User talk:KillerChihuahua

Userpage | talk | contribs | sandbox | e-mail | shiny stuff 9:46 am, 11 January 2025 (UTC) This is a Wikipedia user discussion page. This is not an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user this page belongs to may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:KillerChihuahua. Wikimedia Foundation Talk to the Puppy To leave a message on this page, click here. If you email me, be aware that even if I am actively editing, I cannot always access my email and it may be a day or two before you receive a reply. If you message me on this page, I will probably reply on this page. If I messaged you on your page, please reply there. *Post new messages to the bottom of my talk page. *Comment about the content of a specific article on the Talk: page of that article, and not here. *Sign your post using four tildes ( ~~~~ ) 24 - 23 - 22 - 21 - 20 -19 - 18 -17 - 16 -15 - 14 -13 -12 -11 - 10 - 9 - 8 - 7 - 6 - 5 -4 - 3 - 2 - 1 - Archives Get well soon KC, Thanks for the note at R&I. Certainly nothing is more important than your health. I just went through some major issues in November, and can empathize with your situation. Please be well soon. WP will survive as we all keep muddling toward a great product. Good luck! Kevin --Kevin Murray 17:37, 26 March 2007 (UTC) Thanks much, I really feel bad about this - I would never have accpeted such a complex case had I any prior indication I would be going through a spell of bad health. :-( Hopefully everyone will be as understanding as you are being. KillerChihuahua?!? 17:39, 26 March 2007 (UTC) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Barrett v. Rosenthal The above-entitled arbitration case has been closed and the final decision published at the above link. Ilena (talk · contribs) is banned from editing Wikipedia for one year and is banned from editing articles and talk pages related to alternative medicine, except talk pages related to breat implants. Fyslee (talk · contribs) is cautioned to use reliable sources and to edit from a neutral point of view. He is reminded that editors with a known partisan point of view should be careful to seek consensus on the talk page of articles to avoid the appearance of a COI if other editors question their edits. For the arbitration committee, Thatcher131 12:46, 27 March 2007 (UTC) Morfik Killer, I hope all is well with you and that your health issues clear. A couple of months ago you were involved in restoring and moving the Morfik page I had created so that I could work on it and refine it for re-inclusion in Wikipedia. I have worked on it, and resubmitted it, but now I have people asking that it be deleted again, for various reasons. I'm unsure what to do at this point, so I'm looking for all the suggestions I can get. MikeyTheK 13:21, 27 March 2007 (UTC) Add sources which meet WP:RS, specifically not Morfik's site, blogs, or forums. If Morfik was mentioned in Ajaxian, Redmonk, ZDNet, and Readwriteweb, then why don't you have the articles as sources??? KillerChihuahua?!? 13:53, 27 March 2007 (UTC) Sick as a...puppy? I see you've been feeling under the weather for some time now. I hope that things are holding up on your end, and that you feel better soon. :-) -Severa (!!!) 18:13, 29 March 2007 (UTC) Thanks much, dear!!!! Dr.s don't know what it is... bah. I have good days and bad days, hopefully there will be some kind of diganosis/prognosis soon. KillerChihuahua?!? 18:46, 29 March 2007 (UTC) Aww...I have a chronic condition myself, so I understand what you mean about "good days" and "bad days." I hope that your vets (sorry, had to slip a puppy-pun in there ;) doctors are forthcoming in a diagnosis. There's nothing worse than undergoing a battery of tests, or seeing a host of doctors, and still not knowing what's going on — I know that from experience. :( -Severa (!!!) 18:56, 29 March 2007 (UTC) Have a nice cup of tea! Sorry to hear you're still poorly on and off, dearie, just you sit down and have a nice cuppa. Of whatever you fancy. No need to bother with reading the tealeaves – can I just say how much it made me laugh when you recently admonished an over-publicised mind reader. Well said. Take care, and get well soon, .. dave souza, talk 20:50, 29 March 2007 (UTC) Ah, thanks much dear. KillerChihuahua?!? 