Talk:Folklorism: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m The Anome moved page Talk:Folkloris to Talk:Folklorism without leaving a redirect: fix own mistake |
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 1 WikiProject template. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Stub" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Folklore}}. Tag: |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Stub| |
||
{{WikiProject Folklore|importance=low}} |
|||
}} |
|||
==Key element missing== |
==Key element missing== |
||
We have an article that tells us |
We have an article that tells us |
||
Latest revision as of 00:05, 2 February 2024
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Key element missing
[edit]We have an article that tells us
- the subject is a concept,
- what fields it belongs to,
- who developed it,
- and what it's similar to,
but that doesn't tell us what it is. Largoplazo (talk) 03:20, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
@Largoplazo:: Agreed. I found this a most perplexing stub, because─ while it does briefly mention a few things in its grand total of two (2) sentences─ it never says what Folklorismus is! Which, of course, is obviously an essential part of any article... I hope someone cleans it up and adds a whole lot more detail, but most importantly this basic explanation of what this "Folklorismus" even IS soon! 00:30, 24 March 2021 (UTC)~