Jump to content

Michael Storper: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
OAbot (talk | contribs)
Bots
439,234 edits
m Open access bot: pmc updated in citation with #oabot.
No edit summary
Line 12: Line 12:
Storper criticized [[California Senate Bill 50 (2019)|California Senate Bill 50]], which would have eliminated [[single-family zoning]] statewide and replaced it with four-plex residential zoning, and enabled dense housing near public transit stations and jobs centers.<ref>{{Cite news |date=2019-04-05 |title=The Political Battle Over California's Suburban Dream |language=en |work=Bloomberg.com |url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-04-05/the-suburbs-that-fear-california-s-housing-bill}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |date=2019 |title=Inside the Political Fight Over How to Handle California's Housing Crisis |language=en |work=Pacific Standard |url=https://psmag.com/economics/inside-the-fight-over-affordable-housing-in-california}}</ref> Storper has argued that slight reductions in stringent zoning would mainly produce housing for wealthy people, and that it is already legal under existing zoning to build millions of units in unprofitable locations.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2020 |title=PolitiFact - Fact or Fiction? A Look At Claims About SB 50, One Of California’s Most Controversial Housing Bills |url=https://www.politifact.com/article/2020/jan/21/fact-or-fiction-look-claims-about-one-californias-/ |website=[[PolitiFact]] |language=en-US}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=2021-04-02 |title=The Great Housing Debate: A Profusion of Panaceas |url=https://www.governing.com/assessments/The-Great-Housing-Debate-A-Profusion-of-Panaceas.html |website=Governing |language=en}}</ref>
Storper criticized [[California Senate Bill 50 (2019)|California Senate Bill 50]], which would have eliminated [[single-family zoning]] statewide and replaced it with four-plex residential zoning, and enabled dense housing near public transit stations and jobs centers.<ref>{{Cite news |date=2019-04-05 |title=The Political Battle Over California's Suburban Dream |language=en |work=Bloomberg.com |url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-04-05/the-suburbs-that-fear-california-s-housing-bill}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |date=2019 |title=Inside the Political Fight Over How to Handle California's Housing Crisis |language=en |work=Pacific Standard |url=https://psmag.com/economics/inside-the-fight-over-affordable-housing-in-california}}</ref> Storper has argued that slight reductions in stringent zoning would mainly produce housing for wealthy people, and that it is already legal under existing zoning to build millions of units in unprofitable locations.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2020 |title=PolitiFact - Fact or Fiction? A Look At Claims About SB 50, One Of California’s Most Controversial Housing Bills |url=https://www.politifact.com/article/2020/jan/21/fact-or-fiction-look-claims-about-one-californias-/ |website=[[PolitiFact]] |language=en-US}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=2021-04-02 |title=The Great Housing Debate: A Profusion of Panaceas |url=https://www.governing.com/assessments/The-Great-Housing-Debate-A-Profusion-of-Panaceas.html |website=Governing |language=en}}</ref>


In a 2020 article published with Andres Rodríguez-Pose, Storper questioned whether reducing regulatory barriers to housing construction such as [[Exclusionary zoning|restrictive zoning]] in prosperous urban areas would significantly affect housing supply and prices, and whether it would reduce housing costs for lower-income households in particular.<ref name=":0">{{Cite journal |last=Rodríguez-Pose |first=Andrés |last2=Storper |first2=Michael |date=February 2020 |title=Housing, urban growth and inequalities: The limits to deregulation and upzoning in reducing economic and spatial inequality |url=http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0042098019859458 |journal=Urban Studies |language=en |volume=57 |issue=2 |pages=223–248 |doi=10.1177/0042098019859458 |issn=0042-0980}}</ref> Both the authors of the article and authors writing in response have characterized this position as outside the mainstream consensus of urban economics that strict zoning is the primary cause of the supply shortage and resulting high prices.<ref name=":0" /><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Manville |first=Michael |last2=Lens |first2=Michael |last3=Monkkonen |first3=Paavo |date=January 2022 |title=Zoning and affordability: A reply to Rodríguez-Pose and Storper |url=http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0042098020910330 |journal=Urban Studies |language=en |volume=59 |issue=1 |pages=36–58 |doi=10.1177/0042098020910330 |issn=0042-0980|pmc=10691858 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Nall |first=Clayton |last2=Elmendorf |first2=Christopher |last3=Oklobdzija |first3=Stan |date=15 Nov 2022 |title=Folk Economics and the Persistence of Political Opposition to New Housing |url=https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4266459 |journal=}}</ref>
In a 2020 article published with [[Andres Rodríguez-Pose]], Storper questioned whether reducing regulatory barriers to housing construction such as [[Exclusionary zoning|restrictive zoning]] in prosperous urban areas would significantly affect housing supply and prices, and whether it would reduce housing costs for lower-income households in particular.<ref name=":0">{{Cite journal |last=Rodríguez-Pose |first=Andrés |last2=Storper |first2=Michael |date=February 2020 |title=Housing, urban growth and inequalities: The limits to deregulation and upzoning in reducing economic and spatial inequality |url=http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0042098019859458 |journal=Urban Studies |language=en |volume=57 |issue=2 |pages=223–248 |doi=10.1177/0042098019859458 |issn=0042-0980}}</ref> Both the authors of the article and authors writing in response have characterized this position as outside the mainstream consensus of urban economics that strict zoning is the primary cause of the supply shortage and resulting high prices.<ref name=":0" /><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Manville |first=Michael |last2=Lens |first2=Michael |last3=Monkkonen |first3=Paavo |date=January 2022 |title=Zoning and affordability: A reply to Rodríguez-Pose and Storper |url=http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0042098020910330 |journal=Urban Studies |language=en |volume=59 |issue=1 |pages=36–58 |doi=10.1177/0042098020910330 |issn=0042-0980|pmc=10691858 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Nall |first=Clayton |last2=Elmendorf |first2=Christopher |last3=Oklobdzija |first3=Stan |date=15 Nov 2022 |title=Folk Economics and the Persistence of Political Opposition to New Housing |url=https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4266459 |journal=}}</ref>


