Jump to content

Talk:Alcove, New York: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
PrimeBOT (talk | contribs)
m top: Task 30 - replacing task force templates with the main WP:NY template
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 2 WikiProject templates. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 2 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject New York (state)}}, {{WPCities}}. Remove 1 deprecated parameter: importance.
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject New York (state)|class=start|Capital=yes|Capital-importance=low}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|
{{WPCities|class =start |importance=low}}
{{WikiProject New York (state)|Capital=yes|Capital-importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Cities}}
}}


== possible merger ==
== possible merger ==

Latest revision as of 22:55, 23 January 2024

possible merger

[edit]

Should the separate article now at Alcove Historic District be merged into this aticle at Alcove, New York? The historic district article now includes a link to the NRHP nomination document (read most easily using MS Internet Explorer), which contains maps of the district's area. Could someone could judge whether the HD is substantially the same as the hamlet or not? That would be a major consideration. --doncram (talk) 22:35, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I would have no problem with a merger to either name, I dont believe the boundaries established in the historic district differ from unofficial local ideas of what the hamlet is as a place-name. I lack the technical abilities to do a merger however. Feel free to do so. PS- I use Firefox, would I still be able to read the document?Camelbinky (talk) 00:33, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Alcove, New York. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:03, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]