Jump to content

Talk:Glucosamine: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
BattyBot (talk | contribs)
m top: Fixed/removed unknown WikiProject parameter(s) and general fixes
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 6 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "B" in {{WPBS}}. Keep 2 different ratings in {{WikiProject Chemicals}}, {{WikiProject Skepticism}}. Remove 4 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Molecular Biology}}, {{WikiProject Alternative medicine}}, {{WikiProject Pharmacology}}, {{WikiProject Medicine}}.
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Talk header|archive_age=365|archive_bot=Lowercase Sigmabot III}}
{{Talk header|archive_age=365|archive_bot=Lowercase Sigmabot III}}
{{British English}}
{{British English}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|1=
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|1=
{{WikiProject Chemicals|class=start|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Chemicals|class=start|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Molecular Biology|class=B|MCB=yes |MCB-importance=Mid }}
{{WikiProject Molecular Biology|MCB=yes |MCB-importance=Mid }}
{{WikiProject Skepticism|class=Start|importance=high}}
{{WikiProject Skepticism|class=Start|importance=high}}
{{WikiProject Alternative medicine|class=B}}
{{WikiProject Alternative medicine}}
{{WikiProject Pharmacology|class=B|importance=Mid |Medicine=}}
{{WikiProject Pharmacology|importance=Mid |Medicine=}}
{{WikiProject Medicine|class=B|importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Medicine|importance=Mid}}
}}
}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
{{User:MiszaBot/config

Revision as of 06:25, 14 January 2024

Sorry this page sounds like a hit piece

Sorry, this page sounds like a hit piece on glucosamine. There's ample medical evidence that it helps relieve arthritis pains and injuries, and it does not convey this. Instead it sounds like a disclaimer. I call this a hit piece. This is one of the worst pages if come to on wikipedia in years, so biased. Somebody's been paid to do this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.151.139.15 (talk) 20:29, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It is completely unfounded to claim that this article is the result of someone being paid to write it. In its current state, it has developed over the course of years through the contributions of many editors who voluntarily add to Wikipedia's medical content. (Please see Wikipedia:Assume good faith.) If you would like to suggest specific changes to the article's content, please feel free to do so here. -- Ed (Edgar181) 21:04, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Very late to the game here, but no. There isnt. The "best" result of multigenerational studies show that there is zero proof it helps with injuries and its effect on osteoporosis is so limited you might as well not bother. 219.88.172.162 (talk) 04:28, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]