Jump to content

Talk:Isotopes of fermium: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 1 WikiProject template. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "List" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Elements}}.
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject Elements
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=List|
{{WikiProject Elements|isotope=yes|importance=Low|isotopes=yes}}
|isotope=yes
}}
|class=List
|importance=Low
|isotopes=yes}}

== Mendelevium ==
== Mendelevium ==
{{archive top|[[WP:NOTAFORUM]]. Question already answered in the [[mendelevium]] article: no isotopes of fermium beta decay, and it's not our job to speculate on the hypothetical existence of one that does (which, by the way, is highly unlikely).}}
{{archive top|[[WP:NOTAFORUM]]. Question already answered in the [[mendelevium]] article: no isotopes of fermium beta decay, and it's not our job to speculate on the hypothetical existence of one that does (which, by the way, is highly unlikely).}}

Revision as of 01:25, 4 February 2024

Mendelevium

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Theoretically, is there an isotope of Fermium that decays into Mendelevium? So far, by extending the rn-process, I have gotten this far, but none decay into Mendelevium. Could maybe an extremely neutron-rich isotope decay into Mendelevium, and if so, what is it/could it be? 32ieww (talk) 19:44, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Isotopes of fermium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:13, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Isotopes of fermium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:51, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Spontaneous fission of 242Fm

Should it be noted that 242Fm is the lightest known nuclide to undergo purely spontaneous fission? 129.104.241.214 (talk) 01:57, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Possible double beta plus decay of 252Fm

252Fm is potentially capable of double beta plus decay, although the estimated half-life should be very long. 129.104.241.214 (talk) 11:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]