Talk:Radio Reverb: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 11:33, 5 February 2024

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

speedy keep, 25 November 2015, see discussion.
no consensus, 3 November 2015, see discussion.

Radio Stations Low‑importance

	Radio portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio Stations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of radio stations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Radio StationsWikipedia:WikiProject Radio StationsTemplate:WikiProject Radio StationsRadio station
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Radio: UK Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Radio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RadioWikipedia:WikiProject RadioTemplate:WikiProject RadioRadio

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This page is within the scope of the UK Radio taskforce. New members are always welcome!

To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Create: Missing years and articles in radio, National Association of Radio Distress-Signalling and Infocommunications (Hungary)
Assess : Unassessed Radio articles; Unknown-importance Radio articles
Cleanup : Radio articles needing attention
Expand : Midweek Politics Bob Crane
Maintain : Portal:Radio
Stubs : Expand: Radio stubs
Verify : Unreferenced BLPs
Other : Collaboration of the Week:
Requests for Radio peer review:

Not sure why this page was ever deleted. If you are nominating it for deletion for any reason in the future can you let me know?Silverwood (talk) 08:22, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the notification of the recent deletion nomination. I have added some additional sources that should help satisfy reliability criteria including the charity Stonewall and a link from the Local Authority (Silverwood (talk) 13:51, 6 May 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Earshot

Is this radio station supported by a band based in California-(Earshot), or Earshot in the case something else? -I thought it was some charity which supported local radio; a band would only be on some programmes so couldn't 'support' a whole station in the musical sense. 78.147.6.159 (talk) 12:49, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you look at the article where Earshot is mentioned you will see there is a reference to their website so you could have checked that to find out. I'm not sure why you'd think it was anything to do with a Californian band, even if they do share the name... I am not 100% but I believe Earshot is a training company that established Reverb as a seperate company, rather than a subsidiary, so "supports" seemed an clear enough term. Silverwood (talk) 12:14, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{Old AfD multi | date = 3 November 2015 | result = '''no consensus''' | page = Radio Reverb | date2 = 25 November 2015 | result2 = '''speedy keep''' | page2 = Radio Reverb (2nd nomination)}}
-{{RadioStationsProject|class=Stub|importance=Low}}
+{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Stub|
-{{WikiProject Radio |class=Stub|importance=Low|uk=yes}}
+{{WikiProject Radio Stations|importance=Low}}
+{{WikiProject Radio |importance=Low|uk=yes}}
+}}
 Not sure why this page was ever deleted. If you are nominating it for deletion for any reason in the future can you let me know?[[User:Silverwood|Silverwood]] ([[User talk:Silverwood|talk]]) 08:22, 22 April 2009 (UTC)