Talk:Sudden stratospheric warming: Difference between revisions
m Replacing {{WikiProject Meteorology}} with {{WikiProject Weather}} (via Bandersnatch) |
Tag: |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start| |
||
{{WikiProject Weather|importance=Low}} |
|||
}} |
|||
== Cosmic rays detected deep underground reveal secrets of the upper atmosphere == |
== Cosmic rays detected deep underground reveal secrets of the upper atmosphere == |
Latest revision as of 09:48, 7 February 2024
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Cosmic rays detected deep underground reveal secrets of the upper atmosphere
[edit][1] Brian Pearson (talk) 18:10, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Relevance of SSWs to the surface
[edit]Can someone in the know please make a definitive statement one way or the other as to whether sudden stratospheric warmings need to be taken seriously by surface-dwellers like us or can be safely ignored? --Vaughan Pratt (talk) 05:59, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
Nice work
[edit]I would like to note that I think this is a very fascinating and difficult topic to explain. This article has improved greatly and I hope refinements continue. I, for one, appreciate it. Some possibilities might include explaining Rossby Wave numbers, a brief explanation of the atmospheric waveguide and how it may work in this case. Thanks for the very solid explanation that has already been done and I hope it keeps getting refined. TimeOnTarget (talk) 20:03, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
But what about the warming?
[edit]So Rossby waves slow down the stratospheric wind... but how does that cause warming? 78.149.18.53 (talk) 00:37, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
You will find your answer in the central and east-central equatorial Pacific (between approximately the International Date Line and 120°W), and the Pacific coast of South America. (GNU)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/El_Ni%C3%B1o
https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/gibbs/image/GOE-6/IR/1985-01-16-21 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.133.90.215 (talk) 17:57, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
[clarification needed]
[edit]Can it be "clarification needed" means hypertexting wanted? I'm into weather around here and I recognize the terms to be hypertexed. What do u call that ... portmando? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.133.90.215 (talk) 17:42, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018)
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Sudden stratospheric warming. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:.
- Added archive https://archive.is/20130419175546/http://www.met.reading.ac.uk/Data/CurrentWeather/wcd/blog/sudden-stratospheric-stirrings/ to http://www.met.reading.ac.uk/Data/CurrentWeather/wcd/blog/sudden-stratospheric-stirrings/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:47, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
(geopotential height)?
[edit]Under the heading Classification and Description and Major, there is a link to the Wiki about "geopotential height" following "10hPa" (which should be styled "10 hPa"). 10 hPa is a height expressed at a pressure, not a geopotential height, which would be in geopotential metres. I have removed the reference, and inserted a space between 10 and hPa. RossMarsden (talk) 03:40, 30 August 2019 (UTC)Ross Marsden