Talk:Deadpool & Wolverine

Filming resumed

"Sporting the chops can only mean one thing". Worth adding? Kailash29792 (talk) 12:10, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

We cannot interpret Jackman's statement as meaning filming has actually resumed. That would be WP:SYNTH. Trailblazer101 (talk) 15:51, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

We now have a source from a producer that filming has indeed resumed, which is now reflected in the article. Trailblazer101 (talk) 16:19, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Daily Mirror set photos

@Favre1fan93: I didn't want to revert you on this, although while Daily Mail is unreliable, the site that was in use in the article was actually the Daily Mirror, which has no consensus per WP:DAILYMIRROR regarding its reliability unlike its sister site Daily Mail. I suppose using a third-party would be more preferred and in compliance with WP:FRUIT, though the Mirror is not the same as Daily Mail entirely. Trailblazer101 (talk) 17:41, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

I have a ComicBook.com source I was going to implement in its place. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:44, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

Added in, but we should still avoid citing Daily Mirror since it is a tabloid site. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 18:18, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

Agreed. I swapped it for a singular SuperHeroHype article that covers both Sabretooth and Toad. Trailblazer101 (talk) 18:26, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

Also the fact that the Mirror only noted about Toad and didn't get any photos of it makes it a bit more suspect in my opinion. It could very well have happened, but without the visual confirmation, it makes it harder to justify it's inclusion at this time (and I am aware a few months back DanielRPK did report Toad would be featured so I know it is very likely to be true). - Favre1fan93 (talk) 18:36, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

@Favre1fan93 there's also an image of a TVA agent, the Fantastic Car, and can we also give mention to the downed Fox Logo? 2600:1004:B308:BEE8:B9D9:27F8:3AFA:C1B2 (talk) 18:06, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

We would need a reliable source addressing those and contextualizing their significance. We do not need to simply note every object spotted on a set. Trailblazer101 (talk) 19:28, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

Bona Film Group investment

I'm wondering if this is a DMG/Iron Man 3 situation and we should err on not including it in the infobox. Obviously we'll see what a billing block and then the actual on screen credits are, but I think how we approach DMG with Iron Man 3 we should likely do with Bona and TSG here. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:27, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

I concur that may be the best course of action, considering the report only says they would invest in the Deadpool franchise, not that they would produce. Trailblazer101 (talk) 18:04, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

I think maybe we hide it from the lead and infobox until their exact credit is revealed. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 19:23, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

I agree, and have hidden them. Trailblazer101 (talk) 20:16, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Premise

How exactly does Premise work for upcoming films? The one provided is taken from ScreenRant, and while SR is semi-reliable, the source for the premise is taken from Japanese version as stated in the article itself. JEDIMASTER2008 (talk) 15:07, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

The Marvel Japanese site has been questionable in the past. I do think this premise is more so a logline and not something we should retain in the article as it hardly contextualizes any plot and provides nothing new to the article. I was a bit skeptical on removing it, though seeing another regular editor has similar concerns with it, I'll be BOLD and remove it unless others object. Trailblazer101 (talk) 15:37, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

 Done – taken care of. MarioProtIV (^talk/_contribs) 15:55, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

I mean, it is still an official premise (Marvel Japan's issues stem from a lack of timely updates on material, not being an incorrect or unverifiable source as it is still owned and operated by Disney, so the WP:Verification issue you used in your edit summary does not apply). I kind of wanted other regular editors to weigh in before any removal just in case others deemed it to be helpful/necessary. Trailblazer101 (talk) 17:17, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

Kevin Feige Deadpool/Wolverine Hat

Doubt circles around the prospective inclusion of a note about Kevin Feige's new Deadpool film hat debuted at The 51st Annual Saturn Awards. It shows the title, it shows a new logo. Is the indecipherability enough to make it not notable for mention here? It is very much existant. It has been worn by an official at a public event. It has been shown to the public. Thoughts? — Preceding unsigned comment added by ToNeverFindTheMets (talk • contribs) 20:29, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

We can barely make out what the hat says, Feige was not at the awards promoting the film and gave no insight about it, and a producer wearing a hat for an upcoming film is hardly relevant or notable marketing information. Just because it exists doesn't mean it ought to be included. We don't have to list every trivial piece of info surrounding a project on this page. Trailblazer101 (talk) 20:33, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

(edit conflict) The images yesterday don't tell us anything. InfiniteNexus (talk) 20:34, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

Yeah, i suppose so. It's just that it's an entirely new logo for the *one* MCU film releasing this year. It sure is a hat in promotion of the new Deadpool film, yes, but I do think we should add it back in once/if it can be verified with any further potential identifying information. It would be a prominent logo debut once more info is released about it. ToNeverFindTheMets (talk) 21:38, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

Should we get another logo, it would ought to be from an official Marvel material, not from his hat (Feige’s hats have used variations of logos not used on posters and in the films, ie Multiverse of Madness). Trailblazer101 (talk) 22:12, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

New logo

There is a new logo: [1]https://www.instagram.com/p/C2-bvyqvFkt/?igsh=MWJsZHZoNnhua3Bwdg== 152.230.125.226 (talk) 17:59, 6 February 2024 (UTC)