Sorry about the editing issue. I wasn't aware of a 3 edit rule. If you wouldn't mind, though, please go into the article and look at the edits that were being made. The other user continually attempted to add information that is already present in the article, along with some information that included false sources (i.e. a link led to nola.com, but there was no actual article, just a blank page). In the future, I'll stop reverting and bring the issue to an administrator. Sorry again. --Bobster687 04:51, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Replied on the user's talk page. [1] -- ReyBrujo 04:57, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, that is inconsistent to MOS.100110100 06:33, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It's not really a content dispute, unless that includes blatant POV pushing by a fascist editor who's engaged in blatant trolling at the RFCN regarding his user name. If you check the edits he made he removed a reliable source and replaced it with a {{fact}} tag, then with the subsequent edits he just removed the source and didn't add a tag. He claims some of the content belongs on the Skinhead page which might have merit to it, and had he actually added the content to that page there wouldn't be an issue. One Night In Hackney303 17:36, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Replied on the user's talk page. [2] -- ReyBrujo 17:45, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Just a request to take note of my comment on the JK talk page and a request that you take more care before accusing someone of edit warring. 89.240.13.237 22:11, 1 April 2007 (UTC) (formerly 89.240.14.218)[reply]
- Replied on the article's talk page. [3] -- ReyBrujo 22:29, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you 89.240.13.237 22:39, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
RE [4] The edits made by User:Noroton are an attempt at WP:POINT withought consensus, in order to disrupt Wikipedia:WikiProject Spam after being caught spamming. Please review WikiProject Spam case. --Hu12 03:22, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Replied on the user's talk page. [5] -- ReyBrujo 03:34, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Replied back--Hu12 03:58, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Replied on the user's talk page. [6] -- ReyBrujo 04:09, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please check out the talk page on the NES, it should hopefully settle the little disagreement going on with the Famicom's square button controller. FamicomJL 05:03, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Replied on the article's talk page. [7] -- ReyBrujo 05:29, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
in regard to sending an Image to the foundation, does it need to be mailed or an original image from the Digital camera as it were, the copy I have is 2000 x 1312 and can be Zipped and /or emailed immediately.DC 10:54, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Replied on the user's talk page. [8] -- ReyBrujo 14:45, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Replied on the user's talk page. [9] -- ReyBrujo 14:55, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
ReyBrujoI have followed your suggestions and sent the email to the permissions-Common, with the url of the original image under a GFDL licensing. Thank you for assiting me with this.
DC 03:05, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Replied on the user's talk page. [10] -- ReyBrujo 03:19, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I know our waiting period isnt over yet, but I would just like to say that the User:Mr.e-i-b is being very uncivil towards all parties involved. I have several times politely mentioned to him to please desist with name-calling and other uncivil activity per WP:Civility and he totally dismisses my reminders, openly asserting his right to call people ignorant and be rude. I am not the only user to say something to him. Outside of this content dispute, I think the user needs to be warned and/or reprimanded for blatantly violating wp etiquette. VanTucky 17:43, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hey there ReyBrujo,
I've noted that you've contributed before to the List of Wii games. Just wanted to let you know that the list is getting ready for Featured status and is currently undergoing a Peer Review. If you can take a moment to look over the article and add your suggestions/comments for improvement here, it'd be much appreciated. Thanks! -Digiwrld1 21:39, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I deleted a few "Notable alumni" from thish page. My question is what about all this other infor down there, about people doing stuff for IMEA and whatnot. This prolly all needs to be deleted also. Thoughts?--Kranar drogin 10:39, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Replied on the user's talk page. [11] -- ReyBrujo 16:06, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
How do you upload a picture from Wikipedia Commons to the English Wikipedia? [12] Do you simply right click and save a picture from there and upload it back to the Wikipedia? mirageinred 18:42, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- It seems like there's an unfree image of the same name on Wikipedia. What should I do? mirageinred 18:44, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Replied on the user's talk page. [13] -- ReyBrujo 22:01, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you, you are always helpful. mirageinred 02:48, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Just coming here with a question (came across you whilst editing the J Krishnamurti article).
I notice that articles often have a mixture of American and British English spelling and sometimes grammar. Is there a page on WP where this has been/is discussed? As an example the word, 'wooly' in the K article would be spelt by me as'woolly'. Thank you. :) 89.240.7.84 09:33, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Hi there. It is accepted that articles about British topics should be in British spelling, while US topics should be in American spelling. For other topics, the English is decided by the first major contribution done to the article. If it has been done in British English, it should stay to it; if it was in American, it should stay in American. When an article has mixed spelling, and it is neither American nor British, you should ask in the talk page whether the editors agree to move it to either spelling. Note that if an article has a determined spelling, and is moved to another spelling without a valid justification (either consensus in the talk page to switch to another spelling, or without the "British topic-British spelling, American topic-American spelling" rule), it may be viewed as disruption (there is a precedent at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Jguk). I hope that clarifies the matter. -- ReyBrujo 15:59, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Replied on the user's talk page. [14] -- ReyBrujo 16:00, 5 April 2007
(UTC)
- Thank you for the help. 89.240.14.51 20:08, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I completely understand your decision for using the free image, but quite frankly, that free image is horribly inadequate. The band consists of Steven Wilson, Gavin Harrison, Colin Edwin, and Richard Barbieri. John Wesley only plays with them at concerts, and plays an infinitely smaller role in making their music. Also, the image you provide gives a good view of 2 performers, a somewhat obstructed view of another, and then the back of another's head somewhere in the background. When I first saw the image I wasn't sure who the fourth person they were referring to was. If you have a better free image loaded somewhere by all means use that instead. I just find too many things wrong with this picture to see it as a viable alternative to free use. Also, I'd started a discussion on the talk page to discuss what to do about the image. Please check before you make a disputable edit. I'll change the image back for now. Thank you for your time. Kerrow 17:09, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Replied on the article's talk page. [15] -- ReyBrujo 17:17, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
![[12]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:LeeSooYoung.jpg){kind=link}