16:17, 30 March 2007 (UTC) You May Want to Step In Hi KillerChihuahua A while back you stepped in when I was being stalked by a user named "Arniep". To refresh your memory, I was one of several users who contributed to articles on the Travolta family including Rikki Lee Travolta. Arniep didn't like Rikki Lee Travolta or something to that affect so I was labeled a "sock puppet" and Arniep would follow me around where ever I would contribute on whatever subject until I got so sick I basically quick Wikipedia. You were kind enough to step in and stop the stalking with a warning to Arniep. Eventually I guess Arniep stalked too many people and was banned. I think Arniep may be back under the name "Corvus cornix". I made an edit to the "Tony n' Tina's Wedding" page in February and when I checked in on the page today the history shows someone named Corvus cornix had been in a battle of some kind trying to remove Rikki Lee Travolta from the page. That seemed curious so when I looked at Corvus cornix's history it appears they are following the same pattern that Arniep did of targeting the exact same subjects, stating disregard for the Wikipedia rules (I will continue deleting...bla bla bla), stalking different members. I've been through this once and have no interest in being attacked yet again by someone with an axe to grind over and over. Maybe it is weak of me, but I don't have the conviction to stand up to being attacked and labeled with insults. So, I'm not going to get involved in any of the things Corvus cornix is doing. I'm just letting you know so somebody does. If that info dies here so be it, but even if I don't have the strength to battle this kind of behavoir I still do believe in the principles of Wikipedia and wanted to let someone know this kind of thing is going on. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Icemountain2 (talk • contribs) 15:54, 30 March 2007 (UTC) Hrm... I'll take a look and ask for a checkuser if it seems it would be useful. Is RLT a verified notable addition to the article, btw? I thought there was some question about that. KillerChihuahua?!? 16:16, 30 March 2007 (UTC) What jumped out at me as a caution flag about Corvus cornix is that RLT wasn't an addition to the Tony n' Tina's Wedding article. He was there and there since the beginning. According to the history he dates back as the verified first celebrity guest star since the start of the page. It even had plenty of articles proving this. Even now with Corvus cornix removing RLT, the references being used to qualify the other actors all list RLT (so the references apparently only apply when Corvus cornix wants them too?) Here's some of the links from the page: http://chicago.about.com/cs/events1/a/Fabio_Travolta.htm http://www.elitestv.com/pub/2005/Jan/EEN41e6b44f2b4e5.html If I recall, the whole RLT being in question was basically a one-man (or woman) battle headed by Arniep going and recruiting friends to back him/her up. Once Arniep was banned it stopped. Now there's a new user named Corvus Cornix going to all the same pages, recruiting all the same friends? It just seems fishy to me. Understand my concern is not about RLT. If he is listed on a page or not, I'm not getting into any battle about that. I like him as an actor but I'm not a big enough fan to really care that much. If it was one user being annoying about one page, so be it. What I thought I should point out was that Corvux Cornix's history shows he is going through to multiple pages and chopping the same way or getting into revert wars. I don't have the energy for it (nor do I want to get labeled with insults) but it just seems fishy to me. Icemountain2 17:06, 30 March 2007 (UTC) I do not think this is the same editor. Also, I don't know about elitestv, but about.com is not a reliable source. He was mentioned in several sources as the first guest star on TnT's Wedding though. And he doesn't seem to be related to John, sfaict. KillerChihuahua?!? 19:54, 30 March 2007 (UTC) Thanks for looking into that. Just seemed fishy to me that a new editor who had a self described falling out with Wikipedia Admin and was banned under a form name would jump in and attack the same pages the prior user did. I don't know if Elite's is a "reliable resource" or not. I just though it was interesting that Elite's is being used as the reference to validate all the other guest stars and it lists RLT in it, but it is only being qualified as a "reliable resource" for the other actors and not for RLT. Doesn't make sense in my mind. As for relation to John, everything I have read and researded shows he's Michaels' son which would make him John's nephew but I am absolutely NOT going to get involved in RLT pages because I don't want to be targeted with insults and stalking again. Kind of sad, I guess, because I've probably done more research on the Travolta family than most which should be the type of person who should be ideal to contribute to a community based encyclopedia, but instead people like me who have done the research are driven out by fantatics who decide they know the facts rather than look objectively at the research. Enough enough. My point was I just wanted to thank you for looking into those actions of Corvus Cornix because they seemed fishy to me and I prefer to trust an outside person's impartial prospective. Thanks! Icemountain2 20:01, 2 April 2007 (UTC)