Jump to content

Talk:Spinosaurus: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Spinosaurus/Archive 4) (bot
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 2 WikiProject template(s). Merge {{VA}} into {{WPBS}}. Keep the rating of {{VA}} "GA" in {{WPBS}}. Remove the same ratings as {{WPBS}} and keep only the dissimilar ones from {{WikiProject Dinosaurs}}, {{WikiProject Palaeontology}}.
Line 16: Line 16:
|collapse = yes
|collapse = yes
}}
}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=GA|collapsed=|1=
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=GA|collapsed=|vital=yes|1=
{{WikiProject Dinosaurs|importance=high}}
{{Vital article|class=GA|level=5|topic=Biology|subpage=Animals}}
{{WikiProject Dinosaurs|class=GA|importance=high}}
{{WikiProject Palaeontology|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Palaeontology|class=GA|importance=mid}}
}}
}}
{{American English}}
{{American English}}

Revision as of 07:03, 5 January 2024

Good articleSpinosaurus has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 5, 2007Good article nomineeListed
June 27, 2009Good article reassessmentKept
Current status: Good article

The snout

Please consider referencing: Romain Vullo, Ronan Allain, and Lionel Cavin. Convergent evolution of jaws between spinosaurid dinosaurs and pike conger eels. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 61 (4), 2016: 825-828 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.4202/app.00284.2016

New Photo

The Field Museum recently installed a cast of FSAC-KK-11888. It includes the new material (tail paddle) and is displayed in a swimming pose. I wanted to see what others thought before incorporating in the article since questions have been raised about the "semi-aquatic" behavior and the fact that this specimen may not be Spinosaurus.

3blindMies (talk) 12:37, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Looks better than our current taxobox photo, which is also in swimming posture. It's not like it couldn't swim at all even if it wasn't semi-aquatic, so there's nothing inaccurate about it. Might you have a version with background as well? Can also be useful. FunkMonk (talk) 13:07, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Here's a cropped version with the background.
  • 3blindMies (talk) 21:26, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

    Nice, I see it's of course more busy with the background. Either way, these are an improvement, so I think the infobox image should be replaced. FunkMonk (talk) 11:54, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    New images look nice, though perhaps the image without background could be cropped more tightly, as currently there's lots of unused space above and below? --Slate Weasel [Talk - Contribs] 19:00, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Yeah, thought the same. FunkMonk (talk) 20:35, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

    Potential typo in the first paragraph

    sentence says "longest known" and then makes a comparison to largeness immediately after. Should this read "largest known" or is the phrasing just confusing 198.20.49.98 (talk) 19:47, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]