Talk:List of space artists: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
→An interesting exploration!: Reply |
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 2 WikiProject templates. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "List" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Visual Arts}}. Tag: |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=List| |
|||
{{WikiProject Lists|class=list}} |
{{WikiProject Lists|class=list}} |
||
{{WikiProject Visual |
{{WikiProject Visual arts}} |
||
}} |
|||
== An interesting exploration! == |
== An interesting exploration! == |
Latest revision as of 11:01, 5 February 2024
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
An interesting exploration!
[edit]Thank you Wikipedia to keep myself busy during troublesome times! (we live in a troublesome world). Anyway, it's an interesting pastime to search more space artists and illustrators for the list. Unfortunately, most of the space artists/illustrators are totally unknown and have no Wikipedia articles. I hope these names ring a bell and are possible sparks to create new Wikipedia pages! DannyCaes (talk) 14:26, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
- @DannyCaes: Nope, you've got that backward. It's entirely encumbent upon you to prove the WP:N notability of all contributions, not to dump a bunch of chat and WP:TRIVIA and WP:FANCRUFT and expect the rest of the world to build a case for you. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a personal toy or a chat forum. So please review your history and delete anything that lacks WP:RS or wikilinks to existing articles. — Smuckola(talk) 06:08, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
- Many months later... july of the year 2022... Wa...?!?! A personal toy? I am not a kid! I know very well it (Wikipedia) is an encyclopedia! DannyCaes (talk) 16:53, 3 July 2022 (UTC)