Talk:Robert Wishart: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m Bot (FAQ) (Plugin) Tag Category:Biography articles needing priority parameter replacement. importance→priority. |
m Bot (FAQ) (Plugin) Tag Category:14th century deaths. living=no. |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WPBiography |
{{WPBiography |
||
|living=no |
|||
|class= |
|class= |
||
|priority=Mid |
|priority=Mid |
||
Revision as of 20:40, 5 April 2007
 | Biography Unassessed  | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
Guardians and Queens
I really do not want to make too much of this, and I have seen from the relevant talk page just how much intellectual energy has been devoted to Margaret's exact title and status; but I think it is a reasonably safe assumption that Wishart-and others- would have continued to act as Guardian even afer her inauguration as queen, considering her age. The amendment on this point is therefore misleading. I would have edited accordingly; but having no wish to cause upset or offence will allow this to stand for a day or two for comment. Thereafter it will stand as justification. Rcpaterson 23:19, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
- I'm sure you're right (unless, speculating, Bek had been appointed Regent by her father-in-law-to-be). Still, Wishart would surely have been on the regency council. Angus McLellan (Talk) 23:34, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
I have now made what I think is a neutral, and open-ended, amendment. Rcpaterson 21:59, 25 July 2006 (UTC)