==Books==
==Books==

Revision as of 17:25, 15 January 2024

Michael Storper is an economic and urban geographer[1] who teaches at the University of California (UCLA), Sciences Po and London School of Economics.

Biography

Michael Storper completed a bachelor's degree in sociology and history in 1975, followed by a masters in 1979 and a PhD in geography in 1982 from the University of California, Berkeley.[1]

In 2014 he was named by Thomson Reuters as one of the "World’s Most Influential Scientific Minds" of the 21st century for his writings being among the top 1% most cited in the field of social sciences.[2] He is a fellow of the British Academy[3] and in 2016 received the Founder's Medal from the Royal Geographical Society.[4]

He lives in Los Angeles and Paris.[5]

Views on housing

Storper criticized California Senate Bill 50, which would have eliminated single-family zoning statewide and replaced it with four-plex residential zoning, and enabled dense housing near public transit stations and jobs centers.[6][7] Storper has argued that slight reductions in stringent zoning would mainly produce housing for wealthy people, and that it is already legal under existing zoning to build millions of units in unprofitable locations.[8][9]

In a 2020 article published with Andres Rodríguez-Pose, Storper questioned whether reducing regulatory barriers to housing construction such as restrictive zoning in prosperous urban areas would significantly affect housing supply and prices, and whether it would reduce housing costs for lower-income households in particular.[10] Both the authors of the article and authors writing in response have characterized this position as outside the mainstream consensus of urban economics that strict zoning is the primary cause of the supply shortage and resulting high prices.[10][11][12]

Books

  • 1989 (with Richard Walker) The Capitalist Imperative: Territory, Technology and Industrial Growth, Wiley-Blackwell
  • 1997 The Regional World: Territorial Development in a Global Economy, The Guilford Press
  • 2013 Keys to the City: How Economics, Institutions, Social Interaction, and Politics Shape Development, Princeton University Press
  • 2015 The Rise and Fall of Urban Economies: Lessons from San Francisco and Los Angeles, Stanford Business Books

Further reading

  • Hoyler, M.; Freytag, T.; Jöns, H. (2004). "Technology, organization, territory. A biographical interview with Michael Storper". In Storper, Michael (ed.). Institutions, incentives and communication in economic geography. Hettner-Lecture 2003. Steiner. pp. 69–83. ISBN 3-515-08453-3.
  • Reimer, Suzanne (2010). "Michael Storper". In Hubbard, Phil; Kitchin, Rob (eds.). Key Thinkers on Space and Place (2nd ed.). Sage. pp. 394–399. ISBN 978-1-84920-102-5.

References

  1. ^ a b Latham, Alan (2017) "Michael Storper", in Koch, R. and Latham, A. (eds.) Key Thinkers on Cities, London: Sage
  2. ^ UCLA: "Michael Storper Makes List of World’s Most Influential Scientific Minds", 7 October 2014
  3. ^ British Academy Fellows | Record for: STORPER, Professor Michael Archived 2016-03-14 at the Wayback Machine
  4. ^ Bob Geldof and Professor Michael Storper receive Royal Medals
  5. ^ Bernard, Ariane: "An American (and His Second Home) in Paris", in The New York Times 18 October 2006
  6. ^ "The Political Battle Over California's Suburban Dream". Bloomberg.com. 2019-04-05.
  7. ^ "Inside the Political Fight Over How to Handle California's Housing Crisis". Pacific Standard. 2019.
  8. ^ "PolitiFact - Fact or Fiction? A Look At Claims About SB 50, One Of California's Most Controversial Housing Bills". PolitiFact. 2020.
  9. ^ "The Great Housing Debate: A Profusion of Panaceas". Governing. 2021-04-02.
  10. ^ a b Rodríguez-Pose, Andrés; Storper, Michael (February 2020). "Housing, urban growth and inequalities: The limits to deregulation and upzoning in reducing economic and spatial inequality". Urban Studies. 57 (2): 223–248. doi:10.1177/0042098019859458. ISSN 0042-0980.
  11. ^ Manville, Michael; Lens, Michael; Monkkonen, Paavo (January 2022). "Zoning and affordability: A reply to Rodríguez-Pose and Storper". Urban Studies. 59 (1): 36–58. doi:10.1177/0042098020910330. ISSN 0042-0980. PMC 10691858.
  12. ^ Nall, Clayton; Elmendorf, Christopher; Oklobdzija, Stan (15 Nov 2022). "Folk Economics and the Persistence of Political Opposition to New Housing". {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Michael_Storper&oldid=1195860530"