Jump to content

Talk:Brazilian wandering spider: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
note on name
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 1 WikiProject template. Create {{WPBS}}.
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|
{{WPSpiders|Redirect}}
{{WikiProject Spiders|Redirect}}

}}
==Venomous genera within family Ctenidae?==
==Venomous genera within family Ctenidae?==
From what I've read the genus Phoneutria is the only genus within the family Ctenidae that has potent enough bite and venom to be a real danger to humans, is it known if any of the other genera of that family really do have as potent of venom?
From what I've read the genus Phoneutria is the only genus within the family Ctenidae that has potent enough bite and venom to be a real danger to humans, is it known if any of the other genera of that family really do have as potent of venom?

Revision as of 08:16, 29 January 2024

Venomous genera within family Ctenidae?

From what I've read the genus Phoneutria is the only genus within the family Ctenidae that has potent enough bite and venom to be a real danger to humans, is it known if any of the other genera of that family really do have as potent of venom? --Fxer 06:37, May 20, 2005 (UTC)

merge with Brazlian wandering spider

The article Brazilian wandering spider describes the entire genus Phoneutria in much greater detail than this article. I propose merging (better yet, deleting and redirecting) this with that article. --EngineerScotty 22:24, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

However, the name "Brazilian" wandering spider does not apply to the genus as a whole, but primarily to Phoneutria fera and closely related species that occur in Brazil. Peter coxhead (talk) 08:12, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]