporting on the Epstein documents as they have been recently made public. Panian513 05:21, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah it’s too early to discuss it as fact but it should definitely be mentioned in personal life as alleged and I mean alleged. I myself have very strong feelings in this but for the sake of journalistic integrity I would stress putting it as alleged until we get further information since this stuff has just been released. I myself am not a confirmed protection user hence why I have brought the subject for someone more skilled in editing and with more power to do so. 99.232.236.142 (talk) 06:22, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also there is a good source here from sky news uk
https://news.sky.com/story/epstein-court-documents-latest-prince-andrew-among-those-named-13041708
is the telegraph a reliable source because I know they have an even more detailed article on the allegations against Hawking but I’m unsure if you guys think the telegraph is reliable 99.232.236.142 (talk) 06:29, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Exactly WHAT do you want to allege? HiLo48 (talk) 06:33, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@99.232.236.142 This source says He said false allegations had been made, including one he described as "the new version in the Virgin Islands that Stephen Hawking participated in an underage orgy", which suggests false allegation so I think it might be a bit early to include it in Hawking's article as of now, we'll probably get more information within the next few days/weeks to write about this correctly. I do think that we should add this to an article relating to Epstein, however. —Panamitsu (talk) 07:03, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
So from what I have read it says that Epstein emailed Maxwell telling her to deny that Stephen Hawking participated in an “underage orgy”. Now obviously we must wait a couple more days for more information to come out but as you can see my main root point here is that Stephen Hawking is being named as complicit since you know Epstein is emailing his accomplice to deny that hawking was a participant basically telling her to lie. Again it’s too early but more confirmation and information will come out soon 99.232.236.142 (talk) 08:27, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry didn’t read it right I might have misunderstood. So yes Epstein did email about it being a “false allegation”. Again however another source that telegraph article didn’t say that. Again it’s just been a day since the news broke out so we must wait longer do determine if the allegations are true or not. 99.232.236.142 (talk) 08:29, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think a really good idea would be to wait for the website hosting the Epstein client list to come back online and then directly access it. This will take longer than the actual news coming out but would be direct evidence and would help clear up a lot of misunderstanding and all 99.232.236.142 (talk) 08:32, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]