Talk:Ancient Macedonians: Difference between revisions
Knoflook101 (talk | contribs) →No debate among modern historians: new section |
m Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Talk:Ancient Macedonians/Archive 8) (bot |
||
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
|archive = Talk:Ancient Macedonians/Archive %(counter)d |
|archive = Talk:Ancient Macedonians/Archive %(counter)d |
||
}} |
}} |
||
== Worthington Quote == |
|||
Can someone double check the Ian Worthington quote "Not much is to be said about the Greekness of Macedonians: it is undeniable". I can't for the life of me find that quote in his book Philip II. I can find "There is enough evidence and reasoned theory to conclude that the Macedonians were Greek" on p.219, but not the former. [[Special:Contributions/2A02:6B67:7917:0:C8F1:C995:AF34:FB67|2A02:6B67:7917:0:C8F1:C995:AF34:FB67]] ([[User talk:2A02:6B67:7917:0:C8F1:C995:AF34:FB67|talk]]) 17:23, 31 July 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:Really. They is no historical evidence of a country called Greece (Hellas or Ellada, whatever you want to call it) before 1821. There is also no historical evidence of such people called Greek before 1821. The koine language was simply called Koine and not Koine Greek as the so called Greeks of today call it. This page is just full of propaganda. You also fail to mention that your first Bavarian king Otto came to Athena where the majority of the people in Athens spoke Albanian (Arvanites ) [[Special:Contributions/14.201.79.60|14.201.79.60]] ([[User talk:14.201.79.60|talk]]) 05:07, 23 April 2023 (UTC) |
|||
:I have to say Wikipedia is just full of propaganda articles like this one. An ethnic group that conquered Thrace, Epirus Archaia etc. ohhh they didn't conquer Greece because there was no such country. But you will respond with some crap like ancient city states of Ancient Greece. <— yet no Ancient Greece country existed lol. You don't make sense at all. [[Special:Contributions/14.201.79.60|14.201.79.60]] ([[User talk:14.201.79.60|talk]]) 05:09, 23 April 2023 (UTC) |
|||
== "Greek stock", "racially Greek" == |
|||
These phrases—in quotations from scholars, no less—jump out at me. Is that what this is really about? [[User:Srnec|Srnec]] ([[User talk:Srnec|talk]]) 01:39, 1 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:@[[User:Srnec|Srnec]] I do agree that the phrasing is strange, but I assume a lot of that how problematic this discourse is contemporarily anyway. Maybe some re-verifying is necessary, but I wouldn't be surprised at all if this language was used in the original source. |
|||
:Maybe we should reword out of quotations and paraphrase, but I assume that would very easily fall into [[WP:OR]] territory. [[User:Uness232|Uness232]] ([[User talk:Uness232|talk]]) 18:28, 9 December 2023 (UTC) |
|||
==A matter of accuracy== |
==A matter of accuracy== |
Revision as of 18:03, 19 January 2024
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ancient Macedonians article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
Ancient Macedonians has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
Ancient Macedonians is part of the Macedonia (ancient kingdom) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
A matter of accuracy
I know there are frequent inaccuracies here and the effect of centuries of propaganda is inevitable but depite that it is reasonably sound. I know there was no nation of ancient Greece. What there was was an ancient-Greek-speaking network of poleis streching all across the Mediterranean. It was vastly larger than modern Greece. So, it wasn't the same at all. Different species of animal. Not a nation. The nation of course is relatively recent. The U. of Copenhagen did a 10-year flag study of the polis, which need to be brought in. So, I'm saying the ideology here is somewhat behind the study. Needs to be brought up to date. Second, overbriefness has resulted in certain inaccuracies. This great plain of lower Macedonia the article begins with didn't exist. There was no plain there. It was the Thermaic Gulf plus wetlands. The states were all squeezed between it and the mountains. I'm working on this under Emathia. And finally, the article does not make clear that "Macedonian" meant different thing at different times. The original Macedonians were around Mt Olympus. So, there is more work here if anyone dares to risk it. Oh, one thing more. Beekes is a good linguist I am sure but he tends to be something of a wild man in some of his etymologies, as when he discovers the source of all the Etruscans in the Mediterranean hiding in a section of Anatolia about the size of a county. "The slim men" indeed. Why don't we name them after their hair-do? Highlanders is much more likely.Botteville (talk)
No debate among modern historians
There is a section stating that there is ambiguity in historical texts regarding Macedonians being Greeks semi Greeks or 'barbarians'.It holds no scientific truth as the Macedonians themselves referred to non-Greeks as 'barbarians'.The sentence also lacks any stated source. Moreover there is currently no debate among the majority of modern historians regarding the ethnicity of Macedonians. Again in this sentence there is no source stated. In my opinion the following sentences:"Authors, historians, and statesmen of the ancient world often expressed ambiguous if not conflicting ideas about the ethnic identity of the Macedonians as either Greeks, semi-Greeks, or even barbarians. This has led to some debate among modern academics about the precise ethnic identity of the Macedonians, who nevertheless embraced many aspects" should be removed and replaced with a sentence starting with : " the Macedonians, who embraced many aspects of contemporaneous Greek culture such as". Knoflook101 (talk) 20:57, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
- Wikipedia good articles
- History good articles
- GA-Class Featured topics articles
- Wikipedia featured topics Macedonia (ancient kingdom) good content
- Low-importance Featured topics articles
- All unassessed articles
- GA-Class Greek articles
- Mid-importance Greek articles
- WikiProject Greece general articles
- All WikiProject Greece pages
- GA-Class Classical Greece and Rome articles
- Mid-importance Classical Greece and Rome articles
- All WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome pages
- GA-Class Ethnic groups articles
- Mid-importance Ethnic groups articles
- WikiProject Ethnic groups articles
- GA-Class former country articles
- WikiProject Former countries articles