Talk:Hankel matrix: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
→= Confusing statement: Copy edit: supplied missing "=" in section title. |
Maths rating|class=Start| -- it is not a stub any longer |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ |
{{Maths rating|class=Start|importance=low|field=algebra}} |
||
== Hankel transform as presented in the text correct? == |
== Hankel transform as presented in the text correct? == |
Revision as of 23:57, 14 January 2024
Mathematics Start‑class Low‑priority | ||||||||||
|
Hankel transform as presented in the text correct?
does the material presented in the section Hankel transform correct? I can make a simple example to violate it! For example, take b1=1, b2=1, b3=2 and you will have detB=1 but detC=-1! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.18.170.199 (talk) 09:46, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
- formula is now correctBPets (talk) 04:34, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
- Please improve the section on system identification... it currently doesn't begin to suggest how one might actually do this.--Witbrock (talk) 18:15, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
Reference to R. B. Pachori
Bhajan123 (contributions) (talk) has been including references to R. B. Pachori in several articles. Bhajan123 may simply be promoting his or her own work. I recommend removing such references. — Anita5192 (talk) 19:41, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
Confusing statement
I can't make any sense of the statement " must satisfy, for all rows and columns , . ". Is this perhaps a typo? Andylatto (talk) 17:50, 23 June 2021 (UTC)