Talk:Flight and expulsion of Germans (1944–1950): Difference between revisions
m Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Talk:Flight and expulsion of Germans (1944–1950)/Archive 21) (bot |
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 8 WikiProject templates. Merge {{VA}} into {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "B" in {{WPBS}}. |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Talk header}} |
{{Talk header}} |
||
{{Vital article|topic=History|level=5|class=B}} |
|||
{{controversial}} |
{{controversial}} |
||
{{British English}} |
{{British English}} |
||
{{ |
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|vital=yes|1= |
||
{{WikiProject Germany |
{{WikiProject Germany|importance=High|Prussia=yes|PrussiaImp=Mid}} |
||
{{WikiProject Poland |
{{WikiProject Poland|importance=High}} |
||
{{WikiProject Czech Republic |
{{WikiProject Czech Republic|importance=Low}} |
||
{{WikiProject Yugoslavia |
{{WikiProject Yugoslavia|importance=High}} |
||
{{WikiProject Romania |
{{WikiProject Romania|importance=High}} |
||
{{WikiProject European history |
{{WikiProject European history|importance=High}} |
||
{{WikiProject Human rights |
{{WikiProject Human rights|importance=high}} |
||
{{WikiProject International relations |
{{WikiProject International relations|importance=high}} |
||
}} |
}} |
||
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
Revision as of 09:35, 6 January 2024
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Flight and expulsion of Germans (1944–1950) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Euphemisms?
It's interesting how the article uses language almost euphemistically. "Expulsion" is used in place of where "ethnic cleansing" would be appropriate nearly every single time; Contrast with articles dealing with the Armenian Genocide which use "harsher" language more liberally, so to speak. This article has some major issues. User: Dehler 15:04, 14 January 2020
Expulsion is used when transfered people are guilty, ethnic cleansing when transfered people are innocent. The Sudeten Germans Flocked to Hitler - Herrenvolk und Lebensraum. They were guilty.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.15.218.62 (talk) 07:46, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
There is no such thing as collective guilt. It exists only in propaganda and such language displays inhumane thinking. And maybe you should do a little research on the Sudetendeutsche opposision to the Nazis and their fate. --93.203.105.178 (talk) 14:47, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
Supposing there were enough of them remaining.
You should do a little research on the Sudetendeutsche opposision to the Nazis and their fate in Dachau concentration camp and elsewhere during the Nazi-German occupation of the democratic Czechoslovakia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 171.23.6.193 (talk) 14:52, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
It is claimed that Sudeten Germans expelled from Czechoslovakia were based on the concept of collective guilt. This is not true.
Almost every decree explicitely stated that the sanctions did not apply to anti-fascists.
About 90% of the German population of the Czech borderlands had supported the Nazi and affilation to Nazi-Germany. Some 280 000 Germans in Czechoslovakia remained Czechoslovak citizens after the transfer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 171.23.6.193 (talk) 15:37, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
- I've noticed this issue too. This expulsion led to the use of forced labour, rapes, executions, massacres, and the extinction of German language dialects and cultures. It surpassed the Jewish Holocaust of World War Two in terms of numbers of victims and was a great travesty for German heritage. Take Kaliningrad, where Germans were executed and used as slaves and German culture was erased and replaced (evidence most strikingly in the new architecture of the city. It is simply another example of the vilification of Germans post-war. Doorfrench (talk) 13:49, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
Genocide Denial
What's up with the genocide denial in this article? 2003:C0:F720:F000:389F:2BEB:D917:7561 (talk) 08:14, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
- Because this wasn't a genocide. Not even close. SinoDevonian (talk) 01:16, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
- It was a genocide under the CPPCG which says that
- any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group, as such:
- (a) Killing members of the group;
- (b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
- (c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical
- destruction in whole or in part;
- (d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
- (e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group. Crainsaw (talk) 11:55, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
No one has denied Holocaust in this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.15.223.133 (talk) 12:01, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
\
Trail of tears
I have heard some Germans referring to the "trail of tears" and I doubt that they were referring to the one in America as they were talking about WW2. Could they be referring to the ethnic cleansing of Germans in 1945? 2A00:23C7:5882:8201:6DFA:8BC8:9F2C:8F40 (talk) 09:58, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
2.5 million deaths
I'm checking the sources for this number. The third source, Bernd Faulenbach puts the number at 2 million. The second source is a politician giving the 2.5 number in an interview, this isn't reliable by itself. The first source just lists a book with no page number, so this isn't verifiable.
I propose to list the maximum as 2 million, as that's what the reliable source states. Thanks. Stix1776 (talk) 15:14, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
- Wikipedia controversial topics
- Wikipedia articles that use British English
- B-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in History
- B-Class vital articles in History
- B-Class Germany articles
- High-importance Germany articles
- WikiProject Germany articles
- B-Class Poland articles
- High-importance Poland articles
- WikiProject Poland articles
- B-Class Czech Republic articles
- Low-importance Czech Republic articles
- All WikiProject Czech Republic pages
- B-Class Yugoslavia articles
- High-importance Yugoslavia articles
- WikiProject Yugoslavia articles
- B-Class Romania articles
- High-importance Romania articles
- All WikiProject Romania pages
- B-Class European history articles
- High-importance European history articles
- All WikiProject European history pages
- B-Class Human rights articles
- High-importance Human rights articles
- WikiProject Human rights articles
- B-Class International relations articles
- High-importance International relations articles
- WikiProject International relations articles