Jump to content

User talk:Dishant Valmiki: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
AfC notification: User:Dishant Valmiki/sandbox has a new comment: Your draft therefore has no sources and cannot be accepted, sorry.
General note: Removal of content, blanking on Draft:Silver Statue Valmiki Temple.
Line 42: Line 42:
:@[[User:Theroadislong|Theroadislong]] Hello Theroadislong I have added the references but it is again declined. Can you tell me why it is declined again, in depth. [[User:Dishant Valmiki|Dishant Valmiki]] ([[User talk:Dishant Valmiki#top|talk]]) 13:25, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
:@[[User:Theroadislong|Theroadislong]] Hello Theroadislong I have added the references but it is again declined. Can you tell me why it is declined again, in depth. [[User:Dishant Valmiki|Dishant Valmiki]] ([[User talk:Dishant Valmiki#top|talk]]) 13:25, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
::It has not been declined again you have NOT submitted it for review, I merely replaced the previous decline which you had removed and please note Wikipedia cannot be used as a source, it is user edited so not reliable. Your draft therefore has no sources and cannot be accepted, sorry. [[User:Theroadislong|Theroadislong]] ([[User talk:Theroadislong|talk]]) 13:30, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
::It has not been declined again you have NOT submitted it for review, I merely replaced the previous decline which you had removed and please note Wikipedia cannot be used as a source, it is user edited so not reliable. Your draft therefore has no sources and cannot be accepted, sorry. [[User:Theroadislong|Theroadislong]] ([[User talk:Theroadislong|talk]]) 13:30, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

== January 2024 ==

[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hello, I'm [[User:Theroadislong|Theroadislong]]. I noticed that you recently [[Wikipedia:Content removal|removed content]] from [[:Draft:Silver Statue Valmiki Temple]]&nbsp;without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate [[Help:Edit summary|edit summary]]. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use [[User:Dishant Valmiki/sandbox|your sandbox]]. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on [[User_talk:Theroadislong|my talk page]]. ''Please read [[WP:REF]] you are NOT referencing correctly''<!-- Template:uw-delete1 --> [[User:Theroadislong|Theroadislong]] ([[User talk:Theroadislong|talk]]) 15:33, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:33, 25 January 2024

When will I get the permission to make a page

Hello Wikipedia when will I get the permission to create a new page ? Dishant Valmiki (talk) 20:27, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 08:52, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Dishant Valmiki! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 08:52, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Theroadislong
Why did you decline it ?
please answer.. Dishant Valmiki (talk) 13:34, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It tells you in the decline notice which you have since deleted inappropriately..."This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject) reliable, secondary, independent of the subject Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia." Theroadislong (talk) 14:42, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: User:Dishant Valmiki/sandbox has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Dishant Valmiki/sandbox. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 13:17, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Theroadislong Hello Theroadislong I have added the references but it is again declined. Can you tell me why it is declined again, in depth. Dishant Valmiki (talk) 13:25, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It has not been declined again you have NOT submitted it for review, I merely replaced the previous decline which you had removed and please note Wikipedia cannot be used as a source, it is user edited so not reliable. Your draft therefore has no sources and cannot be accepted, sorry. Theroadislong (talk) 13:30, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Information icon Hello, I'm Theroadislong. I noticed that you recently removed content from Draft:Silver Statue Valmiki Temple without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please read WP:REF you are NOT referencing correctly Theroadislong (talk) 15:33, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]