Jump to content

Talk:Twin: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Talk:Twin/Archive 2) (bot
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 4 WikiProject templates. Merge {{VA}} into {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "B" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 4 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Biology}}, {{WikiProject Molecular Biology}}, {{WikiProject Family and relationships}}, {{WikiProject Genealogy}}.
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Talk header|search=yes}}
{{Talk header|search=yes}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|vital=yes|1=
{{Vital article|level=4|topic=Life|class=B}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|1=
{{WikiProject Biology|importance =mid}}
{{WikiProject Biology|class =B|importance =mid}}
{{WikiProject Molecular Biology|importance =mid|MCB=yes|MCB-importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Molecular Biology|class=B|importance =mid|MCB=yes|MCB-importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Family and relationships|importance =mid}}
{{WikiProject Family and relationships|class =B|importance =mid}}
{{WikiProject Genealogy|importance =mid}}
{{WikiProject Genealogy|class =B|importance =mid}}
}}
}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
{{User:MiszaBot/config

Revision as of 23:43, 6 January 2024

Quaternary mention?

I not only didn't see any mention of non-communal "quaternary marriages" mentioned in this article, I couldn't find a single mention anywhere on wikipedia. Could quaternary marriages be mentioned or even have its own article? I learned about it earlier today in the letter section of Popular Science and this was basically the only worthwhile web reference I could find outside of discussion about group marriages: [1]

Wiki Education assignment: BIO 378 Developmental Biology

Polar body twins (hypothetical)

The Polar body article says that "Polar body twinning is a hypothesized form of twinning in meiosis, where one or more polar bodies do not disintegrate and are fertilized by sperm". This article has one source supposedly documenting one occurrence in humans. So what's the deal? One occurrence is pretty weak evidence. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 19:22, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]